A detour in research through the gorge: Approaching human–nature connections with site-specific performance | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2049-3010
  • E-ISSN: 2049-3029

Abstract

This article examines the eligibility of a theatre-based method in transdisciplinary research into human–nature connectedness. We elaborate on a need to refine scientific tools with creative means of art to find novel ways to explore dimensions of human–nature relations unobtainable with conventional scientific methods. Over the past few decades, arts-based research (ABR) methods have gained more popularity in academic research as they offer opportunities to approach aspects previously neglected in science, such as embodied and sensory experience. In this article, we describe the study accomplished in the form of site-specific performance at a nature conservation area combined with qualitative research inquiry focusing on participants’ ideas and experiences of nature. We reflect on the benefits of combining art and science when aiming at a better understanding of the range of variegated ideas and conceptualizations behind human behaviour, and at gaining knowledge of topics that are complex and contradictory.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/atr_00077_1
2023-07-17
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Birch, A., and Tompkins, J.. (eds) ( 2012), Performing Site-Specific Theatre: Politics, Place, Practice, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dyrssen, C.. ( 2011;), ‘ Navigation in heterogeneity: Architectural thinking and art-based research. ’, in M. Biggs, and H. Karlsson. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, London:: Routledge;, pp. 22337.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Glasser, H.. ( 2011;), ‘ Naess’s deep ecology: Implications for the human prospect and challenges for the future. ’, Inquiry, 54:1, pp. 5277, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2011.542943.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Haila, Y.. ( 2004), Retkeilyn rikkaus. Luonto ympäristöhuolen aikakaudella, Helsinki:: Taide;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Haraway, D.. ( 2018), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chtulucene, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huhmarniemi, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Ekoaktivismia, yhteisötaidetta, pupuja ja kyyhkysiä. Biotaide, art&sci ja arviointi. ’, Synteesi, 30:3, pp. 2844.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunter, V.. ( 2005;), ‘ Embodying the site: The here and now in site-specific dance performance. ’, New Theater Quarterly, 21:4, pp. 36781.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hyvärinen, E.,, Juslén, A.,, Kemppainen, E.,, Uddström, A., and Liukko, U.. (eds) ( 2019), Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. The Red List of Finnish Species 2019, Helsinki:: Ympäristöministeriö and Suomen ympäristökeskus;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ingold, Tim. ( 1993;), ‘ Globes and spheres: The topology of environmentalism. ’, in K. Milton., (ed.), Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology, London:: Routledge;, pp. 3142.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ives, C. D.,, Abson, D. J.,, von Wehrden, H.,, Dorninger, C.,, Klaniecki, K., and Fischer, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. ’, Sustainability Science, 13:5, pp. 138997.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kjørup, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ Pleading for plurality: Artistic and other kinds of research. ’, in M. Biggs, and H. Karlsson. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, London:: Routledge;, pp. 2443.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kloetzel, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Lend me an ear: Dialogism and the vocalising site. ’, in K. Barbour,, V. Hunter, and M. Kloetzel. (eds), (Re)Positioning Site Dance: Local Acts, Global Perspectives, Bristol:: Intellect;, pp. 15782.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kypärä, T.. ( 2020), Hitonhaudan rotkolaakson luontoselvitys (‘The ecological field survey of Hitonhauta gorge’), Jyväskylä:: Agriborealis osk;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Leavy, P.. ( 2009), Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice, New York:: The Guilford Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Leavy, P.. ( 2017a;), ‘ Criteria for evaluating arts-based research. ’, in P. Leavy. (ed.), Handbook of Arts-Based Research, New York:: The Guilford Press;, pp. 57586.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Leavy, P.. ( 2017b;), ‘ Introduction to arts-based research. ’, in P. Leavy. (ed.), Handbook of Arts-Based Research, New York:: The Guilford Press;, pp. 321.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Leopold, A.. ( 1949), A Sand County Almanac – and Sketches Here and There, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Levin, L.. ( 2014), Performing Ground: Space, Camouflage and the Art of Blending In, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lippard, L.. ( 1998), The Lure of the Local: Senses of Place in a Multicentered Society, New York:: The New Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lippard, L.. ( 2014), Undermining: A Wild Ride Through Land Use, Politics, and Art in the Changing West, New York:: The New Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Little, R.. ( 2016;), ‘ Testimony: Art for the sake of place. ’, in J. Brady. (ed.), Elemental: An Arts and Ecology Reader, New York:: Gaia Project Press;, pp. 1321.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lumber, R.,, Richardson, M., and Sheffield, D.. ( 2017;), ‘ Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. ’, PLoS ONE, 12:5, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mackey, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Performing location: Place and applied theatre. ’, in J. Hughes, and H. Nicholson. (eds), Critical Perspectives on Applied Theatre, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 10726.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. May, T.. ( 2014), Salmon is Everything: Community-Based Theatre in the Klamath Watershed, Corvallis, OR:: Oregon State University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Moisio, S.. ( 2022), Balancing Acts in Spectatorship: Dynamics of Value Creation in Audience Experiences of Contemporary Dance, Helsinki:: University of Helsinki;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Muhr, M. M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Beyond words: The potential of arts-based research on human–nature connectedness. ’, Ecosystems and People, 16:1, pp. 24957 https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1811379.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Murphy, M.A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Learning from locality: A critical consideration of the uncontrolled. ’, in L. Beloff,, E. Berger, and T. Haapoja. (eds), Field Notes: From Landscape to Laboratory – maisemasta laboratorion, Helsinki:: The Finnish Society of Bioart;, pp. 11729.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Noë, A.. ( 2015), Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature, New York:: Hill & Wang;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Raatikainen, K. J.,, Juhola, K.,, Huhmarniemi, M., and Peña-Lagos, H.. ( 2020;), ‘ “Face the cow”: Reconnecting to nature and increasing capacities for pro-environmental agency. ’, Ecosystems and People, 16:1, pp. 27389, https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1817151.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Raatikainen, K. et al. ( n.d;.), ‘ The intricate multidimensionality of human–nature relations: Evidence from Finland. ’ (submitted manuscript).
  31. Riechers, M.,, Loos, J.,, García-Llorente, M.,, Bieling, C.,, Burgos-Ayala, A.,, Chakroun, L.,, Mattjssen, T. J. M.,, Muhr, M. M.,, Pérez-Ramírez, I.,, Raatikainen, K. J.,, Rana, S.,, Richardson, M.,, Rosengren, L., and West, S.. ( 2021;), ‘ Key advantages of the leverage points perspectives to shape human–nature relations. ’, Ecosystems and People, 17:1, pp. 20514, https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1912829.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tilley, C., with Bennett, W.. ( 2008), Body and Image: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology 2, Walnut Creek, CA:: Left Coast Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tsing, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Arts of inclusion, or, how to love a mushroom. ’, Australian Humanities Review, Special Issue: ‘Unloved Others: Death of the Disregarded in the Time of Extinctions’, 50, pp. 519.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vangeline ( 2020), Butoh: Cradling Empty Space, New York:: Vangeline Theater/New York Butoh Institute;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Williams, R.. ( 1980), Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays, London:: Verso;, pp. 6785.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Interviewees 1–34 ( 2020), Interviews by Riikka Niemelä, 22–23 August, restricted access archive of University of Jyväskylä;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Interviewees 35–67 ( 2020), Interviews by Anna-Kaisa Tupala, 22–23 August, restricted access archive of University of Jyväskylä;.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Vangeline ( 2020), Interview by Riikka Niemelä, 8 September, restricted access archive of University of Jyväskylä;.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Performers’ reflective accounts ( 2020), A Sacred Place? project, manuscripts.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Raatikainen, K.. ( 2020;), Reflective account. , A Sacred Place? project, manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Niemelä, Riikka,, Laulumaa, Anna-mari,, Tupala, Anna-Kaisa, and Raatikainen, Kaisa J.. ( 2023;), ‘ A detour in research through the gorge: Approaching human–nature connections with site-specific performance. ’, Applied Theatre Research, 11:1, pp. 7192, https://doi.org/10.1386/atr_00077_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/atr_00077_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/atr_00077_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error