Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The seroconversion rate of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test in psoriatic patients receiving secukinumab and ixekizumab, the anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibodies

  • Chen-Yu Wu,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Dermatology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Hsien-Yi Chiu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan

  • Tsen-Fang Tsai

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    tftsai@yahoo.com

    Affiliation Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Background

For psoriatic patients receiving biologics, the concern of tuberculosis (TB) infection exists. Although the TB risk of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A agents is generally considered very low, more real-world data are needed to support the safety.

Objectives

This study aims to provide the real-world experience of using serial QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test among patients treated with secukinumab or ixekizumab in Taiwan, an intermediate TB burden country, for the detection of latent TB infection (LTBI) reactivation or newly acquired TB infection.

Methods

This retrospective review evaluated 100 consecutive patients with psoriasis receiving anti-IL-17A therapies who were checked with at least twice QFT-GIT between 2016 and 2019 in National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei and Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.

Results

Among the 100 patients, the baseline QFT-GIT results were negative in 81.0% (81/100), positive in 18.0% (18/100), and indeterminate in 1.0% (1/100) of patients. The overall outcomes in patients receiving at least 6 months of cumulative exposure to anti-IL-17A agents were persistently seronegative in 80 patients (80.0%), persistently seropositive in 14 patients (14.0%), seroconversion in 1 patient (1.0%), seroreversion in 3 patients (3.0%), and others in 2 patients (2.0%). In patients with at least 11 months of cumulative exposure, the seroconversion rate was 1.3% (1/79). The only case with seroconversion had a positive QFT-GIT result previously. No case of TB reactivation or newly acquired TB infection was identified during the follow-up.

Conclusions

In patients treated with anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibodies for psoriasis, routine serial repeat QFT-GIT testing was associated with lower seroconversion rate compared to real-world data of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and anti-IL-12/23 antibody in Taiwan and in pivotal studies. Because clinical TB symptoms and signs are often preceded by QFT-GIF seroconversion, this result further supports the safety of anti-IL-17A agents in patients with psoriasis for LTBI.

Introduction

For moderate to severe psoriasis, several monoclonal antibodies have been approved for the treatment, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 antibody, anti-IL-23 agents, an IL-17 receptor blocker, and IL-17A inhibitors. Secukinumab is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against IL-17A that selectively binds with the interleukin IL-17A cytokine and inhibits its interaction with IL-17 receptor; Ixekizumab is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds with the interleukin IL-17A cytokine and inhibits its interaction with the IL-17 receptor. [1] The choice of drugs depends on the efficacy, risks, comorbidities, convenience, and cost.

Though generally safe, the administration of biologics often raises the concern of infection, including tuberculosis (TB), viral hepatitis [24] and pneumonia. TB, either reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI) or newly acquired TB infection is an especially important safety issue due to the communicable nature and high prevalence in some countries. Despite the presence of many pivotal studies of the biologics, most of the studied were conducted in areas of low TB burden, [5] and cases of TB infection only appeared when the drugs are on the market in real-world practice. [6,7]

To detect LTBI, the whole blood interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) and tuberculin skin test (TST) could be performed, with the former offering a better sensitivity (IGRAs: 89%, TST: 74%) and specificity (IGRAs: 98%, TST: 81%) profile, [8,9] especially in the population routinely receiving Bacilli Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination. [10,11] Among the commercially available IGRAs, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT; Cellestis Limited, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia) is more commonly applied.

In Taiwan, TB is not uncommon with Taiwan Centers for Disease Control reporting 11,528 cases of TB (49.4 cases per 100,000 populations) and 609 TB-related deaths in 2013. [12] For TNF-α inhibitors, screening and monitoring for LTBI before and during the treatment sessions are regarded as the standard of care due to the increased risk of LTBI reactivation. [1318] The validity of IGRAs in screening LTBI before initiating TNF-α inhibitors had been well documented. [1922] The risk of QFT-GIT tests positivity and seroconversion may be different according to the regions, ethnicities, comorbidities, concomitant medications, and underlying diseases. [23] Prior studies with serial QFT-GIT tests revealed an annual seroconversion rate between 0.38% to 18% in psoriatic patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors, [2429] and the data from Taiwan was 14.29%. [30] Although routine prophylaxis use of isoniazid can significantly decrease the risk of LTBI, isoniazid resistance is not uncommon and may result in hepatotoxicity. Also drug compliance is another potential risk. Thus the pursuit of biologics with lower risk of LTBI is still needed.

Compared to TNF-α inhibitors, the newer biologics for psoriasis such as anti-IL-12/23 and anti-IL-17A agents are generally considered with a lower risk of active TB or LTBI reactivation. Nevertheless, for IL-12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab), regular screening of LTBI during treatment is still listed on the guideline of several professional dermatologic associations. [3133] Previous studies from Taiwan showed a lower QFT-GIT seroconversion rate (7.3%) during ustekinumab use compared to TNF-α antagonist (14.29%). [30,34] Although the presence of QFT-GIT seroconversion is not equal to clinical LTBI reactivation, QFT-GIT seroconversion usually precedes TB clinical symptoms and signs, and thus may be used as a surrogate markers for the inherent TB reactivation risks for biologics. Several case reports existed for the development of active TB after use of ustekinumab, and most of these cases came from the real-world data or post-marketing report. [3537]

Compared to the anti-IL-12/23 agent, anti-IL-17A agents are generally considered to be safer in regard to latent TB reactivation or infection. [38] In a pooled analysis of 10 clinical studies in 3430 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis treated with secukinumab, no case of reactivated LTBI was detected during the long-term follow-up. [39] Similarly, in one integrated safety analysis, no case of active TB was reported across 5730 patients with 13479 patient-years of exposure to ixekizumab. [40] Moreover, some experimental studies have demonstrated the lack of effect of secukinumab on Mycobacterium tuberculosis reactivation human in vitro model and animal model. [41,42]

However, there is limited real-world data providing the results of serial IRGAs among patients receiving anti-IL-17A therapies in TB intermediate or high burden countries. This study aims to evaluate the QFT-GIT status of psoriatic patients treated with secukinumab or ixekizumab in Taiwan.

Materials and methods

Patients

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) (201904124RINC) and NTUH, Hsin-Chu branch (105-064-E). We retrospectively enrolled consecutive psoriasis patients receiving anti-IL-17A therapies for at least 6 months and with at QFT-GIT check at least twice in NTUH, Taipei and Hsin-Chu, Taiwan from January 2014 to June 2019 on July 1st, 2019. The need for informed consent was waived by the REC of NTUH for the retrospective medical records prior to May 2019, and written informed consent was obtained from all the other patients. According to the local risk management plan in Taiwan, QFT-GIT has to be performed before biologic use followed by at least once yearly after treatment. Additional tests are usually performed during biologic switch and in the presence of clinical suspicion of TB infection, such as prolonged respiratory symptoms which are the most frequent adverse events during biologic use. [43] We defined the baseline QFT-GIT as the data checked on the nearest date to the initial exposure to anti-IL-17A therapies, and the follow-up QFT-GIT as the latest data checked during the follow-up. The number of months with exposure to anti-IL-17A agents in the timespan from the baseline to follow-up QFT-GIT was recorded. The patients without 6 months of overlapping period between the course of anti-IL-17A therapies and the timespan from baseline to follow-up QFT-GIT were excluded. We reviewed the medical records of these patients to evaluate clinical diagnosis, demographic information, medical history, and laboratory data.

The concomitant and immediately-before (defined as one month prior to the observed period) therapies along with anti-IL-17A therapies, which might have confounding effects, were recorded, including methotrexate, cyclosporine, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), corticosteroid, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and other target agents (etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab, golimumab, guselkumab, and tofacitinib). Also, the patients without exposure history to any kinds of biologics before the observed period were recorded as biologic-naïve.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test for latent tuberculosis infection

QFT-GIT was performed in all the studied patients. Antigen with peptide cocktail simulating the proteins ESAT-6, CFP-10 and TB7.7 were used in the test. The interferon-γ (IFN-γ) values were calculated by subtracting the obtained value with nil antigens. A positive result was defined as IFN-γ ≥ 0.35 IU/ml and positive control value (IFN-γ of mitogen minus nil antigens) ≥ 0.5 IU/ml. A negative result was defined as 0 < IFN-γ < 0.35 IU/ml and positive control (mitogen) value ≥ 0.5 IU/ml. Indeterminate result was defined as IFN-γ of nil antigen > 8 IU/ml or positive control value < 0.5 IU/ml.

The final outcomes were defined according to the baseline and the follow-up QFT-GIT results during anti-IL-17A treatments: seroconversion as from negative to positive, seroreversion as from positive to negative, persistently seronegative as invariantly negative, persistently seropositive as invariantly positive, and others as any result showing indeterminate.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis and graphs were done with standard spreadsheet software program using Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA). Fisher exact test was applied for groups comparison. Statistical significance was defined as p-value < 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

We enrolled 100 patients to this study in total (S1 Dataset). Of these patients, the mean age is 47.8 years [standard deviation (SD) 13.8 years], the male-to-female ratio is 74/26, and 40 patients (40.0%) also had psoriatic arthritis. The total observed period with anti-IL-17A exposure is 1254 person-months, with individual follow-up time varying from 6 to 24 months (median 12.5 months; mean 12.5 months, SD 4.0 months). The cumulative treated months were at least 11 months in 79 patients (79.0%). Most of the patients (96.0%) included in this study received only secukinumab as the anti-IL-17A agent, with the rest receiving ixekizumab only or switched agents between secukinumab and ixekizumab (due to inadequate or loss of efficacy to secukinumab). Thirty-seven patients (37.0%) and 67 patients (67.0%) were treated with concomitant and immediately-before therapies respectively, with NSAIDs (n = 19, 19.0%) and methotrexate (n = 32, 32.0%) as the most frequent medications. Twenty-two patients (22.0%) were biologic-naïve. The demographic features are presented in Table 1.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test results and final outcomes

The final outcomes were summarized in Table 1. Patients flow-chart with results of baseline and follow-up QFT-GIT (Fig 1) and histogram with corresponding cumulative exposure time (Fig 2) were also shown. All the patients had a baseline QFT-GIT, with 81 patients (81.0%) showing negative, 18 patients (18.0%) showing positive, and 1 patient (1.0%) showing indeterminate results. All the patients with positive baseline QFT-GIT result had completed isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis therapy for LTBI in prior treatment courses. The follow-up QFT-GIT was measured at variable timing from 6 to 24 months for each patient, and the overall final outcomes were persistently seronegative in 80 patients (80.0%), persistently seropositive in 14 patients (14.0%), seroconversion in 1 patient (1.0%, details described in Table 2), seroreversion in 3 patients (3.0%), and others in 2 patients (2.0%). In patients with at least 11 months of follow-up time, the seroconversion rate was 1.3% (1/79). No case of TB reactivation or newly acquired TB infection was identified during the follow-up.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Final outcomes corresponding to the cumulative exposure time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225112.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Description of the patient with seroconversion outcome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225112.t002

To identify the differences between the persistently seronegative group and seroconversion group, we divided the patients according to (I) whether receiving concomitant treatment (II) whether receiving immediately-before treatment (III) whether being biologic naive. No statistically significant difference was noted upon these analyses (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Comparison between persistently seronegative group and seroconversion group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225112.t003

Discussion

IL-17 is the key downstream cytokine driving psoriasis. [44] Treatment with anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibodies including secukinumab and ixekizumab leads to a rapid and robust clearing of psoriasis. Though inhibiting critical immune mediators may carry an increased risk of infections, the safety profile of anti-IL-17A therapies is generally favorable except for higher Candida infection and inflammatory bowel disease. [4548]

Compared with TNFα inhibitors, the effect of IL-17A inhibition remains favorable in the host defense to TB infections. [4953] IL-17 inhibitors have been recommended as one of the preferred agents in patients with LTBI. [38] A recent study showed that IL-17A actually promotes intracellular growth of M. tuberculosis by inhibiting apoptosis of infected macrophages. [54] Hence, anti-IL-17A treatment may limit intracellular growth of M. tuberculosis by enhancing apoptosis of infected macrophages.

The diagnosis of LTBI was defined as a positive QFT-GIT result and a negative chest X-ray or microbiological assay. The recommendation of tuberculosis screening was originally based on anti-TNF-α agents risk management plan during treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. At least 4-week treatment with isoniazid (INH) before anti-TNF-α agent use was suggested in cases of LTBI detected by either IRGAs or TST; a total 9-month INH is needed for complete treatment of LTBI. Due to the relatively lower TB risk of other monoclonal antibodies, including anti-IL-17A agents, a recently revised AAD-NPF guideline has suggested pre-treatment screening and subsequent yearly testing for latent TB only for patients with high risk and at the discretion of the dermatologist. [55] However, routine pre-treatment LTBI and subsequent yearly testing for latent TB is still often practiced or recommended. [32,33,56]

Reviewing the history of the only patient with QFT-GIT serooconversion in our study (Table 2), an episode of seroconversion (IFN-γ value to 2.23 IU/ml) was present already in his previous treatment course of ustekinumab. He received a 9-month INH therapy for LTBI, and the IFN-γ value decreased to 0.23 IU/ml in the follow-up. Yet another serooconversion with IFN-γ value elevating to 2.01 IU/ml was noted after use of secukinumab for 15 months. Chest X-ray and sputum culture revealed negative results. Since IGRA could be persistently positive in the majority of patients after the INH therapy, [57] and a completed course of treatment is usually sufficient for LTBI, close observation was suggested by the infection specialist. In fact, the routine use of INH prophylaxis based only on positive QFT-GIT result is arguable due to the risk of INH resistance and INH toxicity. [58,59] Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference in whether receiving concomitant or immediately-before treatments, and whether being biologic-naïve between the seroconversion group and the persistently seronegative group in our study (Table 3). As for the persistently seropositive group, all the cases (14/14) in our study had received INH therapy previously and the subsequent treatment with anti-IL-17A agents did not show evidence of TB reactivation during the follow-up.

In psoriatic patients treated with anti-IL-17A agents, a low QFT-GIT tests seroconversion rate was demonstrated in our study. The increased seroconversion rate in the cohort with longer follow-up time (11 months) resulted from a fewer population rather than more cases. No case of TB reactivation or newly acquired TB infection was identified during the observed period in our study. This real-world data supported the findings in prior clinical studies showing no evidence of increased M. tuberculosis infections under anti-IL-17A therapies.

In conclusion, we found routine serial repeat QFT-GIT testing in patients using anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibodies for psoriasis was associated with very low seroconversion rate in Taiwan, compared to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors (14.29%) [30] and ustekinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 antibody (7.3%). [34] Though the absence of QFT-GIT seroconversion could not completely rule out TB infection, [60] the anti-IL17A antibodies may carry the lowest TB risk for psoriatic patients, compared to other biologics. We also recommend the use of clinical vigilance of relying more on clinical symptoms, exposure and travel history for the monitor of TB during treatment of psoriasis. Our study is limited by the limited subjects, retrospective nature and the short follow up periods. Additional studies from controlled studies in higher TB burden countries are needed.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. Primary data of enrolled patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225112.s001

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Kaushik SB, Lebwohl MG. Review of safety and efficacy of approved systemic psoriasis therapies. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58: 649–658. pmid:30246393
  2. 2. Cho YT, Chen CH, Chiu HY, Tsai TF. Use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in hepatitis B virus carriers with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis: a case series in Taiwan. J Dermatol. 2012;39: 269–73. pmid:22077677
  3. 3. Chiu HY, Chen CH, Wu MS, Cheng YP, Tsai TF. The safety profile of ustekinumab in the treatment of patients with psoriasis and concurrent hepatitis B or C. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169: 1295–303. pmid:23746170
  4. 4. Chiu HY, Hui RC, Huang YH, Huang RY, Chen KL, Tsai YC, et al. Safety Profile of Secukinumab in Treatment of Patients with Psoriasis and Concurrent Hepatitis B or C: A Multicentric Prospective Cohort Study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2018;98: 829–834. pmid:29972221
  5. 5. Tsai YC, Tsai TF. A review of clinical trials of biologic agents and small molecules for psoriasis in Asian subjects. G Ital di Dermatologia e Venereol. 2016;151: 412–431.
  6. 6. Papp KA, Tyring S, Lahfa M, Prinz J, Griffiths CE, Nakanishi AM, et al. A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152: 1304–12. pmid:15948997
  7. 7. Li CR, Mao QX, Chen M, Jia WX, Yao X, Feng SY, et al. Acquired latent tuberculosis infection in psoriasis patients treated with etanercept in the People’s Republic of China. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9: 5591–5594. pmid:26508833
  8. 8. Mori T, Sakatani M, Yamagishi F, Takashima T, Kawabe Y, Nagao K, et al. Specific Detection of Tuberculosis Infection: An Interferon-Gamma-based Assay Using New Antigens. Am J Resp. 2004;170: 59–64. pmid:15059788
  9. 9. Lein AD, von Reyn CF, Ravn P, Horsburgh CR, Alexander LN, Andersen P. Cellular immune responses to ESAT-6 discriminate between patients with pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex and those with pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6: 606–609. pmid:10391871
  10. 10. Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Meywald-Walter K, Niemann S, Nienhaus A. Predictive value of a whole blood IFN-γ assay for the development of active tuberculosis disease after recent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177: 1164–1170. pmid:18276940
  11. 11. Gisondi P, Pezzolo E, LoCascio G, Girolomoni G. Latent tuberculosis infection in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who are candidates for biological therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171: 884–890. pmid:24863903
  12. 12. Centers for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C.(Taiwan). 2015 Centers for disease control annual report. http://www.cdc.gov.tw/uploads/files/201509/0cc797c3-5252-477f-bd33-91b68c62238d.pdf.
  13. 13. Keane J, Gershon S, Wise RP, Mirabile-Levens E, Kasznica J, Schwieterman WD, et al. Tuberculosis associated with infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor alpha-neutralizing agent. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: 1098–104. pmid:11596589
  14. 14. Gómez-Reino JJ, Carmona L, Valverde VR, Mola EM, Montero MD; BIOBADASER Group. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors may predispose to significant increase in tuberculosis risk: A multicenter active-surveillance report. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48: 2122–2127. pmid:12905464
  15. 15. Mohan AK, Coté TR, Block JA, Manadan AM, Siegel JN, Braun MM. Tuberculosis following the Use of Etanercept, a Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39: 295–299. pmid:15306993
  16. 16. Bongartz T, Sutton AJ, Sweeting MJ, Buchan I, Matteson EL, Montori V. Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;295: 2275–2285. pmid:16705109
  17. 17. Ahn CS, Dothard EH, Garner ML, Feldman SR, Huang WW. To test or not to test? An updated evidence-based assessment of the value of screening and monitoring tests when using systemic biologic agents to treat psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73: 420–428.e1. pmid:26184440
  18. 18. Sivamani RK, Goodarzi H, Garcia MS, Raychaudhuri SP, Wehrli LN, Ono Y, et al. Biologic therapies in the treatment of psoriasis: A comprehensive evidence-based basic science and clinical review and a practical guide to tuberculosis monitoring. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013;44: 121–140. pmid:22311162
  19. 19. Chen DY, Shen GH, Hsieh TY, Hsieh CW, Lan JL. Effectiveness of the combination of a whole-blood interferon-gamma assay and the tuberculin skin test in detecting latent tuberculosis infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving adalimumab therapy. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59: 800–806. pmid:18512714
  20. 20. Pratt A, Nicholl K, Kay L. Use of the QuantiFERON TB Gold test as part of a screening programme in patients with RA under consideration for treatment with anti-TNF- agents: the Newcastle (UK) experience. Rheumatology. 2007;46: 1035–1036. pmid:17409126
  21. 21. Ponce de Leon D, Acevedo-Vasquez E, Alvizuri S, Gutierrez C, Cucho M, Alfaro J, et al. Comparison of an interferon-gamma assay with tuberculin skin testing for detection of tuberculosis (TB) infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a TB-Endemic population. J Rheumatol. 2008;35: 776–781. pmid:18398944
  22. 22. Matulis G, Jüni P, Villiger PM, Gadola SD. Detection of latent tuberculosis in immunosuppressed patients with autoimmune diseases: Performance of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-specific interferon γ assay. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67: 84–90. pmid:17644549
  23. 23. Aydin V, Akici A, Isli F, Aksoy M, Aydin M, Gursoz H. Relative risk of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatic diseases managed with anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha therapy: A nationwide cohort study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019; pmid:30763469
  24. 24. Kim KH, Lee SW, Chung WT, Kim BG, Woo KS, Han JY, et al. Serial interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in patients treated with immunosuppressive agents. Korean J Lab Med. 2011;31: 271–278. pmid:22016681
  25. 25. Garcovich S, Ruggeri A, D’Agostino M, Ardito F, DeSimone C, Delogu G, et al. Clinical applicability of Quantiferon-TB-Gold testing in psoriasis patients during long-term anti-TNF-alpha treatment: A prospective, observational study. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol. 2012;26: 1572–1576. pmid:21923840
  26. 26. Hatzara C, Hadziyannis E, Kandili A, Koutsianas C, Makris A, Georgiopoulos G, et al. Frequent conversion of tuberculosis screening tests during anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74: 1848–1853. pmid:24854354
  27. 27. Bartalesi F, Goletti D, Spinicci M, Cavallo A, Attala L, Mencarini J, et al. Serial QuantiFERON TB-Gold in-tube testing during LTBI therapy in candidates for TNFi treatment. J Infect. 2013;66: 346–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2012.10.017 pmid:23103667
  28. 28. Sauzullo I, Mengoni F, Marocco R, Potenza C, Skroza N, Tieghi T, et al. Interferon-γ release assay for tuberculosis in patients with psoriasis treated with tumour necrosis factor antagonists: In vivo and in vitro analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169: 1133–1140. pmid:23909256
  29. 29. Chung J, Aronson AB, Srikantha R, Vogelgesang SA, Wanat KA. Low conversion rate of QuantiFERON-TB Gold screening tests in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: A retrospective cohort study identifying an important practice gap. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79: 169–171. pmid:29588247
  30. 30. Cheng CY, Hui CY, Hu S, Hsieh MH, Huang YH. Serial QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube testing for psoriatic patients receiving antitumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy. Dermatologica Sin. 2015;33: 124–129.
  31. 31. Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, Van Voorhees AS, Leonardi CL, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58: 826–850. pmid:18423260
  32. 32. Ohtsuki M, Terui T, Ozawa A, Morita A, Sano S, Takahashi H, et al. Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2013 version). J Dermatol. 2013;40: 683–695. pmid:24033880
  33. 33. Nast A, Gisondi P, Ormerod AD, Saiag P, Smith C, Spuls PI, et al. European S3-Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris—Update 2015—Short version—EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29: 2277–94. pmid:26481193
  34. 34. Hsiao CY, Chiu HY, Wang TS, Tsai TF. Serial QuantiFERON-TB Gold testing in patients with psoriasis treated with ustekinumab. PLoS One. 2017;12. pmid:28886099
  35. 35. Tsai TF, Chiu HY, Song M, Chan D. A case of latent tuberculosis reactivation in a patient treated with ustekinumab without concomitant isoniazid chemoprophylaxis in the PEARL trial. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168: 444–446. pmid:22816505
  36. 36. Sánchez-Moya AI, Daudén E. Peripheral Lymph Node Recurrence of Tuberculosis After Ustekinumab Treatment. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148: 1332. pmid:23165852
  37. 37. Errichetti E, Piccirillo A. Latent tuberculosis reactivation in a patient with erythrodermic psoriasis under treatment with ustekinumab and a low dose steroid, Despite isoniazid chemoprophylaxis. Eur J Dermatology. 2014;24: 508–509. pmid:25120233
  38. 38. Kaushik SB, Lebwohl MG. Psoriasis: Which therapy for which patient: Focus on special populations and chronic infections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80: 43–53. pmid:30017706
  39. 39. van de Kerkhof PC, Griffiths CE, Reich K, Leonardi CL, Blauvelt A, Tsai TF, et al. Secukinumab long-term safety experience: A pooled analysis of 10 phase II and III clinical studies in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75: 83–98.e4. pmid:27180926
  40. 40. Riedl E, Winkler S, Xu W, Agada N, Lebwohl M. P1827 No reactivation of tuberculosis in psoriasis patients with latent tuberculosis infection while on ixekizumab treatment: a report from 11 clinical studies. 27th Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol Congr 2018, Paris. 2018.
  41. 41. Kammüller M, Tsai TF, Griffiths CE, Kapoor N, Kolattukudy PE, Brees D, et al. Inhibition of IL-17A by secukinumab shows no evidence of increased Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections. Clin Transl Immunol. 2017;6. pmid:28868144
  42. 42. Segueni N, Tritto E, Bourigault ML, Rose S, Erard F, Le Bert M, et al. Controlled Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice under treatment with anti-IL-17A or IL-17F antibodies, in contrast to TNFα neutralization. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 36923. pmid:27853279
  43. 43. Wu NL, Hsu CJ, Sun FJ, Tsai TF. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Taiwanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Subanalysis from ERASURE phase III study. J Dermatol. 2017;44: 1129–1137. pmid:28493369
  44. 44. Chiu HY, Cheng YP, Tsai TF. T helper type 17 in psoriasis: From basic immunology to clinical practice. Dermatologica Sin. 2012;30: 136–141.
  45. 45. Chiu HY, Hui RC, Huang YH, Huang RY, Chen KL, Tsai YC, et al. Safety profile of secukinumab in treatment of patients with psoriasis and concurrent hepatitis B or C: A multicentric prospective cohort study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2018;98: 829–834. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2989 pmid:29972221
  46. 46. Chiu HY, Chan CC, Tsai TF. The impact of long-term secukinumab treatment on Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus loads in patients with psoriasis. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55: e600–e602. pmid:27261186
  47. 47. Chiu HY, Tsai TF. The impact of secukinumab treatment on the prevalence of human papillomavirus in patients with psoriasis: A pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75: 224–226. pmid:27317524
  48. 48. Hohenberger M, Cardwell LA, Oussedik E, Feldman SR. Interleukin-17 inhibition: role in psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018;29: 13–18. pmid:28521565
  49. 49. TorradoE CooperAM. IL-17 and Th17 cells in tuberculosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21: 455–462. pmid:21075039
  50. 50. Mourik BC, Lubberts E, de Steenwinkel JEM, Ottenhoff THM, Leenen PJM. Interactions between type 1 interferons and the Th17 response in tuberculosis: Lessons learned from autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2017;8. pmid:28424682
  51. 51. Domingo-Gonzalez R, Prince O, Cooper A, Khader SA. Cytokines and Chemokines in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4. pmid:27763255
  52. 52. Das S, Khader S. Yin and yang of interleukin-17 in host immunity to infection. F1000Research. 2017;6: 741. pmid:28713557
  53. 53. Robinson RT, Huppler AR. The Goldilocks model of immune symbiosis with Mycobacteria and Candida colonizers. Cytokine. 2017;97: 49–65. pmid:28570933
  54. 54. Cruz A, Ludovico P, Torrado E, Gama JB, Sousa J, Gaifem J, et al. IL-17A promotes intracellular growth of Mycobacterium by inhibiting apoptosis of infected macrophages. Front Immunol. 2015;6. pmid:26483789
  55. 55. Menter A, Strober BE, Kaplan DH, Kivelevitch D, Prater EF, Stoff B, et al. Joint AAD-NPF guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80: 1029–1072. pmid:30772098
  56. 56. Nast A, Spuls PI, van der Kraaij G, Gisondi P, Paul C, Ormerod AD, et al. European S3-Guideline on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris—Update Apremilast and Secukinumab—EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31: 1951–1963. pmid:28895202
  57. 57. Johnson JL, Geldenhuys H, Thiel BA, Toefy A, Suliman S, Pienaar B, et al. Effect of isoniazid therapy for latent TB infection on QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube responses in adults with positive tuberculin skin test results in a high TB incidence area: a controlled study. Chest. 2014;145: 612–7. pmid:24135768
  58. 58. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe isoniazid associated liver injuries among persons being treated for latent tuberculosis infection—United States, 2004–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59: 224–229. pmid:20203555
  59. 59. Comstock GW, Ferebee SH. How much isoniazid is needed for prophylaxis? Am Rev Respir Dis 1970;101: 780–782. pmid:4910642
  60. 60. Kobashi Y, Shimizu H, Ohue Y, Mouri K, Obase Y, Miyashita N, et al. False negative results of QuantiFERON TB-2G test in patients with active tuberculosis. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2009;62: 300–2. pmid:19628910