Lipidome profiles of postnatal day 2 vaginal swabs reflect fat composition of gilt’s postnatal diet
Fig 4
Comparison of relative mean intensity of selected MRMs between respective sources.
Comparison of relative mean intensity of PE (34:4), 712.5->495.19 in (A) nutrition source (24 h colostrum sample versus milk replacer-MR); (B) serum of suckled-S versus bottle fed milk replacer-B; and (C) vaginal swab samples in S versus B gilts. Relative mean intensity of PE (36:5), 738.5->521.19 in (D) nutrition source (24 h colostrum sample versus milk replacer-MR); (E) serum of suckled-S versus bottle fed milk replacer-B; and (F) vaginal swab samples in S versus B gilts. Relative mean intensity of PG (34:6), 739.6->522.29 in (G) nutrition source (24 h colostrum sample versus milk replacer-MR); (H) serum of suckled-S versus bottle fed milk replacer-B; and (I) vaginal swab samples in S versus B gilts. Differing letters indicate statistical difference at p<0.005.