http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-6512
Figures
Abstract
Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) is an oil-bearing plant used for biodiesel production. Construction of its standard karyotype and identification of the euchromatin/heterochromatin distribution associated with gene expression and meiotic recombination are essential to fully characterize its genome. Here, we developed a J. curcas karyotype based on meiotic pachytene chromosomes. In addition, a karyotype of J. integerrima, a useful species for jatropha breeding, was also constructed. Five out of eleven J. curcas chromosomes were metacentric, but only two were metacentric in J. integerrima. Almost all of the heterochromatin was distributed around the pericentric regions. The interstitial and distal regions were euchromatic without heterochromatic knobs, except for small heterochromatin regions associated with the subtelomeric repeat sequence JcSat1. These pericentric heterochromatin distribution patterns, together with chromosome structure data and the results of FISH probing with rDNA and JcSat1, allowed us to classify all chromosomes of both species. The two species had two 35S rDNA loci and one 5S rDNA locus; one 35S rDNA locus in J. integerrima was located on the interstitial region of the short arms. In addition, JcSat1 was found at only the heterochromatic ends of the J. curcas chromosome, not the J. integerrima chromosome. Despite the same chromosome number, the two pachytene chromosome-based karyotypes suggest variation in chromosome structure and distribution of repetitive DNAs in these two species.
Citation: Muakrong N, Kikuchi S, Fukuhara S, Tanya P, Srinives P (2018) Two jatropha karyotypes constructed from meiotic pachytene chromosomes: Pericentric distribution of heterochromatin and variation in repetitive DNAs. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0208549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208549
Editor: Dengcai Liu, Sichuan Agricultural University at Chengdu, CHINA
Received: August 21, 2018; Accepted: November 19, 2018; Published: December 6, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Muakrong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding: This work was supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists, Grant Number 25711024 to S.K. A part of this work was also supported by Thailand’s NSTDA Chair Professor Project (grant no. P-11-00599) to P.T. and P.S. https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-grants/index.html https://www.nstda.or.th/th/index.php
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Jatropha curcas is known as physic nut or jatropha (Euphorbiaceae) and has become one of the most important oilseed crops in the world. It is used for biodiesel production and is cultivated in areas not intended for other crops. However, genetic improvement is required for the mass production of J. curcas owing to its nondomesticated traits [1,2]. Recent studies revealed a modest level of interaccessional variability in J. curcas [3–5]; thus, the utilization of interspecific hybridization is thought to be a good option in jatropha breeding.
Jatropha curcas is a diploid plant with 2n = 2x = 22 [6] and a genome size of approximately 370 Mb [7]. Jatropha genome sequences have been previously obtained by whole-genome sequencing [8] and have been updated with newly assembled nonredundant sequences of approximately 298 Mbp from 39,277 contigs including 25,433 predicted genes [9]. Thirty-two percent of the Jatropha genome sequences are class I and class II transposable elements [8]. The average size of the contigs was 7,579 bp, and the N50 length was 15,950 bp [9], providing a fundamental resource for map-based cloning, resequencing and genome analysis. A syntenic relation with castor bean (Ricinus communis) was found on 53% of the scaffolds, suggesting a significant degree of microsynteny within the family Euphorbiaceae [8,9].
Despite the rapid progress in the genome analysis in Jatropha, limited success has been achieved in the cytological characterization of the Jatropha genomes. Using Giemsa staining, Carvalho et al. 2008 [7] reported the first detailed karyotype of J. curcas. Subsequently, several research groups used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to probe with rDNA, tandem repeat, and transposable elements to map these DNAs on mitotic metaphase chromosomes [10–12]. However, mitotic Jatropha chromosomes are small and similar in size, and these FISH signals can be used in the identification of a limited number of chromosomes. So far, reasonable chromosome identification has not been achieved. Although euchromatic/heterochromatic features associated with gene expression and meiotic recombination were defined at centric and telomeric regions using prometaphase J. curcas chromosomes [6], none of the karyotypes based on meiotic pachytene chromosomes (on average 10–50 times longer than mitotic metaphase chromosomes) have provided a high-resolution image. Karyotyping with pachytene chromosomes has been reported in various species, e.g., rice [13], corn [14], cotton [15] and papaya [16].
To analyze the cytological features of two Jatropha species, we observed well-spread meiotic pachytene chromosomes stained by DAPI and FISH signals of repetitive DNAs. Our observations revealed an overconcentration of heterochromatin at the centric region and a variation in the locations of 35S rDNA and JcSat1. These heterochromatin bands, the chromosome length, the centromere position and the distribution of repetitive DNAs were used for the identification of individual chromosomes.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
A plant from the local variety of Jatropha curcas “Chai Nat” originating from the Chai Nat province in Thailand, a commercial plant of J. integerrima with dwarf traits [17], and an interspecific F1 hybrid (F1-4) [18] derived from a cross between the two plants were used in this study. Meiotic cells were prepared from the anthers of the flower buds, whereas mitotic cells were prepared from root tips of the F1 plant. All three plants were grown in the field of the Department of Agronomy, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen campus, Thailand.
Pachytene chromosome preparation
The chromosome slide preparation procedure was similar to that of Wang et al. 2015 [19]. Immature flower buds of 0.8–3.0 mm and root tips of 1.0–1.5 mm in length were fixed with acetic alcohol (1:3 acetic acid: ethanol) for 5 days at room temperature and then stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C until slide preparation. To prepare a meiotic slide, the flower buds were washed with Milli-Q water (MQW) for 30 min, and anthers were collected from the bud in MQW on a slide glass under a stereomicroscope. Upon this stage, slides for anthers and root tips were prepared following the same procedure. The explants were incubated with 10 μL enzyme solution (4% cellulose Onozuka RS, 2% pectinase and 1% Pectolyase Y-23) in a moist chamber at 37°C for 30 min. After maceration, the enzyme solution was removed by Kimwipe tissue paper, and a drop of 45% acetic acid was instilled. The slide was incubated for 2–5 min, covered with a cover slip and prepared according to the standard squash method.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH)
FISH and GISH were performed using root tip samples of the F1 plant to observe the presence of rDNA and JcSat1 repeats on the chromosomes of each parental species. The FISH probes used were 35S rDNA (pTa71) [20], J. curcas 5S rDNA (pJc5SrDNA) [6], and JcSat1 (pJcSat1-1) [6]. 35S rDNA and JcSat1 were labeled with biotin-dUTP, while 5S rDNA was labeled with digoxigenin-dUTP using the High Prime labeling technique (Roche—Germany). For the GISH probe, the genomic DNA of J. curcas and J. integerrima was labeled with digoxigenin-dUTP and biotin-dUTP, respectively, using the High Prime technique.
The slides were incubated in 100 ng/μL RNase at 37°C for 60 min, followed by re-fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Ten microliters of hybridization solution (50% formamide, 2x SSC, 10% dextran sulfate, 20 ng of each probe) was applied to each slide. For DNA denaturation, the slide was placed on a heat block at 80°C for 5 min and then incubated at 37°C for 2 days. After washing in MQW, 125 μL of detection solution (1% BSA, 4x SSC, 0.1 μg of anti-digoxigenin rhodamine (Roche) and 1 μg of FITC streptavidin conjugates (Molecular Probes)) was applied at 37°C for 60 min. The slides were washed in prewarmed MQW at 42°C for 2 min; the washing process was repeated four more times. The chromosomes were counterstained with 5 μg/mL 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories—USA).
FISH and GISH signals were captured with an OLYMPUS BX-53 fluorescence microscope equipped with a CCD camera (Photometrics Cool SNAP MYO) and processed by MetaVue/MetaMorph version 7.8 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 v10.0.1.
For sequential FISH on the same chromosome samples using three probes, the coverslip was removed after the 1st detection, and the chromosome slide was washed with distilled water and dried quickly. To remove the DNA probes from the chromosomes, the slide was incubated in 50% formamide/2x SSC at 75°C for 3 min. Upon being washed and dried quickly, the slides were used for sequential FISH using the same FISH method as described above.
In the karyotype analysis, ten chromosome images were used for the measurements. The chromosome numbers from 1 to 11 of J. curcas and J. integerrima were determined by the total length of the chromosome.
Results and discussion
Distribution of euchromatin/heterochromatin, rDNAs, and subtelomeric repeat JcSat1 on J. curcas and J. integerrima pachytene chromosomes
DAPI stained the heterochromatin, including AT-rich regions, more than the euchromatin. However, Marinho et al. 2018 [21] reported CMA+/DAPI- pericentromeric heterochromatin (GC-rich) in all J. curcas chromosomes. To investigate in detail the distribution of heterochromatin, pachytene chromosomes longer than the mitotic chromosomes were observed. The condition and characteristics of the pachytene chromosomes depend on the pachytene stage, as estimated by the length of the flower buds. In this study, the vertical lengths of the buds were 2–2.5 mm in J. curcas and 2.5–3 mm in J. integerrima, and pachytene chromosomes with a length of 40–70 μm were suitable for observing the chromatin patterns. The overall distribution patterns of strongly stained heterochromatin on the eleven meiotic pachytene J. curcas and J. integerrima chromosomes were observed consistently at the pachytene stage (Fig 1 and Tables 1 and 2). Almost all heterochromatic knobs were distributed around the pericentric regions (Fig 1). The knobs were clearly seen, with 2–8 blocks per region (Fig 2), although some blocks were usually fused to each other at the late pachytene stage. Relatively lightly DAPI-stained chromosome arms (euchromatic regions) were observed in both species. The chromosome ends carried small heterochromatin blocks in J. curcas, but none carried small heterochromatin blocks in J. integerrima (Fig 1). Kikuchi et al. (2011) [6] reported a subtelomeric tandem repeat (JcSat1) associated with terminal heterochromatic blocks in J. curcas. Alipour et al. (2013) [12] demonstrated that copia-type retrotransposons produced strong FISH signals in the distal regions, similar to JcSat1. Since we could not find other heterochromatin knob structures, those repeats might be adjacent to and/or intermingled in the heterochromatin blocks.
Pachytene chromosomes of J. curcas (A) and J. integerrima (B) with DAPI staining converted to a black and white image to observe distribution of euchromatin and heterochromatin on pachytene chromosomes. Bar = 5 μm.
A previous study reported that the chromosome pairing configuration of an F1 hybrid between J. curcas and J. integerrima was 0.88I + 10.56II, and the bivalents might have formed by the pairing of homologous chromosomes from both parents [18]. However, pairs of homologous chromosomes between J. curcas and J. integerrima have not been identified so far. FISH analyses showed two 35S rDNA locus pairs and a 5S rDNA locus pair in both species (Figs 3 and 4), consistent with previous observations [21, 22]. In this study, we found that meiotic chromosomes of the F1 plant showed pairing between interspecific chromosomes of the same rDNA signal strength, i.e., strong J. curcas chromosome signal with strong J. integerrima signal and weak with weak (Fig 5), suggesting that the two pairs of chromosomes with rDNA are homologous. The strong 35S and 5S rDNA signals on L (linked)-type chromosomes were similar between both species. Interestingly, the S (separated)-type of the weak 35S rDNA signals were located at the interstitial regions of the short arms of J. integerrima but at the chromosome tips of J. curcas (Figs 3 and 4). FISH examination of mitotic metaphase chromosomes in five Jatropha species revealed that all except for J. integerrima showed terminal localization of 35S rDNA [22], although detection of a weak 35S rDNA signal at the end of the chromosomes of J. integerrima has been reported [21]. Highly resolved FISH signals using a meiotic pachytene chromosome indicated that the weak 35S rDNA signals were located at the middle of the short arms in J. integerrima. Repositioning of the rDNA foci might have occurred in J. integerrima after the divergence of the two species. Transposon-mediated rDNA repositioning events [23] and chromosome rearrangements such as translocation and inversion [24] might contribute to the position change in the 35S rDNA locus. However, the chromosome reposition pattern was not examined in this study, and only the heterochromatic pattern was observed thus far.
FISH signals on pachytene chromosomes of J. curcas (A) and J. integerrima (B) based on 5S rDNA (red signal), 45S rDNA (yellow signal) and JcSat1 DNA (green signal). Bar = 5 μm.
Ideogram based on pachytene chromosomes of J. curcas (A) and J. integerrima (B). Green signal is JcSat1 DNA, yellow signal is 45S rDNA, red signal is 5S rDNA, deep gray is the heterochromatin regions observed by stronger DAPI-bright region, light gray is the euchromatin regions observed by weaker DAPI-bright region.
Red signal is J. curcas DNA, yellow signal is J. integerrima DNA, green is 45S rDNA signal. The weaker 45S rDNA signal (box B1) and stronger 45S rDNA signal (box B2) at diakinesis stage of the F1 hybrid showed homologous pairing of the chromosomes of both species. Bar = 5 μm.
The tandem repeat in J. curcas, JcSat1, was located on the subtelomeric heterochromatin of most chromosomes but not on the chromosome ends with rDNA [6]. The currently available highly resolved FISH images also failed to reveal JcSat1 signals at the rDNA ends with long exposure times (Fig 4A). In addition, our FISH analysis revealed that J. integerrima does not have JcSat1 (Fig 4B). The J. curcas-specific detection of JcSat1 was confirmed by FISH/GISH analysis on the interspecific hybrid J. curcas x J. integerrima using meiotic cells and mitotic cells at metaphase (Fig 6). Because a close phylogenic relationship between J. curcas and J. integerrima has been suggested by phylogenic analysis based on ISSR markers [4] and by FISH analysis of the number and signal intensities of rDNA [21, 22], JcSat1 might have recently evolved in J. curcas separately from J. integerrima on the evolutionary tree.
DAPI stained (A), green signal is JcSat1 DNA (B), red signal is J. curcas DNA (C), yellow signal is J. integerrima DNA (D). The merged image confirmed that JcSat1 DNA was specifically hybridized only on J. curcas chromosomes (E). Bar = 5 μm.
Karyotypes of J. curcas and J. integerrima
The length of the J. curcas mitotic metaphase chromosomes ranged from 1.71 to 1.24 μm, and Carvalho et al. [7] reported that five and six chromosomes were metacentric and submetacentric, respectively. For karyotyping, Kikuchi et al. [6] used the properties of prometaphase chromosomes in terms of chromosome structures and FISH signals of rDNAs and JcSat1 and reported a partial karyotype of J. curcas in the classification of six chromosomes that ranged in size from 6.33 to 4.04 μm. The JcSat1 signals on the pachytene chromosomes were similar in signal intensity (Fig 1), and only the rDNAs are reliable markers for J. curcas chromosomes. Although less decisive at later meiotic stages, the heterochromatic knobs in the pericentric region together with the arm ratio and total chromosome length are reliable discriminators for the identification of each chromosome pair (Figs 1 and 2 and Tables 1 and 2). In both figures, all chromosomes of the two species are arranged in order of their length.
J. curcas.
Chromosomes 1 to 4 possess similar total lengths, and the lengths of both the short and long arms are similar, classifying these chromosomes as metacentric. Among them, chromosome 2 shows a relatively wide range of pericentric heterochromatin regions. Chromosome 3 has four pericentric heterochromatic knobs. Although chromosomes 1 and 4 are quite similar in length and arm ratio, chromosome 1 shows a third heterochromatin block on the long arm. Chromosome 5 is submetacentric, possessing light heterochromatin on the short arm side, which is thinner than that on the long arm side in the pericentric region. Chromosome 6 has the shortest short arm, with a 4.49 ratio. Chromosomes 7 and 8 are similar in length and ratio, but the large heterochromatin blocks across the centromere on chromosome 8 are useful discriminators. Classification of chromosomes 9 to 11 can be achieved by observing the locations of the JcSat1 and rDNAs signals on their arms (Table 1).
J. integerrima.
Chromosome 1 is the longest subtelocentric-like chromosome, with a 3.38 arm ratio (Table 2). Distinguishing chromosomes 2 and 3 may be a challenge due to the similar total chromosome length and arm ratio. Chromosome 2 possesses small heterochromatin blocks on half of the short arm. However, depending on the chromatin condensation, chromosome 3 shows a relatively longer short arm and appears nearly metacentric. Chromosomes 4 and 11 are metacentric with different lengths. Pericentric heterochromatin on chromosome 5 covers half of the short arm; this chromosome is subtelocentric. Chromosomes 6, 8 and 10 display similar length and arm ratios. However, a distant pericentric heterochromatin block on the long arm side of chromosome 6 and four pericentric heterochromatic knobs on chromosome 8 can help distinguish the three chromosomes. Chromosomes 7 and 9 can be distinguished by the presence of stronger rDNA signals on chromosome 7 (Table 2).
In conclusion, the constructions of the karyotypes provide knowledge of overall chromosomal features, i.e., the length of each chromosome, chromatin condensation, and distribution of repetitive DNAs. Although less decisive at later meiotic stages, each pachytene chromosome is distinguishable. In a future study, FISH-based karyotypes with single-copy genes [25] and bulked-oligonucleotide probes [26] will be used as tools for karyotyping pachytene chromosomes to obtain an even higher resolution.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A), Grant Number 25711024 to S.K. A part of this work was also supported by Thailand’s NSTDA Chair Professor Project (Grant No. P-11-00599) to P.T. and P.S.
References
- 1. Achten WMJ, Maes WH, Aerts R, Verchot L, Trabucco A, Mathijs E, et al. (2010) Jatropha: from global hype to local opportunity. J Arid Environ 74:164–165.
- 2.
Carels N (2013) Towards the domestication of Jatropha: the integration of science. In: Jatropha challenges for a new energy crop: volume II. Springer; New York: 2013. pp. 263–299.
- 3. Basha SD and Sujatha M (2007) Inter and intra-population variability of Jatropha curcas (L.) characterized by RAPD and ISSR markers and development of population specific SCAR markers. Euphytica 156: 375–386.
- 4. Tanya P, Taeprayoon P, Hadkam Y, Srinives P (2011) Genetic diversity among Jatropha and Jatropha-related species based on ISSR markers. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29:252–264.
- 5. Montes JM, Technow F, Martin M, Becker K (2014) Genetic diversity in Jatropha curcas L. assessed with SSR and SNP markers. Diversity 6:551–566.
- 6. Kikuchi S, Tsujimoto H, Sassa H, Koba T (2011) JcSat1, a novel subtelomeric repeat of Jatropha curcas L. and its use in karyotyping. Chromosome Sci 13: 11–16.
- 7. Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR, Praça MM, Araújo FS, Carels N (2008) Genome size, base composition and karyotype of Jatropha curcas L., an important biofuel plant. Plant Sci 174:613–617.
- 8. Sato S, Hirakawa H, Isobe S, Fukai E, Watanabe A, Kato M, et al. 2011. Sequence analysis of the genome of an oil-bearing tree Jatropha curcas L. DNA Res 18:65–76. pmid:21149391
- 9. Hirakawa H, Tsuchimoto S, Sakai H, Nakayama S, Fujishiro T, Kishida Y, et al. (2012) Upgraded genomic information of Jatropha curcas L. Plant Biotechnol 29:123–130.
- 10. Kikuchi S., Matsui K, Tanaka H, Ohnishi O, Tsujimoto H (2008) Chromosome evolution among seven Fagopyrum species revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probed with rDNAs. Chromosome Sci 11:37–43.
- 11. Witkowska M, Ohmido N, Cartagena J, Shibagaki N, Kajiyama S, Fukui K (2009) Physical mapping of ribosomal DNA genes on Jatropha curcas chromosomes by multicolor FISH. Cytologia 74: 133–139.
- 12. Alipour A, Tsuchimoto S, Sakai H, Ohmido N and Fukui K (2013) Structural characterization of copia-type retrotransposons leads to insights into the marker development in a biofuel crop, Jatropha curcas L. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:129. pmid:24020916
- 13. Cheng Z, Buell CR, Rod AW, Gu M, Jiming J (2001) Toward a cytological characterization of the rice genome. Genome Res 11: 2133–2141. pmid:11731505
- 14. Chen CC, Chen CM, Hsu FC, Wang CJ, Yang JT, Kao YY (2000) The pachytene chromosomes of maize as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with repetitive DNA sequences. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:30–36.
- 15. Peng R., Zhang T, Liu F, Ling J, Wang C, Li S, Zhang X, Wang Y (2012) Preparations of meiotic pachytene chromosomes and extended DNA fibers from cotton suitable for fluorescence In Situ hybridization. PLoS ONE 7(3): e33847 pmid:22442728
- 16. Zhang W, Man C, Ming WR, Yu Q and Jiang J. (2010) Integration of genetic and cytological maps and development of a pachytene chromosome-based karyotype in papaya, Trop Plant Biol 3: 166–170.
- 17. One KT., Muakrong N, Phetcharat C, Tanya P, Srinives P (2014) Inheritance of dwarfiness and erect growth habit in progenies of Jatropha curcas × Jatropha integerrima. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 139: 582–586.
- 18. Fukuhara S, Muakrong N, Kikuchi S, Tanya P, Sassa H, Koba T, et al. (2016) Cytological characterization of an interspecific hybrid in Jatropha and its progeny reveals preferential uniparental chromosome transmission and interspecific translocation. Breed. Sci. 66: 838–844. pmid:28163600
- 19. Wang L, Kikuchi S, Muto C, Naito K, Isemura T, Ishimoto M, Cheng X, Kaga A, Tomooka N (2015) Reciprocal translocation identified in Vigna angularis dominates the wild population in East Japan. J plant Res 128:653–663. pmid:25796202
- 20. Gerlach WL, Bedbrook JR (1979) Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res 7:1869–1885. pmid:537913
- 21. Marinho ACTA, Vasconcelos S, Vasconcelos EV, Marques DA, Benko-Iseppon AM, Brasileiro-Vidal AC (2018) Karyotype and genome size comparative analyses among six species of the oilseed-bearing genus Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae). Genet Mol Biol 41: 442–449. pmid:29767665
- 22. Muakrong N, Kikuchi S, Tanya P, Srinives P (2018) Conservation and variation of 35S ribosomal DNA among five Jatropha species revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytologia 83: 57–61.
- 23. Raskina O, Belyayev A, Nevo E (2004) Activity of the En/Spm-like transposons in meiosis as a base for chromosome repatterning in a small, isolated, peripheral population of Aegilops speltoides Tausch. Chromosome Res 12:153–161. pmid:15053485
- 24. Mohannath G, Pontvianne F, Pikaard CS (2016) Selective nucleolus organizer inactivation in Arabidopsis is a chromosome position-effect phenomenon. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113: 13426–13431. pmid:27821753
- 25. Lou Q, Zhang Y, He Y, Li J, Jia L, Cheng C, Guan W, Yang S, Chen J (2014) Single-copy gene-based chromosome painting in cucumber and its application for chromosome rearrangement analysis in Cucumis. Plant J 78: 169–179. pmid:24635663
- 26. Han Y, Zhang T, Thammapichai P, Weng Y, Jiang J (2015) Chromosome-specific painting in cucumis species using bulked oligonucleotides. Genetics 200: 771–779. pmid:25971668