The Role of the Amygdala in Facial Trustworthiness Processing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of fMRI Studies
Fig 2
Meta-analysis of effect sizes (n = 11): Confidence intervals for effect size (Pearson’s correlation coefficient).
Forest plot resulting from the meta-analysis with 12 studies (11 articles) for the contrast "Untrustworthy > Trustworthy" faces presenting central values of correlation coefficients (square markers) and their confidence intervals (horizontal lines). The size of the square markers varies with the sample size. Diamond markers represent pooled effects. The location of the diamond represents the estimated effect size and the width of the diamond reflects the precision of the estimate.