Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Varied performance of picture description task as a screening tool across MCI subtypes

Fig 1

The 2018 speech or language features from Table 2 are displayed with violin and embedded box plots to show the distribution of these features in the three study cohorts: aMCI, naMCI, and Healthy Control.

These features have p-values below 0.005 for association with membership in the aMCI or HC cohorts, as determined by logistic regression with adjustment for age and gender. The plots are in the same alphanumeric order as the rows in Table 2, with panel A showing the distribution across cohorts of values for Count of DISTINCT RELATED content units, and subsequent panels for features with increasing p-values. The corresponding p-values for the association of features with aMCI versus HC cohort status are in Table 1. No features had false discovery rates below 1.0 for association with naMCI versus HC cohort status. A: Count of DISTINCT RELATED content units. B: Count of RELATED content units. C: Count of indefinite articles. D: Count of prepositions. E: Count of nouns. F: Both Sides Total Content Units DISTINCT. G: Both Sides Total Content Units. H: Count of ALL content units. I: Count of content units on RIGHT side of picture. J: Count of Syllables. K: Count of words. L: Count of ALL DISTINCT content units. M: Count of DISTINCT content units on RIGHT side of picture. N: Count of sentences. O: Count of phrases. P: Acoustics standard deviation of F0. Q: Count of complete sentences. R: Count of content units on LEFT side of picture. S: Count of all function words. T: Count of DISTINCT content units on Left side of picture.

Fig 1

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000197.g001