Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T16:13:57.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Microstructure of Vermicular Glaucony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Simon G. McMillan*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

Abstract

Vermicular glaucony grains observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) show three irregularly alternating zones. Zone A has a high degree of linear orientation, no void space, and relatively defect-free lattice-fringe images. Zone B has an amalgamated bundle texture with a sub-parallel, linear orientation of bundles to each other and to zone A. Zone B has little or no void space, and lattice images appear to be a combination of those typical of zone C with minor amounts of modified zone A forms. Zone C has a randomly oriented, curved, and circular or semicircular bundle texture. In addition, zone C has much void space and curvilinear and linear lattice-fringe images with numerous defects, including edge dislocations. Such morphologic and crystallographic characteristics indicate that zones B and C probably comprise the glauconitic minerals of the vermicular glaucony grains, and that zone A comprises non-glauconitic micaceous minerals of higher structural order. Zone B is sharply demarcated from zone A, but B zone bundle textures merge gradationally to those of zone C. These spatial relationships suggest that zone B forms first on the surface of zone A. Sub-parallel orientation in the B zone could be produced by initial confinement between adjacent A zones. Once constraints change or are removed, the randomly oriented, curved, and semicircular or circular bundles of zone C develop.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1994, Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amouric, M., and Parron, C., (1985) Structure and growth mechanism of glauconite as seen by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy: Clays & Clay Minerals 33, 473482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, J. F., and Eggleton, R. A., (1988) Transmission electron microscope study of biotite weathering: Clays & Clay Minerals 36, 4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. H., (1963) The geology of the Mt. Stoker area, Eastern Otago. Part 1. Metamorphic geology: N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 6, 847871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burst, J. F., (1958a) “Glauconite” pellets: Their mineral nature and applications to stratigraphic interpretations: Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 42, 310327.Google Scholar
Burst, J. F., (1958b) Mineral heterogeneity in “glauconite” pellets: Amer. Mineral. 43, 481497.Google Scholar
Carter, R. M., and Norris, R. J., (1976) Cainozoic history of southern New Zealand: An accord between geological observations and plate-tectonic predictions: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 31, 8594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. M., (1988) Post-breakup stratigraphy (Kaikoura Synthem: Cretaceous-Cenozoic) of the continental margin of southeastern New Zealand: N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 31, 405429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galliher, E. W., (1935) Geology of glauconite: Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 19, 15691601.Google Scholar
Iijima, S., and Buseck, P. R., (1978) Experimental study of disordered mica structures by high resolution electron microscopy: Acta. Cryst. A34, 709719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, B. J., Curtis, C. D., and Whiteman, J. A., (1983) Compositional variation within some glauconites and illites and implications for their stability and origins: Sedimentology 30, 769786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H., Ahn, J. H., and Peacor, D. R., (1985) Textures in layered silicates: Progressive changes through diagenesis and low-temperature metamorphism: J. Sedim. Petrol. 55, 532540.Google Scholar
McMillan, S. G., (1993) The Abbotsford Formation: Ph.D. thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 646 pp.Google Scholar
Norris, R. J., Carter, R. M., and Turnbull, I. M., (1978) Cainozoic sedimentation in basins adjacent to a major continental transform boundary in southern New Zealand: J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 135, 191205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odin, G. S., (1972) Observations nouvelles sur la structure de la glauconie en accordeón: Description du processus de genèse par néoformation: Sedimentology 19, 285294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odin, G. S., 1988 ed. () Green marine clays: Developments in Sedimentology 45, Amsterdam. Elsevier, 445 pp.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S., and Matter, A., (1981) De glauconiarum origine: Sedimentology 28, 611641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. H., (1980) Partial interlayers in phyllosilicates studied by transmission electron microscopy: Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 75, 309314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phakey, P. P., Curtis, C. D., and Oertal, G., (1972) Transmission electron microscopy of fine-grained phyllosilicates in ultra-thin rock sections: Clays & Clay Minerals 20, 193197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapper, M., and Fanning, D. S., (1968) Glauconite pellets: Similar X-ray patterns from individual pellets of lobate and vermiform morphology: Clays & Clay Minerals 16, 275283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vali, H., and Köster, H. M., (1986) Expanding behaviour, structural disorder, regular and random irregular interstratification of 2: 1 layer silicates studied by high resolution images of transmission electron microscopy: Clay Miner. 21, 827859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, B. L., (1968) Otago Schist: in Geological Map of the Dunedin District. 1: 50,000, Benson, W. N., ed., New Zealand Geological Survey Miscellaneous Series Map 1, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar