Study the Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Interactive Teaching Environment on Student Learning of Junior High School Biology

Kai-Ti Yang; Tzu-Hua Wang; Chiu Mei-Hung Chiu

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a

Full Text (PDF)

Kai-Ti Yang ¹, Tzu-Hua Wang ² ^* , Chiu Mei-Hung Chiu ³

More Detail

¹ Taichung Municipal Yu-Ying Junior High School, Taichung City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)² Department of Education and Learning Technology, Department of Education and Learning Technology, National HsinChu University of Education, Taiwan (R.O.C.)³ Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan (R.O.C.)^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research investigates the effectiveness of integrating Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) into the junior high school biology teaching. This research adopts a quasi-experimental design and divides the participating students into the conventional ICT-integrated learning environment and IWB-integrated learning environment. Before teaching, students took the pre-test of summative assessment. The entire teaching process was recorded as a teaching video for analysis of teacher-student verbal interactions. Finally, students took the post-test of summative assessment and Constructivist Multimedia Learning Environment Survey (Maro & Fraser, 2005). The findings show that students in the IWB group have significantly better learning effectiveness. They also tend to have more positive attitudes towards their learning environment. The verbal interactions in the IWB group tend to involve less lecturing and more active participation by students.

Keywords

Interactive WhiteBoard
interactive teaching
biology teaching
teacher-student verbal interaction
attitudes towards learning environment

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2015, Volume 11, Issue 2, 263-275

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a

Publication date: 02 Apr 2015

Article Views: 5029

Article Downloads: 2031

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Anderson, L., Ryan, D. W. L., & Shapiro, B. J. (1989). The IEA Classroom Environment study. Oxford: Pergamnon Press.
British Educational Communications and Technology (2007). Harnessing Technology schools survey 2007. Retrieved August 1, 2014, from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/ 1554/1/becta_2007_htssfindings_report.pdf
Brown, C. R. (1995). The Effective Teaching of Biology. New York, USA: Longman publishing.
Crawford, T., Chen, C. & Kelly, G. J.(1997). Creating authentic opportunities for presenting science: The influence of audience on student talk. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32, 1-13.
Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A.(2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understanding of modern genetics across the 5th -10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655-674.
Duran, D., & Monereo, C. (2005). Styles and sequences of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning & Instruction, 15, 179-199.
Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environment: Assessment, effects, and determinants. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), The International Handbook of Science Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170.
Gillen, J., Littleton, K., Twiner, A., Staarman, J. K., & Mercer, N. (2008). Using the interactive whiteboard to resource continuity and support multimodal teaching in a primary science classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 348-358.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R. , Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 283-301.
Hirumi, A. (2002). Student-centred, technology-rich learning environments (SCen-TRLE): Operationalizing constructivist approaches to teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 497–537.
Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351-365.
Knippels, M. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108-112.
Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. Retrieved January 1, 2012, from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm
Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinsoon, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell devision and inheritance – Do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22, 177-197.
Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinsoon, C. (2000a). What’s in a cell? – young people’s understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual. International Journal of Biological Education, 34, 129-132.
Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinsoon, C. (2000b). Chromosomes: The missing link – Young people’s understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation. International Journal of Biological Education, 34, 189-199.
Maor, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). An online questionnaire for evaluating students’ and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist multimedia learning environments. Research in Science Education, 35, 221-244.
Murcia, K. (2008). Teaching for scientific literacy with an interactive whiteboard. Teaching Science, 54(4), 17-21.
Myers Ⅲ, R. E., & Fouts, J. T. (1992). A cluster analysis of high school classroom environments and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 929-937.
Northcote, M., Mildenhall, P., Marshall, L., & Swan, P. (2010). Interactive whiteboards: Interactive or just whiteboards? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 494-510.
Oztap, H., Ozay, E., & Oztap, F. (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary school students: An investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers. International Journal of Biological Education, 38, 13-15.
Sahlberg, P. (2010). Hope of cooperative learning: Intentional talk in Albanian secondary school classrooms. Intercultural Education, 21(3), 205-218.
Sahlberg, P., & Boce, E. (2010). Are teachers teaching for a knowledge society? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 31-48.
Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to science: An update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26-59.
She, H-C., & Fisher, D. (2000). The development of a questionnaire to describe science teacher communication behavior in Taiwan and Australia. Science Education, 84(6), 706–726.
Simpson, C. L., Pollacia, L., Speers, J., Willis, T. H., & Tarver, R.(2003). An analysis of certain factors related to the use of powerpoint. Communications of the International Information Management Association, 3(2), 73-83.
Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitudes toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grade six through ten. Science Education, 69, 511-526.
Slay, H., Sieborger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboard: Real beauty or just lipstick? Computers & Education, 51(3), 1321-1341.
Smith, M. U. (1991). Teaching cell division: Students’ difficulties and teaching recommendations. Journal of College Science Teaching, 21, 28-33.
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91- 101.
Stewart, J., Cartier, J. L., & Passmore, C. M. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Thomas, M., & Jones, A. (2010). Interactive whiteboards: An Australasian perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), iii-vi.
Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ selfreported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(2), 379-383.
Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). ‘The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.
Wubbels, T. & Levy, J. (1993). Do you know what you look like: interpersonal relationships in education. London: Falmer.
Yager, R. E., Tamir, P., & Huang, D-S. (1992). An STS approach to human Biology instruction affects achievement & attitudes of elementary Science majors. The American Biology Teacher, 54(6), 349-355.
Yang, K. T., Wang, T. H., & Kao, Y. C. (2012). How an interactive whiteboard impacts a traditional classroom. Education as Change, 16(2), 313-332.
Yang, K.T., & Wang, T. H. (2012). Interactive WhiteBoard: Effective interactive teaching strategy designs for Biology teaching. In Anderson Silva, Elvis Pontes, Adilson Guelfi and Sergio Takeo Kofuji (Eds.), ELearning - Engineering, On-Job Training and Interactive Teaching (pp. 139-156).Croatia: InTech.

How to cite this article

APA

Yang, K.-T., Wang, T.-H., & Mei-Hung Chiu, C. (2015). Study the Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Interactive Teaching Environment on Student Learning of Junior High School Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a

Vancouver

Yang KT, Wang TH, Mei-Hung Chiu C. Study the Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Interactive Teaching Environment on Student Learning of Junior High School Biology. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(2):263-75. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a

AMA

Yang KT, Wang TH, Mei-Hung Chiu C. Study the Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Interactive Teaching Environment on Student Learning of Junior High School Biology. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(2), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a

Chicago

Yang, Kai-Ti, Tzu-Hua Wang, and Chiu Mei-Hung Chiu. "Study the Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Interactive Teaching Environment on Student Learning of Junior High School Biology". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 2 (2015): 263-275. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a

Harvard

Yang, K.-T., Wang, T.-H., and Mei-Hung Chiu, C. (2015). Study the Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Interactive Teaching Environment on Student Learning of Junior High School Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), pp. 263-275. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a

MLA

Yang, Kai-Ti et al. "Study the Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Interactive Teaching Environment on Student Learning of Junior High School Biology". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 2, 2015, pp. 263-275. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a