All Issue

2023 Vol.32, Issue 4 Preview Page

Original Articles

Analysis of Relationship between Tomato Growth, Vital Response, and Plant-induced Electrical Signal in a Plastic Greenhouse due to Carbon Dioxide Enrichment Treatment

플라스틱 온실 내 이산화탄소 시비에 따른 토마토 생육과 생체 반응 및 Plant-induced Electrical Signal 간 관계 분석

Hee Woong Goo1†
,
Gyu Won Lee2†
,
Wook Jin Song2
,
Do Hyeon Kim2
,
Hyun Jun Park3
,
Kyoung Sub Park14*
구 희웅1†
,
이 규원2†
,
송 욱진2
,
김 도현2
,
박 현준3
,
박 경섭14*
1Researcher. Regional Crop Research Institute, Muan 58554, Korea
2Graduate Student, Department of Horticulture, Mokpo National University, Muan 58554, Korea
3Representative, Soil Research Institute, Prumbio Co. Ltd., Suwon 16386, Korea
4Professor, Department of Horticulture, Mokpo National University, Muan 58554, Korea
1지역특화작목산업화센터 연구원
2국립목표대학교 원예학과 대학원생
3㈜푸름바이오 대표
4국립목포대학교 원예학과 교수
*Corresponding Author
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
31 October 2023. pp. 484-491
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Tomatoes in greenhouse are a widely cultivated horticultural crop worldwide, accounting for high production and production value. When greenhouse ventilation is minimized during low temperature periods, CO2 enrichment is often used to increase tomato photosynthetic rate and yield. Plant-induced electrical signal (PIES) can be used as a technology to monitor changes in the biological response of crops due to environmental changes by using the principle of measuring the resistance value, or impedance, within the crop. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between tomato growth data, vital response, and PIES resulting from CO2 enrichment in greenhouse tomatoes. The growth of tomato treated with CO2 enrichment in the morning was significantly better in all items except stem diameter compared to the control, and PIES values were also higher. The growth of tomato continuously applied with CO2 was better in the treatment groups than control, and there was no significant difference in chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis. However, PIES and SPAD values were higher in the CO2 treatment group than control. CO2 enrichment have a direct relationship with PIES, growth increased, and transpiration increased due to the increased leaf area, resulting in increased water absorption, which appears to be reflected in PIES, which measures vascular impedance. Through this, this study suggests that PIES can be used to monitor crops due to environmental changes, and that PIES is a useful method for non-destructively and continuously monitoring changes of crops.

Keywords
CO2 application
crop stress
photosynthesis
PIES
Solanum lycopersicum

토마토는 전세계적으로 많이 재배되는 시설 원예작물로 높은 생산량과 생산액을 차지하고 있다. 저온기 온실 환기를 최소화하는 상황에서 CO2 시비는 토마토 광합성 속도와 수확량을 높이기 위해 많이 사용한다. PIES는 작물 내 저항값 즉 임피던스값을 측정하는 원리를 원용하여 환경 변화에 따른 작물의 생체 반응 변화를 모니터링하는 기술로 활용이 가능하다. 본 연구는 온실 토마토에서 CO2 시비에 따른 토마토의 생육 데이터와 생체정보 및 PIES 간의 연관성을 구명하기 위해 수행되었다. 오전에 CO2 처리한 작물의 생육은 무처리 구에 비해 경직경을 제외한 모든 항목에서 유의적으로 좋았고, PIES도 높게 나왔다. 연속적으로 CO2 시비한 작물의 생육도 처리구에서 좋았고 생체 반응 중 엽록소 형광과 광합성은 유의한 차이는 없었다. 하지만 PIES와 엽록소지수는 CO2 처리구에서 높은 수치를 보였다. CO2 시비가 PIES와 직접적인 관계가 있기보다는 시비를 통해 작물의 생육량이 상승하였고, 높아진 엽면적으로 인해 증산량이 증가되어 수분흡수가 많아졌고, 유관속 임피던스를 측정하는 PIES에 반영된 것으로 보인다. 이를 통해 본 연구는 PIES가 환경 변화에 따른 작물 모니터링에 활용할 수 있음을 시사하며, PIES가 작물의 변화를 비파괴적으로 연속적으로 모니터링할 수 있는 유용한 방법이다.

키워드
광합성
식물 내부 전기전도도
탄산가스 시용
작물 스트레스
토마토
References
1
Al-aghabary K., Z. Zhu, and Q. Shi 2005, Influence of silicon supply on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidative enzyme activities in tomato plants under salt stress. J Plant Nutr 27:2101-2115. doi:10.1081/PLN-200034641 10.1081/PLN-200034641
2
Cha S.J., H.J. Park, J.K. Lee, S.J. Kwon, H. K. Jee, H. Baek, H.N. Kim, and J.H. Park 2020, Multi-sensor monitoring for temperature stress evaluation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). J Appl Biol Chem 63:347-355. doi:10.3839/jabc.2020.046 10.3839/jabc
3
De Swaef T., K. Verbist, W. Cornelis, and K. Steppe 2012, Tomato sap flow, stem and fruit growth in relation to water availability in rockwool growing medium. Plant Soil 350:237-252. doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0898-4 10.1007/s11104-011-0898-4
4
Farquhar G.D., S. von Caemmerer, and J.A. Berry 1980, A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78-90. doi:10.1007/BF00386231 10.1007/BF0038623124306196
5
Fontes P.C.R., and C. de Araujo 2006, Use of a chlorophyll meter and plant visual aspect for nitrogen management in tomato fertigation. J Appl Hortic 8:8-11. doi:10.37855/jah.2006.v08i01.02 10.37855/jah
6
Gaspar T., T. Franck, B. Bisbis, C. Kevers, L. Jouve, J.F. Hausman, and J. Dommes 2002, Concepts in plant stress physiology. Application to plant tissue cultures. Plant Growth Regul 37:263-285. doi:10.1023/A:1020835304842 10.1023/A:1020835304842
7
Heuvelink E. 1999, Evaluation of a dynamic simulation model for tomato crop growth and development. Ann Bot 83:413-422. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0832 10.1006/anbo.1998.0832
8
Heuvelink E., and L.F.M. Marcelis 1989, Dry matter distribution in tomato and cucumber. Acta Hortic 260:149-180. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.260.8 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.260.8
9
Hicklenton P.R., and P.A. Jolliffe 1978, Effects of greenhouse CO2 enrichment on the yield and photosynthetic physiology of tomato plants. Can J Plant Sci 58:801-817. doi:10.4141/cjps78-119 10.4141/cjps78-119
10
Jeon Y.H., E.J. Kim, S.H. Ju, D.J. Myeong, K.H. Kim, S.J. Lee, and H.Y. Na 2022, Comparison of climate between a semi-closed and conventional greenhouse in the winter season. Hortic Sci Technol 40:400-409. doi:10.7235/HORT.20220036 10.7235/HORT.20220036
11
Jiang C., M. Johkan, M. Hohjo, S. Tsukagoshi, and T. Maruo 2017, A correlation analysis on chlorophyll content and SPAD value in tomato leaves. HortResearch 71:37-42. doi:10.20776/S18808824-71-P37 10.20776/S18808824-71-P37
12
Kaiser E., A. Morales, J. Harbinson, J. Kromdijk, E. Heuvelink, and L.F.M. Marcelis 2015, Dynamic photosynthesis in different environmental conditions. J Exp Bot 66:2415-2426. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru406 10.1093/jxb/eru40625324402
13
Kim H.N., Y.J. Seok, G.M. Park, G. Vyavahare, and J.H. Park 2023, Monitoring of plant-induced electrical signal of pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) according to urea fertilizer application. Sci Rep 13:291. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26687-w 10.1038/s41598-022-26687-w36609663PMC9822957
14
Kim K.S., K.Y. Hong, H.J. Kim, G.H. Kim, K.C. Kim, and M.H. Lee 2020, Tomato growth rate measurement system using image processing. J Korean Inst Commun Inf Sci 45:1460-1471. doi:10.7840/kics.2020.45.8.1460 10.7840/kics.2020.45.8.1460
15
Kim K.S., M.K. Kim, and S.W. Nam 2004, Optimization of growth environment in the enclosed plant production system using photosynthesis efficiency model. J Bio-Environ Control 13:209-216.
16
Kim P.G., and E.J. Lee 2001a, Ecophysiology of photosynthesis 1: Effects of light intensity and intercellular CO2 pressure on photosynthsis. Korean J Agric For Meteorol 3:126-133.
17
Kim P.G., and E.J. Lee 2001b, Ecophysiology of photosynthesis 3: Photosynthetic responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature. Korean J Agric For Meteorol 3:238-243.
18
Körner O., E. Heuvelink, and Q. Niu 2009, Quantification of temperature, CO2, and light effects on crop photosynthesis as a basis for model-based greenhouse climate control. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 84:233-239. doi:10.1080/14620316.2009.11512510 10.1080/14620316.2009.11512510
19
KOSIS 2020, Agriculture crop production survey: Fruit vegetable. Retrieved from https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=114&tblId=DT_114018_005&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=F1_AAA_010&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE
20
Lee I.B., S.B. Kang, and J.M. Park 2008, Effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and temperature on yield and fruit characteristics of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Korean J Environ Agric 27:428-434. doi:10.5338/KJEA.2008.27.4.428 10.5338/KJEA.2008.27.4.428
21
Lee J.H., S.H. Kim, and H.Y. Yoo 2020, Future prospects for industrial application of abscisic acid, a stress-resistant phytohormone. Korean Chem Eng Res 58:514-523. doi:10.9713/kcer.2020.58.4.514 10.9713/kcer.2020.58.4.514
22
Makino A., and T. Mae 1999, Photosynthesis and plant growth at elevated levels of CO2. Plant Cell Physiol 40:999-1006. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029493 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029493
23
Mishra K.B., R. Iannacone, A. Petrozza, A. Mishra, N. Armentano, G. La Vecchia, M. Trtílek, F. Cellini, and L. Nedbal 2012, Engineered drought tolerance in tomato plants is reflected in chlorophyll fluorescence emission. Plant Sci 182:79-86. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.022 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.02222118618
24
Nam S.W., and H.H. Shin 2015, Development of a method to estimate the seasonal heating load for plastic greenhouses. J Korean Soc Agric Eng 57:37. doi:10.5389/KSAE.2015.57.5.037 10.5389/KSAE.2015.57.5.037
25
Paek Y., S.W. Kang, J.K. Jang, and J.K. Kwon 2020, Variations of carbon dioxide concentration in a strawberry greenhouse using dry ice. J Korea Acad-Ind Coop Soc 21:182-188. doi:10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.2.182 10.1038/s41583-020-0282-632127699
26
Park H.J., J.H. Park, K.S. Park, and J.E. Son 2019, Evaluating plant stress conditions in paprika by comparing internal electrical conductivity, photosynthetic response, and sap flow. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 60:41-48. doi:10.1007/s13580-018-0105-0 10.1007/s13580-018-0105-0
27
Park H.J., J.H. Park, K.S. Park, T.I. Ahn, and J.E. Son 2018a, Nondestructive measurement of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) internal electrical conductivity and its relation to environmental factors. Hortic Sci Technol 36:691-701. doi:10.12972/kjhst.20180069 10.12972/kjhst.20180069
28
Park K.S., D.Y. Kwon, J.W. Lee, and J.E. Son 2018b, Comparing photosynthesis, growth, and yield of paprika (Capsicum annuum L. 'Cupra') under supplemental sulfur plasma and high-pressure sodium lamps in growth chambers and greenhouses. J Bio-Environ Control 27:332-340. doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.4.332 10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.4.332
29
Park J.H. 2020, Contrasting effects of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) on lettuce grown in hydroponics and soil: Chromium and manganese speciation. Environ Pollut 266:115073. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115073 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11507332629411
30
Park J.S., J.W. Shin, T.I. Ahn, and J.E. Son 2010, Analysis of CO₂ and harmful gases caused by using burn-type CO₂ generators in greenhouses. J Bio-Environ Control 19:177-183.
31
Park K.S., S.K. Kim, Y.Y. Cho, M.K. Cha, D.H. Jung, and J.E. Son 2016, A coupled model of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance for the ice plant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.), a facultative CAM plant. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 57:259-265. doi:10.1007/s13580-016-0027-7 10.1007/s13580-016-0027-7
32
Yoo S.J., and M.K. Sang 2017, Induced systemic tolerance to multiple stresses including biotic and abiotic factors by rhizobacteria. Res Plant Dis 23:100. doi:10.5423/RPD.2017.23.2.99 10.5423/RPD.2017.23.2.99
33
Zribi L., G. Fatma, R. Fatma, R. Salwa, N. Hassan, and R.M. Néjib 2009, Application of chlorophyll fluorescence for the diagnosis of salt stress in tomato "Solanum lycopersicum (variety Rio Grande)". Sci Hortic 120:367-372. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.025 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.025
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국생물환경조절학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Bio-Environment Control
  • Journal Title(Ko) :생물환경조절학회지
  • Volume : 32
  • No :4
  • Pages :484-491
  • Received Date : 2023-10-19
  • Revised Date : 2023-10-30
  • Accepted Date : 2023-10-30
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2023.32.4.484
Journal Informaiton Journal of Bio-Environment Control Journal of Bio-Environment Control
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close