MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF AZOTPIXING BACTERIA AZOSPIRILLUM
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Cel'yu raboty yavlyalos' aprobirovanie i podbor rodo-specificheskih par praymerov dlya dostovernoy identifikacii azotfiksiruyuschih mikroorganizmov – gramotricatel'nyh bakteriy roda Azospirillum. V hode raboty byla modificirovana metodika ekstrakcii summarnoy DNK izolyatov bakteriy iz ih biomassy – chistoy kul'tury. Provodilis' eksperimental'nye issledovaniya po podboru rodo-specificheskogo molekulyarnogo markera dlya nadezhnoy identifikacii. Byli optimizirovany i usloviya provedeniya polimerazno-cepnoy reakcii (PCR). Amplifikaciya summarnoy DNK bakteriy s praymerom Az16S-A F / Az16S-A R vyyavila u vseh izuchaemyh nomerov nalichie amplikona razmerom v 640 p. n., chto podtverzhdaet prinadlezhnost' vseh treh issleduemyh obrazcov k rodu Azospirillum. V rezul'tate provedennyh eksperimentov aprobirovan i otobran rodo-specificheskiy praymer Az16S-A F / Az16S-A R, pozvolivshiy vydelit' shtammy roda Azospirillum v chistoy kul'ture (3 shtamma). Poluchennye eksperimental'nye dannye po molekulyarnomu markeru pozvolyayut obrazcam shtammov, prinadlezhnost' kotoryh k dannomu rodu podtverzhdena PCR analizom, sluzhit' kak polozhitel'nym, tak i otricatel'nym kontrolem pri dal'neyshey rabote s bakteriyami. Klyuchevye slova: DNK, polimerazno-cepnaya reakciya, praymer, bakterii, Azospirillum

Keywords:
DNK, polimerazno-cepnaya reakciya, praymer, bakterii, Azospirillum
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Bashan Y., HolguinG., De-Bashan L.Azospirillum-plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural and environmental advances Can J Microbiol, 2004, Vol. 50,pp. 521-577.

2. Braun-Kiewnick A. [et al.]Development of species-, strain- and antibiotic biosynthesis-specific quantitative PCR assays for Pantoea agglomerans as tools for biocontrol monitoring. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2012, Vol. 90, pp. 315-320.

3. Fukami J., CereziniP., Hungria M. Azospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation. AMB Express, 2018, Vol. 8, pp. 73-85.

4. HusseinA., NalbandyanA. , FedulovaT., BogachevaN.Efficient and nontoxic DNA isolation method for PCR analysis.Russian Agricultural Sciences, May 2014, Vol. 40,Issue 3,pp. 177-178.

5. Mahuku G. S. A simple extraction method suitable for PCR-based analysis of plant, fungal, and bacterial DNA Plant Mol. Biol. Rep, 2004, Vol. 22, pp. 71-81.

6. Rogers S., Bendich A.Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues. Plant Molecular Biologi, 1985, Vol. 5, pp. 67-69.

7. Scarpellini M.,FranzettiL., Galli A. Development of PCR assay to identify Pseudomonas fluorescens and its biotype. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2004, Vol. 236, pp. 257-260.

8. Shime-HattoriA., KobayashiS., IkedaS., Asano R. A rapid and simple PCR method for identifying isolates of the genus Azospirillum within populations of rhizosphere bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2011, Vol. 111,pp. 915-924.

9. SpilkerT., CoenyeT., VandammeP., Puma J. Li PCR-Based Assay for Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeru-ginosa from Other Pseudomonas Species Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiolgy, 2004, Vol. 42,no 5, pp. 2074-2079.

10. Suaad S. Microbiological and molecular identification of bacterial species isolated from nasal and oropha-ryngeal mucosa of fuel workers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J of Biological Sciences, 2017, Vol. 24,no 6, pp. 1281-1287.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?