Back to History Current Version

Advice Taking and Gender

Last registered on May 24, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Advice Giving, Advice Taking, and Gender
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0011317
Initial registration date
May 17, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 24, 2023, 12:03 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Chicago

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Chicago

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-05-18
End date
2024-05-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Using an online laboratory experiment, this study investigates

(1) how the advice given varies based on the gender of the advisor and advisee and the type of environment (tournament vs piece-rate), and (2) the impact of advisor-advisee gender match on advisee's propensity to follow advice as well as their test choice (math vs verbal).
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ersoy, Fulya and Derek Rury. 2023. "Advice Giving, Advice Taking, and Gender." AEA RCT Registry. May 24. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.11317-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2023-05-18
Intervention End Date
2023-06-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Whether a subject advises taking math or verbal test in the advisor experiment
Whether a subject choose the non-stereotypical test in the advisee experiment
Whether a subject follows advice in the advisee experiment
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Whether a subject advises taking math or verbal test in the advisor experiment
Whether a subject choose the non-stereotypical test in the advisee experiment (math test is the non-stereotypical test for females and verbal test is the non-stereotypical test for males)
Whether a subject follows advice in the advisee experiment (defined as choice of advisee being the same with the advice of the advisor)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Test scores in the second part test in the advisee experiment
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Advisor Experiment: Advisors will take a test in which they will answer some math and verbal questions. Then, they will give advice to the other participants of the research study on whether they should choose to complete the math portion or the verbal portion of the test under different scenarios. Their advice will be provided to another participant of the research study.

Advisee Experiment: Advisees will answer 4 math and verbal questions. Then, they will be given a choice between choosing math or verbal portion of a new but similar test. Some of these advisees will receive advice on what to do before they make their choice. Advisor characteristics will be orthogonal to the advice received.

Both advisor experiment and advisee experiment are incentivized.
Experimental Design Details
Advisor Experiment: The following are the goals of this experiment: 1. Create the advice that will be given in the advisee experiment 2. Test whether advice is endogenous based on an advisee's gender and/or whether the test has a piece-rate structure vs. tournament structure. We are also interested in whether there are interactions between the two. We will explore heterogeneity by the gender of the advisor, whether the advisor knows their part 1 performance, whether the advisor perceives themselves as better at math, and whether the advisor perceives math as more interesting.

Advisors will take a test in which they will answer some math and verbal questions in a randomized order. A randomly chosen half of the advisors will learn about their score whereas the other half won't. Then, they will give advice to the other participants of the research study on whether they should choose to complete the math portion or the verbal portion of the test under 10 different scenarios. In 5 of these scenarios, they are randomly assigned to one of the following scenarios (1) male advisee, tournament condition; (2) male advisee, piece-rate condition, (3) female advisee, tournament condition; (4) female advisee, piece-rate condition. In the other 5 of the scenarios, they will not know the gender of the advisee or whether the advisee is in piece-rate vs tournament condition. These scenarios involve different combinations of correct answers in math and verbal tests in the test advisees will take. Advice answer choices are randomized across subjects.

Advisors' bonus payment will depend on either (1) the number of correct answers that they have in the test they will take in the first part of their survey, or (2) the number of correct answers that their advisee will have on the portion of the test that they will choose to take (math or verbal) after receiving their advice.

Advisee Experiment: The goal of this experiment is to test whether advisees are 1. more likely to follow the advice they received or 2. more likely to choose non-stereotypical test when there is a gender match between the advice and advisor. We will explore heterogeneity by gender of advisee, whether the advice received is stereotypical or non-stereotypical, whether the advisee is informed about the knowledge level of advisor, whether the advisee knows their own score, by payment scheme (tournament vs piece-rate), risk aversion of the advisee, and whether the advisee perceives themselves as better at math.

Advisees will answer 4 math and verbal questions. Then, they will be given a choice between choosing math or verbal portion of a new but similar test. Some of these advisees (randomly selected) will receive advice on what to do before they make their choice. Advisor characteristics will be orthogonal to the advice received. We will assign 1/6th of the subjects into the control group where they will not receive any advice. 1/6th of the subjects will be assigned to a treatment group where they will receive advice but not know the gender of the advisor. 2/6th of the subjects will be assigned to a a treatment group where they will receive advice from a male advisor and 2/6th of the subjects will be assigned to a treatment group where they will receive advice from a female advisor. Half of the subjects in all treatment groups will be randomly assigned to receive advice from a knowledgeable advisor and will know about this whereas the other half will not receive any information about the knowledgeability of the advisor. All of the subjects will be randomly assigned to either learn their part 1 performance or not learn their part 1 performance. All of the subjects will be randomly assigned to take the second test under a piece-rate scheme or a tournament scheme. Their choices (math or verbal) will be collected for both schemes. After subjects make their choices about which tests to take under what schemes, they will be randomly assigned to a scheme (piece-rate or tournament) and complete their choice of test (4 questions).

Advisees' bonus payment will depend on either (1) the number of correct answers that they have in the test they will take in the first part of their survey, or (2) the number of correct answers that they will have on the portion of the test that they will choose to take (math or verbal) and the payment scheme they are in (piece-rate or tournament). Advisees will also get paid if they correctly recall the characteristics of their advisor and the information provided to them about what the advisor knows and doesn't know.

Randomization Method
Randomization done by qualtrics
Randomization Unit
Individual randomization; some of the randomization that takes place is within subject and some of it is across subject.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
200 advisors, 1000 advisees

sample stratified based on gender.
Sample size: planned number of observations
200 advisors, 1000 advisees
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Advisor Experiment: 50 in treatment 1, 50 in treatment 2, 50 in treatment 3, 50 in treatment 4.

Advisee Experiment: 200 in treatment 1, 200 in treatment 2, 400 in treatment 3, 400 in treatment 4. (there is another randomization across treatments 2-4 and another two randomizations across treatments 1-4).
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Chicago Social & Behavioral Sciences
IRB Approval Date
2023-03-23
IRB Approval Number
23-0238
IRB Name
Loyola Marymount University
IRB Approval Date
2023-03-27
IRB Approval Number
2023 SP 47-R

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials