岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 156–164.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210616

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    

用“成分-结构”分类法识别古潜山变质岩岩性——以渤海海域太古界为例

叶涛1,2, 牛成民1, 王清斌1, 高坤顺1, 孙哲1, 陈安清2   

  1. 1. 中海石油 (中国) 有限公司 天津分公司 天津 300459;
    2. 成都理工大学 沉积地质研究院 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-25 修回日期:2021-06-02 发布日期:2021-11-25
  • 作者简介:叶涛(1987-),男,成都理工大学在读博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事含油气盆地综合分析与沉积储层地质研究。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油管理局B座。Email:tao_y2012@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家油气重大专项“渤海海域勘探新领域及关键技术研究”(编号:2016ZX05024-003)资助

Identification of metamorphite lithology in paleo buried hill by compositionstructure classification: A case study from Archean in Bohai Sea

YE Tao1,2, NIU Chengmin1, WANG Qingbin1, GAO Kunshun1, SUN Zhe1, CHEN Anqing2   

  1. 1. Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Tianjin 300459, China;
    2. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Received:2021-03-25 Revised:2021-06-02 Published:2021-11-25

摘要: 变质岩潜山岩性对储层发育具有重要控制作用。为了有效识别变质岩潜山岩性,以渤海海域油气钻井资料为基础,建立基于“成分-结构”的变质岩测井-地质学分类方案,探索兼顾岩石结构的岩性测井识别方法。结果表明,区域变质作用以及中基性岩脉的侵入共同控制了太古界复杂的岩性组合,形成了铁镁质侵入体与长英质变质花岗岩系2大岩类,而差异混合岩化作用将变质花岗岩进一步复杂化。基于矿物、元素分析以及岩心观察,确立了成分4分、结构3分的划分方案,建立了渤海海域太古界测井地质学分类方案。基于该方案,构建了不同岩性的测井交会识别图版,重点建立了岩石结构的常规测井及成像测井识别方法。通过对取心井的回判,识别结果与地质认识一致。此方法为变质岩岩性的识别提供了一种新的思路。

关键词: 岩性识别, 测井-地质分类, 潜山, 太古界, 渤海海域

Abstract: The lithology of metamorphic buried hill plays an important role in controlling reservoir development. In order to identify lithology of metamorphic buried hill effectively, the well-logging identification methods based on component-structure classification of metamorphite were studied with the data of boreholes in Bohai Sea. The results show that migmatization and intrusion of intermediate basic magma are the main controlling factors for the complex lithologic association of Archean, which control the formation of femic intrusion and the felsic metamorphite, and the migmatization makes the metamorphic granite more complex. Based on mineral and element analysis and core observation, the division scheme of four components and three structures was established, and the classification scheme of Archean well logging geology in Bohai Sea area was established. Based on this scheme, the identification chart of logging intersection for different lithologies were constructed, and the conventional logging and imaging logging identification methods for rock structure were established. The identification result is consistent with the geological understanding through the back judgment of coring well. This method provides a new thinking for identification of metamorphite.

Key words: lithology identification, logging-geology classification, buried hill, Archean, Bohai Sea

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 徐珏, 王登红, 陈毓川, 等. 中国大陆科学钻主孔超高压变质岩中钛的矿化作用. 地质学报, 2008, 82(5):612-624. XU J, WANG D H, CHEN Y C, et al. Titanium mineralization of the ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rock:Based on the Chinese continental scientific drilling 5158 m main hole. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(5):612-624.
[2] 张丕富, 吴锡生, 梁乃杰, 等. 浙江治岭头金银矿床成矿成晕模式. 地质论评, 1991, 37(5):429-436. ZHANG P F, WU X S, LIANG N J, et al. A model of ore and halo formation for the Zhilingtou gold-silver deposit, Zhejiang. Geological Review, 1991, 37(5):429-436.
[3] 朱大岗, 吕古贤, 邓军, 等. 胶东变质岩型金矿构造-岩相特征及其控矿作用. 地质力学学报, 1998, 4(2):67-73. ZHU D G, LYU G X, DENG J, et al. Tectonic lithofacies features of gold deposit of metamorphic rock type in eastern Shandong and its ore controlling. Journal of Geomechanics, 1998, 4(2):67-73.
[4] 王运, 胡宝群, 孙占学, 等. 相山铀矿田邹家山矿床碱交代型矿石地球化学特征及其成矿意义.铀矿地质, 2009, 36(1):68-74. WANG Y,HU B Q,SUN Z X,et al. The geochemical characteristics of alkali metasomatic ore and its ore-forming significance at Zoujiashan deposit,Xiangshan uranium field,Uranium Geology, 2009, 36(1):68-74.
[5] 王玉荣, 樊文苓, 郁云妹. 碱交代与铁矿形成的地球化学机理探讨. 地球化学, 1981, 1:95-103. WANG Y R, FAN W L, YU Y M, et al. Geochemical mechanism of alkali metasomatism and the formation of iron deposits. Geochimica, 1981, 1:95-103.
[6] 叶涛, 牛成民, 王清斌, 等. 渤海湾盆地大型基岩潜山储层特征及其控制因素:以渤中19-6凝析气田为例. 地质学报, 2021, 95(6):1889-1902. YE T, NIU C M, WANG Q B, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of large bedrock buried-hill reservoirs in the Bohai Bay Basin:A case study of the BZ19-6 condensate field. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(6):1889-1902.
[7] 宋柏荣, 胡英杰, 边少之, 等. 辽河坳陷兴隆台潜山结晶基岩油气储层特征. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1):263-272. SONG B R, HU Y J, BIAN S Z, et al. Reservoir characteristics of the crystal basement in the Xinglongtai buried-hill, Liaohe Depression. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1):263-272.
[8] 黄宏才, 罗厚义, 汤永梅, 等. 测井资料确定变质岩地层岩性的探索性应用. 测井技术, 2001, 25(3):204-208. HUANG H C, LUO H Y, TANG Y M, et al. Exploratory application of log data to determining lithology of metamorphic rock. Well Logging Technology, 2001, 25(3):204-208.
[9] 顾军锋, 金振奎, 朱留方, 等. 中国大陆科学钻探井(CCSD)超高压变质岩岩性的识别. 地球物理学进展, 2009, 24(4):1252-1256. GU J F, JIN Z K, ZHU L F, et al. The log response and the determining method of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks in CCSD. Progress in Geophysics, 2009, 24(4):1252-1256.
[10] 景建恩, 魏文博, 金胜, 等. 中国大陆科学钻探主孔榴辉岩的分类及测井识别. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2007, 32(4):504-510. JING J E, WEI W B, JIN S, et al. Classification and well-logging identification of eclogite in main hole of Chinese continental scientific drilling project. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2007, 32(4):504-510.
[11] 朱博远, 张超谟, 张占松, 等. 渤中19-6太古界潜山复杂岩性储层矿物组分反演. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):107-114. ZHU B Y, ZHANG C M, ZHANG Z S, et al. Mineral component inversion of complex lithologic reservoirs in Bozhong 19-6 Archean buried hill. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):107-114.
[12] 牛一雄, 潘和平, 王文先, 等. 中国大陆科学钻探主孔(0~2000 m)地球物理测井. 岩石学报, 2004, 20(1):165-178. NIU Y X, PAN H P, WANG X W, et al. Geophysical well logging in main hole(0-2000 m) of Chinese continental scientific drilling. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2004, 20(1):165-178.
[13] 王永刚, 耿斌, 张豆娟. 济阳坳陷埕北地区变质岩储层特征与测井解释. 油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(1):48-52. WANG Y G, GENG B, ZHANG D J. Reservoir characteristics and logging interpretation of Chengbei metamorphic rocks in Jiyang Depression. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2013, 20(1):48-52.
[14] 李艳.兴隆台古潜山测井评价.特种油气藏, 2008, 15(5):40-43. LI Y. Logging evaluation of Xinglongtai buried hill. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2008, 15(5):40-43.
[15] AHMED A K, PAN H P, MA H L, et al. Application of dimensionality reduction to improve geophysical log data classification performance in crystalline rocks. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015(133):633-645.
[16] LUO M, PAN H P. Well logging responses of UHP metamorphic rocks from CCSD main hole in Sulu terrane,eastern central China. Journal of Earth Science, 2010, 21(3):347-357.
[17] 叶涛, 王清斌, 代黎明, 等. 台地相碳酸盐岩层序划分新方法:以渤中凹陷奥陶系为例. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3):95-103. YE T, WANG Q B, DAI L M, et al. New method for sequence division of platform facies carbonate rocks:A case study of Ordovician in Bozhong Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(3):95-103.
[18] 叶涛, 韦阿娟, 祝春荣, 等. 渤海海域基底"改造型火山机构"特征及油气成藏意义. 石油学报, 2016, 37(11):1370-1380. YE T, WEI A J, ZHU C R, et al. Characteristic and petroleum exploration of Mesozoic "basement residual volcanic edifices" in Bohai Bay area, eastern China. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(11):1370-1380.
[19] 汪百齐. 辽河坳陷潜山油藏变质岩储集层原岩恢复. 新疆石油地质, 2009, 30(6):702-704. WANG B Q. Recovery of original rocks in metamorphic reservoirs of paleo-buried hills in Liaohe Depression. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2009, 30(6):702-704.
[20] 孙卉, 边少之, 宋柏荣, 等. 渤海湾盆地辽河坳陷兴隆台潜山变质岩地球化学特征. 新疆石油地质, 2009, 31(6):602-608. SUN H, BIAN S Z, SONG B R, et al. Geochemical characteristics of metamorphic rocks in Xinglongtai buried mountain, Liaohe Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2009, 31(6):602-608.
[21] LAURENT P, PATRICE R, PIERRE B, et al. Characterization of rock discontinuity openings using acoustic wave amplitude:Application to a metamorphic rock mass. Engineering Geology, 2015(193):402-411.
[22] 张莹, 潘保芝, 印长海, 等. 成像测井图像在火山岩岩性识别中的应用. 石油物探, 2007, 46(3):284-288. ZHANG Y, PAN B Z, YIN C H, et al. Application of imaging logging maps in lithologic identification of volcanics. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2007, 46(3):284-288.
[23] 叶涛, 韦阿娟, 黄志, 等. 基于主成分分析法与Bayes判别法组合应用的火山岩岩性定量识别:以渤海海域中生界为例. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3):872-879. YE T, WEI A J, HUANG Z, et al. Quantitative identification of volcanic lithology based on comprehensive principal component analysis and Bayes discriminant method:A case study of Mesozoic in Bohai Bay. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(3):872-879.
[24] 牛虎林, 胡欣, 徐志强, 等. 基岩油气藏裂缝性储层的成像测井评价及裂缝预测. 石油学报, 2010, 31(2):264-270. NIU H L, HU X, XU Z Q, et al. Evaluation of imaging logging and fracture prediction in fractured basement reservoirs. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(2):264-270.
[25] 王永刚. 济阳坳陷太古界变质岩储层裂缝识别与定量解释. 测井技术, 2012, 36(6):590-596. WANG Y G. Study on fracture identification and quantitative interpretation for Archaean metamorphic rock reservoir of Jiyang Depression. Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(6):590-596.
[1] 田晓平, 张汶, 周连德, 沈孝秀, 郭维. 南堡凹陷二号断裂带古生界碳酸盐岩潜山岩溶模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 93-101.
[2] 武中原, 张欣, 张春雷, 王海英. 基于LSTM循环神经网络的岩性识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 120-128.
[3] 黄芸, 杨德相, 李玉帮, 胡明毅, 季汉成, 樊杰, 张晓芳, 王元杰. 冀中坳陷杨税务奥陶系深潜山储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 70-80.
[4] 李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81-92.
[5] 孙夕平, 张昕, 李璇, 韩永科, 王春明, 魏军, 胡英, 徐光成, 张明, 戴晓峰. 基于叠前深度偏移的基岩潜山风化淋滤带储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 220-228.
[6] 李树博, 郭旭光, 郑孟林, 王泽胜, 刘新龙. 准噶尔盆地东部西泉地区石炭系火山岩岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 258-266.
[7] 孙予舒, 黄芸, 梁婷, 季汉成, 向鹏飞, 徐新蓉. 基于XGBoost算法的复杂碳酸盐岩岩性测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 98-106.
[8] 朱博远, 张超谟, 张占松, 朱林奇, 周雪晴. 渤中19-6太古界潜山复杂岩性储层矿物组分反演[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 107-114.
[9] 庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[10] 孙哲, 彭靖淞, 江尚昆, 叶涛, 郭颖. 渤海海域庙西中南洼围区烃源岩有机相与测井评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 102-110.
[11] 仲鸿儒, 成育红, 林孟雄, 高世臣, 仲婷婷. 基于SOM和模糊识别的复杂碳酸盐岩岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 84-91.
[12] 李娟, 孙松领, 陈广坡, 张斌, 洪亮, 何巍巍. 海拉尔盆地浅变质岩潜山岩性控储特征及储层岩性序列识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 26-36.
[13] 蔡冬梅, 叶涛, 鲁凤婷, 高坤顺, 任云鹏. 渤海海域中生界火山岩岩相特征及其识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 112-120.
[14] 刘超, 李云鹏, 张伟, 冯海潮, 王颍超. 渤海海域A油田夹层控制下的剩余油分布模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 148-154.
[15] 马峥, 张春雷, 高世臣. 主成分分析与模糊识别在岩性识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 127-133.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!