黄山毛峰茶产区重点乡镇原料适制性研究

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15120081

中国农学通报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (22): 200-204.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15120081

所属专题：园艺

• 食品营养检测安全 • 上一篇

黄山毛峰茶产区重点乡镇原料适制性研究

袁争,王烨军,苏有健,张永利,宋莉,孙力

(安徽省农业科学院茶叶研究所,安徽祁门 245600）

收稿日期:2015-12-14 修回日期:2016-01-13 接受日期:2016-02-22 出版日期:2016-08-09 发布日期:2016-08-09
通讯作者: 王烨军
基金资助:
国家技术创新工程试点省专项资金项目计划“黄山名优绿茶提质增效关键技术研究与集成应用”(13z03097、2013-2015)。

Suitability-for-Processing of Huangshanmaofeng Tea

Yuan Zheng, Wang Yejun, Su Youjian, Zhang Yongli, Song Li, Sun Li

(Tea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qimen Anhui 245600)

Received:2015-12-14 Revised:2016-01-13 Accepted:2016-02-22 Online:2016-08-09 Published:2016-08-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为推动黄山毛峰茶产地规划和品质提升，运用理化检测和感官审评等方法分析了富堨镇、唐里乡、洽舍乡和富溪乡等地的‘黄山大叶种’以及自‘黄山大叶种’中选育的‘漕溪一号’、‘漕溪二号’、‘漕溪三号’和‘漕溪四号’等新品系的黄山毛峰茶适制性。结果显示：4个产地中，黄山毛峰茶适制性最高的品种是富堨镇‘黄山大叶种’；新品系中，黄山毛峰茶适制性较高的依次为‘漕溪三号’、‘漕溪四号’；富堨镇‘黄山大叶种’的综合品质优于‘漕溪三号’和‘漕溪四号’。此外，相关性分析得出，咖啡碱、水浸出物和茶多酚含量与相应的审评得分均呈一定的负相关关系，而游离氨基酸和水溶性糖含量与滋味得分分别呈一定的正相关关系。

关键词: 植物萜类合成, 植物萜类合成, DXS合成酶, 序列分析, 生物信息学

Abstract: The suitability for processing of ‘Huangshandayezhong’ from key producing districts (Fu’e, Tangli, Qiashe, and Fuxi), and the new strains bred from ‘Huangshandayezhong’, including ‘Caoxiyihao’, ‘Caoxi’erhao’, ‘Caoxisanhao’ and ‘Caoxisihao’, were analyzed by sensory evaluation and bio-chemical analysis, to promote the planning of the producing area of Huangshanmaofeng Tea and improve tea quality. The results were as follows: (1) ‘Huangshandayezhong’ in Fu’e had the best suitability for processing; among the new strains, ‘Caoxisanhao’ had the best suitability for processing, followed by ‘Caoxisihao’; ‘Huangshandayezhong’ in Fu’e was better than ‘Caoxisanhao’ and ‘Caoxisihao’ in appearance; (2)Pearson’s r between the content of caffeine, aqueous extract, tea polyphenols and sensory scores was below zero, respectively, Pearson’s r between the content of free amino acid, soluble saccharide and scores of taste was above zero, respectively.

袁争,王烨军,苏有健,张永利,宋莉,孙力. 黄山毛峰茶产区重点乡镇原料适制性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(22): 200-204.

Yuan Zheng,Wang Yejun,Su Youjian,Zhang Yongli,Song Li and Sun Li. Suitability-for-Processing of Huangshanmaofeng Tea[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(22): 200-204.

参考文献

[1] 宛晓春.茶叶生物化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008:9.
[2] 阮宇成,程启坤.茶儿茶素的组成与绿茶品质的关系[J].园艺学报,1964,3(3):287-300.
[3] 施兆鹏,刘仲华.夏茶苦涩味化学实质的数学模型探讨[J].茶叶科学,1987,7(2):7-12.
[4] Bai W F, Guo X Y, Ma L Q, et al. Chemical composition and sensory evaluation of fermented tea with medicinal mushrooms[J]. Indian J Microbiol,2013,53(1):70-76.
[5] Ramdani D, Chaudhry A S, Seal C J. Chemical composition, plant secondary metabolites, and minerals of green and black teas and the effect of different tea-to-water ratios during their extraction on the composition of their spent leaves as potential additives for ruminants[J]. J Agric Food Chem,2013,61(20):4961-4967.
[6] Valera P, Pablos F, Gustavo Gonzalez A. Classification of tea samples by their chemical composition using discriminant analysis[J].Talanta,1996,43(3):415-419.
[7] Wang Y, Li Q, Wang Q, et al. Simultaneous determination of seven bioactive components in Oolong tea Camellia sinensis quality control by chemical composition and HPLC fingerprints[J]. J Agric Food Chem,2012,60(1):256-260.
[8] 王同和.茶叶鉴赏[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2008:42.
[9] 顾家雯,程坚,蒋震华,等.GB/T 19460—2008.地理标志产品——黄山毛峰茶[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008:1-6.
[10] 钟萝.茶叶品质理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1989:125-252.
[11] 龚淑英,鲁成银,刘栩,等.GB/T 23776—2009.茶叶感官审评方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009:1-10.
[12] 张泽岑.对茶树早期鉴定品质指标和酚氨比的一点看法[J].茶叶通讯,1991(3):22-25.
[13] 陈美丽.基于感官审评与化学计量学的茶叶色香味品质研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2013:1-2.
[14] 徐文平,李大祥,张正竹,等.绿茶几种化学组分苦涩味非线性回归分析及在感官审评中的应用[J].茶叶科学,2010,30(5):399-406.
[15] Scharbert S, Hofmann T. Molecular Definition of Black Tea Taste by Means of Quantitative Studies, Taste Reconstitution, and Omission Experiments[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2005,53(13):5377-5384.
[16] 罗文文,龚淑英,邵晓林,等.黄山毛峰茶主要呈味物质浸出浓度与浸出率的研究[J].中国食品学报,2007,7(1):69-73.
[17] 张英娜,陈根生,刘阳,等.烘青绿茶苦涩味及其滋味贡献物质分析[J].茶叶科学,2015,35(4):377-383.
[18] 崔燕芒.黄山毛峰和祁门红茶中多酚类成分分析及其抗肝损伤作用研究[D].西安:第四军医大学,2014:1-2.
[19] Trivittayasil V, Tsuta M, Imamura Y, et al. Fluorescence fingerprint as an instrumental assessment of the sensory quality of tomato juices[J].J Sci Food Agric,2015,2.
[20] 高俊.黄山毛峰茶指纹图谱的初步研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2008:1-2.
[21] Bertoli A, Fambrini M, Doveri S, et al. Pollen aroma fingerprint of two sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes characterized by different pollen colors[J]. Chem Biodivers,2011,8(9):1766-1775.
[22] Cardeal Z L, de Souza P P, da Silva M D, et al. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography for fingerprint pattern recognition in cachaca production[J]. Talanta,2008,74(4):793-799.
[23] Ciesa F, Holler I, Guerra W, et al. Chemodiversity in the fingerprint analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of 35 old and 7 modern apple cultivars determined by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) in two different seasons[J]. Chem Biodivers,2015,12(5):800-812.
[24] Li D C, Liu R S, Li H M, et al. Ranking the significance of fermentation conditions on the volatile organic compounds of Tuber melanosporum fermentation system by combination of head-space solid phase microextraction and chromatographic fingerprint similarity analysis[J]. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng,2014,37(3):543-552.
[25] Socaci S A, Socaciu C, Muresan C, et al. Chemometric discrimination of different tomato cultivars based on their volatile fingerprint in relation to lycopene and total phenolics content[J]. Phytochem Anal,2014,25(2):161-169.

黄山毛峰茶产区重点乡镇原料适制性研究

Suitability-for-Processing of Huangshanmaofeng Tea

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	巩永永, 端木慧子. 甜菜TIFY基因家族的全基因组鉴定与生物信息学分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 17-24.
[2]	王盛昊, 于冰. 甜菜M14品系BvM14-UNG基因克隆及生物信息学分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 16-22.
[3]	张琼, 王锦霞, 孟诗琪, 钟鑫爱, 刘大丽, 兴旺. 甜菜热激蛋白基因BvHSP18.2的克隆和生物信息学分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 111-118.
[4]	姚琼, 全林发, 徐淑, 董易之, 李文景, 池艳艳, 陈炳旭. 粗胫翠尺蛾视蛋白基因的克隆及灯光对其表达量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(16): 103-109.
[5]	王丽, 路运才. 玉米miR395基因家族生物信息学分析及靶基因预测[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(14): 30-37.
[6]	尤梦瑶, 闫佳佳, 万璐, 张赫, 郑春英. 甘草产香内生真菌RP2的初步鉴定及挥发性成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(12): 138-145.
[7]	王长丽, 廖巍, 叶广彬, 葛菁萍, 刘磊, 马毓坚, 黄霞, 宾晓芸. 编码酿酒酵母丙酮酸脱羧酶(Pdc6)基因克隆及其生物信息学分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(9): 103-108.
[8]	周婉婷, 汪曼, 周翔, 高卓, 李佳佳, 李王胜, 李思琪, 王雪倩, 王录红, 刘大丽. 甜菜BvGSTU9基因的生物信息学及在镉胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(36): 111-118.
[9]	汪曼, 周婉婷, 周翔, 李思琪, 王雪倩, 王录红, 李王胜, 李佳佳, 高卓, 刘大丽. 能源甜菜转录因子BvMYB44基因响应镉胁迫的表达特性及生物信息学分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(35): 25-33.
[10]	王爽, 李海英. 甜菜应答盐胁迫PUB基因的生物信息学分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(33): 120-127.
[11]	谢道龙, 谭智, 李虹烨, 付小侠, 王帆, 刘晓霞, 覃佐东, 何福林, 骆鹰. 银杏GbASR基因的克隆、生物信息学及表达分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(32): 34-41.
[12]	贾惠旭, 李海英, 端木慧子. 甜菜M14品系BvM14-RIN4基因的克隆及应答盐胁迫分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(14): 27-33.
[13]	李颖, 王莹莹, 苏旭, 谷建田. 番茄MYB44基因生物信息学及亚细胞定位分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(14): 34-40.
[14]	张庭跃, 赵晨曦, 陈思学, 李洪丽. 甜菜M14品系BvM14-Tpx基因克隆及原核表达体系下应答氧化胁迫功能的初步研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(32): 30-38.
[15]	刘佳佳, 佘露露, 兰小中, 陆雅宁, 杨佳慧, 刘欢, 卢存福, 陈玉珍. 喜马拉雅紫茉莉MYB家族的生物信息学及表达分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(29): 54-61.