欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (36): 404-408.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-0313

所属专题: 烟草种植与生产

• 食品 营养 检测 安全 • 上一篇    

湘西烟叶口感特性感官评价

周米良 邓小华 陆中山 黎娟 田峰 田茂成 向德明 杨丽丽   

  • 收稿日期:2013-01-29 修回日期:2013-05-10 出版日期:2013-12-25 发布日期:2013-12-25

Sensory Evaluation on Taste Characteristics of Tobacco Leaves from Xiangxi Areas

  • Received:2013-01-29 Revised:2013-05-10 Online:2013-12-25 Published:2013-12-25

摘要: 为明确湘西烟叶的口感特性评价指标的区域特征和空间分布特征,对来自湘西烟区的41个烟叶样品进行感官评价。结果表明:(1)湘西烟叶刺激性有至稍有;干燥感多数表现为有,少数稍有;余味以尚净尚舒适为主。(2)烟叶刺激性、干燥感县域间差异不显著;余味差异极显著,主要是古丈县烟叶的余味标度值极显著高于其他各县。(3)不同乡镇之间以红石林镇的余味标度值最高和干燥感标度值最低;高坪乡、列夕乡的刺激性标度值最低。(4)‘K326’的口感特性较‘云烟87’要好。(5)海拔低于600 m烟区的烟叶口感特性较其他海拔好。(6)烟叶刺激性、干燥感、余味在空间上分别以标度值2.6~2.8、2.7~2.8、2.6~2.8分为主要分布;口感特性评价指标标度值呈斑块状分布态势。

关键词: 林业专业合作社, 林业专业合作社

Abstract: 41 tobacco leaves samples from Xiangxi areas were analyzed by sensory evaluation in order to ascertain the regional characteristics and spatial distribution of taste characteristics. The results were as follows: 1) the irritancy was a little to little; the majority of samples have dryness while the minority of them just have min-dryness; the after taste of a little purity and easiness were taken as the principal. 2) There were extremely significant differences among the different counties for the after taste, non-significant differences among the different counties for the irritancy and dryness; the after taste of flue-cured tobacco from Guzhang County were relatively higher than others.3)The scale of irritancy of flue-cured tobacco from Gaoping town and Liexi town were the lowest among the different towns, while the scale of dryness from Hongshilin town was the lowest and the scale of after taste from Hongshilin town was the highest .4)The taste characteristics of ‘K326’ was better than ‘Yunyan87’.5) The taste characteristics of flue-cured tobacco from plant-tobacco areas under 600m altitude was better than other areas.6) The Kriging interpolation map indicated that the spatial distributions of the scale of taste characteristic indexes were plaque. The 2.6 to2.8 , 2.7 to 2.8 and 2.6 to 2.8were main distribution of irritancy, dryness, and after taste, respectively.