Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:29:57.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Saving and Life Insurance Holdings at Boston University – a Unique Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

B. Douglas Bernheim*
Affiliation:
Stanford University and National Bureau of Economic Research
Solange Berstein*
Affiliation:
Boston University and the Central Bank of Chile
Jagadeesh Gokhale*
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Laurence J. Kotlikoff*
Affiliation:
Boston University and National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This study examines the saving and insurance behaviour of 386 Boston University (BU) employees who volunteered to receive financial planning based on ESPlanner (Economic Security Planner) — a detailed life-cycle financial planning model developed by Economic Security Planning, Inc. Because the employees received their own financial plan, they had a strong incentive to provide full and accurate financial information. Hence, the data appear to be of particularly high quality for studying saving and life insurance decisions.

ESPlanner recommends annual levels of consumption, saving, and life insurance holdings that smooth a household's living standard through time subject to the household not exceeding its self-ascribed borrowing limit. The programme treats housing and special expenditures as ‘off-the-top’, adjusts for economies in shared living and the relative costs of raising children, makes highly detailed tax and Social Security benefit calculations, and permits users who don't want a stable living standard to specify how they'd like their living standards to change through time.

Our findings are striking. First, the correlation between ESPlanner's saving and insurance prescriptions and the actual decisions being made by BU employees is very weak in the case of saving and essentially zero in the case of life insurance. Many employees are spending far more and saving far less than they should, while others are under-spending and oversaving. The same holds for life insurance. The degree of under-insurance seems particularly acute. Almost 13 per cent of those BU spouses who are secondary earners would experience a 40 per cent or greater drop in their living standards were their spouses to pass away in the near future. Another 13 per cent would experience a 20 to 40 per cent drop. Second, planning shortcomings are as common among high-income professors with significant financial knowledge as they are among low-income staff with limited financial knowledge. Third, two thirds of BU employees are not in a position to smooth their living standards without exceeding their debt limits.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are very grateful to the National Institute of Aging, Boston University, and Economic Security Planning, Inc. for research support. We thank David Laibson for helpful comments. The findings here are those of the authors and not those of their respective institutions.

References

Auerbach, A. J. and Kotlikoff, L.J., (1987), ‘Life insurance of the elderly: its adequacy and determinants’, in Burtless, G. (ed.), Work, Health, and Income Among the Elderly, Washington D.C., The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Kotlikoff, L.J., (1991a), ‘Life insurance inadequacy – evidence from a sample of older widows’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 3765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Kotlikoff, L.J., (1991b), ‘The adequacy of life insurance purchases’, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 1(3), June, pp. 215241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B.D. (1987), ‘The economic effects of Social Security: towards a reconciliation of theory and measurement’, Journal of Public Economics, 33 (3), August, pp. 273304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B.D. (1991), The Vanishing Nest Egg: Reflections on Saving in America, New York, NY, Priority Press.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B.D., Berstein, S., Gokhale, J. and Kotlikoff, L.J. (2002), ‘Saving and life insurance holdings at Boston University – a unique case study’, mimeo, Boston University, May, posted at http://people.bu.edu/kotlikoff/CaseStudy7-2-02.pdf.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B.D., Carman, K.G., Gokhale, J. and Kotlikoff, L.J. (2001), ‘The mismatch between life insurance holdings and financial vulnerabilities: evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances’, NBER working paper, no. 8544, October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B.D., Forni, L., Gokhale, J. and Kotlikoff, L.J. (2003), ‘The mismatch between life insurance holdings and financial vulnerabilities: evidence from the Health and Retirement Survey’, American Economic Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gokhale, J., Kotlikoff, L.J. and Warshawsky, M. (2001), ‘Comparing the economic and conventional approaches to financial planning’, in Kotlikoff, L.J., Essays on Saving, Bequests, Altruism, and Life-Cycle Planning, Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press, pp. 489560.Google Scholar
Holden, K.C., Burkhauser, R.V. and Myers, D.A. (1986), ‘Pensioners' annuity choice: is the well-being of their widows considered?University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty, Discussion Paper 802-86.Google Scholar
Hurd, M.D. and Wise, D.A. (1989), ‘The wealth and poverty of widows: assets before and after the husband's death’, in Wise, D. (ed.), The Economics of Aging, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, pp. 177199.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, L.J. and Spivak, A. (1981), ‘The family as an incomplete annuities market’, Journal of Political Economy, 89 (2), April, pp. 372391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaari, M. (1965), ‘Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer’, Review of Economic Studies, 32, April, pp. 137150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar