The Logic and Urgency of Primary Prevention
Abstract
An estimated 15 per cent of the American population suffers from some form of emotional disorder. Such widespread prevalence dictates allocation of more funds for development of primary prevention programs. For years investigators have successfully used the specific disease prevention paradigm to control infectious and nutritional diseases. To prevent psychiatric disorders, however, investigators are now including a general disease prevention paradigm that seeks etiological factors among a variety of stressful life events as well as among biological, psychological, and sociological factors that differentially predispose individuals to emotional disorders. An effective primary prevention campaign will require a national policy for the enhancement of mental health and perhaps even the establishment of an agency concerned solely with primary prevention. In the related paper following this one, Drs. Lamb and Zusman discuss new concepts in primary prevention but question the effectiveness of mental health promotion.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
