The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Reliability and concordance in the subtyping of schizophrenia

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.142.11.1355

The authors examined the reliability, frequency, concordance, and demographic characteristics of subtypes of schizophrenia in patients from the Iowa 500 study as defined by four major diagnostic systems: DSM-III, Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), ICD-9, and the Tsuang- Winokur criteria. Reliability was higher in diagnostic systems with operationalized than in those with unoperationalized criteria and consistently higher for the paranoid subtype. The frequency of individual subtypes varied widely for the different systems. Concordance for subtype diagnoses between systems ranged from quite high to quite low. Demographic characteristics of the individual subtypes were similar according to all systems.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.