不同高寒草地植物群落生态系统多功能性分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.08.029

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 2505-2515.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.08.029

不同高寒草地植物群落生态系统多功能性分析

邓得婷¹, 武玉坤^1,2, 赖锋³, 孙建财^1,4, 史惠兰¹

1. 青海大学生态环境工程学院, 青海西宁 810016;
2. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100083;
3. 青海省自然资源综合调查监测院, 青海西宁 810000;
4. 宁夏大学农学院, 宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2023-02-06 修回日期:2023-03-14 出版日期:2023-08-15 发布日期:2023-09-01
通讯作者: 史惠兰,E-mail:hlshi7701@126.com
作者简介:邓得婷(1997-),女,青海互助人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态学研究,E-mail:youyu_456456@qq.com
基金资助:
青海省科技厅基础研究项目(2021-ZJ-715)；2021年促进与加澳新及拉美地区科研合作与高层次人才培养项目(留金美[2021]109号)；青海大学第六批“教学名师”培育项目(青大校教字[2013]73号)；青海大学三江源一流学科核心课程《生态系统管理》(ZYHX-202208)；青海大学三江源生态一流学科大学生创新项目(2022-stxy-B35)资助

The Analysis on Ecosystem Multifunctional Indexes of Different Alpine Grassland Communities

DENG De-ting¹, WU Yu-kun^1,2, LAI Feng³, SUN Jian-cai^1,4, SHI Hui-lan¹

1. College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
2. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Qinghai Provincial Natural Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Xining, Qinghai Province 810000, China;
4. College of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China

Received:2023-02-06 Revised:2023-03-14 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究不同高寒草地植物群落的生态系统多功能性及其环境影响因子，本研究以青海省河南县五种典型植物群落：垂穗披碱草(Elymus nutans，EN)人工群落、矮嵩草(Kobresia humilis，KH)原生群落、小嵩草(Kobresia pygmaea，KP)原生群落、藏嵩草(Kobresia tibetica，KT)沼泽化群落、黄帚橐吾(Ligularia virgaurea)退化草地(Degraded grassland，DG)群落为研究对象，选取表征生态系统功能的指标与土壤理化性质指标，测定并计算生态系统单一功能指数与多功能指数(Ecosystem multifunctional index，EMFI)，分析土壤因子与各指数间的关系。五种植物群落中KT群落生物量、土壤养分、植物养分含量和生态系统单一功能指数、EMFI较高，KP群落相对较低，土壤容重与EMFI呈现负相关关系，土壤温度与生态系统单一功能指数、EMFI均呈现正相关关系。土壤湿度、水分、电导率与CI呈负相关关系，研究发现典型高寒草地群落中不同的土壤因子和植被性状对生态系统多功能性的影响不同。

关键词: 高寒草地, 生态系统多功能指数, 生产力指数, 碳循环指数, 氮循环指数, 磷循环指数

Abstract: Five typical plant communities were selected in this research in order to study the relationship between the ecosystem multifunctionalities and environmental impact factors. The five typical plant communities respectively were the Elymus nutans community (EN),Kobresia humilis community (KH),Kobresia pygmaea community (KP),Kobresia tibetica community (KT) and Ligularia virgaurea degraded grassland community (DG),which located in Henan County,Huangnan Prefecture,Qinghai Province. The ecosystem functional indexes and productivity index (PI),carbon cycle index (CI),nitrogen cycle index (NI),phosphorus cycle index (PCI) and ecosystem multifunctional function index(EMFI) were measured and calculated,as while as calculated the relative weight of each functional index,and analyzed the relationship between soil factors and each index. Among the typical five plant communities,the biomass,soil nutrient,plant nutrient content,ecosystem single function index and EMFI of KT community were higher,while these indicators was relatively lower in KP community. Soil bulk density was negatively correlated with EMFI,and soil temperature was positively correlated with ecosystem single function index and EMFI. Soil moisture,soil moisture,soil conductivity were negatively correlated with CI. Therefore,the study found out that different soil factors and vegetation traits had different effects on ecosystem versatility in Alpine grassland.

Key words: Alpine grassland, Ecosystem multifunctionality, Productivity index, Carbon cycle index, Nitrogen cycle index, Phosphorus cycle index

中图分类号:

S812

邓得婷, 武玉坤, 赖锋, 孙建财, 史惠兰. 不同高寒草地植物群落生态系统多功能性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2505-2515.

DENG De-ting, WU Yu-kun, LAI Feng, SUN Jian-cai, SHI Hui-lan. The Analysis on Ecosystem Multifunctional Indexes of Different Alpine Grassland Communities[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2505-2515.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.08.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I8/2505

参考文献

[1] 傅伯杰,刘世梁,马克明. 生态系统综合评价的内容与方法[J]. 生态学报,2001,21(11):1885-1892
[2] 董世魁,汤琳,张相锋,等. 高寒草地植物物种多样性与功能多样性的关系[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(5):1472-1483
[3] SANDERSON M A,SKINNER R H,BARKER D J,et al. Plant species diversity and management of temperate forage and grazing land ecosystems[J]. Crop Science,2004,44(4):1132-1144
[4] 徐炜,马志远,井新,等. 生物多样性与生态系统多功能性:进展与展望[J]. 生物多样性,2016,24(1):55-71
[5] HECTOR A,BAGCHI R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multi-functionality[J]. Nature,2007,448(7150):188-190
[6] GAMFEIDT L,HILLEBRAND H,JONSSON P R. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning[J]. Ecology,2008,89(5):1223-1231
[7] ZAVALETA E S,PASARI J R,HULVEY K B,et al. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2010,107(4):1443-1446
[8] 李非凡,刘顺,许格希,等. 生态系统多功能性驱动因子及机制研究进展[J]. 陆地生态系统与保护学报,2022,2(2):74-82
[9] BYRNES J,LEFCHECK J S,GAMFELDT L,et al. Multifunctionality does not imply that all functions are positively correlated[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2014,111(51):E5490
[10] TILMAN D,ISBELL F,COWLES J M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning[J]. Annual Reviwe of Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,2014(45):471-493
[11] WOOD S A,BRADFORD M A,GILBERT J A,et al. Agricultural intensification and the functional capacity of soil microbes on samllholder African farms[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,52(3):744-752
[12] GARLAND G,BANERJEE S,EDILNGER A,et al. A closer look at the functions behind ecosystem multifunctionality:A review[J]. Journal of Ecology,2021,109(2):600-613
[13] 王凯,王聪,冯晓明,等. 生物多样性与生态系统多功能性的关系研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(1):11-23
[14] FU G,SHEN Z X. Response of alpine plants to nitrogen addition on the Tibetan Plateau:A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation,2016,35(4):974-979
[15] 冯锦,崔东,孙国军,等. 新疆土壤有机碳与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(4):692-697
[16] 蔡艳,吕光辉,何学敏,等. 不同利用方式下草地生态系统的多功能性与物种多样性[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(5):200-210
[17] HOOPER D U,VITOUSEK P M. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling[J]. Ecological Monographs,1998,68(1):121-149
[18] 孟泽昕. 不同海拔高度青藏高寒草地生态系统多功能性评估[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021:8-15
[19] 赵忠,王安禄,马海生,等. 藏嵩草草地植物群落组成及生产力动态监测研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2003(2):144-153
[20] 李杰霞. 黄河源高寒草甸景观破碎化过程及其对两种扰动的响应[D]. 西宁:青海大学,2021:17-18
[21] 李华,高丽. β-葡萄糖苷酶活性测定方法的研究进展[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2007(2):107-114
[22] 张洁,吕光辉,王恒方,等. 艾比湖流域不同水盐环境植物多样性对生态系统多功能性的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2021,30(4):22-30
[23] HOOPER D U,ADAIR E C,CARDINALE B J,et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change[J]. Nature,2012,486(7401):105-129
[24] MAESTRE F T,QUERO J L,GOTELLI N J,et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global dry lands[J]. Science,2012,335(6065):214-218
[25] 陈晓鹏,尚占环. 中国草地生态系统碳循环研究进展[J]. 中国草地学报,2011,33(4):99-110
[26] 井新,贺金生. 生物多样性与生态系统多功能性和多服务性的关系:回顾与展望[J]. 植物生态学报,2021,45(10):1094-1111
[27] 温军,王晓丽,王彦龙. 长江源区3种地形高寒草地土壤阳离子交换量和交换性盐基离子的分布特征及其机理探讨[J]. 生态环境学报,2019,28(3):488-497
[28] FRY E L,SAVAGE J,HALL A L,et al. Soil multifunctionality and drought resistance are determined by plant structural traits in restoring grassland[J]. Ecology,2018,99(10):2260-2271
[29] VALENCIA E,GROSS N,QUERO J L,et al. Cascading effects from plants to soil microorganisms explain how plant species richness and simulated climate change affect soil multifunctionality[J]. Global Change Biology,2018,24(12):5642-5654
[30] JING X,SANDERS N J,SHI Y,et al. The links between ecosystem multifunctionality and above-and below ground biodiversity are mediated by climate[J]. Nature Communications,2015(6):81595
[31] 黄小波,李帅锋,苏建荣,等. 云南松天然次生林物种丰富度与生态系统多功能性的关系[J]. 生物多样性,2017,25(11):1182-1191
[32] 陈美领,陈浩,毛庆功,等. 氮沉降对森林土壤磷循环的影响[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(16):4965-4976
[33] TIAN J,WEI K,CONDRON L M,et al. Impact of land use and nutrient addition on phosphatase activities and their relationships with organic phosphorus turnover in semiarid grassland soils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2016.52(5):675-683
[34] 吴金凤,刘鞠善,李梓萌,等. 草地土壤磷循环及其对全球变化的响应[J]. 中国草地学报,2021,43(6):102-111

不同高寒草地植物群落生态系统多功能性分析

The Analysis on Ecosystem Multifunctional Indexes of Different Alpine Grassland Communities

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王程, 胡夏嵩, 刘昌义, 李希来, 付江涛, 卢海静, 赵吉美, 邢光延, 何伟鹏, 杨馥铖, 李国荣. 黄河源区六种草本植物根系抗拔力特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 157-165.
[2]	刘文亭, 王芳草, 杨晓霞, 刘玉祯, 冯斌, 俞旸, 张春平, 曹铨, 董全民. 混合放牧对高寒草地矮生嵩草生殖枝与营养枝性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2231-2238.
[3]	张海娟, 芦光新, 范月君, 周华坤, 周学丽, 窦声云, 姚世庭, 颜珲璘, 赵阳安, 马坤, 祁岩慧, 邱鹏滢. AM真菌对高寒草地2种禾本科牧草的接种效果研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1684-1691.
[4]	邵建翔, 刘育红, 马辉, 魏卫东. 退化高寒草地浅层土壤理化性质Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1370-1378.
[5]	毛芮, 郭碧花, 刘金平, 游明鸿, 张雪梅, 羊勇. 寒区公路不同坡度护坡土壤性状和群落特征及功能群差异[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1550-1557.
[6]	冯斌, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 董全民, 张春平, 刘玉祯, 孙彩彩, 李彩弟, 时光, 杨增增, 张小芳, 魏琳娜. 不同放牧方式对高寒草地功能群生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1063-1070.
[7]	苏洪烨, 张中华, 佘延娣, 马丽, 毛旭锋, 贾顺斌, 马真, 周华坤, 黄小涛. 不同管理措施对青海湖流域高寒草地土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1071-1076.
[8]	邵梓桐, 秦彧. 高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草地碳循环的影响研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1086-1094.
[9]	孙建财, 杨沙, 武玉坤, 李孟玉, 赵国丁, 肖国涛, 邓得婷, 史惠兰. 高寒混播草地优势草种生态位与种间竞争力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1273-1279.
[10]	周学丽, 马坤, 王英成, 赵阳安, 祁星民, 土旦加, 史德军, 芦光新, 董世魁. 有机肥对环青海湖地区退化草地土壤微生物区系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3191-3198.
[11]	魏晶晶, 秦瑞敏, 张中华, 李永良, 邓艳芳, 马丽, 苏洪烨, 佘延娣, 常涛, 周宸宇, 杨旭芹, 邵新庆, 孙建, 周华坤. 不同退化程度高寒草地植物群落与土壤性质变化及相关性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3035-3045.
[12]	杨冲, 王文颖, 刘攀, 周华坤, 索南吉, 刘艳方, 关晋宏. 三江源区不同高寒草地植物矿物元素含量特征及分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 52-61.
[13]	秦海蓉, 陈长成, 胡月明, 王立亚, 肖武, 赵之重, 胡永强, 赵理, 马秉云, 霍俊领, 王福成. 青海省高寒草地土壤侵蚀强度及其空间分布特点[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 104-112.
[14]	晏和飘, 李文龙, 梁天刚, 周华坤, 曹亚鹏, 廖元成. 青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[15]	赵树栋, 李建宏. 高原早熟禾根际促生菌分离筛选及特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1885-1891.