Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Adoption and Adoption Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Among Smallholder Farmers in Welmera District, Oromia Region, Ethiopia

Received: 6 October 2023    Accepted: 16 November 2023    Published: 29 November 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Adoption of climate smart agriculture practices believed to have significant contribution to lessen the devastating impact of climate change on agriculture. However, in countries like Ethiopia, adoption and use level remains low. Understanding farmers' levels of CSA practice adoption and influencing factors is therefore crucial. The goal of the study was to evaluate adoption of various CSA practices in the study area, as well as adoption determinants. The study was conducted in Welmera district, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Three kebeles were chosen from the district, and a random sample of 306 farmers was picked. We utilized a cross-sectional household survey, a focus group discussion, and interviews with key informants. A multivariate probit model was employed to investigate factors influencing adoption of multiple climate-smart agriculture practices. According to the result, Conservation agriculture, integrated soil fertility management, and crop diversification are the most often used CSA practices. The results also revealed that men farmers outperformed female farmers in terms of crop diversity and improved animal feed and feeding practice adoption. Farmers' age has a considerable and unfavorable impact on their likelihood of adopting improved soil fertility management and crop diversification. However, it has a positive and considerable impact on the adoption of agroforestry practices. According to economic factors, having a relatively big farmland area considerably enhances the adoption of conservation agriculture, enhances soil fertility management, crop diversity, improved livestock feed and feeding methods, and postharvest technology practice. Improved livestock feed and feeding are more likely to be used if farm income is higher. Having significant number of animals strongly promotes conservation agriculture adoption, and access to financial services positively impacts agroforestry, diversification of crops, and postharvest technology practice adoption. Furthermore, institutional factors including access to the agricultural extension services and trainings were discovered important and beneficial for crop diversification; similarly, access to field day participation was discovered to have a significant and positive impact on the adoption of conservation agriculture and improved soil fertility management practices. It is critical to raise awareness about climate change among farmers and experts, as well as to incorporate location-specific CSA practices into agricultural programs.

Published in Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12
Page(s) 52-63
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Climate Change, Climate Smart Agriculture, Adoption, Multivariate Probit, Determinants

References
[1] The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development /OECD. 2016. Agriculture and Climate Change: towards Sustainable, Productive and Climate-Friendly Agricultural Systems.
[2] Arora, N. K., (2019). Impact of climate change on agricultural production and its sustainable solutions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00078-w
[3] Lynch, J., Cain, M., Frame, D., & Pierrehumbert, R. (2021). Agriculture’s Contribution to Climate Change and Role in Mitigation Is Distinct From Predominantly Fossil CO2-Emitting Sectors. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.518039
[4] Malhi, G. S.; Kaur, M.; Kaushik, P. (2021). Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Its Mitigation Strategies: A Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031318
[5] International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). (2009). Climate Change Impact on Agriculture and Costs of Adaptation. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/0896295354
[6] Holleman, C., Rembold, F., Crespo, O. & Conti, V. 2020. The impact of climate variability and extremes on agriculture and food security – An analysis of the evidence and case studies. Background paper for The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Technical Study No. 4. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb2415en
[7] Ahmad, A., Raza, A., Hasnain, M. U., Alharby, H. F., Alzahrani, Y. M., Bamagoos, A. A., Hakeem, K. R., Ahmad, S., Nasim, W., Ali, S., Mansour, F., & EL Sabagh, A. (2022). Impact of climate change on agricultural production; Issues, challenges, and opportunities in Asia. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 925548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.925548
[8] Mekonnen, A., Tessema, A., Ganewo, Z. & Haile, A. (2021). Climate change impacts on household food security and adaptation strategies in southern Ethiopia. September 2020, 1–14. Food Energy Secur. 10: e 266. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.266
[9] Rahel Solomon, Belay Simane, & Zaitchik, B. F. (2021). The Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture Production in Ethiopia : Application of a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Model. American Journal of Climate Change, 2021, 10, 32-50 Https://Www.Scirp.Org/Journal/Ajcc, 32–50. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2021.101003
[10] Conway, D., Schipper, E. Lisa F. (2011). Adaptation to climate change in Africa: Challenges and opportunities identified from Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change 21, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.013
[11] Zeray N. and Demie A. (2015). Climate Change Impact, Vulnerability and Adaptation Strategy in Ethiopia: A Review. www.iiste.org Journal Of environment and earth science.
[12] Jirata, M., Grey, S. and Kilawe, E. (2016). Ethiopia Climate-Smart Agriculture Scoping Study. FAO, 2016.
[13] Singh, R., Mulugeta Worku, Solomon Bogale, Cullis, A., Alebachew Adem, Irwin, B., Lim, S., Bosi, L., & Venton, C. C. (2016). Reality of Resilience : perspectives of the in Ethiopia. 6.
[14] Yalew, Amsalu W.; Hirte, Georg; Lotze-Campen, Hermann; Tscharaktschiew, Stefan (2017): Economic effects of climate change in developing countries: Economy-wide and regional analysis for Ethiopia, CEPIE Working Paper, No. 10/17, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE), Dresden, https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-227554
[15] Mera, G. A. (2018). Drought and its impacts in Ethiopia. Weather and Climate Extremes, 22 (September), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2018.10.002
[16] Asaminew, T. and Jie, Z. (2019). Increase of Extreme Drought over Ethiopian under Climate Warming. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5235429
[17] CIAT, BFS/USAID. 2017. Climate-Smart Agriculture in Ethiopia. CSA Country Profiles for Africa Series. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); Bureau for Food Security, United States Agency for International Development (BFS/USAID), Washington, D. C. 26 p.
[18] Van Breemen, N., Driscoll, C. T. and Mulder, J. 1984. Acidic deposition and internal proton sources in acidification of soils and waters. Nature 307: 599–604. Cross reference.
[19] Behera, S. K. and Shukla, A. K. 2015. Spatial distribution of surface soil acidity, electrical conductivity, soil organic carbon content and exchangeable potassium, calcium and magnesium in some cropped acid soils of India. Land Degradation and Development 26: 71–79. Cross reference.
[20] Temesgen D., Gonzalo J. and Maria, B. T. (2015). Effects of short-rotation Eucalyptus plantations on soil quality attributes in highly acidic soils of the central highlands of Ethiopia.
[21] Dinkecha K, Tsegaye D (2018 Effects of Liming on Physicochemical Properties and Nutrient Availability of Acidic Soils in Welmera Woreda, Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Acad. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Res. 6 (1): 20-28.
[22] Girma Asefa, Mengistu Mengesha, Gebre Hadgu Gebreyohannes (2021). Modelling the impacts of climate change on faba bean (Vicia faba L.) production in Welmera area, central Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08176.
[23] Belay, A., Mirzabaev, A., & Recha, J. W. (2023). Does climate ‑ smart agriculture improve household income and food security ? Evidence from Southern Ethiopia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03307-9
[24] FAO. (2013). Climate-Smart Agriculture Sourcebook. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome.
[25] Kifle, T., Ayal, D. Y., & Mulugeta, M. (2022). Factors influencing farmers adoption of climate smart agriculture to respond climate variability in Siyadebrina Wayu District, Central highland of Ethiopia. Climate Services, 26, 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100290
[26] Neufeldt, H., Jahn, M., Campbell, B. M., Beddington, J. R., Declerck, F., Pinto, A. De, Gulledge, J., Hellin, J., Herrero, M., Jarvis, A., & Lezaks, D. (2013). Beyond climate smart agriculture: Toward safe operating spaces for global food systems. Agriculture & Food Security 2, 12 1–6. https://doi.org/10. 1186/2048-7010-2-12
[27] Nkumulwa HO and Pauline NM (2021) Role of Climate-Smart Agriculture in Enhancing Farmers’ Livelihoods and Sustainable Forest Management: A Case of Villages Around Songe-Bokwa Forest, Kilindi District, Tanzania. http://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.671420
[28] Zizinga A, Mwanjalolo J-GM, Tietjen B, Bedadi B, Gabiri G and Luswata KC (2022). Impacts of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices on Soil Water Conservation and Maize Productivity in Rainfed Cropping Systems of Uganda. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6: 889830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.889830
[29] Deng, C., Zhang, G., Liu, Y., Nie, X., Li, Z., Liu, J. and Zhu, D. (2021). Advantage and disadvantage of terracing: A comprehensive review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.03.002
[30] Tesfaye, K., Kruseman, G., Cairns, J. E., Zaman-Allah, M., Wegary, D., Zaidi, P. H., Boote K. J., Rahut, D., Erenstein O. (2018). Potential benefits of drought and heat tolerance for adapting maize to climate change in tropical environments.
[31] Aditya Kumar Singh, Narendra Singh, Himanshu Singh and Kushwaha, H. S. (2021). Role and Importance of Weather Forecasts in Modern Agriculture. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 10 (01): 2646-2662. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.308
[32] Meybeck A, Licona Manzur C, Gitz V, Dawson IK, Martius C, Kindt R, Louman B, Djoudi H, Duguma LA, Somarriba E, Duchelle AE, Gebrekirstos A, Jamnadass R, Kettle C, Lamanna C, Minang P, Murdiyarso D, Sinclair F and Thomas RP. (2021). Adaptation to Climate Change with Forests, Trees and Agroforestry. FTA Highlights of a Decade 2011–2021 series. Highlight No. 12. Bogor, Indonesia: The CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/008222
[33] Yamane, Taro. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Edition, New York: Harper and Row.
[34] Mebratu Negera, Tekie Alemu, Fitsum Hagos and Amare Haileslassie. (2022). Determinants of adoption of climate smart agricultural practices among farmers in Bale-Eco region, Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09824
[35] Tamirat Girma. (2022). Is There A Synergy in Adoption of Climate Smart Agricultural Practices? Evidences from Ethiopia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 10 (8), 1611–1619. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10i8.1611-1619.5157
[36] Samuel Diro, Agajie Tesfaye and Beza Erko (2022). Determinants of adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies and practices in the cofee-based farming system of Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00385-2
[37] Abyiot Teklu, Belay Simane and Mintewab Bezabih (2023). Multiple adoption of climate-smart agriculture innovation for agricultural sustainability: Empirical evidence from the Upper Blue Nile Highlands of Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100477
[38] Keller, K. L. (2009), "Leveraging Sponsorship through Integrated Marketing", in Day, H. (ed.), and Sponsorship: From Theory to Practice and All the Latest Trends, the Marketing & Management Collection, Henry Stewart Talks Ltd, London.
[39] Hellin, T., T. Beuchelt, C. Camacho, L. Badstue, B. Govaerts, L. Donnet and J. Riis-Jacobsen. (2014). An innovation systems approach to enhanced farmer adoption of climate-ready germplasm and agronomic practices. CAPRi Working paper No. 116. Washington, D. C.: International Food policy Research Institute. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/CAPRiWP116.
[40] FAO. (2016). The state of Food and Agriculture; Climate change, Agriculture and Food Security. Food and agricultural Organization of the United Nations. FAO, Rome, Italy.
[41] Komarek, A., Thurlow, J., Pinto, A. De, & Koo, J. (2018). Economy-wide effects of climate-smart agriculture in Ethiopia Economy-wide effects of climate-smart agriculture in Ethiopia Abstract.
[42] Saguye, T. S. (2017). Farmers’ Perception on Climate Variability and Change and Its Implication for Implementation of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices in Geze Gofa District, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 18–32.
[43] Liliane, T. N., and Charles, M. S. (2020). Factors affecting yield of Crops. http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90672
[44] Braimoh, A. K., & G. Vlek, P. L. (2006). Soil quality and other factors influencing maize yield in northern Ghana. Soil Use and Management, 22 (2), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00032.x
[45] Pedreschi, R. (2016). Postharvest Proteomics of Perishables. Proteomics in Food Science, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804007-2.00001-1
[46] Tazeze Aemro, Haji Jemma, & Ketema Mengistu. (2012). Climate change adaptation strategies of smallholder farmers: The case of Babilie district, East Harerghe Zone of Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3 (14), 2222–2855 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.10.001.
[47] Titay Zeleke, Fikadu Beyene, Temesgen Deressa, Jemal Yousuf, and Temesgen Kebede. (2022). Smallholder farmers ’ perception of climate change and choice of adaptation strategies in East Hararghe Zone, Eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Managemen. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-01-2022-0014
[48] Emerick, K., & Dar, M. H. (2021). Farmer Field Days and Demonstrator Selection for Increasing Technology Adoption. March 2020. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest a. 00917.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Hailu, M., Abate, E. (2023). Adoption and Adoption Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Among Smallholder Farmers in Welmera District, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology, 9(3), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Hailu, M.; Abate, E. Adoption and Adoption Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Among Smallholder Farmers in Welmera District, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Front. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 9(3), 52-63. doi: 10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Hailu M, Abate E. Adoption and Adoption Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Among Smallholder Farmers in Welmera District, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Front Environ Microbiol. 2023;9(3):52-63. doi: 10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12,
      author = {Mesay Hailu and Esubalew Abate},
      title = {Adoption and Adoption Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Among Smallholder Farmers in Welmera District, Oromia Region, Ethiopia},
      journal = {Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {52-63},
      doi = {10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.fem.20230903.12},
      abstract = {Adoption of climate smart agriculture practices believed to have significant contribution to lessen the devastating impact of climate change on agriculture. However, in countries like Ethiopia, adoption and use level remains low. Understanding farmers' levels of CSA practice adoption and influencing factors is therefore crucial. The goal of the study was to evaluate adoption of various CSA practices in the study area, as well as adoption determinants. The study was conducted in Welmera district, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Three kebeles were chosen from the district, and a random sample of 306 farmers was picked. We utilized a cross-sectional household survey, a focus group discussion, and interviews with key informants. A multivariate probit model was employed to investigate factors influencing adoption of multiple climate-smart agriculture practices. According to the result, Conservation agriculture, integrated soil fertility management, and crop diversification are the most often used CSA practices. The results also revealed that men farmers outperformed female farmers in terms of crop diversity and improved animal feed and feeding practice adoption. Farmers' age has a considerable and unfavorable impact on their likelihood of adopting improved soil fertility management and crop diversification. However, it has a positive and considerable impact on the adoption of agroforestry practices. According to economic factors, having a relatively big farmland area considerably enhances the adoption of conservation agriculture, enhances soil fertility management, crop diversity, improved livestock feed and feeding methods, and postharvest technology practice. Improved livestock feed and feeding are more likely to be used if farm income is higher. Having significant number of animals strongly promotes conservation agriculture adoption, and access to financial services positively impacts agroforestry, diversification of crops, and postharvest technology practice adoption. Furthermore, institutional factors including access to the agricultural extension services and trainings were discovered important and beneficial for crop diversification; similarly, access to field day participation was discovered to have a significant and positive impact on the adoption of conservation agriculture and improved soil fertility management practices. It is critical to raise awareness about climate change among farmers and experts, as well as to incorporate location-specific CSA practices into agricultural programs.
    },
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Adoption and Adoption Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Among Smallholder Farmers in Welmera District, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
    AU  - Mesay Hailu
    AU  - Esubalew Abate
    Y1  - 2023/11/29
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12
    T2  - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology
    JF  - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology
    JO  - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology
    SP  - 52
    EP  - 63
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-8067
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20230903.12
    AB  - Adoption of climate smart agriculture practices believed to have significant contribution to lessen the devastating impact of climate change on agriculture. However, in countries like Ethiopia, adoption and use level remains low. Understanding farmers' levels of CSA practice adoption and influencing factors is therefore crucial. The goal of the study was to evaluate adoption of various CSA practices in the study area, as well as adoption determinants. The study was conducted in Welmera district, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Three kebeles were chosen from the district, and a random sample of 306 farmers was picked. We utilized a cross-sectional household survey, a focus group discussion, and interviews with key informants. A multivariate probit model was employed to investigate factors influencing adoption of multiple climate-smart agriculture practices. According to the result, Conservation agriculture, integrated soil fertility management, and crop diversification are the most often used CSA practices. The results also revealed that men farmers outperformed female farmers in terms of crop diversity and improved animal feed and feeding practice adoption. Farmers' age has a considerable and unfavorable impact on their likelihood of adopting improved soil fertility management and crop diversification. However, it has a positive and considerable impact on the adoption of agroforestry practices. According to economic factors, having a relatively big farmland area considerably enhances the adoption of conservation agriculture, enhances soil fertility management, crop diversity, improved livestock feed and feeding methods, and postharvest technology practice. Improved livestock feed and feeding are more likely to be used if farm income is higher. Having significant number of animals strongly promotes conservation agriculture adoption, and access to financial services positively impacts agroforestry, diversification of crops, and postharvest technology practice adoption. Furthermore, institutional factors including access to the agricultural extension services and trainings were discovered important and beneficial for crop diversification; similarly, access to field day participation was discovered to have a significant and positive impact on the adoption of conservation agriculture and improved soil fertility management practices. It is critical to raise awareness about climate change among farmers and experts, as well as to incorporate location-specific CSA practices into agricultural programs.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Assela, Ethiopia

  • College of Development Study, Addis Ababa University, Center for Rural Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sections