Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5277 No. 1: 1 May 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-05-01
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5277.1.7
Page range: 149-164
Abstract views: 245
PDF downloaded: 161

Phylogeny and taxonomy of Himerometroidea (Echinodermata: Crinoidea)

University of Tampa; Tampa; FL 33606; USA
Scripps Institution of Oceanography; University of California San Diego; La Jolla; CA 92037; USA; South Australian Museum; North Terrace; Adelaide SA 5000 Australia
Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center; Dania Beach; FL 33004; USA
Echinodermata Crinoidea Himerometroidea phylogenetics morphology systematics featherstar

Abstract

Himerometroidea is a clade of chiefly shallow-water, tropical, feather-star crinoids that is currently divided, based on morphology, into four families comprising 119 extant species in 31 genera. Our molecular phylogenetic results, based on three mitochondrial (CO1, 16S, CytB) and two nuclear (ITS and 28S) markers for 55 accepted species in 23 of the extant genera, allow for six clades within Himerometroidea to be given family ranks. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference analyses recovered largely congruent topologies with varying nodal support. A new classification revises generic placements among five families: Himerometridae, Colobometridae, and Mariametridae, all retained, and Pontiometridae and Stephanometridae both resurrected. Zygometridae is no longer accepted, since the type genus of the family, Zygometra, falls within Himerometridae. Catoptometra was recovered as a sister clade with respect to those treated herein as a new family, Catoptometridae. Two genera, Iconometra and Analcidometra, are retained within Himerometroidea but without family assignments pending further assessment of their positions. Currently published diagnostic and descriptive morphological features are noted where possible to support taxonomic names in the recovered phylogeny, although more examination of morphology is needed to identify synapomorphies and designate taxon names formally.

 

References

  1. Bell, F.J. (1884) Report on the zoological collections made in the lndo-Pacific Ocean during the voyage of H.M.S. Alert 1881–1882. Echinodermata & Crinoidea. Taylor & Frances, London, pp. 117–177 & 153–170 + 509–512.
  2. Bell, F.J. (1894) On the echinoderms collected during the voyage of H.M.S. Penguin and by H.M.S. Egeria, when surveying Macclesfield Bank. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1894, 392–413.
  3. Carpenter, P.H. (1881) On the genus Solanocrinus, Goldfuss, and its relations to recent Comatulae. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 15, 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1880.tb00356.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1880.tb00356.x
  4. Carpenter, P.H. (1882a) Descriptions of new or little-known Comatulae. I. On the species of Atelecrinus and Eudiocrinus. II. The Comatulae of the Hamburg Museum. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 16, 487–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1882.tb02394.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1882.tb02394.x
  5. Carpenter, P.H. (1882b) Preliminary report on the Comatulae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 9, 1–20.
  6. Carpenter, P.H. (1888) Report on the Crinoidea collected during the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, during the years 1873-1876. Part II. The Comatulae. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, Zoology, 26, 1–402.
  7. Carpenter, P.H. (1889) Report on the Comatulae of the Mergui Archipelago collected for the Trustees of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 21, 204–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1889.tb00639.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1889.tb00639.x
  8. Clark, A.H. (1907a) New genera of recent free crinoids. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, Quarterly Issue, 50, 343–364.
  9. Clark, A.H. (1907b) Description of new species of recent unstalked crinoids from the coast of northeastern Asia. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 33, 127–156. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.33-1561.127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.33-1561.127
  10. Clark, A.H. (1907c) Description of new species of recent unstalked crinoids from the North Pacific Ocean. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 33, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.33-1559.69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.33-1559.69
  11. Clark, A.H. (1908a) New genera of unstalked crinoids. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 21, 125–136.
  12. Clark, A.H. (1908b) Description of new species of crinoids, chiefly from the collections made by U.S. Fisheries steamer “Albatross” at the Hawaiian Islands in 1902; with remarks on the classification of the Comatulida. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 34, 209–239. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.34-1608.209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.34-1608.209
  13. Clark, A.H. (1908c) On a collection of feather stars, or comatulids, from Japan. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 34, 305–319. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.34-1615.305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.34-1615.305
  14. Clark, A.H. (1909a) New recent Indian crinoids. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 22, 143–152.
  15. Clark, A.H. (1909b) New genera and higher groups of unstalked crinoids. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 22, 173–178.
  16. Clark, A.H. (1909c) A revision of the crinoid families Thalassometridae and Himerometridae. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 22, 1–22.
  17. Clark, A.H. (1911a) The systematic position of the crinoid genus Marsupites. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 40, 649–654. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.40-1845.649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.40-1845.649
  18. Clark, A.H. (1911b) On a collection of unstalked crinoids made by the United States Fisheries Steamer “Albatross” in the vicinity of the Philippine Islands. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 36, 529–563. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.39-1798.529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.39-1798.529
  19. Clark, A.H. (1911c) The recent crinoids of the coasts of Africa. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 40, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.40-1808.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.40-1808.1
  20. Clark, A.H. (1911d) The recent crinoids of Australia. Memoirs of the Australian Museum, 4, 705–804. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1967.4.1911.1511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1967.4.1911.1511
  21. Clark, A.H. (1912a) Description of twenty new unstalked crinoids, belonging to the families Antedonidae and Atelecrinidae, from the Dutch East Indies. Notes from the Leyden Museum, 34, 129–155.
  22. Clark, A.H. (1912b) The crinoids of the Indian Ocean. Echinoderma of the Indian Museum. Pt 7. Crinoidea. Trustees of the Indian Museum, Calcutta, 325 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.28237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.28237
  23. Clark, A.H. (1912c) Preliminary descriptions of eleven new crinoids belonging to the families Himerometridae, Mariametridae, and Colobometridae, discovered by the ‘Siboga’ in the Dutch East Indies. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 10, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222931208693194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222931208693194
  24. Clark, A.H. (1913a) A revision of the crinoid family Mariametridae. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 26, 141–144.
  25. Clark, A.H. (1913b) Notes on the recent crinoids in the British Museum. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, 61, 1–89.
  26. Clark, A.H. (1915a) A Monograph of existing crinoids. Vol. 1. Part 1. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 82, 1–406. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.i DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.i
  27. Clark, A.H. (1915b) Die Crinoiden der Antarktis. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 16, 101–209. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11370
  28. Clark, A.H. (1918) The unstalked crinoids of the Siboga Expedition. Siboga Expedition, 42b, 1–300.
  29. Clark, A.H. (1921) A monograph of existing crinoids. Vol. 1. Part 2. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82, 1–795. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.2
  30. Clark, A.H. (1929) On some recent crinoids in the collection of the British Museum. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London, 36, 635–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1929.tb02210b.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1929.tb02210b.x
  31. Clark, A.H. (1931) A monograph of the existing crinoids. Vol. 1. Part 3. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82, 1–816. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.3
  32. Clark, A.H. (1932) On a collection of crinoids from the Indian Ocean and the Bay of Bengal. Records of the Indian Museum, 34, 551–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v34/i4/1932/162578
  33. Clark, A.H. (1941) A monograph of the existing crinoids. Vol. 1. Part 4a. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82, 1–603. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.4a DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.4a
  34. Clark, A.H. (1947) A monograph of the existing crinoids. Vol. 1. Part 4b. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82, 1–816.
  35. Clark, A.H. (1950) A monograph of the existing crinoids. Vol. 1. Part 4c. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82, 1–383. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.82.2
  36. Clark, A.H. & Clark, A.M. (1967) A monograph of the existing crinoids. Vol. 1. Part 5. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82, 1–860.
  37. Clark, A.M. & Rowe, F.W.E. (1971) Monograph of shallow-water Indo-west Pacific Echinoderms. British Museum (Natural History), London, 238 pp.
  38. Darriba, D., Posada, D., Kozlov, A.M., Stamatakis, A., Morel, B. & Flouri, T. (2020) ModelTest-NG: a new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37 (1), 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz189
  39. Edler, D., Johannes, K., Antonelli, A. & Silvestro, D. (2021) RaxmlGUI 2.0: a graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 12 (2), 373–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13512
  40. Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Kallersjo, M., Lipscomb, D. & Kluge, A.G. (1996) Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics, 12, 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00196.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00196.x
  41. Foo, S.Z., Taylor, K.H., Messing, C.G., Rouse, G.W., Tay, T.S., Tan, K.S. & Huang, D. (2021) Assessing the taxonomy of Heterometra-like feather stars (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Himerometroidea) based on morphology and molecular data. Systematics and Biodiversity, 19, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2021.1902418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2021.1902418
  42. Fleming, J. (1828) A history of British animals, exhibiting the descriptive characters and systematical arrangement of the genera and species of quadrupeds, birds, reptiles, fishes, Mollusca, and Radiata of the United Kingdom; including the indigenous, extirpated, and extinct kinds, together with periodical and occasional visitants. Bell & Bradfute, Edinburgh/James Duncan, London, 565 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12859
  43. Fréminville, C.P. de la P. de (1811) Mémoire sur un nouveau genre de Zoophytes de l’ordre des Radiaires. Nouveau Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société Philomathique, Paris, 2, 349–350.
  44. Gislén, T. (1924) Echinoderm studies. Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala, 9, 330–349.
  45. Haig, J. & Rouse, G.W. (2008) Larval development of the featherstar Aporometra wilsoni (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Invertebrate Biology, 127, 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2008.00134.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2008.00134.x
  46. Hartlaub, C. (1890) Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Comatuliden-Fauna des indischen Archipels. Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften und der Georgs-August-Universität zu Göttingen, 5, 168–187. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11733
  47. Helgen, L.E. & Rouse, G.W. (2006) Species delimination and distribution in Aporometra (Crinoidea: Echinodermata): endemic Australian featherstars. Invertebrate Systematics, 20, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS05050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/IS05050
  48. Hemery, L., Eleaume, M., Roussel, V., Ameziane, N., Gallut, C., Steinke, D., Cruaud, C., Couloux, A. & Wilson, N. (2012) Comprehensive sampling reveals circumpolarity and sympatry in seven mitochondrial lineages of the Southern Ocean crinoid species Promachocrinus kerguelensis (Echinodermata). Molecular Ecology, 21, 2502–2518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05512.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05512.x
  49. Hemery, L., Roux, M., Ameziane, N. & Eleaume, M. (2013) High-resolution crinoid phyletic inter-relationships derived from molecular data. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 54 (4), 511–523.
  50. Hess, H. & Messing, C.G. (2011) Comatulida. In: Selden, P.A. (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part T. Echinodermata 2 Revised. Crinoidea. Vol. 3. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. 70–146. https://doi.org/10.17161/dt.v0i0.5392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/dt.v0i0.5392
  51. ICZN (1999) International Code on Zoological Nomenclature. 4th Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp.
  52. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acid Research, 30, 3059–3066. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf436
  53. Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., Thierer, T., Ashton, B., Mentjies, P. & Drummond, A. (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28, 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
  54. Kohtsuka, H. & Nakano, H. (2005). Development and growth of the feather star Decametra tigrina (Crinoidea), with emphasis on the morphological differences between adults and juveniles. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 85, 1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315405012701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315405012701
  55. Kozlov, A.M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B. & Stamatakis, A. (2019) RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable, and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics, 35, 4453–4455. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305
  56. Larkin, M.A., Blackshields G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I.M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J. & Higgins, D.G. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947–2948. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
  57. Lé, H.L, Lecointre, G. & Perasso, R. (1993) A 28S rRNA-based phylogeny of the gnathostomes, first steps in the analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladograms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1993.1005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1993.1005
  58. MacCord, F.S. & Duarte, L.F.L. (2002) Dispersion in populations of Tropiometra carinata (Crinoidea: Comatulida) in the São Sebastião Channel, São Paulo State, Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 54, 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2001.0843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2001.0843
  59. Messing, C.G. (1981) Reclassification and redescription of the comatulid Comatonia cristata (Hartlaub) (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 94 (1), 240–253.
  60. Messing, C.G. (1994) Comatulid crinoids (Echinodermata) of Madang, Papua New Guinea, and environs: Diversity and ecology. In: David, B., Guille, A. & Feral, J.-P. (Eds.), Echinoderms through Time. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003077831-46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003077831-46
  61. Messing, C.G. (1995) Redescription of a unique feather star (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Comatulida: Comasteridae) with a diagnosis of a new genus. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 108, 656–661.
  62. Messing, C.G. (1997) Living comatulids. In: Waters, J.A. & Maples, C.G. (Eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms. Vol. 3. The Paleontological Society, Pittsburgh, pp. 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1089332600000188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1089332600000188
  63. Messing, C.G. (1998) Revision of the recent Indo-West Pacific comatulid genus Comaster Agassiz - Part 1 - the type species of Comaster and Phanogenia Loven (Echinodermata, Crinoidea, Comasteridae). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 12, 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1071/IT97004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/IT97004
  64. Messing, C.G. (2013) A revision of the genus Atelecrinus PH Carpenter (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Zootaxa, 3681 (1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3681.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3681.1.1
  65. Messing, C.G. (2020a) A revision of the unusual feather star genus Atopocrinus with a description of a new species (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Zootaxa, 4731 (4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4731.4.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4731.4.2
  66. Messing, C.G. (2020b) Erratum: A revision of the unusual feather star genus Atopocrinus with a description of a new species (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Zootaxa, 4772 (3), 600. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4772.3.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4772.3.11
  67. Messing, C.G., Meyer, D.L., Siebeck, U.E., Jermiin, L.S., Vaney, D.I. & Rouse, G.W. (2006) A modern soft-bottom, shallow-water crinoid fauna (Echinodermata) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs, 25, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-005-0076-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-005-0076-3
  68. Messing, C.G. & White, C.M. (2001) A revision of the Zenometridae (new rank) (Echinodermata, Crinoidea, Comatulidina). Zoologica Scripta, 30, 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.2001.00062.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.2001.00062.x
  69. Meyer, D.L. & Macurda, D.B. (1977) Adaptive radiation of the comatulid crinoids. Paleobiology, 3 (1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300005121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300005121
  70. Müller, J. (1841) Über den Bau des Pentacrinus caput Medusae. Abhandlungen Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1841, 177–248.
  71. Norman, A.M. (1865) On the genera and species of British Echinodermata. 1, Crinoidea, Ophiuroidea,
  72. Asteroidea. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 3, 15, 98–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222936508681771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222936508681771
  73. Palumbi, S., Martin, A., Romano, S. & McMillan, W. (1996) The simple fool’s guide to PCR. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 94 pp.
  74. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M.A. (2018) Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology, 67, 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  75. Rankin, D.L. & Messing, C.G. (2008) A revision of the comatulid genus Stephanometra A. H. Clark with a rediagnosis of the genus Lamprometra A. H. Clark (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Zootaxa, 1888 (1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1888.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1888.1.1
  76. Rasmussen, H.W. (1978) Articulata. In: Moore, R.C. & Teichert, C. (Eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part T. Echinodermata 2. Crinoidea. Vol. 3. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. 813–938.
  77. Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., Van Der Mark, P., Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., Hohna, S., Larget, B.L., Liu, L. Suchard, M.A. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2012) MRBAYES 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model selection across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61, 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  78. Rouse, G.W., Jermiin, L.S., Wilson, N.G., Eeckhaut, I., Lanterbecq, D., Oji, T., Young, C.M., Browning, T., Cisternas, P., Helgen, L.E., Stuckey, M. & Messing, C.G. (2013) Fixed, free, and fixed: the fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinodermata) and their Permian-Triassic origin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66, 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.09.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.09.018
  79. Roux, M., Messing, C.G. & Améziane, N. (2002) Artificial keys to the genera of living stalked crinoids (Echinodermata). Bulletin of Marine Science, 70, 799–830.
  80. Roux, M., Eleaume, M. & Améziane, N. (2019) A revision of the genus Conocrinus d’Orbigny, 1850 (Echinodermata, Crinoidea, Rhizocrinidae) and its place among extant and fossil crinoids with a xenomorphic stalk. Zootaxa, 4560 (1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4560.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4560.1.3
  81. Rowe, F. W. E. & Gates, J. (1995) Echinodermata. In: Wells, A. (Ed.), Zoological Catalogue of Australia. Vol. 33. CSIRO Australia, Melbourne, pp. 1–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb01812.x
  82. Rowe, F.W.E., Hoggett, A.K., Birtles, R.A. & Vail, L. (1986) Revision of some comasterid genera from Australia (Echinodermata: Crinoidea), with descriptions of two new genera and nine new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 86, 197–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb01812.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb01812.x
  83. Stevens, T. & Connolly, R.M. (2003) Shallow water crinoids are on soft sediment too: evidence from a video survey of a subtropical estuary. Bulletin of Marine Science, 73, 593–604.
  84. Summers, M.M., Messing, C.G. & Rouse, G.W. (2014) Phylogeny of Comatulidae (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Comatulida): a new classification and an assessment of morphological characters for crinoid taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 80, 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.030
  85. Summers, M.M., Messing, C.G. & Rouse, G.W. (2017) The genera and species of Comatulidae (Comatulida: Crinoidea): taxonomic revisions and a molecular and morphological guide. Zootaxa, 4268 (2), 151–190. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4268.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4268.2.1
  86. Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. [program]
  87. Taylor, K.H., Messing, C.G. & Rouse, G.W. (2017) Systematics of Himerometra (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Himerometridae) based on morphology and molecular data. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 181, 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx009
  88. Taylor, K.H., Rouse, G.W. & Messing, C.G. (2018) Revising Mariametridae: the genera Dichrometra, Lamprometra, and Liparometra (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Systematics and Biodiversity, 16, 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2017.1375044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2017.1375044
  89. WoRMS Editorial Board (2022) World Register of Marine Species. VLIZ. Available from: http://www.marinespecies.org (accessed 5 May 2022)
  90. Zmarzly, D.L. (1985) The shallow-water crinoid fauna of Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands: ecological observations, interatoll comparisons, and zoogeographic affinities. Pacific Science, 39, 340–358.