Phonetica was published by Karger Publishers up to and including 2020. If you or your institution subscribed to Phonetica during that period, you might still have access to the full text of this article on the Karger platform if you cannot access it here.
Abstract
Voiceless velar stops may become palatoalveolar affricates before front vowels. This sound change is not only one of the most common types of palatalization, but is a very common sound change in the world’s languages. Nevertheless, we do not have an adequate understanding of how this sound change takes place. Three experiments reported here test the hypothesis that velar palatalization is the result of listeners’ on-line perceptual reanalysis of fast rate speech. It is shown that velars before front vowels are both acoustically and perceptually similar to palatoalveolars. This supports the proposal that velar palatalization is perceptually conditioned.
verified
References
1 Ahmed, R.; Agrawl, S.: Significantfeatures in the perception of (Hindi) consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 45:758–763 (1969).10.1121/1.1911459Search in Google Scholar
2 Anttila, R.; Historical and comparativelinguistics (Benjamins, Philadelphia 1989).10.1075/cilt.6Search in Google Scholar
3 Baxter, William, H.: Ahandbook of Old Chinese phonology (Mouton de Gruyter, New York1992).10.1515/9783110857085Search in Google Scholar
4 Behrens, S.; Blumstein S.: Acoustic characteristics of Englishvoiceless fricatives: a descriptive analysis. J. Phonet. 16: 295–298(1988).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30504-2Search in Google Scholar
5 Bhat, D.: A general study of palatalization; in Greenberg,Universals of human language, vol 2: Phonology, pp. 47–92 (Stanford UniversityPress, Stanford 1978).Search in Google Scholar
6 Bloomfield, L.: Language (Holt, Rinehart, &Winston, New York 1993).Search in Google Scholar
7 Campbell, A.: Old English grammar(Clarendon, Oxford 1959).Search in Google Scholar
8 Chen, M.: Predictive power in phonologicaldescription. Lingua 32: 173–191 (1973).10.1016/0024-3841(73)90041-7Search in Google Scholar
9 Cheng,C.-C.: Mandarin phonology; PhD diss., University of Illinois(1968).Search in Google Scholar
10 Dorman, M.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.; Raphael, L.: Stop-consonantrecognition: release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues. Percept. Psychophys. 22: 109–122(1977).10.3758/BF03198744Search in Google Scholar
11 Duez, D.: Second formant locus-nucleus patters in spontaneousspeech: some preliminary results on French. Phonetic Experimental Research at the Instituteof Linguistics University of Stockholm (PERILUS), vol. 10,pp. 109–114(1989).Search in Google Scholar
12 Duez, D.: Some evidence on second formant locus-nucleuspatterns in spontaneous speech in French. Phonetic Experimental Research at the Instituteof Linguistics University of Stockholm (PERILUS), vol. 11(1990).Search in Google Scholar
13 Emerson, O.: The history of the English language (MacMillian,New York 1903).Search in Google Scholar
14 England, N.: El Mam: semejanzas y diferenciasregionales; in England, Elliot, Lectura sobre la lingüística maya (CIRMA, LaAntigua Guatemala 1990).Search in Google Scholar
15 Fant, G.: Stops in CV-syllables; in Fant,Speech sounds and features, pp. 110–139 (MIT Press, Cambridge1973).Search in Google Scholar
16 Fischer-Jørgensen, E.: Acoustic analysis of stopconsonants. Misc. Phonet. 2: 42–59(1954).Search in Google Scholar
17 Fowler, C.: Invariants, specifier, cues: an investigation of locusequations as information for place of articulation. Percept. Psychophys. 55:597–610 (1994).Search in Google Scholar
18 Grammont, M.: Traité dephonétique (Delagrave, Paris 1933).Search in Google Scholar
19 Guion, S.: 1996. Velarpalatalization: coarticulation, perception and sound change; PhD diss., University of Texas atAustin 1996.Search in Google Scholar
20 Guthrie, M.: Comparative Bantu, vol. 1–4 (Gregg,London 1967–1970).Search in Google Scholar
21 Halle, M.; Huges G.; Radley, J.-P.: Acousticproperties of stop consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 21: 107–116(1957).10.1121/1.1908634Search in Google Scholar
22 Harris, K.: Cues for the discrimination of American Englishfricatives in spoken syllables. Lang. Speech 1: 1–7(1958).10.1177/002383095800100101Search in Google Scholar
23 Heinz, J.; Stevens, K.: On the properties of voiceless fricativeconsonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 33: 589–596(1961).10.1121/1.1908734Search in Google Scholar
24 Hock, H.: Principles of historical linguistics; 2nd ed. (Mouton deGruyter, New York 1991).10.1515/9783110219135Search in Google Scholar
25 Hoffmann, K.: Avestan language; in Yarshater,Encyclopaedia Iranica, pp. 47–62 (London 1982).Search in Google Scholar
26 Hogg, R.: OnEnglish palatalization. Trans. Philol. Soc. 1979: 89–113(1979).10.1111/j.1467-968X.1979.tb00358.xSearch in Google Scholar
27 Hughes, G.; Halle, M.: Spectral properties of fricativeconsonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 28: 303–310(1956).10.1121/1.1908271Search in Google Scholar
28 Hyman, L.; Moxley, J.: The morpheme in phonological change:velar palatalization in Bantu. Diachronica 13: 259–282(1996).10.1075/dia.13.2.04hymSearch in Google Scholar
29 Keating, P.; Phonetic and phonological representation of stopconsonant voicing. Language 60: 286–319(1984).10.2307/413642Search in Google Scholar
30 Keating, P.; Lahiri, A.: Fronted velars, palatalized velars, andpalatals. Phonetica 50: 73–101 (1993).Search in Google Scholar
31 Kewley-Port, D.: Time-varying features as correlates of place of articulation on stop consonants. J.acoust. Soc. Am. 73: 322–355 (1983).10.1121/1.388813Search in Google Scholar
32 Kinkade, D.:The alveopalatal shift in Cowlitz Salish. Int. J. Am. Linguistics 39:224–231 (1973).10.1086/465270Search in Google Scholar
33 Kiparsky, V.: Russische historischeGrammatik, vol. 1: die Entwicklung des Lautsystems (Winter, Heidelberg1963).Search in Google Scholar
34 Klatt, D.: Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initialconsonant clusters. J. Speech Hear. Res. 18: 686–706(1975).Search in Google Scholar
35 Kohler, K.J.: Segmental reduction in connected speech inGerman: phonological facts and phonetic explanations; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speechproduction and speech modeling, pp. 69–92 (Kluwer, Dordrecht1990).10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_4Search in Google Scholar
36 Krull, D.: Acoustic properties as predictors of perceptualresponses: a study of Swedish voiced stops. Phonetic Experimental Research at the Instituteof Linguistics University of Stockholm (PERILUS), vol. 7 (1988). Krull, D.: Second formantlocus patterns and cosonant-vowel coarticulation in spontaneous speech. PhoneticExperimental Research at the Institute of Linguistics University of Stockholm (PERILUS),vol. 10, pp. 87–108 (1989).Search in Google Scholar
37 Krull, D.: Locus-nucleus relation andVOT in spontaneous and elicited speech. Proc. 12th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., vol. 4, pp.382–385 (1991).Search in Google Scholar
38 Lehiste, I.; Peterson, G.: Vowel amplitude andphonemic stress in American English. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 31: 428–435(1959).10.1121/1.1907729Search in Google Scholar
39 Lindblom, B.: On vowel reduction, Report 29 (SpreechTransmission Laboratory, Stockholm 1963).Search in Google Scholar
40 Lisker, L.; Abramson, A.: Across-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20:384–422 (1964).10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830Search in Google Scholar
41 Lunt, H.: Old Church Slavonic grammar(Mouton, The Hague 1974).10.1515/9783111563053Search in Google Scholar
42 Matthews, W.: Russian historical grammar(Athlone, London 1967).Search in Google Scholar
43 Mayrhofer, M.: Sanskrit Grammatik mitsprachvergleichenden Erläuterungen; 2nd ed. (Berlin, 1965). English translation Ford,G.: A Sanskrit Grammar (University of Alabama Press 1972).10.1515/9783112315675Search in Google Scholar
44 Myers, S.:Epenthesis, mutation, and structure preservation in the Shona causative. Stud Afr Linguistics23: 185–216 (1992–1994).10.32473/sal.v23i2.107414Search in Google Scholar
45 Nartey, J.: Onfricative phones and phonemes: measuring the phonetic differences within and betweenlanguages. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, No. 55 (1982).Search in Google Scholar
46 Neeld,R.: Remarks on palatalization. Working Papers in Linguistics No. 14: Studies in phonologyand methodology (Columbus, Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University1973).Search in Google Scholar
47 Ohala, J.: The role of physiological and acoustic models inexplaining the direction of sound change. Project on linguistic analysis. Reports, SecondSeries, No. 15. Berkeley: Phonology Laboratory – Department of Linguistics,University of California, Berkeley 1971).Search in Google Scholar
48 Ohala, J.: Phonetic explanationin phonology; in Bruck, Fox, LaGaly, Papers from the parasession on natural phonology, pp.251–274 (Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago 1974).Search in Google Scholar
49 Ohala, J.:The listener as the source of sound change; in Masek, Hendrick, Miller, Papers from theparasession on language and behavior, pp. 178–203 (Chicago Linguistic Society,Chicago 1981).Search in Google Scholar
50 Ohala, J.: Linguistics and automatic speech processing,in Mori, Suen, New systems and architectures for automatic speech recognition andsynthesis. NATO ASI Series, Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, vol. 16, pp.447–475 (Springer, Berlin 1985).10.1007/978-3-642-82447-0_18Search in Google Scholar
51 Ohala, J.: Discussion, in Perkell,Klatt, Invariance and variability in speech processes, pp. 197–198 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale1986).Search in Google Scholar
52 Ohala, J.: What’s cognitive, what’s not, in soundchange; in Kellermann, Morrissey, Diachrony within synchrony: language history andcognition. Duisburger Arbeiten zur Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 14, pp. 309–355(Lang, Frankfurt 1992).Search in Google Scholar
53 Ohala, J.: The origin of sound patterns in vocaltract constraints; in MacNeilage, The production of speech, pp. 189–216 (Springer,New York 1983).10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_9Search in Google Scholar
54 Ohala, J.: Sound change is drawn from a pool ofsynchronic variation; in Breivik, Jahr, Language change: contributions to the study of itscauses, pp. 171–198 (Mouton de Gruyter, New York 1989).Search in Google Scholar
55 Ohala,J.: The phonetics of sound change; in Jones, Historical linguistics: problems andperspectives, pp. 237–278 (Longman, London 1993).Search in Google Scholar
56 Peterson,G.; Barney, H.: Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am.24: 175–184 (1952).10.1121/1.1906875Search in Google Scholar
57 Plauché, M.; Delogu,C.; Ohala, J.: Asymmetries in consonant confusion. Eurospeech 97 (inpress).Search in Google Scholar
58 Poch-Olivé, D.; Fernandez-Guitierrez, N.; Martinez-Dauden, G.: Some problems of coarticulation in CV stop syllables in Spanish and Catalanspontaneous speech. Proc. Speech Res. ‘89, June 1–3. Budapest, pp.111–115 (1989).Search in Google Scholar
59 Pulleyblank, E.: Middle Chinese: a study inhistorical phonology (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver1984).Search in Google Scholar
60 Repp, B.; Lin, H.-B.: Acoustic properties and perception of stopconsonant release transients. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 379–395(1989).10.1121/1.397689Search in Google Scholar
61 Schenker, A.: Proto-Slavic; in Comrie, Corbett, The Slavoniclanguages (Routledge, New York 1993).Search in Google Scholar
62 Shevelov, G.: A prehistory ofslavic (Columbia University Press, New York 1965).Search in Google Scholar
63 Smiths, R.: Detailedversus gross spectro-temporal cues for the perception of stop consonants; PhD diss.,Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (1995).Search in Google Scholar
64 Smits, R.; ten Bosch, L.;Collier, R.: Evaluation of various sets of acoustic cues for the perception of prevocalic stopconsonants. I. Perception experiment. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 100:3852–3864 (1996).10.1121/1.417241Search in Google Scholar
65 Strevens, P.: Spectra of fricative noisein human speech. Lang. Speech 3: 32–49(1960).10.1177/002383096000300105Search in Google Scholar
66 Sussman, H.; Fruchter, D.; Cable, A.: Locus equations derivedfrom compensatory articulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 3112–3124(1995).10.1121/1.411873Search in Google Scholar
67 Sussman, H.; Hoemeke, K.; Ahmed, F.: A cross-linguisticinvestigation of locus equations as a phonetic descriptor for place of articulation. J. acoust.Soc. Am. 94: 1256–1268 (1993).10.1121/1.408178Search in Google Scholar
68 Sussman, H.;McCaffery, H.; Matthews, S.: An investigation of locus equations as a source of relationalinvariance for stop place categorization. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 90:1309–1325 (1991).10.1121/1.401923Search in Google Scholar
69 Sussman, H.; Shore, J.: Locusequations as phonetic descriptors of consonantal place of articulation. Percept. Psychophys.58: 936–946 (1996).10.3758/BF03205495Search in Google Scholar
70 Tekieli, M.; Cullinan, W.: Theperception of temporally segmented vowels and consonant-vowel syllables. J. Speech Hear.Res. 22: 103–121 (1979).10.1044/jshr.2201.103Search in Google Scholar
71 Vaillant, A.: Grammairecomparée des langues slaves, vol. 1: phonétique (I A C., Lyon1950).Search in Google Scholar
72 Wang, M.; Bilger, R.: Consonant confusions in noise: a study ofperceptual features. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 54: 1248–1266(1973).10.1121/1.1914417Search in Google Scholar
73 Whalen, D.: Perception of the English /s/–/E/ distinctionrelies on fricative noises and transitions, not on brief spectral slices. J. acoust. Soc. Am.90: 1776–1785 (1991).10.1121/1.401658Search in Google Scholar
74 Winitz, H.; Scheib, M.;Reeds, J.: Identification of stops and vowels for the burst portion of /p, t, k/ isolated fromconversational speech. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 51: 1309–1317(1972).Search in Google Scholar
75 Zue, V.: Acoustic characteristics of stop consonants: a controlledstudy. Technical Report 523 (Lincoln Laboratory, Cambridge1976).Search in Google Scholar
© 1998 S. Karger AG, Basel
