Determination of Virulence Factors and Resistance Profile of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains among Different Types of spa, agr, and SCCmec

Latifpour, Mohammad; Narimani, Tahmineh; Sadeghi, Amin; Niakan, Mohammad

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5863310

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Consent Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5863310 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5863310

Determination of Virulence Factors and Resistance Profile of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains among Different Types of spa, agr, and SCCmec

Mohammad Latifpour,¹Tahmineh Narimani,²Amin Sadeghi,²and Mohammad Niakan¹

Academic Editor: Mejdi Snoussi

Received18 Jul 2022

Accepted03 Oct 2022

Published15 Oct 2022

Abstract

In order to restrict the spread of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in hospitals, it is necessary to characterize isolates rapidly and precisely. The objective of this study was to determine virulence factors and resistance profiles of MRSA strains among spa, agr, and SCCmec types. In total, 55 MRSA isolates were collected from clinical specimens. The MRSA isolates were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, virulence genes, agr typing, spa typing, and SCCmec typing. According to our findings, all MRSA strains were resistant to cefoxitin; 88% and 86.7% of which were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, respectively. Type II agr was predominant with 54.54% frequency. Among 27 different spa types, type t030 was most frequently (25.45%). Most MRSA isolates (63.3%) were SCCmec type III. The pvl and tst genes were found in 25.3% and 32.7% of MRSA isolates, respectively. Among the MRSA strains, ermA, ermB, and ermC were present in 50%, 33.3%, and 57.3% of cases, respectively. In addition, 43 of the 55 MRSA strains (78%) harbored aminoglycoside resistance genes. The results of our study revealed that the MRSA rate in our region is dramatically high. Better infection control guidelines in hospitals, as well as ongoing epidemiological surveillance studies, could be strongly suggested for effective prevention of the spread of MRSA to inpatients.

1. Introduction

Among human pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common ones [1]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains have emerged as a major problem in hospitals, owing to the increased mortality rate associated with some of these infections. MRSA strain outbreaks have a significant impact on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs [2–4]. MRSA strains express virulence factors that play a key role in infection progression. The accessory gene regulator (agr) system regulates the expression of numerous virulence factors in S. aureus, and four major agr types have been identified to date. Different agr types have different properties and distributions in various geographic regions; thus, identification of the predominant types in each location would be of benefit [5, 6].

It is clear that the spread of MRSA around the world is constantly evolving, with new strains emerging in a variety of geographical regions. The mecA gene, which confers beta-lactam resistance, is found on the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) of MRSA strains. MRSA is divided into distinct epidemiological types based on the presence of the SCCmec element. The SCCmec typing method can help distinguish community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) from hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) infections [7].

Continuous MRSA surveillance in each location necessitates monitoring the epidemiology, host characteristics, and transmission routes of emerging strains [8]. Therefore, clinicians must have a thorough understanding of MRSA’s molecular epidemiology in order to assess the efficiency of preventative strategies and provide effective prophylaxis [9]. Prevention of MRSA transmission by screening patients, personnel, and the environment is a critical goal of infection control [9]. However, investigating the origins and routes of transmission of MRSA is possible only through the use of typing approaches, which are necessary for genetic characterization. There is a variety of molecular epidemiological methods used for MRSA surveillance, including multilocus sequencing typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), staphylococcal protein A (spa) gene sequencing, agr, and SCCmec typing [10]. Although each of these methods has a pretty good discriminating power, it has been demonstrated that combining genotyping methods is beneficial and advantageous for distinguishing distinct MRSA clones.

spa typing is a valuable typing instrument owing to its ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and uniform nomenclature, which is based solely on assessment of the repetition space in the X region of the spa gene [11]. The X region polymorphism, which encodes a part of the spa protein, is characterized by variations in tandem repeats as well as variations in base sequences within repetitions. In other words, in any strain of S. aureus, each motif consists of 24 base pairs, which are referred to as unique sequence motif repeats. The order of the repeats determines the spa type for a strain [12]. The spa types are important for identifying S. aureus outbreak isolates and infection control policies around the world. Over the last decade, studies have been conducted on the distribution of spa, agr, and SCCmec types in various geographic areas [13, 14]. Therefore, the current research is aimed at determining virulence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of MRSA isolates using spa, agr, and SCCmec typing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Considerations

Ethics approval to perform this study was obtained from the institutional review board of Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (http://ethics.research.ac.ir/IR.SHAHED.REC.1398.089).

2.2. Detection and Isolation of MRSA

In this cross-sectional study, out of a total of 142 S. aureus isolates, 55 MRSA isolates were identified and included in this study, while the remaining isolates were excluded. The isolates were obtained from clinical samples including blood, urine, wounds, and cerebrospinal fluid collected from different wards (emergency, men, women, children, and intensive care unit) in Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan (Iran), then referred to the hospital laboratory. The S. aureuswas identified using growth on mannitol salt agar, showing beta-hemolysis on 5% sheep blood agar, and being gram positive as well as producing catalase, coagulase, and DNase. The presence of the nucA gene was confirmed by PCR in all S. aureus isolates (Table 1).

2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Detection of MRSA

The following antibiotics were tested for antibiotic susceptibility using the disk diffusion technique on Mueller-Hinton agar, and the results were recorded after incubation for 18 hours at 37°C and in accordance with the CLSI guidelines [15]: penicillin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), rifampicin (5 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), linezolid (5 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (5 μg) (Mast, Merseyside, UK). The presence of the 310-base pair (bp) PCR product of the mecA gene was examined in all S. aureus isolates (Table 1), and cefoxitin (30 μg) discs on Muller-Hinton agar plates were used to screen for MRSA isolates.

2.4. Genomic DNA Extraction

A DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used for genomic DNA extraction. Fresh colonies harvested from agar plates were washed with 500 μl TE 1x and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 5000 rpm according to manufacturer’s protocol. A suspension was then prepared in 200 μl TE 1x with 20 μl lysostaphin (200 μg/ml final concentration) and incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes. Finally, the obtained DNA was dissolved 50 μl RNase-DNase-free water (Sigma). DNA concentration was measured with a spectrophotometer.

2.5. SCCmec Typing

As described previously, multiplex PCR was used to identify various MRSA isolates using genomic DNA as the template [16]. The amplification started with a 3-minute denaturation step at 94°C, then 35 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 1 minute at 55°C, 1 minute at 72°C, and finally 5 minutes at 72°C for final extension.

2.6. Detection of Virulence and Resistance Genes

To detect virulence genes such as hemolysin A (hla), toxic shock syndrome toxin (tst), staphylococcal enterotoxins (sea, seb, and sec), and Panton-Valentine leukocidin, PCR was used (pvl). As previously described, PCR assays were used to investigate the common aminoglycoside resistance genes (aac (6)-aph (2), aph3, ant4) and macrolide resistance genes (ermA, ermB, ermC) [17, 18].

2.7. Detection of agr Types

Multiplex PCR was performed to detect agr types using a set of primers containing a common forward primer (Pan) and reverse primer (agrI, agrII, agrIII, and agrIV) that are unique to each agr group [19]. The primer sequences are shown in Table 1.

2.8. Detection of spa Types

The identified MRSA strains were subjected to PCR to detect the spa gene (Table 1). The amplification reaction consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 40 second, hybridization at 56°C for 40 second, and extension to 72°C for 50 second, followed by final extension to 72°C for 5 minutes [11]. Sequencing was then performed on the PCR products. Also, after sequencing, the spa database server (http://spaserver.ridom.de/) was used to determine different types.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, SPSS Statistics 22.0 for Windows was used. Data were presented using descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation).

3. Results

3.1. Detection and Isolation of MRSA

In this study, 55 clinical MRSA isolates were recovered from blood samples (; 21.83%), nasal (; 24.45%), urine (; 12.72%), trachea (; 14.54%), wound (; 21.83%), and synovial (; 3.63%). According to our data, the nasal specimen has the highest frequency of MRSA (26%). The patients were divided into 29 (52%) males and 26 (48%) females. Participants in the study ranged in age from 9 to 86. Most of the study participants were in the 21–60-year-old group (66%).

3.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on all MRSA isolates. All were resistant to cefoxitin and penicillin; 88% and 86.7% of them were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, respectively. On the other hand, all MRSA isolates were sensitive to linezolid (Table 2).

3.3. agr Typing

According to agr typing, 55 of the MRSA isolates belonged to one of agr types I, II, III, or IV. By using the agr typing method, 29.09% (), 54.54% (), 10.9% (), and 5.45% () of isolates belonged to agr types I, II, III, and IV, respectively.

3.4. Prevalence of SCCmec Types, Virulence, and Resistance Genes

Most MRSA isolates (63.3%) were SCCmec type III. Also, the frequency of SCCmec types II and IX was 10.7% for each, 9.3% as SCCmec type V, 4% as SCCmec type I, and 2% as SCCmec type IV. In addition, 43 of the 55 MRSA strains (78%) harbored aminoglycoside resistance genes, with the presence of aac(6)-aph(2), aph3, and ant4 genes among MRSA isolates, were 54%, 32.7%, and 31.3%, respectively. Among the 55 MRSA strains, macrolide resistance genes ermC, ermA, and ermB were detected in 35 (63.6%), 11 (20%), and 9 (16.4%) isolates, respectively. In our study, genes encoding staphylococcal enterotoxins sea, seb, and sec were found in 48%, 25.5%, and 12% of MRSA isolates, respectively. In addition, the pvl and tst genes were found in 25.3% and 32.7% of MRSA isolates, respectively.

3.5. spa Typing

Twenty-seven spa types were observed in this study. There were 19 spa types that were found only once in all of the 55 strains analyzed. Accordingly, single types of spa are extremely important in MRSA strains. Table 3 shows that t030 and t037 predominate in clinical samples, especially in blood and nasal samples. As well as, phenotypic and genotypic traits of all our isolates are presented in Table 4 [21].

4. Discussion

MRSA strains are one of the leading causes of infections in hospitals, but infections from community-related MRSA have become a global public health threat over the recent decades [22]. The widespread occurrence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) MRSA augments the cost of antibiotic therapy and limits treatment options. During the last two decades, the widespread use of beta-lactam antibiotics in Iranian hospitals and medical facilities led to increased resistance to these antibiotics [23]. The results of the current study revealed that MRSA strains are resistant to erythromycin (88%), clindamycin (86.6%), tetracycline (68%), rifampicin (57%), and gentamicin (54.6%). Based on these results, linezolid was the most effective drug for MRSA in the study area. In addition, more than 93% of our MRSA isolates were MDR. We did not report the frequency of MRSA strains since the selection criteria of our study were isolation of MRSA strains, and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains were not included. As a protein synthesis inhibitor, erythromycin is widely utilized for the treatment of staphylococcal infections [24]. According to Mahdiyoun et al., the frequency of MRSA resistance tested for erythromycin was 84.4% [25]. A study conducted in Taiwan reported that the resistance rates for erythromycin and clindamycin were 94.9% and 86.5%, respectively [26]. High frequency of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin antibiotics in the present study was in consistent with the findings of previous research in Iran [24] and India [27].

We also found SCCmec type III in a high percentage of MRSA isolates. Similarly, studies in Iran and other Asian countries have reported the high prevalence of SCCmec type III [28–30]. In MRSA isolates, SCCmec mobile genetic factor leads to an expansion of antibiotic resistance determinants as well as virulence factors, which can act as a large reservoir of resistance genes, enterotoxins, and other virulence factor genes. Our results showed that among MRSA with SCCmec type III, sea, hla, and seb were the most frequently found genes encoding virulence factors. Herein, the majority of the isolates with type III were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin (55% and 54%) while all the isolates were resistant to gentamicin. The SCCmec typing has also been done in other parts of Iran in accordance with our study. A study by Ebrahim-Saraie et al., Moshtagheian et al., and Parhizgari et al. reported that SCCmec type IV dominated MRSA isolates; however, in line with our findings, most studies conducted in Iran described SCCmec type III as the predominant SCCmec type [31–33]. In the present study, among MRSA strains, ermC (63.6%) was the most commonly detected macrolide resistance gene, followed by ermA (20%) and ermB (16.4%). Also, the most frequently identified aminoglycoside resistance gene was aac (6)-aph (2) (54%). These findings are in contrary with the study by Hau et al. [34] conducted with clinical MRSA in the United States in which an incidence of 91.5% for ermA and 12.7% for aac (6)-aph (2) was reported. A similar finding was also reported by Yılmaz and Aslantaş [35] that the ermC and aac (6)-aph (2) genes were detected in 91.5% and 50% of S. aureus isolates, respectively.

In view of the widespread of MRSA isolates, it is imperative that the treating physician encourages the preservation of glycopeptides and linezolid only in the case of MRSA. In Iran, a major MRSA-associated problem is the result of increased incidence and hospitalization rates. Therefore, for screening, epidemiology, surveillance, and infection control, rapid and accurate typing of MRSA isolates is crucial [23]. Several genotyping techniques are available for identifying S. aureus strains in epidemiological studies. Sequence-based typing methods, such as MLST and spa typing, have several obvious advantages; for example, they are easily used, portable, reproducible, and able to provide comparable results compared to tape-based methods, such as small macrorestricted analysis [14]. One of the key regulators of S. aureus, which is involved in the regulation of bacterial virulence factors, is the agr system. There are currently four agr types identified in S. aureus strains (I, II, III, and IV). According to our study, the predominant agr type among the 55 MRSA isolates was type II, with a frequency of 54.54 percent. The majority (69.5%) of the isolates studied by Ghasemian et al., showed agr I, followed by agr III (30.5%) [36]. The agr type III is the most prevalent type of MRSA isolate, according to a study by Goudarzi et al., in Iran [37]. There is a significant relationship between agr types and specific pathogens [38], and the distribution of agr types varies by geographic region. The selected regions of the spa gene are usually short repeats of sequences with enough polymorphisms to allow isolated typing [20]. In the current work, 27 different spa types were found. spa typing analysis indicated that spa type t030 was the most common spa type found in 25.45% of isolates. The second most frequently identified spa type in our study was t037. These results are consistent with those of other studies in Iran and other Asian countries [10]. The spa type t037 was previously reported by Alreshidi et al. in Saudi Arabia [39], Chen et al. in China [40], and Goudarzi et al. in Iran [37]. In agreement with our study, in China, t030 was found to be one of the most common spa types (52.0%) of MRSA isolates [40]. We believed that t030 would result in longer bacterial survival and easier transmission. In this study, we reported that 7.27% of our isolates had spa type t325 and 19 spa types, which were detected, each, in one isolate.

5. Conclusion

According to recent studies, presence of these common SCCmec (III), spa (t030), and agr (II) types indicates that these MRSA strains are actively circulating in the healthcare setting of Isfahan Province. Despite the high diversity of our spa types (27/55) in this study, most of them are classified as t030 and t037 and are probably phylogenetically related. There is a possibility that these strains may spread to other parts of Iran or the world in relation to the tourism industry in Isfahan Province. Therefore, the current study emphasizes the importance of molecular typing in tracking global trends in the emergence, spread, and persistence of epidemic MRSA strains. Better infection control guidelines in hospitals, as well as ongoing epidemiological surveillance studies, could be strongly suggested for effective prevention of bacteria spread to inpatients and control nosocomial infections.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Consent is not necessary.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Department of Microbiology and the Al-Zahra laboratory at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences for supporting the practical work. This study was funded by the Shahed University of Medical Sciences’ Vice Chancellor for Research.

References

Y. Guo, G. Song, M. Sun, J. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Prevalence and therapies of antibiotic-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 107, p. 263, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Lee, H. de Lencastre, J. Garau et al., “Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 18033, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hassoun, P. K. Linden, and B. Friedman, “Incidence, prevalence, and management of MRSA bacteremia across patient populations-a review of recent developments in MRSA management and treatment,” Critical Care, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 211–211, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Damavandi, M. Safarpour Dehkordi, A. Dehghan, F. Heibati, R. Taghaddosi, and A. Gholipour, “Detection of antiseptic resistance genes among Staphylococcus aureus colonising nurses and coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from clinical specimens at teaching hospitals in southwest of Iran,” Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 1, article e39285, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Tan, S. R. Li, B. Jiang, X. M. Hu, and S. Li, “Therapeutic targeting of the Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) system,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jenul and A. R. Horswill, “Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus virulence,” Microbiology spectrum, vol. 7, no. 2, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Miragaia, “Factors contributing to the evolution of mecA-mediated β-lactam resistance in staphylococci: update and new insights from whole genome sequencing (WGS),” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Turner, B. K. Sharma-Kuinkel, S. A. Maskarinec et al., “Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research,” Nature Reviews. Microbiology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 203–218, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. T. Kavanagh, “Control of MSSA and MRSA in the United States: protocols, policies, risk adjustment and excuses,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 103, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Asadollahi, N. N. Farahani, M. Mirzaii et al., “Distribution of the most prevalent spa types among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus around the world: a review,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Strommenger, C. Braulke, D. Heuck et al., “spaTyping ofStaphylococcus aureusas a frontline tool in epidemiological typing,” Journal of clinical microbiology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 574–581, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hallin, A. W. Friedrich, and M. J. Struelens, “spa typing for epidemiological surveillance of Staphylococcus aureus,” Methods in molecular biology, vol. 551, pp. 189–202, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ravaioli, D. Campoccia, W. Ruppitsch et al., “Comparison of automated ribotyping, spa typing, and MLST in 108 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from orthopedic infections,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 1660, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Abbasian, N. N. Farahani, Z. Mir et al., “Genotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a burn centre by using agr, spa and SCCmec typing methods,” New microbes and new infections, vol. 26, pp. 15–19, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Wayne. P, Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-eight informational, CLSI, 2018.
T. Ito, K. Kuwahara-Arai, Y. Katayama et al., “Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) analysis of MRSA,” Methods in molecular biology, vol. 1085, pp. 131–148, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mehrotra, G. Wang, and W. M. Johnson, “Multiplex PCR for detection of genes for Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, and methicillin resistance,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1032–1035, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Nishi, H. Miyanohara, T. Nakajima et al., “Molecular typing of the methicillin resistance determinant (mec) of clinical strains of Staphylococcus based on mec hypervariable region length polymorphisms,” The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Cázares-Domínguez, S. A. Ochoa, A. Cruz-Córdova et al., “Vancomycin modifies the expression of the agr system in multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, pp. 369–369, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hoseini, M. Niakan, H. Saderi, and M. Emaneini, “Comparison of cefoxitin disk diffusion and PCR for mecA gene methods for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Daneshvar Medicine, vol. 22, no. 114, pp. 41–46, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Latifpour, R. V. Goering, S. A. Havaei et al., “Identification of two major direct repeat unit clusters, 8i and 11ce, among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains: the emergence of novel dru types and repeats,” Molecular biology reports, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 8229–8239, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-M. Li, Y.-F. Zhou, L. Li et al., “Characterization of the multi-drug resistance gene cfr in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from animals and humans in China,” Frontiers in microbiology, vol. 9, pp. 2925–2925, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Kareem, S. S. Aljubori, and M. R. Ali, “Novel determination of _spa_ gene diversity and its molecular typing among _Staphylococcus aureus_ Iraqi isolates obtained from different clinical samples,” New Microbes and New Infections, vol. 34, article 100653, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Goudarzi, S. S. Seyedjavadi, M. J. Nasiri, H. Goudarzi, R. Sajadi Nia, and H. Dabiri, “Molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from patients with bacteremia based on MLST, SCCmec, spa, and agr locus types analysis,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 104, pp. 328–335, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Mahdiyoun, H. Kazemian, M. Ahanjan, H. Houri, and M. Goudarzi, “Frequency of aminoglycoside-resistance genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from hospitalized patients,” Jundishapur journal of microbiology, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e35052, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W.-Y. Wang, T.-S. Chiueh, J.-R. Sun, S.-M. Tsao, and J.-J. Lu, “Molecular typing and phenotype characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from blood in Taiwan,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 1, article e30394, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Indian Network for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance group I, “Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in India: prevalence & susceptibility pattern,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 363–369, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. E. Namvar, M. Afshar, B. Asghari, and A. Rastegar Lari, “Characterisation of SCCmec elements in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from burn patients,” Burns, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 708–712, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Aires de Sousa, M. I. Crisostomo, I. Santos Sanches et al., “Frequent recovery of a single clonal type of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients in two hospitals in Taiwan and China,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 159–163, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Arakere, S. Nadig, G. Swedberg, R. Macaden, S. K. Amarnath, and D. Raghunath, “Genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from two hospitals in Bangalore, South India,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 3198–3202, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Ebrahim-Saraie, M. Motamedifar, J. Sarvari, and S. M. Hoseini Alfatemi, “Emergence of SCCmec type I obtained from clinical samples in Shiraz teaching hospitals, South-West of Iran,” Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 6, article e16998, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Moshtagheian, M. Halaji, H. Sedaghat et al., “Molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage from hospitalized patients and medical staff in Isfahan, Iran,” Annali di Igiene, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 237–244, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Parhizgari, S. S. Khoramrooz, S. A. Malek Hosseini et al., “High frequency of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with SCCmec type III and Spa types t037 and t631 isolated from burn patients in southwest of Iran,” APMIS, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 221–228, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Hau, J. S. Haan, P. R. Davies, T. Frana, and T. L. Nicholson, “Antimicrobial resistance distribution differs among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type (ST) 5 isolates from health care and agricultural sources,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Ş. Yılmaz and Ö. Aslantaş, “Antimicrobial resistance and underlying mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus isolates,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1059–1064, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ghasemian, S. Peerayeh, and M. Mirzaee, “Detection of accessory gene regulator groups genes and cassette chromosome mec types among Staphylococcus aureus isolated from intensive care unit patients,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 153–157, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Goudarzi, H. Goudarzi, A. M. Sá Figueiredo et al., “Molecular characterization of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from intensive care units in Iran: ST22-SCCmec IV/t790 emerges as the major clone,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 5, article e0155529, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. L. Nowrouzian, O. Dauwalder, H. Meugnier et al., “Adhesin and superantigen genes and the capacity of Staphylococcus aureus to colonize the infantile gut,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 204, no. 5, pp. 714–721, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Alreshidi, A. A. Alsalamah, R. A. Hamat et al., “Genetic variation among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cancer patients in Saudi Arabia,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 755–761, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chen, Y. Liu, X. Jiang, M. Chen, and H. Wang, “Rapid change of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in a Chinese tertiary care hospital over a 15-year period,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1842–1847, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Mohammad Latifpour et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

680

Downloads

523

Citations