Apolipoprotein E <i>ε</i>4 Polymorphism as a Risk Factor for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Qiao, Su-Ya; Shang, Ke; Chu, Yun-Hui; Yu, Hai-Han; Chen, Xin; Qin, Chuan; Pan, Deng-Ji; Tian, Dai-Shi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1407183

Disease Markers

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 1407183 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1407183

Apolipoprotein E ε4 Polymorphism as a Risk Factor for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Su-Ya Qiao,¹Ke Shang,¹Yun-Hui Chu,¹Hai-Han Yu,¹Xin Chen,¹Chuan Qin,¹Deng-Ji Pan,¹and Dai-Shi Tian¹

Academic Editor: XIANWEI ZENG

Received25 Oct 2021

Revised21 Dec 2021

Accepted05 Jan 2022

Published03 Feb 2022

Abstract

Introduction. Rising studies indicate that the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is related to the susceptibility of ischemic stroke (IS). However, certain consensus is limited by the lack of a large sample size of researches. This meta-analysis was performed to explore the potential association between the APOE gene and IS. Methods. To identify relevant case control studies in English publications by October 2020, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with fixed- or random-effect models and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to analyze potential associations. Results. A total of 55 researches from 32 countries containing 12207 IS cases and 27742 controls were included. The association between APOE gene ε4 mutation and IS was confirmed (ε4 vs. ε3 allele: pooled , 95% CI, 1.214-1.556; ε2/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3: pooled , 95% CI, 1.056-1.440; ε3/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3: pooled , 95% CI, 1.165-1.542; ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3: pooled , 95% CI, 1.542-2.179; and APOE ε4 carriers vs. non-ε4 carriers: pooled ; 95% CI, 1.203-1.576). Interestingly, APOE ε4 mutation showed a dose-response correlation with IS risk (ε4/ε4 vs. ε2/ε4: pooled ; 95% CI, 1.281-2.060; ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/ε4: pooled ; 95% CI, 1.077-1.571). Similar conclusions were drawn in the small artery disease (SAD) subtype, but not in large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) or in cardioaortic embolism (CE), by subgroup analysis. Conclusions. These observations reveal that specific APOE ε4 mutation was significantly associated with the risk of IS in a dose-dependent manner, while APOE ε4 mutation was related to SAD subtype onset without a cumulative effect.

1. Introduction

Ischemic stroke (IS) is a disturbing problem worldwide, which is attributable to its leading role in disability and mortality worldwide, regardless of age, ethnicity, or gender [1]. Uncovering the etiology of IS is crucial for recognition and prevention of this disorder. Genetic elements and environmental components positively contribute to this multifactorial disease [2, 3]. Genetic inheritance provides a guide to the identification of high-risk individual. It deserves to investigate candidate gene polymorphisms in IS pathophysiological pathways. The apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene locates on chromosome 19q13.2. Two single polymorphisms (rs7412 and rs729358), three common alleles (ε2, ε3, and ε4), and six genotypes (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε2/ε4, ε3/ε3, ε3/ε4, and ε4/ε4) generate in populations [4]. The product of the APOE gene is a polymorphic protein named apolipoprotein E, which modulates the translocation of the cholesterol and other lipids among highly diverse cells [5], involved with neuroinflammation [6] and myelin integrity maintenance [7]. A study indicated that the activated CypA–MMP9 pathway in APOE4 carriers facilitated pericyte injury, which caused blood vessel dysfunction [8]. APOE polymorphisms and its risk associations with coronary artery disease [9], hypertension [10], diabetes [11], and carotid arterial atherosclerosis [12] are widely debated. The abovementioned diseases place individuals at a potential serious risk of IS. Individual studies of the association between IS and APOE polymorphisms have been explored extensively. Clinical differences, ethnic diversities, and small sample sizes restricted the present finding to an inconsistent and controversial one. Previous meta-analyses concerning to this issue have been published several years ago [13] or limited to specific ethnicity [14, 15]. Accordingly, researches from 32 countries are qualified to form our meta-analysis to clarify how APOE genotypes are associated with IS. Moreover, we firstly revealed the correlation of the APOE gene and three IS subtypes (large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), small artery disease (SAD), and cardioaortic embolism (CE)).

2. Materials and Methods

We followed the rules of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement to make this meta-analysis [16].

2.1. Data Availability

The data that contribute to the findings in our study are available and the corresponding authors can be contacted for data access.

2.2. Literature Search

Online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were comprehensively searched for studies potentially involved and published in English publications and prior to October 30, 2020. We used a combination of some search terms relevant for IS (stroke, cerebral infarct, brain infarct, ischemic stroke, cerebral ischemia, transient ischemic attack, and cerebrovascular accident) and for the APOE gene (apolipoprotein E, APOE polymorphisms, apolipoprotein E polymorphisms, apolipoprotein E gene, rs429358, rs7412, apolipoprotein E epsilon 4, APOE e4, apolipoprotein E epsilon 2, and APOE e2). The detailed search strategies were showed next.

2.3. Selection Criteria

The selection of the studies was independently completed by two investigators, and any difference was resolved by discussion until an agreement was reached. We carefully selected case control studies that evaluated the relationship of the APOE gene and IS with definite IS diagnoses (using computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or autopsy) regardless of the ethnic background. The detailed inclusion criteria were (1) high-quality studies which explore the relationship between the APOE gene and IS, (2) explicit IS diagnostic criteria, (3) nonstroke individuals as the control group, and (4) original data including independent and sufficient APOE genotype data, to compute ORs and 95% CIs. The newest and largest studies were chosen to avoid duplicate or overlapped data information.

2.4. Data Extraction

Two investigators separately finished full-text reading to extract the needed information from each selected study and resolved the controversial items through serious discussion. The extracted information was (1) research characteristics, including the first author’s name, year of publication, and geographical location of the study; (2) participant details, such as the sex ratio, mean age, and the sample size of case and control groups; (3) diagnostic criteria for IS; (4) determination methods of the APOE gene; (5) each genotype frequency; (6) the sample sizes of IS subtypes according to TOAST norms and respective genotype frequency; and (7) HWE in controls.

2.5. Quality Assessment

We performed the quality assessment through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score considering selection, comparability, and exposure. It ranged from 0 (worst) to 9 (best) and high-quality studies were known as with a NOS .

2.6. Statistical Analysis

We performed Stata 14.0 to complete all data analyses. The chi-square test was used to examine the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in control groups. An overt deviation from HWE was regarded as . The compositive ORs and 95% CI were calculated. We explored five genetic models to generate the respective pooled ORs: (1) allele comparisons (ε2 allele vs. ε3 allele; ε4 allele vs. ε3 allele); (2) genotype comparisons (ε2/ε2 vs. ε3/ε3; ε2/ε3 vs. ε3/ε3; ε2/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3; ε3/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3; ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3); (3) APOE ε4 carrier comparisons: we defined three ε4-containing genotypes () as APOE ε4 carriers and the other genotypes () as non-APOE ε4 carriers; (4) APOE ε2 carrier comparisons: similar comparisons of ε2-containing genotypes () vs. non-ε2-containing genotypes (); and (5) comparisons between APOE ε4 homozygosis and ε4 heterozygote (ε4/ε4 vs. ε2/ε4; ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/ε4). The statistic and Cochran’s test were applied to measure the heterogeneity between studies [17]. We selected the random effect model (DerSimonian-Laird method) when heterogeneity was found between studies ( and fixed-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel method) when no heterogeneity existed (). Subgroup analysis was conducted to confirm the relationship between the APOE polymorphisms and the risk of different IS subgroups. Sensitivity analysis was performed by successively removing a single study one by one to verify the stability and reliability of our conclusions. Meta-regression analysis was operated to recognize sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plots and quantified Egger’s tests were accomplished to test publication bias. Significant publication bias was considered as the value of Egger’s test less than 0.10 or obvious asymmetric funnel plot.

2.7. The Result of Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA)

Insufficient sample size, continuous updating, and repeating “ significance testing” could increase the risk of type I errors. Therefore, traditional meta-analysis that focuses on the specific topic may suffer an increased risk of random error. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to reduce the risk of type I error and obtain important information regarding the required sample size for such trials. Set the time sequence of a single study as the research node, and then, perform an interim analysis between the new study that will be included in meta-analysis and existing data accumulation. The required information size (RIS), trial sequential monitoring boundary, and futility boundary are estimated using the TSA. As the sample size of meta-analysis reaching the RIS or the -curve crossing the trial sequential monitoring boundary, we can conclude that the results of meta-analysis are quite stable and further studies were not needed. We accomplished TSA following the guidelines of the user manual and previous article [18] by setting a significance of 5% for type I error, a relative risk reduction of 20%, and a statistical test power of 80% with TSA software (TSA, version 0.9 beta; Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark).

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Eligible Studies

We collect a total of 55 studies from 32 countries containing 12207 IS cases and 27742 controls to make the meta-analysis [19–73]. Figure 1 showed the detailed selection process. The selected studies and their main characteristics were exhibited in Table 1. Fifteen of the studies provided data about different subtypes (grouped by classification of cerebrovascular diseases III or TOAST classification) of IS: large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), small artery disease (SAD), and cardioaortic embolism (CE). We extracted them independently and specific information was showed in supplementary material table 1. There were seven studies (Koopal et al. 2016, Lai et al. 2007, Chowdhury et al. 2001, Kokubo et al. 2000, Ji et al. 1998, Couderc et al. 1993, Saidi et al. 2009) which deviated HWE obviously, and one study (Schneider et al. 2005) did not contain enough data to obtain HWE. Forty-eight studies used PCR-based method and seven researches (Slowik et al. 2003, Karttunen et al. 2002, Hachinski et al. 1996, Couderc et al. 1993, Brewin et al. 2020, Aalto-Setala et al. 1998, Schneider et al. 2005) used other methods to identify APOE genotypes. These studies used computed tomography or magnetic resonance to diagnose IS except that one research which used autopsy (Schneider et al. 2005). The NOS score mean value was 7.509, which suggested that the quality of included studies was reliable (supplementary material Table 2). PRISMA2020 checklist was provided to present our meta-analysis items (supplementary material Table 3).

3.2. Main Results of the Comparisons in the Abovementioned Five Genetic Models

3.2.1. Allele Comparisons

In comparison with the ε3 allele, the ε2 allele did not show association of the risk of IS (pooled , 95% CI, 0.867-1.115, ) (as showed in Table 2), while the ε4 allele contributed to an obviously increased risk of IS with the pooled (95% CI, 1.214-1.556, ) (Figure 2(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

3.2.2. Genotype Comparisons

When compared with the ε3/ε3 genotype, the pooled effects of the APOE genotype in the meta-analysis were as follows: for the ε2/ε2 genotype, pooled , 95% CI, 0.653-1.486, , and for the ε2/ε3 genotype, pooled , 95% CI, 0.900-1.066, ; those two genotypes presented no association with the risk of IS (as showed in Table 2). Genotypes ε2/ε4, ε3/ε4, and ε4/ε4 were related to a higher risk of IS than ε3/ε3. The respective IS risk ORs were 1.233 (95% CI, 1.056-1.440, ) (Figure 2(a)), 1.340 (95% CI, 1.165-1.542, ) (Figure 2(b)), and 1.833 (95% CI, 1.542-2.179, ) (Figure 2(c)). The above results could be found in Table 2. A conclusion was drawn: every genotype which contained APOE ε4 mutation increased the risk of IS.

3.2.3. APOE ε4 Carrier Comparisons

Compared with the non-ε4 carriers, we confirmed that the ε4 carriers were associated with the increased risk of IS; the pooled outcome was pooled (95% CI, 1.203-1.576, ) (Figure 2(e)).

3.2.4. APOE ε2 Carrier Comparisons

In the genetic model of ε2 carriers vs. non-ε2 carriers, there was no association with the IS risk (pooled , 95% CI 0.841-1.086, ) (Table 2).

3.2.5. APOE ε4 Homozygosis versus APOE ε4 Heterozygote Comparisons

Given the above, the APOE ε4 mutation was linked to IS risk. To identify whether there is a dose-response relationship between the ε4 allele and IS or not, we implemented the comparisons between the ε4/ε4 genotype and ε4 heterozygotes (ε2/ε4 or ε3/ε4 genotype). Compared with the ε2/ε4 and ε3/ε4 genotypes, the IS risk ORs for ε4/ε4 genotypes were 1.625 (95% CI, 1.281-2.060, ) and 1.301 (95% CI, 1.077-1.571, ), respectively (Figures 2(f) and 2(g)); this part provided evidence that ε4 homozygosis might generate a higher risk of IS than ε4 heterozygotes.

3.3. Main Results of the Relationship between APOE Gene and Three IS Subtypes

We further investigated on the correlation of APOE gene polymorphisms and risks of IS subtypes by making comparisons in five genetic models, with a particular focus on the APOE ε4 mutation. Subgroup analyses showed that APOE ε4 mutation significantly increased SAD risk (ε4 allele vs. ε3 allele: pooled , 95% CI, 1.073-1.618, (Figure 3(d)); ε3/ε4 vs.ε3/ε3: pooled , 95% CI, 1.097-1.767, (Figure 3(b)); ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3: pooled , 95%, CI 1.030-3.175, (Figure 3(c)); and APOE ε4 carriers vs. non-APOE ε4 carriers: pooled , 95% CI, 1.064-1.661, (Figure 3(e))). But genotype ε2/ε4 did not increase the risk of SAD onset (Figure 3(a)). The result of APOE ε4 homozygosis versus ε4 heterozygote comparisons (ε4/ε4 vs. ε2/ε4 and ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/ε4) was a matter of concern: APOE ε4 mutation could not cause a cumulative effect in generating higher risk of SAD onset, as showed in Figures 3(f) and 3(g).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

3.4. Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies one by one to check the effect of the individual study on overall ORs. No single study influenced on the pooled ORs and 95% CIs in all genetic model comparisons as our data showed (supplementary material table 4).

3.5. Publication Bias

We carried out publication bias analysis by using funnel plots as qualitative description and Egger’s regression tests as quantitative outcome. Funnel plots of all genetic model comparisons did not exhibit apparent asymmetry (several funnel plots were showed in supplementary material figure 1 and 2). In addition to subtype analysis of ε2/ε2 vs. ε3/3, all the Egger’s regression test outcomes indicated that there existed no evident publication bias with all values exceeding 0.1 (supplementary material table 5). The above results showed that publication bias of our meta-analysis was not significant.

3.6. Regression Analysis

Meta-regression analysis was then performed to explore sources of heterogeneity as shown in supplementary material table 5, considering the year of publication, region, sample size, genotyping method, HWE, NOS score, and source of control. However, the value of each factor affecting overall heterogeneity was not statistically significant in comparisons of ε3/ε4 vs. ε3/3, ε4 vs. non-ε4, ε2 vs. non-ε2, ε4allele vs. ε3allele, and ε2allele vs. ε3allele (supplementary material figure 3). Heterogeneity sources were unascertainable.

3.7. The Result of Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA)

The RIS was 8901 samples and the sample size of our meta-analysis reached it. Moreover, the cumulative -curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary before reaching the RIS as showed in Figure 4. The result of TSA guaranteed the stability of our meta-analysis results. Our sample size was proved to be enough for evaluating the relationship between APOE polymorphisms and IS risk.

4. Discussion

Recently, scholars explored more how gene polymorphisms were contributing to the occurrence and prognosis of diseases. And several previous publications had well explored how gene polymorphisms related to diseases onset and potential mechanisms [74, 75]. As a heterogeneous multifactorial disorder, ischemic stroke could be regulated by certain gene synthesis and specific gene products. The genes involved in the pathological process of stroke are also worth of attention. Apolipoprotein E has been proven to affect atherosclerosis, neurodegeneration, and the process of nerve damage repair. That is why we explored the relationship between APOE gene polymorphisms and ischemic stroke risk.

APOE is a 299-amino acid protein encoded by the APOE gene of three common polymorphisms, ε2, ε3, and ε4. The correlation of APOE gene polymorphisms and the risk of cerebral vascular and degenerative diseases have been investigated a lot, especially in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) [76]. APOE ε4 is associated with increased risk for AD whereas APOE ε2 is associated with decreased risk [77]. Mirza et al. performed a meta-analysis to find that greater WMH volume was associated with worse performance on all cognitive domains in APOE ε4 carriers only in AD [78]. Charidimou et al. proved that the APOE ε2 allele might be associated with the pathophysiology and severity of cortical superficial siderosis in CAA [79]. As to IS, there existed quite many researches with inconsistent conclusions. Besides method differences, ethnic difference and unclarified pathophysiological mechanisms are probable reasons of the inconsistency.

In a meta-analysis in 1999, McCarron et al. found that the ε4 allele and carriers were more frequent among patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease, compared with control subjects (27% versus 18%; odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.34-2.23; ) [13]. In another meta-analysis based on Chinese population, the ε4 allele is associated with an increased risk of developing cerebral infarction, in which the adjusted risk estimate for the ε4 allele versus ε3 allele was significant (, 95% CI 1.59-2.53, ) [14]. Our estimates seemed to be coinciding with the above ones. Compared with the ε3 allele, the ε4 allele showed a higher risk of IS. Compared with ε3/ε3, both ε4 heterozygote (ε2/ε4, ε3/ε4) and ε4 homozygosis (ε4/ε4) exhibited a significant correlation with an increased risk of IS. Notably, OR in ε4 homozygosis (ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/3: 1.833 (95% CI 1.542-2.179)) was higher than those in ε4 heterozygotes (ε2/ε4 vs. ε3/3: 1.233 (95% CI 1.056-1.440) and ε3/ε4 vs. ε3/3: 1.340 (95% CI 1.165-1.542)), which implied that the ε4 allele might possess a cumulative effect. Then, we performed comparisons between ε4/ε4 and ε2/ε4 or ε3/ε4; there existed significant differences between ε4 homozygosis and ε4 heterozygote. The OR between ε4/ε4 and ε2/ε4 was 1.625 (95% CI 1.281-2.060, ); the OR between ε4/ε4 and ε3/ε4 was 1.301 (95% CI 1.077-1.571, ), giving a hint that ε4 homozygosis might bring a higher risk of IS than ε4 heterozygotes.

There are tremendous researches and discussions focusing on the pathogenicity of ε4. An Indian research reported that VLDL and triglycerides levels were found to be significantly associated with ε2/ε4 and ε3/ε4 genotypes; the ε4 allele exerted a higher influence than the ε3 allele in plasma cholesterol levels [22]. As a lipid transport protein, APOE3 and APOE2 preferentially bind to the smaller, more phospholipid-enriched high-density lipoproteins (HDL), while APOE4 preferentially binds to the larger, triglyceride-rich very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL). Miyata and Smith demonstrated an antioxidant activity in the order , and other researchers also reported similar results that APOE4 was associated with increased oxidative stress [25, 80], which might play a role in atherosclerosis and lead to increased risk of ischemic vascular diseases. Besides the above reasons, APOE4 was proved to be neurotoxic by assuming an abnormal conformation (the unique domain interaction between Arg-61 and Glu-255) which was highly susceptible to neuron specific proteolysis and generating neurotoxic fragments that escaped the secretory pathway and entered the cytosol [81]. Totally, from pathophysiological mechanisms to clinical research results, it seems that APOE4 is indeed related to a higher risk of IS, compared with other isoforms, both in ε4 heterozygote and homozygous. ε2 allele appears to be unclear and controversial in stroke [13]. In a meta-analysis of Martínez-González et al., compared with ε3/ε3, APOE ε2 was associated with intracerebral hemorrhage (; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74); meanwhile, APOE ε2 was more related to lobar hemorrhage than deep hemorrhage [82]. As to the association of IS with APOE based on previous investigation, it is uncertain. Our estimates showed that both ε2/ε2 and ε2/ε3 genotypes exhibited no significant effects on IS risk, compared with ε3/ε3. Also, no differences were found in comparisons of ε2 allele vs. ε3 allele and ε2 vs. non-ε2 carriers. This result remained consistent with another meta-analysis in 2013 [14]. Interestingly, in subtype analysis, ε2/ε2 displayed significances in the CE group (; 95% CI, 1.917-9.600; ) and SAD group (; 95% CI, 1.037-3.134; ). The largest meta-analysis of the APOE genotype with IS showed a positive linear association of increasing risk when ordered from ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε2/ε4, ε3/ε3, ε3/ε4, and ε4/ε4 in European ancestry population [83]. The conclusion might explain why APOE4 brings a higher risk of IS but could not clarify that the CE and SAD subgroups in comparison of ε2/ε2 with ε3/ε3 show significances. It is well known that all patients with type III hyperlipidemia (dysbetalipoproteinemia) were APOE ε2 homozygous, whereas most ε2/ε2 subjects (>90%) were normolipidemic or even hypolipidemic, owing to reductions in LDL or HDL or both. Therefore, the APOE ε2 allele has both increased and decreased risks for atherosclerosis, which induced a comprehensive and undetermined result [84].

As to our subtype analyses, all LAA groups showed no significant difference among comparisons, which raised a question why isoforms of APOE, a lipid transport protein, seemed not to be related with IS caused by large artery atherosclerosis. Besides lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis, there might exist some other pathways underlying the relationships between APOE and risk of IS. Our estimates displayed that APOE isoforms were associated to risk of IS especially in the SAD subgroup. Hypertension was known to be an independent risk factor of SAD. Atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia, and hypertension have a complex interaction, and the causations with APOE need further investigation.

Our meta-analysis has several limitations. First, just as the abovementioned, heterogeneity between studies remains undeterminable. Second, results of our meta-analysis based on case control studies cannot provide a causal relationship, but only an association. Third, age variable and ethnicity can influence APOE frequencies in a population; we cannot obtain sufficient related information to perform further subdivided subgroup analyses. Fourth, other pathogenic factors about IS, a multifactorial disease, such as plasma lipid levels, hypertension, life-style, BMI, and gene-environment interactions, were unachievable. Fifth, the controls in accessible studies were not strictly defined; some were selected from healthy populations and others were from nonstroke people. The expected genotype distribution in controls was not in accordance with HWE in seven studies. Population selection in control groups failed to avoid certain diseases which might have a relation with the APOE gene, such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, other vascular diseases, and diabetes. Sixth, the case groups were not selected by a prospective process and the design of case control studies often caused abnormal gene frequency.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our meta-analysis provides rational evidence that APOE ε4 mutation is a genetic risk factor for IS. Prospective studies of a large sample size, which concerns gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, should be carried out in the future to reach a more comprehensive outcome about the association of APOE gene polymorphisms and IS. What is more, future researches should be designed to elucidate the mechanism by which APOE ε4 mutation adds the risk of IS.

Data Availability

Data presented within the paper and the supplementary materials contributed to the findings in our study. They are all are available from our corresponding author for reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

The conceptualization was done by S.-Y. Q., K. S., Y.-H.C., and X.C.; the methodology was done by D.-S. T., D.-J. P., and C. Q.; K. S., Y-H.C., H.-H. Y, and X.C. took care of the software; meta-analysis was done by D.-S. T., D.-J. P., C. Q., S.-Y. Q., K. S., and X.C.; writing—original draft preparation—was done by S.-Y. Q., K. S., Y.-H.C., and H.-H. Y.; writing—review and editing—was done by D.-S. T., D.-J. P., and C. Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Su-Ya Qiao and Ke Shang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful for all our colleagues of the Department of Neurology in Tongji Hospital.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material Table 1: fifteen of the included studies provide data about different subtypes of IS: LAA, SAD, and CE. Supplementary material Table 2: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score of included studies. Supplementary material Table 3: PRISMA list of our meta-analysis. Supplementary material Table 4: sensitivity analysis of the association between ApoE gene polymorphisms and IS. Supplementary material Table 5: publication bias and heterogeneity of our meta-analysis. Supplementary material Figure 1: funnel plots for studies included in Figures 2A–G. Supplementary material Figure 2: funnel plots for studies included in Figures 3A–G. Supplementary material Figure 3: results of meta-regression. (Supplementary Materials)

References

R. Bonita, “Epidemiology of stroke,” Lancet (London, England), vol. 339, no. 8789, pp. 342–344, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Munshi and S. Kaul, “Genetic basis of stroke: an overview,” Neurology India, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Wang, S. Cheng, V. H. Brophy et al., “A meta-analysis of candidate gene polymorphisms and ischemic stroke in 6 study populations: association of lymphotoxin-alpha in nonhypertensive patients,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 683–695, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Marais, “Apolipoprotein E in lipoprotein metabolism, health and cardiovascular disease,” Pathology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
R. W. Mahley, “Apolipoprotein E: cholesterol transport protein with expanding role in cell biology,” Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 240, no. 4852, pp. 622–630, 1988.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jo, T. Silke, N. Katherine et al., “Low-density lipoprotein receptor deficiency attenuates neuroinflammation through the induction of apolipoprotein E,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li, R. Li, A. Zacharek et al., “ABCA1/ApoE/HDL signaling pathway facilitates myelination and oligodendrogenesis after stroke,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 12, p. 4369, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Montagne, D. A. Nation, A. P. Sagare et al., “_APOE4_ leads to blood -brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline,” Nature, vol. 581, no. 7806, pp. 71–76, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Granér, J. Kahri, M. Varpula et al., “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism is associated with both carotid and coronary atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease,” Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases: NMCD, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 271–277, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Ruixing, W. Jinzhen, L. Weixiong, C. Yuming, Y. Dezhai, and P. Shangling, “The environmental and genetic evidence for the association of hyperlipidemia and hypertension,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 251–258, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
A. L. Lumsden, A. Mulugeta, A. Zhou, and E. Hypponen, “Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype-associated disease risks: a phenome-wide, registry-based, case-control study utilising the UK Biobank,” eBioMedicine, vol. 59, p. 102954, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Cattin, M. Fisicaro, M. Tonizzo et al., “Polymorphism of the apolipoprotein E gene and early carotid atherosclerosis defined by ultrasonography in asymptomatic adults,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 91–94, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. O. McCarron, D. Delong, and M. J. Alberts, “APOE genotype as a risk factor for ischemic cerebrovascular disease: a meta-analysis,” Neurology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1308–1311, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Y. Wang, W. J. Wang, L. Wu, L. Liu, and L. Z. Han, “Meta-analysis of APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism and cerebral infarction,” Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna), vol. 120, no. 10, pp. 1479–1489, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chen and Z. Hu, “ApoE polymorphisms and the risk of different subtypes of stroke in the Chinese population: a comprehensive meta-analysis,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 119–138, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1006–1012, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
J. P. Higgins, S. G. Thompson, J. J. Deeks, and D. G. Altman, “Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses,” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), vol. 327, no. 7414, pp. 557–560, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Meng, S. Wang, M. Zhang, S. Fan, L. Zhang, and C. Liang, “TP73 G4C14-A4T14polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: evidence from 36 case-control studies,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 38, no. 6, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wu, Q. Huang, Z. Yu, H. Wu, and Z. Zhong, “The SNPs rs429358 and rs7412 of APOE gene are association with cerebral infarction but not SNPs rs2306283 and rs4149056 of SLCO1B1 gene in southern Chinese Hakka population,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 202, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
L. L. Zhao, G. Su, L. X. Chen et al., “Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms are associated with ischemic stroke susceptibility in a Northwest China Han population,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 37, no. 6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Coen Herak, J. Lenicek Krleza, M. Radic Antolic et al., “Association of polymorphisms in coagulation factor genes and enzymes of homocysteine metabolism with arterial ischemic stroke in children,” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1042–1051, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Das, S. Kaul, A. Jyothy, and A. Munshi, “Association of APOE (E2, E3 and E4) gene variants and lipid levels in ischemic stroke, its subtypes and hemorrhagic stroke in a south Indian population,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 628, pp. 136–141, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Koopal, M. I. Geerlings, M. Muller et al., “The relation between apolipoprotein E (_APOE_) genotype and peripheral artery disease in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 246, pp. 187–192, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Luo, J. Li, X. Sun et al., “Interactions among candidate genes selected by meta-analyses resulting in higher risk of ischemic stroke in a Chinese population,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 12, article e0145399, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
L. K. Wei, A. Au, S. Menon, S. H. Gan, and L. R. Griffiths, “Clinical relevance of MTHFR, eNOS, ACE, and ApoE gene polymorphisms and serum vitamin profile among Malay patients with ischemic stroke,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2017–2025, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Q. Yan, Y. Yuan, P. Zhang, Z. Huang, L. Chang, and Y. K. Gui, “Association of the ApoE gene polymorphism and dietary factors with cerebral infarction and circulating lipid concentrations,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 665–670, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Chatzistefanidis, S. Giannopoulos, K. Spengos et al., “Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and ischaemic stroke: a two-center Greek study,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1083–1088, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Atadzhanov, M. H. Mwaba, P. N. Mukomena et al., “Association of the APOE, MTHFR and ACE genes polymorphisms and stroke in Zambian patients,” Neurology International, vol. 5, no. 4, article e20, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. A. Gelfand, L. A. Croen, A. R. Torres, and Y. W. Wu, “Genetic risk factors for perinatal arterial ischemic stroke,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Balcerzyk, I. Zak, P. Niemiec et al., “_APOE_ Gene ε Polymorphism Does Not Determine Predisposition to Ischemic Stroke in Children,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 25–28, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tamam, N. Tasdemir, R. Toprak, B. Tamam, and K. Iltumur, “Apolipoprotein E genotype in patients with cerebrovascular diseases and its effect on the disease outcome,” The International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 919–935, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Tascilar, A. Dursun, H. Ankarali et al., “Relationship of apoE polymorphism with lipoprotein (a), apoA, apoB and lipid levels in atherosclerotic infarct,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 277, no. 1-2, pp. 17–21, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Wang, H. Zhao, L. Zhou et al., “Association of genetic variation in apolipoprotein E and low density lipoprotein receptor with ischemic stroke in northern Han Chinese,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 276, no. 1-2, pp. 118–122, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
C. L. Lai, C. K. Liu, R. T. Lin, and C. T. Tai, “Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with ischemic stroke subtypes in Taiwan,” The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 491–497, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
M. G. Parfenov, T. Y. Nikolaeva, M. A. Sudomoina et al., “Polymorphism of apolipoprotein E (APOE) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) genes and ischaemic stroke in individuals of Yakut ethnicity,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 255, no. 1-2, pp. 42–49, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Y. Kang and W. I. Lee, “Apolipoprotein e polymorphism in ischemic stroke patients with different pathogenetic origins,” The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 210–216, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Gao, H. Yang, and T. ZhiPing, “Association studies of genetic polymorphism, environmental factors and their interaction in ischemic stroke,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 398, no. 3, pp. 172–177, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Baum, H. K. Ng, K. S. Wong et al., “Associations of apolipoprotein E exon 4 and lipoprotein lipase S447X polymorphisms with acute ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 274–281, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Pezzini, M. Grassi, E. Del Zotto et al., “Cumulative effect of predisposing genotypes and their interaction with modifiable factors on the risk of ischemic stroke in young adults,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 533–539, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Cerrato, C. Baima, M. Grasso et al., “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and stroke subtypes in an Italian cohort,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 264–269, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Q. Jin, Y. S. Fan, J. Ding et al., “Association of apolipoprotein E 4 polymorphism with cerebral infarction in Chinese Han population,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 352–356, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Duzenli, I. Pirim, A. Gepdiremen, and O. Deniz, “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and stroke in a population from eastern Turkey,” Journal of Neurogenetics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 365–375, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Slowik, T. Iskra, W. Turaj, J. Hartwich, A. Dembinska-Kiec, and A. Szczudlik, “LDL phenotype B and other lipid abnormalities in patients with large vessel disease and small vessel disease,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 214, no. 1-2, pp. 11–16, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Souza, B. F. Campos, E. F. Arruda, L. J. Yamamoto, D. M. Trindade, and W. A. Tognola, “Influence of the polymorphism of apolipoprotein E in cerebral vascular disease,” Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Karttunen, G. Alfthan, L. Hiltunen et al., “Risk factors for cryptogenic ischaemic stroke,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 625–632, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
A. C. Morrison, C. M. Ballantyne, M. Bray, L. E. Chambless, A. R. Sharrett, and E. Boerwinkle, “LPL polymorphism predicts stroke risk in men,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 233–242, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. MacLeod, R. P. De Lange, G. Breen, D. Meiklejohn, H. Lemmon, and D. S. Clair, “Lack of association between apolipoprotein E genoype and ischaemic stroke in a Scottish population,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 570–573, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Chowdhury, T. Yokoyama, Y. Kokubo, M. M. Zaman, A. Haque, and H. Tanaka, “Apolipoprotein E genetic polymorphism and stroke subtypes in a Bangladeshi hospital-based study,” Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 131–138, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Frikke-Schmidt, B. G. Nordestgaard, D. Thudium, M. L. Moes Grønholdt, and A. Tybjaerg-Hansen, “APOE genotype predicts AD and other dementia but not ischemic cerebrovascular disease,” Neurology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Catto, L. J. McCormack, M. W. Mansfield et al., “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in cerebrovascular disease,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 399–404, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Kokubo, A. H. Chowdhury, C. Date, T. Yokoyama, H. Sobue, and H. Tanaka, “Age-dependent association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with stroke subtypes in a Japanese rural population,” Stroke, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1299–1306, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Q. Peng, S. P. Zhao, and J. L. Wang, “Lipoprotein (a) and apolipoprotein E ε4 as independent risk factors for ischemic stroke,” Journal of Cardiovascular Risk, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ji, K. Urakami, Y. Adachi, M. Maeda, K. Isoe, and K. Nakashima, “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia and ischemic cerebrovascular disease,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 243–245, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Margaglione, D. Seripa, C. Gravina et al., “Prevalence of apolipoprotein E alleles in healthy subjects and survivors of ischemic stroke: an Italian case-control study,” Stroke, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 399–403, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Kessler, C. Spitzer, D. Stauske et al., “The apolipoprotein E and beta-fibrinogen G/A-455 gene polymorphisms are associated with ischemic stroke involving large-vessel disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2880–2884, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Hachinski, C. Graffagnino, M. Beaudry et al., “Lipids and Stroke,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 303–308, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Couderc, F. Mahieux, S. Bailleul, G. Fenelon, R. Mary, and J. Fermanian, “Prevalence of apolipoprotein E phenotypes in ischemic cerebrovascular disease. A case-control study,” Stroke, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 661–664, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Qian, L. Ding, L. Cheng et al., “Early biomarkers for post-stroke cognitive impairment,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 259, no. 10, pp. 2111–2118, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Konialis, K. Spengos, P. Iliopoulos et al., “The APOE E4 allele confers increased risk of ischemic stroke among Greek carriers,” Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 471–478, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
H. A. Fayed, E. A. Seidy, E. Shawki, H. A. Serogy, and M. A. J. E. Attia, “Neurosurgery, The risk and prognostic value of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism in stroke,” The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 541–550, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Stankovic, Z. Jovanovic-Markovic, N. Majkic-Singh et al., “Apolipoprotein e gene polymorphism as a risk factor for ischemic cerebrovascular disease,” Jugoslovenska medicinska biohemija, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 255–264, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pedro-Botet, M. Sentí, X. Nogués et al., “Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein profile in men with ischemic stroke. Role of lipoprotein (a), triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and apolipoprotein E polymorphism,” Stroke, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1556–1562, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Fekih-Mrissa, S. Klai, M. Mrad et al., “Apolipoprotein E genotypes associated with Alzheimer disease and concomitant stroke,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 681–685, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. N. Brewin, A. Smith, R. Cook et al., “Genetic Analysis of Patients with Sickle Cell Anemia and Stroke before 4 Years of Age Suggest an Important Role for Apoliprotein E,” Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 531–540, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Saidi, W. Zammiti, L. B. Slamia, S. B. Ammou, W. Y. Almawi, and T. Mahjoub, “Interaction of angiotensin-converting enzyme and apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms in ischemic stroke involving large-vessel disease,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
H. M. Wen, L. Baum, W. S. Cheung et al., “Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele is associated with the volume of white matter changes in patients with lacunar infarcts,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1216–1220, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Giassakis, S. Veletza, N. Papanas, I. Heliopoulos, and H. Piperidou, “Apolipoprotein E and first-ever ischaemic stroke in Greek hospitalized patients,” The Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Nakata, T. Katsuya, H. Rakugi et al., “Polymorphism of angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensinogen, and apolipoprotein E genes in a Japanese population with cerebrovascular disease,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1391–1395, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Szolnoki, F. Somogyvari, A. Kondacs, M. Szabo, and L. Fodor, “Evaluation of the interactions of common genetic mutations in stroke subtypes,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 249, no. 10, pp. 1391–1397, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Aalto-Setala, H. Palomaki, H. Miettinen et al., “Genetic risk factors and ischaemic cerebrovascular disease: role of common variation of the genes encoding apolipoproteins and angiotensin-converting enzyme,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 224–233, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Artieda, A. Gañán, A. Cenarro et al., “Association and linkage disequilibrium analyses of APOE polymorphisms in atherosclerosis,” Disease Markers, vol. 24, no. 2, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Schneider, J. L. Bienias, R. S. Wilson, E. Berry-Kravis, D. A. Evans, and D. A. Bennett, “The apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele increases the odds of chronic cerebral infarction [corrected] detected at autopsy in older persons,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 954–959, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
X. B. Li, J. Wang, A. D. Xu et al., “Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms increase the risk of post-stroke depression,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1790–1796, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Fan, J. Meng, L. Zhang, X. Zhang, and C. Liang, “CAV1 polymorphisms rs1049334, rs1049337, rs7804372 might be the potential risk in tumorigenicity of urinary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 151–158, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
S. L. Gao, Y. D. Chen, C. Yue et al., “-196 to -174del, rs4696480, rs3804099 polymorphisms of Toll-like receptor 2 gene impact the susceptibility of cancers: evidence from 37053 subjects,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 39, no. 12, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. B. Verghese, J. M. Castellano, and D. M. Holtzman, “Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders,” The Lancet. Neurology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Serrano-Pozo, S. Das, and B. T. Hyman, “APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches,” The Lancet. Neurology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 68–80, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
S. S. Mirza, U. Saeed, J. Knight et al., “APOEε4, white matter hyperintensities, and cognition in Alzheimer and Lewy body dementia,” Neurology, vol. 93, no. 19, pp. e1807–e1819, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Charidimou, H. I. Zonneveld, S. Shams et al., “APOEand cortical superficial siderosis in CAA,” Neurology, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. e358–e371, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Miyata and J. D. Smith, “Apolipoprotein E allele-specific antioxidant activity and effects on cytotoxicity by oxidative insults and beta-amyloid peptides,” Nature Genetics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
R. W. Mahley and Y. Huang, “Small-molecule structure correctors target abnormal protein structure and function: structure corrector rescue of apolipoprotein E4-associated neuropathology,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 21, pp. 8997–9008, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
N. A. Martínez-González and C. L. Sudlow, “Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on outcome after ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 1329–1335, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Khan, T. Shah, D. Prieto et al., “Apolipoprotein E genotype, cardiovascular biomarkers and risk of stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of 14,015 stroke cases and pooled analysis of primary biomarker data from up to 60,883 individuals,” International journal of epidemiology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 475–492, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Mahley and S. C. Rall Jr., “Apolipoprotein E: far more than a lipid transport protein,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, vol. 1, pp. 507–537, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Su-Ya Qiao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

440

Downloads

530

Citations