Abstract

In this paper, we study a class of Caputo-type fractional stochastic differential equations (FSDEs) with time delays. Under some new criteria, we get the existence and uniqueness of solutions to FSDEs by Carathodory approximation. Furthermore, with the help of Hlder’s inequality, Jensen’s inequality, It isometry, and Gronwall’s inequality, the Ulam–Hyers stability of the considered system is investigated by using Lipschitz condition and non-Lipschitz condition, respectively. As an application, we give two representative examples to show the validity of our theories.

1. Introduction

The fractional-order differential equations can better simulate many natural physical processes than integer-order differential equations, so it gradually becomes a powerful tool to analyze and solve problems in modern science and technology with the continuous development of natural science and production technology. It is mainly used in the fields of economy and insurance, the analysis of the quantitative structure of biological population, the control of diseases, and the research of genetic law, and we can see these monographs in [15]. For more notable achievements of this concept, the readers can also refer to [615].

As it is well known, stochastic disturbance is inevitable in practical systems, and it has an important influence on the stability of systems. In [16], was unstable when , but it increased the stochastic feedback control to become . Apparently, was stable if and only if . This fact indicated that the stochastic control can stabilize the unstable system . Therefore, it is significant and challenging to study stochastic stabilization of deterministic systems. More relevant results can be found in [1719].

The research on the existence and uniqueness of solutions to fractional differential equations is an important content of differential equations. At the same time, the existence and uniqueness have made rapid development in the field of applied mathematics. In [20], the authors studied the existence and uniqueness of positive solutions of some nonlinear fractional differential equations by using mixed monotone operators on cones. Under a number of new conditions and combined with the generalized Gronwall inequality, the uniqueness of solution for fractional -Hilfer differential equation with time delays was investigated in [21]. In addition, for many other relevant conclusions, readers can refer to [2225].

In 1940, S. M. Ulam proposed the stability to functional equations in a speech at the Wisconsin University [26]. Hyers [27] was the first to answer the question in 1941. From then, the Ulam–Hyers stability was produced. At the same time, more and more people were interested in exploring the Ulam–Hyers stability. In [28], by using fractional calculus, the properties of classical and generalized Mittag–Leffler functions and the Ulam–Hyers stability of linear fractional differential equations were proved by utilizing the Laplace transform method. The authors investigated the Ulam–Hyers stability, generalized Ulam–Hyers stability, Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stability, and generalized Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stability of impulsive integrodifferential equations with Riemann–Liouville boundary conditions in [29]. For more researched results, we can pay attention to [3034].

Inspired by the abovementioned, in this article, we are concerned with the existence and Ulam–Hyers stability of Caputo-type FSDEs with time delays:where , , and are measurable continuous functions, is an -dimensional Brownian motion on a complete probability space , is a continuous function, , and is the mathematical expectation.

Compared with the research results of [12, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 34], the major contributions of this paper include at least the following three aspects:(1)In contrast to [20, 21, 28], the system we study is more generalized because it has not only the stochastic term but also the delay term.(2)In the methods we investigate the existence and uniqueness of solutions to FSDEs are more novel than [24, 25]. In [24, 25], to explore the existence and uniqueness, Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem and Mnch’s fixed point theorem, respectively, were used. However, in this paper, we adopt the Carathodory approximation to investigate the existence and uniqueness.(3)In the study of various stability or existence and uniqueness of FSDEs, many literatures (see [12, 21, 34]) have used a stronger Lipschitz condition. However, in this paper, we used the weak non-Lipschitz condition to discuss the Ulam–Hyers stability of stochastic differential equations. This is a breakthrough in the exploration of the stability to FSDEs.

The structure of this article is arranged as follows. We present some basic definitions and necessary assumptions in Section 2. In Section 3, by Carathodory approximation, a number of assumed conditions are established for existence and uniqueness of solutions. Section 4 is devoted to testify stability results for the FSDEs with time delays. Examples are given to certify the application of our findings in Section 5.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we intend to recommend a few basic definitions, lemmas, and some necessary assumptions that will play a key role in the paper.

Let be a finite interval, and we define the norm of on as follows:

Definition 1 (see [35]). The Riemann–Liouville integral operator of fractional-order is defined bywhere and is the well-known Eulers Gamma function.

Definition 2 (see [1]). For any continuous function, the Caputo derivative of fractional-orderis defined bywhere , .
In particular, for ,

Definition 3. An -value stochastic process is called a solution to equation (1) if it satisfies the following conditions:(1) is -continuous and adapted.(2) and .(3)For ,where .(4)For any other solution , we obtain .

Definition 4 (see [36]). System (1) is Ulam–Hyers stable if there exists a real number such that and for each continuously differentiable function satisfyingand there exists a solution of (1) satisfying

Remark 1 (see [21]). A function is a solution of equation (7) if and only if there exists a function , such that(i)(ii)

Hypothesis 1 (Lipschitz condition). As for any , there is a constant such that, for all ,where are uniformly continuous functions and is defined as .

Hypothesis 2 (non-Lipschitz condition). There is a function , , such that(1)For all and ,where are continuous as well as bounded functions, and for any fixed , is monotone, nondecreasing, continuous, and concave function with .(2)For every and any nonnegative function Y(t) such thatwhere is a constant and , we get .

Hypothesis 3. There exist three functions , such that

Lemma 1 (see [37]). Suppose Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3 are fulfilled. Then, there exists constant such that, for any ,

Proof. Applying Jensen’s inequality and Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3, we havewhere . In a similar way, we obtainLet us set . The proof is therefore complete.

3. Existence and Uniqueness

Utilizing Carathodory approximation [35, 38], the existence and uniqueness of solutions to SFDEs can be obtained. So, let us define the Carathodory approximation as follows. For any integer defineand for all .

Theorem 1. Suppose that Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3hold and,; then, system (1) has a unique solution.

Proof. The proof will be divided into three steps, when .

Step 1. The boundedness of the sequence .
By (16) and Jensen’s inequality, we haveAccording to It isometry, Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, and Lemma 1, it is easy to obtainLetting . It is obvious that , andwhere .
Using Hlders inequality and Jensen’s inequality, we obtainwhere is continuous function on . By the mean value theorem of integrals, there exists such thatUsing the inequalitywe deriveLet us set , and we havewhere .
If , we obtainIf , we obtainand then,By Gronwall’s inequality, we can conclude thatLetting , we obtainwhere is a positive constant. So, we have proved that the sequence is bounded.

Step 2. For and any integer , we obtain by (16)By using Jensen’s inequality, Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, and It isometry, we concludeRecalling Lemma 1, we obtainwhere .
Applying Hlder’s inequality and Step 1, we obtainwhere .
Using Hlder’s inequality and Step 1 again,where .
Then,where and .

Step 3. We claim that is a Cauchy sequence. For integer , one can obtainBy Jensen’s inequality, Hlder’s inequality, and It isometry, we can obtainBy applying Jensen’s inequality and Hypothesis 2, we obtainwhere .
Using Jensen’s inequality and Hypothesis 2 again, we acquireIn terms of Step 2, we can conclude thatLetThen,Thus, by Hypothesis 2, we haveindicating that is a Cauchy sequence. The Borel-Cantelli lemma makes clear, as holds uniformly. So, if we take the limit of both sides of (16), we get that is a solution to (1), with the propertyNow, we have proved the existence. The uniqueness of the solutions can be proved in the same way as Step 3. When , obviously, there is a unique solution to FSDEs. The proof is complete.

Remark 2. If,is a constant, then Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3are equivalent to Hypothesis 1. Therefore, under Hypothesis 1and some proper conditions, there will exist a unique solutionto FSDEs (1).

4. Ulam–Hyers Stability Analysis of FSDEs

We are going to research the solution of system (1) is Ulam–Hyers stable and prove the stability theory of solutions to FSDEs (1) with Lipschitz and non-Lipschitz coefficients in this section.

Theorem 2. Assume that Hypothesis 1holds and,. The FSDE (1) is UlamHyers which is stable at.

Proof. From Definition 3 and Remark 1, we knowAccording to Definition 3 and equation (45), we haveand then using Jensen’s inequality, we obtainNow, we use Hlder’s inequality and Hypothesis 1, and one can obtainwhere .
Then, by It isometry and Hlder’s inequality, we obtainwhere . Since is a continuous function on , according to the mean value theorem of integrals, there exists , such thatBy Hypothesis 1 and Jensen’s inequality, we obtainFinally, we use Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and Remark 1 to yieldwhere .
Hence, we obtainDifferent from the approach of dealing with the delay in [18, 39, 40], we obtainand then, we acquireHence,Let us set , then , and . Thus,For , we obtainThen, we can obtainThen,Using Gronwall’s inequality, we obtainTherefore,consequently, ; there exists , such thatTherefore, this theorem is proved.

Theorem 3. Assume that Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3 hold, , and there exists a constant , . The FSDE (1) is Ulam–Hyers which is stable at .

Proof. From inequality (48), we obtainTaking inequality (48) and Hypothesis 2 into account to achieve,where .
By inequalities (50)–(52) and Hypothesis 2, one can obtainUsing Hypothesis 3, it is immediate to obtainNow, through inequality (52), we haveThen,Let us set and , we can obtainIndeed, we can conclude thatLetting , then and . Thus,For , we get thatMoreover, we haveFurthermore,In view of Gronwall’s inequality, we get thatTherefore,which implies that there exists , , satisfyingThis completes the proof.

5. Examples

Example 1. Consider the Ulam–Hyers stability and existence and uniqueness of the solution to the following equation:where , , and uniformly continuous functionsDue to and satisfy Hypothesis 1, and . Therefore, according to Remark 2 and Theorem 2, we can see that there is a unique solution to equation (80) and the solution is Ulam–Hyers stable.
Now, a numerical simulation will be carried out to find the solution of (79) is Ulam–Hyers stable, and we can see it in Figure 1.

Example 2. Consider the Ulam–Hyers stability of the following especial FSDEs with time delays:where , , and are measurable continuous functions, is an arbitrary number, and .
Becauseobviously, is nondecreasing, continuous, and concave function and . From the arbitrariness of , we know . And, , , such that . That satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 2. Therefore, we can conclude that system (82) is Ulam–Hyers stable on [0, 2].
Next, we will use a numerical simulation to verify the solution of (82) is Ulam–Hyers stable, and we can see it in Figure 2.

6. Conclusion

In this work, the objective is to research the existence and uniqueness of FSDEs with time delays using the novel Carathodory approximation and the weaker non-Lipschitz condition. Furthermore, different assumptions are used to prove the Ulam–Hyers stability of the solutions. Finally, we present two examples to test the validity of the proposed theory. Our future work will focus on exploring Ulam–Hyers stability of various types of fractional differential equations with weaker conditions, and the explored conditions can be applied to a wider range of differential equations.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Special Research Fund Project of Guizhou University (202002).