Kanglaite Injection Combined with Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for the Improvement of Clinical Efficacy and Immune Function in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wen, Jianxia; Yang, Tao; Wang, Jian; Ma, Xiao; Tong, Yuling; Zhao, Yanling

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8586596

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8586596 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8586596

Kanglaite Injection Combined with Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for the Improvement of Clinical Efficacy and Immune Function in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jianxia Wen,^1,2Tao Yang,^1,3Jian Wang,²Xiao Ma,²Yuling Tong,^1,2and Yanling Zhao¹

Academic Editor: Maria G. Miguel

Received19 Jun 2019

Revised15 Dec 2019

Accepted16 Dec 2019

Published27 Jan 2020

Abstract

Recent advances have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors are emerging as promising therapeutic targets to improve the quality of life in cancer patients. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of Kanglaite injection (KLTi) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone on clinical efficacy, immune function, and safety for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Wan-Fang, VMIS, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, and MEDLINE, as well as grey literatures, were comprehensively searched from January 2000 to November 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of clinical efficacy and immune function were collected according to their inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 5.2 was applied to assess the risk of bias of included trials. STATA 13.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software were used for meta-analysis. Twenty-five RCTs comprising 2151 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Meta-analysis showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, KLTi plus the same chemotherapy significantly improved clinical efficacy, including complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, as well as immune function, including CD³⁺, CD⁴⁺, CD⁸⁺, and CD⁴⁺/CD⁸⁺. There was a significant reduction in nausea and vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia in combination treatments. However, the outcomes were limited because of the low quality and small sample size of the included studies. In conclusion, this work might provide beneficial evidence of KLTi combined with chemotherapy for improving clinical efficacy and immune function, as well as reducing the incidence of adverse events in advanced NSCLC patients. KLTi might be a beneficial therapeutic method for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Due to the quality of the data, more rigorous and well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer remains one of the most common leading causes of cancer-related death, with high incidence rates all over the world [1–3]. Histologically, approximately 80% of these lung cancers are of the non-small-cell type, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinomas, adenosquamous carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and sarcomatoid carcinoma [4]. Clinically, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all cases of lung cancer [5], and the 5-year overall survival rate for patients with metastatic NSCLC was less than 5% [6]. Recently, cisplatin-based chemotherapy was recommended as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC in the clinic [7]. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy, such as cisplatin plus vinorelbine, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and pemetrexed, serves as the primary treatment for advanced NSCLC. Carboplatin is a major therapeutic treatment for chemotherapy regiments in patients with comorbidities or in patients not able to tolerate cisplatin. According to clinical trials, these chemotherapies are available for relieving symptoms and prolonging survival in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC [8]. However, these treatments are also limited to a certain extent. Clinically, the effectiveness of chemotherapy alone is not completely satisfactory due to the potential side effects and adverse reactions that affect the quality of life (QOL) and seriously inhibit the immune function of patients [9]. Hence, drugs that exhibit clinical efficacy and promote immune function, improve QOL, and alleviate side effects and adverse reactions may be preferable for advanced NSCLC patients. As one of the most meaningful challenges in drug discovery, more effective and rational drugs for advanced NSCLC remain to be developed.

Recently, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combined with chemotherapy to increase effectiveness, reduce side-effects, and improve QOL has shown its advantages as an adjunct therapy for lung cancer treatment [10]. A series of studies seeking novel anticancer drugs has been triggered by the experience-based herbal medicine as a supplementary to modern western medicine [11]. Kanglaite injection (KLTi), an acetone extract of Semen Coicis Yokuinin, is prepared as an herbal medicine using modern and advanced pharmaceutical technology [12]. Notably, KLTi (Zhejiang Kanglaite Group Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China) is an agent that was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) in 2010. Clinically, KLTi has synergistic effects with radiotherapy and chemotherapy and clearly exerts antievil pathogenic and analgesic effects in advanced lung cancer [13]. The clinical mechanisms of KLTi for advanced NSCLC are related to the induction of cancer cell apoptosis, inhibition of cancer cell mitosis, execution of cancer cells, and improvement of the immune function [14]. Several published systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrated that KLTi combined with chemotherapy improves clinical efficacy, performance status, and Karnofsky (KPS) score and reduces radiotherapy and chemotherapy side effects compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced NSCLC [15, 16]. Nevertheless, the improvements in immune function, including peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets and peripheral blood immunoglobulins, in response to KLTi have not been reported.

Based on previous clinical studies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of KLTi combined with standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The study objectives were to assess the clinical efficacy, immune function (including CD³⁺, CD⁴⁺, CD⁸⁺, CD⁴⁺/CD⁸⁺, natural killer (NK) cell count, IgA, IgG, and IgM), adverse events such as nausea and vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia of combination therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC (Figure 1). This work could provide comprehensive evidence for further studies on KLTi. In addition, the overall number of KLTi clinical studies on cancer needs to be improved, so that the clinical efficacy and safety of KLTi can be approved by the international community and possibly enter the international market.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Registration

This systematic review and meta-analysis had been registered in PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#joinuppage), and the registration number is CRD42018087094.

2.2. Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

As this study does not involve animal and patient experiments, the ethical approval and consent to participate are not applicable.

2.3. Literature Source and Search Strategy

PubMed, Web of Science, Wan-Fang database, VIP medicine information system (VMIS), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, Chinese Biological Medical (CBM), and MEDLINE databases, as well as Baidu and Google, were comprehensively searched from January 2000 to November 2019. In addition to these, grey literatures were searched to identify potential studies that focused on the clinical efficacy and immune function of KLTi combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The following search terms were used: (“Kanglaite” [Mesh terms] OR “KLT” [Mesh terms] OR “Kanglaite Injection” [Mesh terms]) AND (“lung cancer” [Mesh terms] OR “lung carcinoma” [Mesh terms] OR “non-small cell lung cancer” [Mesh terms] OR “non-small lung carcinoma” [Mesh terms] OR “NSCLC” [Mesh terms]). Languages were limited to English and Chinese. Search results were downloaded for further evaluation. Furthermore, any additional relevant articles were identified by searching studies included in the reference lists from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We contacted authors whose research reports had questionable data or lacked any relevant information.

2.4. Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with advanced NSCLC confirmed by cytology or pathology were considered eligible for inclusion in this systematic review; (2) study type included randomized controlled trials (RCTs); and (3) intervention included a control group given routine chemotherapy, including cisplatin plus vinorelbine, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and pemetrexed, while the experimental group was additionally given KLTi with chemotherapy. RCTs with one or more outcomes were included. Citations were screened at the title and abstract level and were subsequently retrieved as full reports.

2.5. Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients could not be confirmed as having advanced NSCLC; (2) neither RCT nor “random” was mentioned in trials; (3) control measures did not include chemotherapy; (4) duplication of previous publications; (5) study was mechanistic, case report, comment, conference abstracts, review, meta-analyses, or letters to the journal editor; and (6) trials with unavailable or incorrect data for meta-analysis.

2.6. Observation Index

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the observation indexes were as follows: (1) evaluation of clinical efficacy rate and improvement of immune function and QOL were performed according to Guidance for Clinical Research on New Drugs of TCM [17]. (2) Clinical efficacy of chemotherapy was evaluated in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) developed by World Health Organization (WHO) curative effect evaluation criteria. Patients were divided into four categories: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). The clinical effective rate was considered as the primary endpoint. The disease control rate was characterized as the objective response and stabilization rates. Clinical effective rate and disease control rate were calculated as follows: clinical effective rate = (CR + PR)/total cases × 100%, disease control rate = (CR + PR + SD)/total cases × 100% [18]. (3) Immune function indicators, including peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets (CD³⁺, CD⁴⁺, CD⁸⁺, and CD⁴⁺/CD⁸⁺ levels), peripheral blood immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, and IgM levels), and NK cell counts were pooled for meta-analysis; (4) QOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) [19] or the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQC30 [20]. In addition, KPS score was also used to evaluate the QOL; and (5) adverse events or adverse drug reactions (ADEs or ADRs), including incidence of toxic and side effects/adverse reactions before and after treatment, were classified into 0∼IV levels, according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 4.0 (CTC4.0) [21].

2.7. Data Extraction

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two investigators independently selected studies after reading the title, abstract, and full-text of the studies. Any relevant disagreements were resolved in consultation with Prof. Zhao. From each included study, the following basic information was independently extracted by two assessors: author’s name, year published, sample size, age, gender, TNM stage, KPS score, immune function index, and histologically type, including squamous carcinoma (SQC), adenocarcinomas, adenosquamous carcinoma (ADC), and large-cell carcinomas.

2.8. Risk of Bias in Individual Studies

Two investigators assessed the risk of bias for all studies using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment [22]. Quality assessment of each trial was performed by Review Manager 5.3 according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.2. Both pairs of investigators reviewed each study independently. For all the relevant outcomes, the quality of each trial was classified using a nominal scale: “Yes” (low risk of bias), “No” (high risk of bias), or “Unclear” (unclear risk of bias). Disagreements were resolved in consultation with Prof. Zhao.

2.9. Data Synthesis

Statistical analysis was performed using STATA software (version 13.0, TX, USA) and Review Manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the magnitude of Tau², Chi², corresponding value, and I² statistic. Based on the Mantel–Haenszel (MH) or inverse variance (IV) statistical approach in combination with the data, a fixed effect model was performed with minor heterogeneity when I² value was below 50%. Potential heterogeneity was found when the I² value was above 50%. First, the sources of heterogeneity were explored. Second, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to detect the robustness of the result, and subgroup analysis was performed due to different stages in each index. Finally, a random effect model was applied to pool data. A funnel plot was used for assessing potential publication bias.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

According to the PRISMA flow diagram, the selection process of eligible studies is illustrated in Figure 2. Five hundred and fifty-four records (554) were identified through database searches, and another 62 records were included from other sources (grey literatures). Following the removal of 353 duplicates, 263 records were included. Next, 167 relevant studies were further removed. Full-text articles of 96 publications were assessed for eligibility. Among them, trials not reporting immune function or approval by a medical ethics committee, as well as those that were a review or mechanistic study, were excluded. Ultimately, 25 studies [8, 23–46] involving 2151 patients (experimental groups: 1103 cases; control groups: 1048 cases) who met the inclusion criteria were included, and the data were extracted from these trials and used for the qualitative analysis.

3.2. Study Characteristics

A summary of the baseline characteristics for the included studies is presented in Tables 1 and 2. All these studies were RCTs. Sex differences in advanced NSCLC trends reflect historical differences in tobacco use. Patients’ age ranged from 29 to 87 years. Histologically, types of advanced NSCLC were divided into squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinomas, adenosquamous carcinoma, and large cell carcinomas, and the details of each trial are shown in Table 2. Twenty-two trials [8, 23–33, 35–37, 40–46] reported outcomes of clinical efficacy, eighteen trials [8, 23–31, 35, 37, 40, 42–46] showed outcomes of adverse reactions, and fifteen trials [8, 25–27, 29, 33, 36, 38, 40–46] reported improvement of QOL. All the trials reported immune function indicators, including peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets (CD³⁺, CD⁴⁺, CD⁸⁺, and CD⁴⁺/CD⁸⁺ levels) or/and peripheral blood immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, and IgM levels) or NK cell counts.

3.3. Risk of Bias of Included Trials

The risk of bias for each included trial was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias estimation. All included trials mentioned “randomization,” among which only eight trials [8, 24, 27, 28, 32, 35, 36, 38] stated the appropriate generation with random number table, one trial [33] with stratified randomization method, and two trials [44, 45] with random design paper bags. No trials described information on allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, or incomplete outcome data. Selective reporting was performed in two-record [23, 34] (Figure 3).

3.4. Clinical Efficacy of KLTi Combined with Chemotherapy

Clinical efficacy of tumor response was reported in twenty-two trials [8, 23–33, 35–37, 40–46]. As shown in Figure 4, CR, PR, SD, and PD were analyzed in the forms of subgroup. The value of I² was less than 50%, indicating that heterogeneity across different trials was not significant (), and the fixed effect model was applied in this pooled analysis. Overall, the results of the meta-analysis demonstrated a favorable RR for KLTi treatment CR (RR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.20–2.62) (Figure 4(a)), PR (RR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.07–1.36) (Figure 4(b)), SD (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.85–1.09) (Figure 4(c)), and PD (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.65–0.89) (Figure 4(d)). It seems that patients in the KLTi group had more CR (60 in the KLTi group vs. 31 in the control group) and PR (378 in the KLTi group vs. 307 in the control group), while those in the control group had more SD (322 in the control group vs. 331 in the KLTi group) and PD (206 in the control group vs. 267 in the KLTi group). These findings indicated that KLTi in combination with chemotherapy exhibited better clinical efficacy than chemotherapy alone.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Short-term clinical effective rate (CR + PR) and disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) were also evaluated in this study. In the KLTi in combination with the chemotherapy group, 478 of 987 (48.43%) patients reached CR or PR, while 368 of 972 (37.86%) trials achieved CR or PR in the chemotherapy alone group. Our results indicated that KLTi combined with chemotherapy exhibited a superior short-term clinical effective rate (CR + PR) (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.16–1.41) (Figure 5(a)) and disease control rate (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.06–1.17) (Figure 5(b)) than chemotherapy alone.

(a)

(b)

3.5. Effect of KLTi on Immune Function

Clinical study revealed that KLTi has biphasic antitumor effects. It protects the body’s immune system by preventing cancer cell proliferation and transfer and effectively improves immunity in patients with advanced NSCLC [42]. Immune function indicators, including peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets (CD³⁺, CD⁴⁺, CD⁸⁺, and CD⁴⁺/CD⁸⁺ levels), peripheral blood immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, and IgM levels), and NK cell counts were analyzed in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

3.5.1. Peripheral Blood T Lymphocyte Subsets

All studies [8, 23–46] included in this systematic analysis reported data on the percentage of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. As statistical heterogeneity (, I² > 50%) was detected in this data, a random effect model was applied for this meta-analysis (Table 3). Results demonstrated that KLTi combined with chemotherapy significantly improved the levels of CD³⁺ (MD = 8.58, 95% CI 6.13–11.04), CD⁴⁺ (MD = 6.38, 95% CI 4.93–7.83), CD⁸⁺ (MD = 1.50, 95% CI −0.31–3.32), CD⁴⁺/CD⁸⁺ (MD = 0.32, 95% CI 0.25–0.39), and NK cells count (MD = 10.58, 95% CI 7.27–13.90) in NSCLC patients.

3.5.2. Peripheral Blood Immunoglobulins

Five studies [32–35, 39] also evaluated the effect of KLTi on IgA, IgG, and IgM (Table 3). The MD for IgA, IgG, and IgM was as follows: MD = 0.22, 95% CI 0.08–0.35; MD = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.17–2.22; and MD = 0.18, 95% CI 0.09–0.27, respectively (Table 3).

3.6. Improvement of KLTi on QOL Score

One trial used FACT-L [33] and one trial used QLQC30 [29] to assess the QOL. In addition, KPS score was used in eleven trials [25–27, 38, 40–46] to evaluate the QOL of KLTi on the treatment of NSCLC. Among them, continuous outcomes were used in two trials [25, 45]. No significant heterogeneity (I² = 0%, ) was found among another nine trials. Pooled RR revealed that KLTi combined with chemotherapy significantly enhanced KPS improvement compared with chemotherapy alone (RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.27–1.56) (Figure 6).

3.7. Reduction of Adverse Reactions

Among the included trials, a number of studies analyzed toxicities and side effects/adverse reactions. Notably, patients were divided into stage 0∼IV levels according to the WHO grading criteria for adverse drug reactions. Thus, subgroup analysis among nausea and vomiting (Figure 7), thrombocytopenia (Figure 8), and leukopenia (Figure 9) were carried out based on the same criteria. However, several trials were not divided into 0∼IV levels, so dichotomous measures were used for meta-analysis. As shown in Table 4, a fixed effect model was used for the outcomes. In summary, neither of the two groups experienced serious toxicity or side effects/adverse reactions during treatment. The incidence of adverse events in the treatment group was significantly lower than in control groups, indicating the use of KLTi combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC is superior to chemotherapy alone.

3.8. Publication Bias

A funnel plot was created to evaluate publication bias. There were twenty-two trials [8, 23–33, 35–37, 40–46] included in the funnel plot for the clinical efficacy (Figure 10(a)) and twenty-one trials [8, 23–29, 31–33, 35–37, 40–46] included for disease control rate (Figure 10(b)). The results indicated that there was no significant asymmetry observed.

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

4.1. Summary of Evidence

Chemotherapy is a primarily effective therapeutic treatment and has been widely used in routine advanced NSCLC treatment. Numerous studies have indicated that TCM in combination with chemotherapy could be used to increase clinical efficacy and reduce adverse reactions as well as complications from these therapies [47]. KLTi is a botanically sourced and molecularly targeted agent. The patent certificates of KLTi were granted in China in 1995. Notably, phase III clinical trials using KLTi were completed in August 1997. Subsequently, KLTi was officially launched in China after final approval from the Ministry of Public Health [48, 49], which can be combined with chemical, radiological, or targeted therapies in clinical use to decrease cancer burden, improve QOL of cancer patients, and ameliorate multiple drug resistance of cancers [47]. Also, it has been evaluated for preclinical antitumor effects [50]. In pancreatic cells lines, KLTi downregulated protein expression of Bcl-2, increased Fas gene expression, and increased apoptosis [51]. Additionally, KLTi inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha- (TNF-α-) mediated epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) in colorectal cancer cell lines by inhibiting the NF-κΒ signaling pathway [52]. According to research reports, clinical use of KLTi provides objective evidence for the treatment of lung cancer and significantly reduces the expression of miRNA-21 in patients with advanced lung cancer [53]. In this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, we comprehensively evaluated whether KLTi combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone benefits patients with advanced NSCLC. In particular, our results demonstrate that KLTi had statistically improved clinical efficacy and immune function while reducing adverse reactions in advanced NSCLC in later-line treatments.

4.2. Clinical Impact of KLTi on Advanced NSCLC

In the present study, the results were divided into four responses (CR, PR, SD, and PD) (Figures 4(a)–4(d)). Short-term clinical effective rate and disease control rate (DCR) (Figure 5(b)) indicated superior clinical efficacy of KLTi in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced NSCLC with no significant heterogeneity, consistent with previous studies [12, 15]. To our knowledge, medicines focusing on improving management of cancer patient perspectives, such as QOL, may make a significant difference. Here, KLTi combined with chemotherapy had improved KPS score (Figure 6), reducing the incidence of adverse reactions in patients with advanced NSCLC (Table 4). Appropriate drug selection is a major challenge in patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those who are complicated with concomitant gastrointestinal system and circulatory diseases. Our study helps to put the available safety data of KLTi into perspective. Clinically, when using chemotherapy to treat advanced NSCLC, clinicians can use chemotherapy in combination with KLTi to potentially optimize these regimens.

4.3. The Significance of Exploring Immune Function

Recent advances have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors are emerging as promising therapeutic targets to improve QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC [54]. Of the examination indexes for diagnosing the development, progression, and prognosis of tumors, detection of T lymphocyte subgroups in peripheral blood is of great significance clinically [55]. Clinical studies have shown that KLTi exerts inhibitory effects on the generation of neovascularization in tumor cells, increasing macrophages, further inducing lymphocytic cytokines and tumor necrosis factor, thereby enhancing the immunity capacity of patients [56]. However, its improvement on immune function in patients with advanced NSCLC has not been systematically reported before. The current study investigated whether KLTi in combination with chemotherapy influences the percentage of peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets (CD³⁺, CD⁴⁺, CD⁸⁺ and CD⁴⁺/CD⁸⁺) and peripheral blood immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG and IgM) in patients with advanced NSCLC. Our results indicated that KLTi combined with routine chemotherapy was better than routine treatment used alone for these indexes.

4.4. Limitations of the Present Study

This study does have some limitations. First, the small sample sizes of included trials in this study were not sufficient to evaluate clinical efficacy or immune function of combination therapy. As a result, we are not sure whether the impact of KLTi is overestimated or underestimated. Second, with different histology and clinical characteristics in the studies, unbalanced baselines existed. Third, the quality of our analysis is limited by the quality of the underlying data. In the risk of bias section, both blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) were not reported in all trials. In addition, analysis indicated that potential publication bias might influence the results of this systematic review. Furthermore, all included trials were published in Chinese. Notably, different NSCLC patients have different TNM stages, and KLTi may have different therapeutic efficacy and prognosis. In this study, the clinical efficacy and safety of KLTi in the treatment of NSCLC were analyzed with unclear TNM staging. The results of our systematic review must be interpreted with caution. Therefore, we hope our present work provides useful experience on further studies on KLTi. As a consequence of these limitations, we clearly find that the overall level of clinical research needs to be improved, so that the clinical efficacy and safety of TCM can be evaluated by the international community to possibly enter the international market. Therefore, more rigorous and well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the present results suggest that KLTi, in combination with chemotherapy, might be an effective regimen for the treatment of advanced NSCLC, but further prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are required to fully establish the clinical efficacy and safety of this treatment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos: 81573631 and 81874365) and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (no. Z171100001717013).

References

M. Arbyn, E. Weiderpass, L. Bruni et al., “Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis,” The Lancet Global Health, no. 19, pp. 30482–30486, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. Dikshit et al., “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 136, pp. 359–386, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kanda, K. Goto, H. Shiraishi et al., “Safety and efficacy of nivolumab and standard chemotherapy drug combination in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a four arms phase Ib study,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2242–2250, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
NCCN, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, NCCN, Fort Washington, PA, USA, 2019.
W. Chen, R. Zheng, P. D. Baade et al., “Cancer statistics in China, 2015,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 115–132, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. C. Arbour and G. J. Riely, “Systemic therapy for locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer,” JAMA, vol. 322, no. 8, pp. 764–774, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gridelli, A. Morabito, L. Cavanna et al., “Cisplatin-based first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: joint analysis of MILES-3 and MILES-4 phase III trials,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 36, no. 25, pp. 2585–2592, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Li, “Clinical effect of Kanglaite Injection combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin on advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and the impact on immune function,” Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease, vol. 25, pp. 121–123, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Jiao, C. Dong, J. Liu et al., “Effects of Chinese medicine as adjunct medication for adjuvant chemotherapy treatments of non-small cell lung cancer patients,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 46524, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Wang, Q. Wang, L. J. Jiao et al., “Astragalus-containing traditional Chinese medicine, with and without prescription based on syndrome differentiation, combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis,” Current Oncology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 188–195, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wang, N. Acharya, Z. Liu et al., “Enhanced anticancer effects of Scutellaria barbata D. Don in combination with traditional Chinese medicine components on non-small cell lung cancer cells,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 217, pp. 140–151, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, F. Xu, G. Wang, X. Diao, and Y. Li, “Kanglaite injection plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for non-small cell lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Current Therapeutic Research, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 381–411, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Lei, J. Chen, C.-X. Liu, J. Lin, J. Lou, and H.-c. Shang, “Status and thoughts of Chinese patent medicines seeking approval in the US market,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 403–408, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhao and J. Bai, “The mechanism of Kanglaite injection for non-small cell lung cancer,” China Health Standard Management, vol. 8, pp. 99-100, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Liu, Q. Yang, Y. Xi et al., “Kanglaite injection combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma,” Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. C46–C51, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li and W. Wang, “Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of KLT Injection on treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Journal of Liaoning University of TCM, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 170–173, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Zheng, Guidance for Clinical Research on New Drugs of TCM, China Medical Science Press, Beijing, China, 2002.
A. Qin, R. Rengan, S. Lee et al., “A pilot study of Atezolizumab plus hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, no. 19, pp. 34007–34016, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Yanwei, L. Li, and Z. Pan, “Effect of wellness education on quality of life of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line icotinib and on their family caregivers,” Integrative Cancer Therapies, vol. 18, Article ID 153473541984237, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yavuzsen, A. Alacacioglu, M. Dirioz, and U. Yilmaz, “Quality of life of physicians and nurses working in an oncology clinic,” Journal of Buon, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 537–540, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Song, X. Yu, G. Lou, X. Shi, and Y. Zhang, “Salvage treatment with apatinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer,” OncoTargets and Therapy, vol. 10, pp. 1821–1825, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lundh and P. Gotzsche, “Recommendations by cochrane review groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 8, p. 22, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yuan, C. Jin, K. Yuan et al., “Effect of Kanglaite injection in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and its effect on level of T lymphocytes,” Chinese Journal of Immunology, vol. 35, pp. 1126–1130, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Ye, F. Zhao, S. Xing et al., “Clinical observation of Kanglaite injection combined with gemcitabine cisplatin regimen for advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Clinical Research, vol. 27, pp. 24–26, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Wang, “Clinical efficacy of Kanglaite injection-assisted NP chemotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer,” Health Research, vol. 39, pp. 559–562, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Han, J. Kang, and F. Li, “Clincal analysis of Kanglaite Injection combined with GP chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Chinese Journal of Lung Disease, vol. 11, pp. 304–308, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Zhao, Y. Chen, W. Shang et al., “Effects of kanglaite injection combined with gemcitabine on advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the aged,” Henan Medical Research, vol. 27, pp. 2713–2715, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Jia, “Effect of Kanglaite injection on immune function and adverse reactions in advanced NSCLC patients with chemotherapy,” Journal of Community Medicine, vol. 16, pp. 11–13, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Long and Y. Xiao, “Clinical efficacy of Kanglaite injection in combination with GP regimen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and their effects on various indexes of immune function,” Anti-Infection Pharmacy, vol. 14, pp. 377–380, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Tian and J. Yang, “Effect of Kanglaite injection on immune function in chemotherapy patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Journal of Community Medicine, vol. 15, pp. 64-65, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Yao and X. Song, “Efficacy and safety analysis of GP scheme combined with Kanglaite injection for advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 16, pp. 1195–1198, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Liu and W. Wang, “Therapeutic effect of Kanglaite injection on advanced non-small cell lung cancer and its influence on immune function,” Shanxi Medical Journal, vol. 45, pp. 1211–1213, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Fu, X. Li, C. Wang et al., “The clinical application of Kanglaite Injection in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Oncology Progress, vol. 14, pp. 266–268, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Zheng, K. Huang, M. Rao et al., “Influence study of therapeutic effect and immune function of Kanglaite injection combined with chemotherapy on the advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” China Modern Medicine, vol. 23, pp. 69-70, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Zhu and Y. You, “Improvement Effect of Kanglaite injection combined with GP program on the immunity of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer at advanced stage,” Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 36, pp. 1943–1945, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Chen and T. Wei, “Clinical effect and the influence on immune function of Kanglaite injection combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation, vol. 23, pp. 814–817, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Lu, Y. Zhang, H. Ji et al., “Effect of Kanglaite injection combined with chemotherapy on efficacy and immune function of advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Jiangsu Medical Journal, vol. 42, pp. 1068–1070, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Ma and W. Zhou, “Effect of Kanglaite injection on immune function and quality of life in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Pharmacology and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica, vol. 31, p. 184, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Deng, S. Zhao, H. Zhao et al., “Regulatory effect of Kanglaite injection on immune function in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy,” Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, vol. 23, pp. 3767–3769, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Wang, “Effect of Kanglaite adjuvant chemotherapy on immune function of non-small cell lung cancer and analysis of clinical curative effect,” Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, vol. 11, pp. 1072-1073, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Li, F. Dai, Y. Ma et al., “Observation of Kanglaite injection on the quality of life of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Hebei Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 34, pp. 1691-1692, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Guan, Q. Guo, and J. Song, “Kanglaite in combination with GP regimen in the treatment of senile advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care, vol. 8, pp. 5–7, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Wang and Y. Han, “Clinical study of coicis oil injection combined with chemotherapy in the treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Oncology Progress, vol. 7, pp. 217–220, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Hou, “A clinical study on Kanglaite injection combined with chemical therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Traditional Chinese Drug Research & Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 19, pp. 504–506, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Lian, Y. Lu, E. Hou et al., “Combination of GP regimen and Kanglaite in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer, vol. 9, pp. 74–77, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Li, H. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Observation on efficacy Kanglaite injection combined with chemotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer in aged patients,” China Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, vol. 10, pp. 405-406, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Wang, F. Qi, Y. Cui et al., “An update on Chinese herbal medicines as adjuvant treatment of anticancer therapeutics,” BioScience Trends, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 220–239, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Qi, L. Zhao, A. Zhou et al., “The advantages of using traditional Chinese medicine as an adjunctive therapy in the whole course of cancer treatment instead of only terminal stage of cancer,” BioScience Trends, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 16–34, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
An Introduction to Kanglaite Injection, 2007, http://www.kanglaite.com.
L. S. Schwartzberg, F. P. Arena, B. J. Bienvenu et al., “A randomized, open-label, safety and exploratory efficacy study of kanglaite injection (KLTi) plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1872–1883, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Bao, L. Xia, and H. Jang, “The experiment and study on cellular apoptosis produced by KLT Injections in pancreatic cancer cells,” Shanghai Journal Medicine, vol. 27, pp. 421–424, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Shi, X. Zheng, S. Zhang et al., “Kanglaite inhibits EMT caused by TNF-α via NF-κΒ inhibition in colorectal cancer cells,” Oncotarget, vol. 9, pp. 6771–6779, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, J. Zhang, Y. Hong, and X. Wang, “Effects of Kanglaite injection on serum miRNA-21 in patients with advanced lung cancer,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 24, pp. 2901290–2901296, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Benjamin, J. Meghan, and F. Justin, “Immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer,” Oncologist, vol. 22, p. 81, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
D.-P. Yu, Y. Han, Q.-Y. Zhao, and Z.-D. Liu, “CD3⁺ CD4⁺ and CD3⁺ CD8⁺ Lymphocyte subgroups and their surface receptors NKG2D and NKG2A in patients with non-small cell lung cancer,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2685–2688, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Pan, Y. Wu, Z.-Y. Guo, R. Wang, Y.-J. Wang, and Y.-F. Yuan, “Antitumor activity and immunomodulatory effects of the intraperitoneal administration of Kanglaite in vivo in Lewis lung carcinoma,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 680–685, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Jianxia Wen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

760

Downloads

934

Citations