1932

Abstract

While leadership is an important way to coordinate around the globe, societal culture may shape leadership processes and their effects. In this review, we discuss conceptualizations of culture and address what is known about the role culture plays in shaping leadership processes. For example, societal culture shapes people's implicit theories of leadership, and these affect how leaders and followers behave toward each other. Also, culture can moderate the relationship between leadership and important outcomes. We review research done in these areas as well as research on emerging topics in the field, such as followership across cultures and leading groups of employees who are from different areas of the world. As we review the findings of the literature to date, we also acknowledge some of the problems and methodological challenges faced in this field and discuss practical implications and areas for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-033711
2024-01-22
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/organ/11/1/annurev-orgpsych-110721-033711.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-033711&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adler NJ. 2002. International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior Cincinnati, OH: South-West. Coll. Publ, 4th ed.
  2. Adler NJ, Aycan Z. 2018. Cross-cultural interaction: what we know and what we need to know. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 5:307–33
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ailon G. 2008. Mirror, mirror on the wall: culture's consequences in a value test of its own design. Acad. Manag. Rev. 33:885–904
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aktas M, Gelfand MJ, Hanges PJ. 2016. Cultural tightness–looseness and perceptions of effective leadership. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 47:2294–309
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R. 2010. On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. Leadersh. Q. 21:61086–120
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aycan Z 2006. Paternalism: towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context U Kim, K-S Yang, K-K Hwang 445–66 New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aycan Z, Schyns B, Sun JM, Felfe J, Saher N. 2013. Convergence and divergence of paternalistic leadership: a cross-cultural investigation of prototypes. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 44:962–69
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baskerville RF. 2003. Hofstede never studied culture. Account. Organ. Soc. 28:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baskerville-Morley RF. 2005. A research note: the unfinished business of culture. Account. Organ. Soc. 30:389–91
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bass BM. 1997. Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?. Am. Psychol. 52:2130–39
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Beugelsdijk S, Kostova T, Roth K. 2017. An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 48:30–47
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blair BA, Bligh MC. 2018. Looking for leadership in all the wrong places: the impact of culture on proactive followership and follower dissent. J. Soc. Issues 74:1129–43
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boyacigiller NA, Kleinberg J, Phillips ME, Sackmann SA. 2004. Conceptualizing culture: elucidating the streams of research in international cross-cultural management. Handbook for International Management Research BJ Punnett, O Shenkar 99–167 Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bracht EM, Monzani L, Boer D, Haslam SA, Kerschreiter R et al. 2023. Innovation across cultures: connecting leadership, identification, and creative behavior in organizations. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 72:1348–88
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brockner J. 2003. Unpacking country effects: on the need to operationalize the psychological determinants of cross-national differences. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:333–67
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brodbeck FC, Frese M, Akerblom S, Audia G, Bakacsi G et al. 2000. Cultural variation of leadership prototypes across 22 European countries. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 73:11–29
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown ME, Treviño LK, Harrison DA. 2005. Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 97:2117–34
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bullough A, Renko M, Abdelzaher D. 2017. Women's business ownership: operating within the context of institutional and in-group collectivism. J. Manag. 43:72037–64
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA. 2007. Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 50:51217–34
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Carsten MK, Uhl-Bien M. 2012. Follower beliefs in the co-production of leadership: examining upward communication and the moderating role of context. Z. Psychol. 220:4210–20
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Carton AM. 2022. The science of leadership: a theoretical model and research agenda. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 9:61–93
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cho Y, Shin M, Billing TK, Bhagat RS. 2019. Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and affective organizational commitment: a closer look at their relationships in two distinct national contexts. Asian Bus. Manag. 18:3187–210
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Crede M, Jong J, Harms P. 2019. The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: a meta-analysis. J. Manag. Psychol. 34:3139–155
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Den Hartog ND, Dickson MW 2012. Leadership, culture, and globalization. The Nature of Leadership D Day, J Antonakis 393–436 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Den Hartog DN, House RJ, Hanges PJ, Ruiz-Quintanilla SA, Dorfman PW et al. 1999. Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?. Leadersh. Q. 10:2219–56
    [Google Scholar]
  26. DeRue DS, Ashford SJ. 2010. Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:4627–47
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dickson MW, Castaño N, Magomaeva A, Den Hartog DN. 2012. Conceptualizing leadership across cultures. J. World Bus. 47:4483–92
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dickson MW, Den Hartog DN, Castaño N. 2011. Understanding leadership across cultures. Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organization, and Work R Bhagat, R Steers 219–44 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dickson MW, Den Hartog DN, Mitchelson JK 2003. Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: making progress, and raising new questions. Leadersh. Q. 14:6729–68
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dorfman PW, Hanges PJ, Brodbeck FC. 2004. Leadership and cultural variation: the identification of culturally endorsed leadership profiles. See House et al. 2004 669–719
  31. Eisenbeiß SA, Brodbeck F. 2014. Ethical and unethical leadership: a cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 122:343–59
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Epitropaki O, Martin R. 2005. From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader–member exchanges and employee outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:4659–76
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ernst BA, Banks GC, Loignon AC, Frear KA, Williams CE et al. 2022. Virtual charismatic leadership and signaling theory: a prospective meta-analysis in five countries. Leadersh. Q. 33:5101541
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Fang T. 2003. A critique of Hofstede's fifth national culture dimension. Int. J. Cross Cult. Manag. 3:347–68
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Fischer T, Sitkin SB. 2023. Leadership styles: a comprehensive assessment and way forward. Acad. Manag. Ann. 17:1331–72
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Flatten T, Adams D, Brettel M. 2015. Fostering absorptive capacity through leadership: a cross-cultural analysis. J. World Bus. 50:3519–34
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Franke GR, Richey RG. 2010. Improving generalizations from multi-country comparisons in international business research. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41:1275–93
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Gelfand MJ. 2019. Rule Makers, Rule Breakers: Tight and Loose Cultures and the Secret Signals That Direct Our Lives New York: Scribner
  39. Gelfand MJ, Aycan Z, Erez M, Leung K. 2017. Cross-cultural industrial organizational psychology and organizational behavior: a hundred-year journey. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:3514–29
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gelfand MJ, Erez M, Aycan Z. 2007. Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58:479–14
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Gelfand MJ, Raver JL, Ehrhart KH. 2004. Methodological issues in cross-cultural organizational research. Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology SG Rogelberg 216–46 Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gelfand MJ, Raver JL, Nishii L, Leslie LM, Lun J et al. 2011. Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science 332:60331100–4
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gerstner CR, Day DV. 1994. Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadersh. Q. 5:2121–34
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Gupta V, Hanges PJ. 2004. Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures. See House et al. 2004 178–218
  45. Gupta V, Hanges PJ, Dorfman P. 2002. Cultural clusters: methodology and findings. J. World Bus. 37:111–15
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hanges PJ, Dickson MW. 2004. The development and validation of the GLOBE culture and leadership scales. See House et al. 2004 122–51
  47. Hanges PJ, Dickson MW. 2006. Agitation over aggregation: clarifying the development of and the nature of the GLOBE scales. Leadersh. Q. 17:5522–36
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hanges PJ, Lord RG, Dickson MW. 2000. An information processing perspective on leadership and culture: a case for connectionist architecture. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 49:133–61
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Haslam SA, Reicher SD, Platow MJ. 2020. The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power New York: Routledge
  50. Hiller NJ, Sin HP, Ponnapalli AR, Ozgen S. 2019. Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: a multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies. Leadersh. Q. 30:1165–84
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hofstede G. 1980. Culture's Consequences Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  52. Hofstede G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2nd ed.
  53. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. 2010.. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival New York: McGraw-Hill
  54. Hogg MA. 2001. A social identity theory of leadership. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 5:3184–200
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hong G, Cho Y, Froese FJ, Shin M. 2016. The effect of leadership styles, rank, and seniority on affective organizational commitment: a comparative study of U.S. and Korean employees. Cross Cult. Strateg. Manag. 23:2 https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2014-0034
    [Google Scholar]
  56. House RJ, Dorfman PW, Javidan M, Hanges PJ, De Luque MFS. 2014. Strategic Leadership Across Cultures: Globe Study of CEO Leadership Behavior and Effectiveness in 24 Countries Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  57. House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta VGLOBE Assoc 2004. Cultures, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Nations 1 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  58. House RJ, Hanges PJ, Ruiz-Quintanilla SA, Dorfman PW, Javidan M et al. 1999. Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. Advances in Global Leadership WH Mobley, MJ Gessner, V Arnold 171–233 Bingley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  59. House RJ, Wright N, Aditya RN. 1997. Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: a critical analysis and a proposed theory. New Perspectives on International/Organizational Psychology PC Earley, M Erez 535–625 San Francisco: New Lexington
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Huang X, Van de Vliert E. 2003. Where intrinsic job satisfaction fails to work: national moderators of intrinsic motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 24:2159–79
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Jackson TA, Meyer JP, Wang XH. 2013. Leadership, commitment, and culture: a meta-analysis. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 20:184–106
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Javidan M, House RJ, Dorfman PW, Hanges PJ, Sully de Luque M. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 37:897–914
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Kalshoven K, Den Hartog DN, De Hoogh AH 2011. Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Leadersh. Q. 22:151–69
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Karacay G, Bayraktar S, Kabasakal H, Dastmalchian A. 2019. Role of leaders as agents of negotiation for counterbalancing cultural dissonance in the Middle East and North Africa region. J. Int. Manag. 25:4100704
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Kerr S, Jermier JM. 1978. Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 22:3375–403
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Keyhani M, Lévesque M. 2016. The equilibrating and disequilibrating effects of entrepreneurship: revisiting the central premises. Strateg. Entrep. J. 10:165–88
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Kim M, Beehr TA, Prewett MS. 2018. Employee responses to empowering leadership: a meta-analysis. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 25:3257–76
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Lee A, Legood A, Hughes D, Tian AW, Newman A, Knight C. 2020a. Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 29:11–35
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Lee A, Lyubovnikova J, Tian AW, Knight C. 2020b. Servant leadership: a meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 93:11–44
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Lemoine GJ, Hartnell CA, Leroy H. 2019. Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: an integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Acad. Manag. Ann. 13:1148–87
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Leung K, Su SK 2004. Experimental methods for research on culture and management. Handbook for International Management Research BJ Punnett, O Shenkar 68–95 Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Li P, Sun JM, Taris TW, Xing L, Peeters MC. 2021. Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: a meta-analysis. Leadersh. Q. 32:1101458
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Zhao H, Henderson D. 2008. Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadersh. Q. 19:2161–77
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Liou S, Lan X. 2018. Situational salience of norms moderates cultural differences in the originality and usefulness of creative ideas generated or selected by teams. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 49:2290–302
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Lisak A, Erez M, Sui Y, Lee C. 2016. The positive role of global leaders in enhancing multicultural team innovation. . J. Int. Bus. Stud. 47:6655–73
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Lonner WJ 1980. The search for psychological universals. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1 HC Triandis, WW Lambert 143–204 Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Lord RG, Epitropaki O, Foti RJ, Hansbrough TK. 2020. Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 7:49–74
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Lu JG, Swaab RI, Galinsky AD. 2022. Global leaders for global teams: leaders with multicultural experiences communicate and lead more effectively, especially in multinational teams. Organ. Sci. 33:41554–73
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Mackey JD, Frieder RE, Brees JR, Martinko MJ. 2017. Abusive supervision: a meta-analysis and empirical review. J. Manag. 43:61940–65
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Mansur J, Sobral F, Goldszmidt R. 2017. Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures. J. World Bus. 52:5702–13
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Maseland R, Van Hoorn A. 2009. Explaining the negative correlation between values and practices: a note on the Hofstede–GLOBE debate. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 40:527–32
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Maseland R, Van Hoorn A. 2010. Values and marginal preferences in international business. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41:1325–29
    [Google Scholar]
  83. McCrae RR, Martin TA, Hrebícková M, Urbánek T, Boomsma DI et al. 2008. Personality trait similarity between spouses in four cultures. J. Personal. 76:51137–64
    [Google Scholar]
  84. McCune Stein A, Bell CM, Ai Min Y. 2020. Does “the servant as leader” translate into Chinese? A cross-cultural meta-analysis of servant leadership. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 29:3315–29
    [Google Scholar]
  85. McSweeney B. 2002. Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith—a failure of analysis. Hum. Relat. 55:89–118
    [Google Scholar]
  86. McSweeney B. 2009. Dynamic diversity: variety and variation within countries. Organ. Stud. 30:933–57
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Miao C, Humphrey RH, Qian S. 2018. A cross-cultural meta-analysis of how leader emotional intelligence influences subordinate task performance and organizational citizenship behavior. J. World Bus. 53:4463–74
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Nardon L, Steers RM. 2009. The culture theory jungle: divergence and convergence in models of national culture. Handbook of Culture, Organization, and Work R Bhagat, R Steers 3–22 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Neider LL, Schriesheim CA. 2011. The authentic leadership inventory (ALI): development and empirical tests. Leadersh. Q. 22:61146–64
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Neubert MJ, de Luque MS, Quade MJ, Hunter EM. 2022. Servant leadership across the globe: assessing universal and culturally contingent relevance in organizational contexts. J. World Bus. 57:2101268
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Ng TW, Feldman DC. 2015. Ethical leadership: meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:3948–65
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Oyserman D, Lee SWS 2007. Priming “culture”: culture as situated cognition. Handbook of Cultural Psychology S Kitayama, C Cohen 255–79 New York: Guilford Press
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Pagda Z, Bayraktar S, Jimenez A. 2021. Exploring culture and leadership after 23 years: a replication of GLOBE project in Turkey. J. Int. Manag. 27:1100822
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Pellegrini EK, Scandura TA. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: a review and agenda for future research. J. Manag. 34:3566–93
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Pellegrini EK, Scandura TA, Jayaraman V. 2010. Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: an expansion of leader-member exchange theory. Group Organ. Manag. 35:4391–420
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Peng AC, Kim D. 2020. A meta-analytic test of the differential pathways linking ethical leadership to normative conduct. J. Organ. Behav. 41:4348–68
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Peng J, Li M, Wang Z, Lin Y. 2021. Transformational leadership and employees’ reactions to organizational change: evidence from a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 57:3369–97
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Peterson MF, Arregle JL, Martin X. 2012. Multilevel models in international business research. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 43:451–57
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Peterson MF, Barreto TS 2015. Editor's introduction: culture across social sciences. Cross-Cultural Research 4 MF Peterson 1–4 London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Peterson MF, Søndergaard M. 2011. Traditions and transitions in quantitative societal culture research in organization studies. Organ. Stud. 32:111539–58
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Rockstuhl T, Dulebohn JH, Ang S, Shore LM. 2012. Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: a meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:61097–130
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Rockstuhl T, Wu D, Dulebohn JH, Liao C, Hoch JE. 2023. Cultural congruence or compensation? A meta-analytic test of transformational and transactional leadership effects across cultures. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 54:476–504
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Ronen S, Shenkar O. 2013. Mapping world cultures: cluster formation, sources and implications. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 44:867–97
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Schein EH. 1992. Organizational Culture and Leadership San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2nd ed..
  105. Scherbaum CA, Ferreter JM. 2009. Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organ. Res. Methods 12:2347–67
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Schwartz SH. 1994. Beyond Individualism/Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  107. Schwartz SH. 1999. Cultural value differences: some implications for work. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 48:23–48
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Schwartz SH. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Read. Psychol. Cult. 2:111
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Seshadri V, Elangovan ND. 2019. Role of manager in geographically distributed team; A Review. J. Manag. 6:1122–29
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Smith PB. 2006. When elephants fight, the grass gets trampled: the GLOBE and Hofstede projects. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 37:915–21
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Steffens NK, Munt KA, van Knippenberg D, Platow MJ, Haslam SA. 2021. Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: a meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 11:135–72
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Stephan U, Pathak S. 2016. Beyond cultural values? Cultural leadership ideals and entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 31:5505–23
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Taras V, Kirkman BL, Steel P. 2010. Examining the impact of Culture's Consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:3405–39
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Taras V, Steel P, Kirkman B. 2012. Improving national cultural indices using a longitudinal meta-analysis of Hofstede's dimensions. J. World Bus. 47:329–41
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Taras V, Steel P, Kirkman BL. 2016. Does country equate with culture? Beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries. Manag. Int. Rev. 56:455–87
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Tsui AS, Nifadkar SS, Ou AY. 2007. Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: advances, gaps, and recommendations. J. Manag. 33:3426–78
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Tung RL, Stahl GK. 2018. The tortuous evolution of the role of culture in IB research: what we know, what we don't know, and where we are headed. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 49:1167–89
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Urbach T, Den Hartog DN, Fay D, Parker SK, Strauss K 2021. Cultural variations in whether, why, how, and at what cost people are proactive: a followership perspective. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 11:13–34
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Van Dick R, Kerschreiter R. 2016. The social identity approach to effective leadership: an overview and some ideas on cross-cultural generalizability. Front. Bus. Res. China 10:3363–84
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Van Dick R, Lemoine JE, Steffens NK, Kerschreiter R, Akfirat SA et al. 2018. Identity leadership going global: validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory across 20 countries. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 91:4697–728
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Van Knippenberg D, Sitkin SB. 2013. A critical assessment of charismatic–transformational leadership research: back to the drawing board?. Acad. Manag. Ann. 7:11–60
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Venaik S, Brewer P. 2010. Avoiding uncertainty in Hofstede and GLOBE. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41:1294–315
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Venaik S, Brewer P. 2016. National culture dimensions: the perpetuation of cultural ignorance. Manag. Learn. 47:5563–89
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Vogel RM, Mitchell MS, Tepper BJ, Restubog SL, Hu C et al. 2015. A cross-cultural examination of subordinates' perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. J. Organ. Behav. 36:5720–45
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Wang G, Holmes RM, Devine RA, Bishoff J. 2018. CEO gender differences in careers and the moderating role of country culture: a meta-analytic investigation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Process. 148:30–53
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Watts LL, Steele LM, Den Hartog DN. 2020. Uncertainty avoidance moderates the relationship between transformational leadership and innovation: a meta-analysis. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 51:1138–45
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Zhang Y, Guo Y, Zhang M, Xu S, Liu X, Newman A. 2022. Antecedents and outcomes of authentic leadership across culture: a meta-analytic review. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 39:41399–435
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Zhang Y, Liao Z. 2015. Consequences of abusive supervision: a meta-analytic review. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 32:959–87
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Zhang L, Xu S, Liu X, Chen W. 2021. A meta-analytic review of the consequences of servant leadership: the moderating roles of cultural factors. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 38:1371–400
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-033711
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-033711
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error