skip to main content
article
Free Access

An office study: Its implications on the understanding of organizations

Published:01 January 1984Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The results of an office study are presented. The goals of the study were to determine some parameters of the problem solving and knowledge level processing that occurs in a particular organization. The problem solving processes in the organization are described and the relationship between these problem solving processes and some characteristics of the knowledge used to solve the problems is discussed. In addition we describe the impact exceptions have on the evolution of the organization and identify two mechanisms that help the organization adapt to change. The implications of the results of the study on the understanding of organizations are discussed. Areas of further study are described.

References

  1. 1 Barber, G. R. Office Semantics. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Barber, G. Supporting Organizational Problem Solving with a Workstation. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 1(1), January, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Barber, G., de Jong S. P. and Hewitt, C. Semantic Support for Work in Organizations. In Information Processing 83. IFIP, Paris, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Ellis, Clarence A. Formal and Informal Models of Office Activity. In Information Processing 83. IFIP, Paris, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Fikes, R. E. and Henderson, D. A. On Supporting the Use of Procedures in Office Work. In Proceedings of the First Annual AAAI Conference. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, August, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Fox, M. S. An Organizational View of Distributed Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man. and Cybernetics SMC-11(1), January, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Galbraith, J. Organization Design. Addison-Wesley. Reading. MA., 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Kornfeld. W. A. and Hewitt. C. The Scientific Community Metaphor. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man. and Cybernetics SMC-11(1), January, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Kunin, J. S. Analysis and Specification of Office Procedures. Technical Report 275, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, February, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11 March J. G. and Simon H. A. Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Simon, H. Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press., chapter 2. Economic Rationality: Adaptive Artifice. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13 Sirbu, M., Schoichet, S., Kunin, J. and Hammer, M. OAM: An Office Analysis Methodology. Office Automation Group Memo OAM-016, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, January, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 Taylor, F. W. Scientific Management. New York, 1947.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGOA Newsletter
    ACM SIGOA Newsletter  Volume 5, Issue 1-2
    June 25-27, 1984
    225 pages
    ISSN:0737-819X
    DOI:10.1145/966863
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    • cover image ACM Conferences
      COCS '84: Proceedings of the second ACM-SIGOA conference on Office information systems
      January 1984
      228 pages
      ISBN:0897911407
      DOI:10.1145/800023

    Copyright © 1984 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 January 1984

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader