skip to main content
10.1145/944519.944546acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesclihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Impact of numerical and graphical formats on dynamic decision making performance: an eye-tracking study

Published:17 August 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a study in which we manipulated the interface of a computer simulation into: graphical and numerical formats. We obtained both performance and eye-tracking learning curves from individuals assigned to one of these two conditions. Our findings indicate that although performance is not different between the two interfaces, the amount of attention as measured by the number of eye-tracking points was very different in the graphical and numerical conditions. Attention increased over time in the numerical condition, but was stable in the graphical condition. These results showed that the strategies used to make decisions in dynamic environments vary according to the form of information presentation.

References

  1. Hoadley, E., Investigating the Effects of Color. Communications of the ACM, 1990. 33(2): p. 120--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gonzalez, C. Does animation in user interfaces improve decision making? in Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI'96. 1996. Vancouver, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kennedy, M., D. Te'eni, and J. B. Treleaven, Impacts of decision task, data, and display on strategies for extracting information. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1998. 48(2): p. 159--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Davis, L. R., Report Format and the Decision Maker's Task: An Experimental Investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1989. 14(5/6): p. 495--508.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benbasat, I., A. S. Dexter, and P. Todd, The Influence of Color and Graphical Information Presentation in Managerial Decision Simulation. Human-Computer Interaction, 1986. 2: p. 65--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Umanath, N. S. and R. W. Schmell, An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Data Display Format on Recall Performance. Communications of the ACM, 1988. 31(5): p. 562--570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brehmer, B., Strategies in real-time, dynamic decision making., in Insights in Decision Making, R. M. Hogarth, Editor. 1990, University of Chicago Press. p. 262--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, W., Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processing. Human Factors, 1962. 4: p. 59--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Engberg, J. M. and F. L. Wallace, Information Extraction from Different Data Representation Forms on a CRT: Charts and Tables. 1994, University of North Florida: Jacksonville, FL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Logan, G., Toward an Instance Theory of Automatization. Psychological Review, 1988. 95(4): p. 492--527.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonzalez, C., F. J. Lerch, and C. Lebiere, Instance-Based Learning in Dynamic Decision Making. Cognitive Science, In Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Salvucci, D. D. An interactive model-based environment for eye-movement protocol analysis and visualization. in Proceedings of the symposium on Eye tracking research & applications 2000. 2000. Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Impact of numerical and graphical formats on dynamic decision making performance: an eye-tracking study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CLIHC '03: Proceedings of the Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction
      August 2003
      296 pages
      ISBN:9781450343244
      DOI:10.1145/944519

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 August 2003

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate14of42submissions,33%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader