skip to main content
10.1145/800294.811440acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

An application of simulation to compare production line configurations with failures and repairs

Published:01 January 1971Publication History

ABSTRACT

Three parallel production line configurations are compared by simulation: parallel but independent, dual line without expediting, and a dual line with expediting possible around a failure station. Each facility within a stage draws parts from a common queue in a dual line. Relative performance is studied while varying queue capacity, failure rate, repair rate, and number of stages. The preferability of a dual over independent lines is found to depend upon the degree of expediting possible. Expediting, in turn, depends upon the degree of idle machine capacity built into the work standards.

References

  1. 1.Barten, Kenneth, "A Queuing Simulator for Determining Optimum Inventory Levels in a Sequential Process," Journal of Industrial Engineering, XIII, no. 4 (July-August, 1962), pp. 245-52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Chou, Ya-lun, Statistical Analysis, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Conway, R. W., "Some Tactical Problems in Digital Simulation," Management Science, Vol. 10, no. 1(October, 1963), p. 47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Conway, R. W., Johnson, R. M., and Maxwell, W. L., "Some Problems of Digital Machine Simulation," Management Science, Vol. 4, no. 1 (October, 1959).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Gavett, J. William, Production and Operations Management, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Gordon, Geoffrey, System Simulation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Hillier, Frederick S. and Lieberman, Gerald J., Introduction to Operations Research, Holden-Day Inc., San Francisco, 1968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Kiviat, P. J. et al., The SIMSCRIPT II Programming Language, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Mastor, A. A., "Experimental Investigation and Comparative Evaluation of Production Line Balancing Techniques," Management Science, 16 (July, 1970), pp. 728-746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Sadler, G. H., System Reliability Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Shooman, Martin L., Probablistic Reliability: An Engineering Approach, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Taylor, J. and Jackson, R., Operations Research Quarterly, Vol. 5, 1954, p. 95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13.Wallis, W. Allen and Roberts, Harry V., Statistics: A New Approach, The Free Press, New York, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Wyman, Forrest Paul, Simulation Modeling: A Guide to Using SIMSCRIPT, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An application of simulation to compare production line configurations with failures and repairs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WSC '71: Proceedings of the 5th conference on Winter simulation
        January 1971
        544 pages
        ISBN:9781450374088
        DOI:10.1145/800294

        Copyright © 1971 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 January 1971

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate3,413of5,075submissions,67%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader