skip to main content
10.1145/773184.773185acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesppdpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Should UML be used for declarative programming?

Published:05 September 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Widely used in object-oriented programming, the Unified Modelling Language (UML) is largely ignored by the declarative programming community. this paper attempts to introduce the UML and provide reasons for its adoption by declarative programmers as both a design methodology and as a novel application area.

References

  1. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson. The Unified Modelling Language User Guide. Addison Wesley, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Fowler. UML Distilled. Addison-Wesley, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Garlan. Course notes for architectures for software systems, Carnegie Mellon University, Spring 1998. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/tinker-arch/www/html/index.html, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Garlan and M. Shaw, An introduction to software architecture. In V. Ambriola and G. Tortora, editors, Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge, pages 1--39. World Scientific, 1993Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. IBM. Object constraint language. http://www-4.ibm.com/software/ad/standards/ocl.html, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Jackson. Alloy: a lightweight modelling notation. Technical Report 797, MIT Lab. for Computer Science, http://sdg.lcs.mit.edu/"jackson, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Jackson, I. Schechter, and I. Shlyakhter. Alcoa: the Alloy constraint analyzer. In Proc. International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. Jacobson, G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh. The Unified Software Development Process. Addison Wesley, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Jayaraman and P. Tambay. Constrained objects for modeling complex structures. In Proc. ACM Conf. OOPSLA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Kiczales, et al. Aspect-oriented programming. In Proceedings of European Conf. on Object-Oriented Programming, LNCS 1241, Springer, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Mizuno. A pattern-based approach to developing concurrent programs in UML--Parts 1 and 2. Technical Reports 2001--2 and 2001--3, Computing and Info. Sciences Department, Kansas State University, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Mizuno, G. Singh, and M. Nielsen. A structured approach to develop concurrent programs in UML. In Proc. Third International Conference on UML, pages 541--565. LNCS 1939, Springer, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Pooley and P. Stevens, Using UML. Addison Wesley, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Precise UML Group. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/puml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture: Pespectives on an Emerging Discipine. Prentice Hall, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Wolper. The meaning of "formal": from weak to strong formal methods. Int'l J. Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1:6--8, 1997Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Should UML be used for declarative programming?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PPDP '01: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming
      September 2001
      222 pages
      ISBN:158113388X
      DOI:10.1145/773184

      Copyright © 2001 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 September 2001

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      PPDP '01 Paper Acceptance Rate19of40submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate230of486submissions,47%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader