skip to main content
article

Encouraging women in computer science

Published:01 June 2002Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

At a cost to both their own opportunities and society's ability to produce people with much-needed technical skills, women continue to be underrepresented in computer science degree programs at both the undergraduate and graduate level. Although some of the barriers that women face have their foundations in cultural expectations established well before the college level, we believe that departments can take effective steps to increase recruitment and retention of women students. This paper describes several strategies we have adopted at Stanford over the past decade.

References

  1. American Association of University Women. Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC: AAUW, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hal Abelson, Tracy Adams, Lou Braida, Anne Hunter, Bette Johnson, Marilee Jones, Naved Khan, Marilyn Pierce, Lynn Stein, Lisa Tucker-Kellogg, Susan Yeh. Women undergraduate enrollment in electrical engineering and computer science at MIT. Final report of the EECS Women Undergraduate Enrollment Committee, January 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Richard Austing, Bruce Barnes, Della Bonnette, Gerald Engel, and Gordon Stokes. Curriculum '78: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science. Communications of the ACM, March 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Janice Cuny and William Aspray. Recruitment and Retention of Women Graduate Students in Computer Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: Computing Research Association, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kent K. Curtis. Computer manpower: Is there a crisis? Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 1983. ⟨http://www.acm.org/sigcse/papers/curtis83/⟩.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Allan Fisher, Jane Margolis, and Faye Miller. Undergraduate women in computer science: Experience, motivation, and culture. SIGCSE Bulletin, March 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Allan Fisher and Jane Margolis. Unlocking the clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon experience, women in computer science: Experience, motivation, and culture. inroads (the SIGCSE Bulletin), June 2002 (this issue). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Shawna L. Fletcher, Dana C. Newell, Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, and Leyla D. Newton. The women in applied science and engineering summer bridge program: Easing the transition for first-time female engineering students. Proceedings of the 2001 Frontiers in Education Conference. Reno, NV, October 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Batya Friedman and Helen Nissenbaum. Bias in Computer Systems. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, 1994 (report number CSLI-94-188).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Carol Frieze and Lenore Blum. Building an effective computer science student organization: The Carnegie Mellon women@SCS action plan. inroads (the SIGCSE Bulletin), June 2002 (this issue). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Roberta Hall and Bernice Sandler. The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women? Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges, Project on the Status and Education of Women, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Susan T. Hill. Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966-96. Report number NSF 99-330. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women Studying Computer Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Laboratory for Computer Science. Barriers to equality in academia: women in computer science at MIT. Report prepared by female graduate students and research staff in the Laboratory for Computer Science and the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT, February 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2001. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Dept. of Education, March 2002. ⟨http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002130⟩Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Amy Pearl, Martha Pollack, Eve Riskin, Becky Thomas, Elizabeth Wolf, and Alice Wu. Becoming a computer scientist. Communications of the ACM, November 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eric S. Roberts, John Lilly, and Bryan Rollins. Using undergraduates as teaching assistants in introductory programming courses: An update on the Stanford experience. SIGCSE Bulletin, March 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Eric S. Roberts. Conserving the seed corn: Reflections on the academic hiring crisis. SIGCSE Bulletin, December 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ellen Spertus. Why are there so few female computer scientists? MIT technical report, August 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Laraine Zappert and Kendyll Stansbury. In the pipeline: A comparative analysis of men and women in graduate programs in science, engineering, and medicine at Stanford University. Stanford University: Institute for Research on Women and Gender, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
    ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 34, Issue 2
    Women and Computing
    June 2002
    176 pages
    ISSN:0097-8418
    DOI:10.1145/543812
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2002 Authors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 June 2002

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader