skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Predicting Multi-dimensional Surgical Outcomes with Multi-modal Mobile Sensing: A Case Study with Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 May 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Pre-operative prediction of post-surgical recovery for patients is vital for clinical decision-making and personalized treatments, especially with lumbar spine surgery, where patients exhibit highly heterogeneous outcomes. Existing predictive tools mainly rely on traditional Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), which fail to capture the long-term dynamics of patient conditions before the surgery. Moreover, existing studies focus on predicting a single surgical outcome. However, recovery from spine surgery is multi-dimensional, including multiple distinctive but interrelated outcomes, such as pain interference, physical function, and quality of recovery. In recent years, the emergence of smartphones and wearable devices has presented new opportunities to capture longitudinal and dynamic information regarding patients' conditions outside the hospital. This paper proposes a novel machine learning approach, Multi-Modal Multi-Task Learning (M3TL), using smartphones and wristbands to predict multiple surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgeries. We formulate the prediction of pain interference, physical function, and quality of recovery as a multi-task learning (MTL) problem. We leverage multi-modal data to capture the static and dynamic characteristics of patients, including (1) traditional features from PROMs and Electronic Health Records (EHR), (2) Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) collected from smartphones, and (3) sensing data from wristbands. Moreover, we introduce new features derived from the correlation of EMA and wearable features measured within the same time frame, effectively enhancing predictive performance by capturing the interdependencies between the two data modalities. Our model interpretation uncovers the complementary nature of the different data modalities and their distinctive contributions toward multiple surgical outcomes. Furthermore, through individualized decision analysis, our model identifies personal high risk factors to aid clinical decision making and approach personalized treatments. In a clinical study involving 122 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery, our M3TL model outperforms a diverse set of baseline methods in predictive performance, demonstrating the value of integrating multi-modal data and learning from multiple surgical outcomes. This work contributes to advancing personalized peri-operative care with accurate pre-operative predictions of multi-dimensional outcomes.

References

  1. Martín Abadi, Ashish Agarwal, Paul Barham, Eugene Brevdo, Zhifeng Chen, Craig Citro, Greg S Corrado, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, et al. 2016. Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michelle Accardi-Ravid, Linda Eaton, Alexa Meins, Daniel Godfrey, Debra Gordon, Ivan Lesnik, and Ardith Doorenbos. 2020. A qualitative descriptive Study of patient experiences of pain before and after spine surgery. Pain Medicine 21, 3 (2020), 604--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Hasan S Ahmad, Andrew I Yang, Gregory W Basil, Disha Joshi, Michael Y Wang, William C Welch, and Jang W Yoon. 2022. Developing a prediction model for identification of distinct perioperative clinical stages in spine surgery with smartphone-based mobility data. Neurosurgery 90, 5 (2022), 588--596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sajid Ali, Shaker El-Sappagh, Farman Ali, Muhammad Imran, and Tamer Abuhmed. 2022. Multitask deep learning for cost-effective prediction of patient's length of stay and readmission state using multimodal physical activity sensory data. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 26, 12 (2022), 5793--5804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Renée Allvin, Katarina Berg, Ewa Idvall, and Ulrica Nilsson. 2007. Postoperative recovery: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57, 5 (Mar 2007), 552--558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04156.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Saad M Alsaadi, James H McAuley, Julia M Hush, Serigne Lo, Delwyn J Bartlett, Roland R Grunstein, and Chris G Maher. 2014. The bidirectional relationship between pain intensity and sleep disturbance/quality in patients with low back pain. The Clinical journal of pain 30, 9 (2014), 755--765.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tihomir Asparouhov, Ellen L Hamaker, and Bengt Muthén. 2018. Dynamic structural equation models. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal 25, 3 (2018), 359--388.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sangwon Bae, Anind K Dey, and Carissa A Low. 2016. Using passively collected sedentary behavior to predict hospital readmission. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 616--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A Barzouhi, C Vleggeert-Lankamp, G Lycklama a Nijeholt, S Boden, D Davis, T Dina, N Boos, R Rieder, V Schade, E Carragee, et al. 2017. Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations. manuelletherapie 21, 02 (2017), 54--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeremiah W Bertz, David H Epstein, and Kenzie L Preston. 2018. Combining ecological momentary assessment with objective, ambulatory measures of behavior and physiology in substance-use research. Addictive behaviors 83 (2018), 5--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Marius Breitmayer, Michael Stach, Robin Kraft, Johannes Allgaier, Manfred Reichert, Winfried Schlee, Thomas Probst, Berthold Langguth, and Rüdiger Pryss. 2023. Predicting the presence of tinnitus using ecological momentary assessments. Scientific Reports 13, 1 (2023), 8989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jason P Burnham, Chenyang Lu, Lauren H Yaeger, Thomas C Bailey, and Marin H Kollef. 2018. Using wearable technology to predict health outcomes: a literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25, 9 (2018), 1221--1227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. David Cella, Susan Yount, Nan Rothrock, Richard Gershon, Karon Cook, Bryce Reeve, Deborah Ader, James F. Fries, Bonnie Bruce, and Mattias Rose. 2007. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care 45, Suppl 1 (May 2007), S3-S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Tongjia Chu, Chen Zhao, Jian Zhang, Kehang Duan, Mingyang Li, Tianqi Zhang, Shengnan Lv, Huan Liu, and Feng Wei. 2022. Application of a convolutional neural network for multitask learning to simultaneously predict microvascular invasion and vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters in hepatocellular carcinoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology 29, 11 (2022), 6774--6783.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Heidy Cos, Dingwen Li, Gregory Williams, Jeffrey Chininis, Ruixuan Dai, Jingwen Zhang, Rohit Srivastava, Lacey Raper, Dominic Sanford, William Hawkins, et al. 2021. Predicting outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatectomy using wearable technology and machine learning: prospective cohort study. Journal of medical Internet research 23, 3 (2021), e23595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tom J Crijns, David N Bernstein, David Ring, Ronald M Gonzalez, Danielle M Wilbur, and Warren C Hammert. 2019. Depression and pain interference correlate with physical function in patients recovering from hand surgery. Hand 14, 6 (2019), 830--835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Rebecca J Crochiere, Fengqing Zhang, Adrienne S Juarascio, Stephanie P Goldstein, J Graham Thomas, and Evan M Forman. 2021. Comparing ecological momentary assessment to sensor-based approaches in predicting dietary lapse. Translational behavioral medicine 11, 12 (2021), 2099--2109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruixuan Dai, Thomas Kannampallil, Jingwen Zhang, Nan Lv, Jun Ma, and Chenyang Lu. 2022. Multi-task learning for randomized controlled trials: a case study on predicting depression with wearable data. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 2 (2022), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bradley Efron and Robert Tibshirani. 1997. Improvements on cross-validation: the 632+ bootstrap method. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92, 438 (1997), 548--560.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. James B Elsner and Anastasios A Tsonis. 1996. Singular spectrum analysis: a new tool in time series analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeremy CT Fairbank and Paul B Pynsent. 2000. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25, 22 (2000), 2940--2953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lynne M Feehan, Jasmina Geldman, Eric C Sayre, Chance Park, Allison M Ezzat, Ju Young Yoo, Clayon B Hamilton, and Linda C Li. 2018. Accuracy of Fitbit devices: systematic review and narrative syntheses of quantitative data. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6, 8 (2018), e10527.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chris Fifty, Ehsan Amid, Zhe Zhao, Tianhe Yu, Rohan Anil, and Chelsea Finn. 2021. Efficiently identifying task groupings for multi-task learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 27503--27516.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M Frumkin, J Greenberg, J Zhang, S Javeed, Z Xu, B Benedict, K Botterbush, W Ray, C Lu, and T Rodebaugh. 2024. In-Vivo Assessment of Movement-Evoked Pain using Digital Technology in Patients with Chronic Back Pain: Implications for treatment personalization. (2024).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Madelyn R Frumkin, Jacob K Greenberg, Preston Boyd, Saad Javeed, Bulenda Shayo, Jin Shin, Elizabeth A Wilson, Justin K Zhang, Michael JL Sullivan, Simon Haroutounian, et al. 2023. Establishing the reliability, validity, and prognostic utility of the momentary pain catastrophizing scale for use in ecological momentary assessment research. The Journal of Pain 24, 8 (2023), 1423--1433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Hans J Gerbershagen, Sanjay Aduckathil, Albert JM van Wijck, Linda M Peelen, Cor J Kalkman, and Winfried Meissner. 2013. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 118, 4 (2013), 934--944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Hans J. Gerbershagen, Sanjay Aduckathil, Albert J. M. van Wijck, Linda M. Peelen, Cor J. Kalkman, and Winfried Meissner. 2013. Pain Intensity on the First Day after Surgery. Anesthesiology 118, 4 (Apr 2013), 934--944. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e31828866b3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Hamid Reza Ghafarian Malamiri, Iman Rousta, Haraldur Olafsson, Hadi Zare, and Hao Zhang. 2018. Gap-filling of MODIS time series land surface temperature (LST) products using singular spectrum analysis (SSA). Atmosphere 9, 9 (2018), 334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Debra B Gordon, June L Dahl, Christine Miaskowski, Bill McCarberg, Knox H Todd, Judith A Paice, Arthur G Lipman, Marilyn Bookbinder, Steve H Sanders, Dennis C Turk, et al. 2005. American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Archives of internal medicine 165, 14 (2005), 1574--1580.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. JK Greenberg, M Frumkin, Z Xu, J Zhang, S Javeed, JK Zhang, B Benedict, K Botterbush, S Yakdan, CA Molina, et al. 2024. Preoperative Mobile Health Data Improve Predictions of Recovery From Lumbar Spine Surgery. Neurosurgery (2024).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacob K Greenberg, Madelyn R Frumkin, Saad Javeed, Justin K Zhang, Ruixuan Dai, Camilo A Molina, Brenton H Pennicooke, Nitin Agarwal, Paul Santiago, Matthew L Goodwin, et al. 2023. Feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative multimodal mobile health assessment in spine surgery candidates. Neurosurgery 92, 3 (2023), 538--546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jacob K Greenberg, Michael P Kelly, Joshua M Landman, Justin K Zhang, Shay Bess, Justin S Smith, Lawrence G Lenke, Christopher I Shaffrey, and Keith H Bridwell. 2022. Individual differences in postoperative recovery trajectories for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 37, 3 (2022), 429--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ellen L Hamaker, Tihomir Asparouhov, Annette Brose, Florian Schmiedek, and Bengt Muthén. 2018. At the frontiers of modeling intensive longitudinal data: Dynamic structural equation models for the affective measurements from the COGITO study. Multivariate behavioral research 53, 6 (2018), 820--841.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Richard Hardstone, Simon-Shlomo Poil, Giuseppina Schiavone, Rick Jansen, Vadim V Nikulin, Huibert D Mansvelder, and Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen. 2012. Detrended fluctuation analysis: a scale-free view on neuronal oscillations. Frontiers in physiology 3 (2012), 450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu He, Sreenath Chalil Madathil, Greg Servis, and Mohammad T Khasawneh. 2021. Neural network-based multi-task learning for inpatient flow classification and length of stay prediction. Applied Soft Computing 108 (2021), 107483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Jeffrey J Hébert, Edward Abraham, Niels Wedderkopp, Erin Bigney, Eden Richardson, Mariah Darling, Hamilton Hall, Charles G Fisher, Y Raja Rampersaud, Kenneth C Thomas, et al. 2020. Preoperative factors predict postoperative trajectories of pain and disability following surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 45, 21 (2020), E1421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Natasha Jaques, Sara Taylor, Akane Sano, and Rosalind Picard. 2015. Multi-task, multi-kernel learning for estimating individual wellbeing. In Proc. NIPS Workshop on Multimodal Machine Learning, Montreal, Quebec, Vol. 898. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Mark P Jensen and Dennis C Turk. 2014. Contributions of psychology to the understanding and treatment of people with chronic pain: why it matters to ALL psychologists. American Psychologist 69, 2 (2014), 105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Wenyu Jiang and Richard Simon. 2007. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification. Statistics in medicine 26, 29 (2007), 5320--5334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Ara Jo, Bryan D Coronel, Courtney E Coakes, and Arch G Mainous III. 2019. Is there a benefit to patients using wearable devices such as Fitbit or health apps on mobiles? A systematic review. The American journal of medicine 132, 12 (2019), 1394--1400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Rudolph Emil Kalman. 1960. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Transactions of the ASME-Journal of Basic Engineering 82, Series D (1960), 35--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Saddam F Kanaan, Paul M Arnold, Douglas C Burton, Hung-Wen Yeh, Lindsay Loyd, and Neena K Sharma. 2015. Investigating and predicting early lumbar spine surgery outcomes. Journal of allied health 44, 2 (2015), 83--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Saddam F Kanaan, Lemuel R Waitman, Hung-Wen Yeh, Paul M Arnold, Douglas C Burton, and Neena K Sharma. 2015. Structural equation model analysis of the length-of-hospital stay after lumbar spine surgery. The Spine Journal 15, 4 (2015), 612--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. M Karas, N Marinsek, J Goldhahn, L Foschini, E Ramirez, and I Clay. [n. d.]. Predicting Subjective Recovery from Lower Limb Surgery Using Consumer Wearables. Digit Biomark. 2020; 4 (Suppl 1): 73--86. doi: 10.1159/000511531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Alex Kendall, Yarin Gal, and Roberto Cipolla. 2018. Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 7482--7491.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Richard Kendall, Bill Wagner, Darrel Brodke, Jerry Bounsanga, Maren Voss, Yushan Gu, Ryan Spiker, Brandon Lawrence, and Man Hung. 2018. The relationship of PROMIS pain interference and physical function scales. Pain Medicine 19, 9 (2018), 1720--1724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Sara Khor, Danielle Lavallee, Amy M Cizik, Carlo Bellabarba, Jens R Chapman, Christopher R Howe, Dawei Lu, A Alex Mohit, Rod J Oskouian, Jeffrey R Roh, et al. 2018. Development and validation of a prediction model for pain and functional outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. JAMA surgery 153, 7 (2018), 634--642.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Ho-Joong Kim, Joon-Hee Park, Jang-Woo Kim, Kyoung-Tak Kang, Bong-Soon Chang, Choon-Ki Lee, and Jin S Yeom. 2014. Prediction of postoperative pain intensity after lumbar spinal surgery using pain sensitivity and preoperative back pain severity. Pain medicine 15, 12 (2014), 2037--2045.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Zachary D King, Judith Moskowitz, Begum Egilmez, Shibo Zhang, Lida Zhang, Michael Bass, John Rogers, Roozbeh Ghaffari, Laurie Wakschlag, and Nabil Alshurafa. 2019. Micro-stress EMA: A passive sensing framework for detecting in-the-wild stress in pregnant mothers. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Atesh Koul, Cristina Becchio, and Andrea Cavallo. 2018. Cross-validation approaches for replicability in psychology. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 1117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Kurt Kroenke, Robert L. Spitzer, and Janet B. W. Williams. 2001. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16, 9 (Sep 2001), 606--613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. CASEY K LEE, HAROLD T HANSEN, and ANDREW B WEISS. 1978. Developmental lumbar spinal stenosis: Pathology and surgical treatment. Spine 3, 3 (1978), 246--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Lukas Liebel and Marco Körner. 2018. Auxiliary tasks in multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.06334 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Breton Line, Shay Bess, Jeffrey L Gum, Richard Hostin, Khaled Kebaish, Christopher Ames, Douglas Burton, Gregory Mundis, Robert Eastlack, Munish Gupta, et al. 2022. Opioid use prior to surgery is associated with worse preoperative and postoperative patient reported quality of life and decreased surgical cost effectiveness for symptomatic adult spine deformity; a matched cohort analysis. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ) 9 (2022), 100096.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Carissa A Low, Dana H Bovbjerg, Steven Ahrendt, M Haroon Choudry, Matthew Holtzman, Heather L Jones, James F Pingpank Jr, Lekshmi Ramalingam, Herbert J Zeh III, Amer H Zureikat, et al. 2018. Fitbit step counts during inpatient recovery from cancer surgery as a predictor of readmission. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 52, 1 (2018), 88--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Nicolai Maldaner, Marketa Sosnova, Anna M Zeitlberger, Michal Ziga, Oliver P Gautschi, Luca Regli, Astrid Weyerbrock, and Martin N Stienen. 2020. Evaluation of the 6-minute walking test as a smartphone app-based self-measurement of objective functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 33, 6 (2020), 779--788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Anne F Mannion, A Elfering, Ralph Staerkle, Astrid Junge, Dieter Grob, Jiri Dvorak, Nicola Jacobshagen, Norbert Karl Semmer, and Norbert Boos. 2007. Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. European Spine Journal 16 (2007), 777--786.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Matthew J McGirt, Scott L Parker, Silky Chotai, Deborah Pfortmiller, Jeffrey M Sorenson, Kevin Foley, and Anthony L Asher. 2017. Predictors of extended length of stay, discharge to inpatient rehab, and hospital readmission following elective lumbar spine surgery: introduction of the Carolina-Semmes Grading Scale. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 27, 4 (2017), 382--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Angus GK McNair, F MacKichan, JL Donovan, ST Brookes, KNL Avery, SM Griffin, T Crosby, and JM Blazeby. 2016. What surgeons tell patients and what patients want to know before major cancer surgery: a qualitative study. BMC cancer 16 (2016), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Ralph J Mobbs, Kevin Phan, Monish Maharaj, and Prashanth J Rao. 2016. Physical activity measured with accelerometer and self-rated disability in lumbar spine surgery: a prospective study. Global Spine Journal 6, 5 (2016), 459--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Makoto Mori, Sanket S Dhruva, Arnar Geirsson, and Harlan M Krumholz. 2022. Characterization of multi-domain postoperative recovery trajectories after cardiac surgery using a digital platform. npj Digital Medicine 5, 1 (2022), 192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. William Mualem, Sulaman Durrani, Nikita Lakomkin, Jamie Van Gompel, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa, and Mohamad Bydon. 2022. Utilizing data from wearable technologies in the era of telemedicine to assess patient function and outcomes in neurosurgery: systematic review and time-trend analysis of the literature. World neurosurgery (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Manpreet S. Mundi, Paul A. Lorentz, Karen Grothe, Todd A. Kellogg, and Maria L. Collazo-Clavell. 2015. Feasibility of Smartphone-Based Education Modules and Ecological Momentary Assessment/Intervention in Pre-bariatric Surgery Patients. Obesity Surgery 25, 10 (Feb 2015), 1875--1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1617-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Lindsay D. Nelson, Jana Ranson, Adam R. Ferguson, Joseph Giacino, David O. Okonkwo, Alex B. Valadka, Geoffrey T. Manley, Michael A. McCrea, and the TRACK-TBI Investigators. 2017. Validating Multi-Dimensional Outcome Assessment Using the Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements: An Analysis of the TRACK-TBI Pilot Study Sample. Journal of Neurotrauma 34, 22 (Nov 2017), 3158--3172. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Che Ngufor, Sudhindra Upadhyaya, Dennis Murphree, Daryl Kor, and Jyotishman Pathak. 2015. Multi-task learning with selective cross-task transfer for predicting bleeding and other important patient outcomes. In 2015 IEEE International conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Che Ngufor, Sudhindra Upadhyaya, Dennis Murphree, Nageswar Madde, Daryl Kor, and Jyotishman Pathak. 2015. A heterogeneous multi-task learning for predicting RBC transfusion and perioperative outcomes. In Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: 15th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, AIME 2015, Pavia, Italy, June 17-20, 2015. Proceedings 15. Springer, 287--297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Jared Ou-Young, Stuart Boggett, Doa El-Ansary, Sandy Clarke-Errey, Colin Royse, and Andrea Bowyer. 2023. Identifying risk factors for poor multidimensional recovery after major surgery: A systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 67, 10 (Jul 2023), 1294--1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Diane Oyen and Terran Lane. 2012. Leveraging domain knowledge in multitask Bayesian network structure learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 26, 1091--1097.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research 12 (2011), 2825--2830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825--2830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Julie A Penley, Joe Tomaka, and John S Wiebe. 2002. The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of behavioral medicine 25 (2002), 551--603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Prashanth J Rao, Kevin Phan, Monish M Maharaj, Matthew H Pelletier, William R Walsh, and Ralph J Mobbs. 2016. Accelerometers for objective evaluation of physical activity following spine surgery. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 26 (2016), 14--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Rosalba Rosato, Valentina Palazzo, Felice Borghi, Marco Camanni, Andrea Puppo, Elena Maria Delpiano, Luca Pellegrino, Elisa Piovano, Alessio Rizzo, Monica Rolfo, et al. 2023. Factor structure of post-operative quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15): An Italian adaptation and validation. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2023), 1096579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Stefan Schneider, Doerte U Junghaenel, Joan E Broderick, Masakatsu Ono, Marcella May, and Arthur A Stone. 2021. II. Indices of pain intensity derived from ecological momentary assessments and their relationships with patient functioning: an individual patient data meta-analysis. The journal of pain 22, 4 (2021), 371--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Saul Shiffman, Arthur A Stone, and Michael R Hufford. 2008. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4 (2008), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Richard L Skolasky, Stephen T Wegener, Anica M Maggard, and Lee W Riley. 2014. The Impact of Reduction of Pain After Lumbar Spine Surgery. Spine 39, 17 (Aug 2014), 1426--1432. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Matthew Smuck, Amir Muaremi, Patricia Zheng, Justin Norden, Aman Sinha, Richard Hu, and Christy Tomkins-Lane. 2018. Objective measurement of function following lumbar spinal stenosis decompression reveals improved functional capacity with stagnant real-life physical activity. The Spine Journal 18, 1 (2018), 15--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Joseph E Snavely, Joseph A Weiner, Daniel J Johnson, Wellington K Hsu, and Alpesh A Patel. 2021. Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative outcomes in lumbar spine surgery patients. Spine 46, 17 (2021), 1139--1146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Trevor Standley, Amir Zamir, Dawn Chen, Leonidas Guibas, Jitendra Malik, and Silvio Savarese. 2020. Which tasks should be learned together in multi-task learning?. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 9120--9132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Martin N Stienen, Paymon G Rezaii, Allen L Ho, Anand Veeravagu, Corinna C Zygourakis, Christy Tomkins-Lane, Jon Park, John K Ratliff, and Atman M Desai. 2020. Objective activity tracking in spine surgery: a prospective feasibility study with a low-cost consumer grade wearable accelerometer. Scientific Reports 10, 1 (2020), 4939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. AA Stone, JE Broderick, RE Goldman, DU Junghaenel, A Bolton, M May, and S Schneider. 2020. Indices of pain intensity derived from ecological momentary assessments: rationale and stakeholder interviews. Journal of Pain,(under review)[Europe PMC free article][Abstract][Google Scholar] (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Sneha Subramaniam, Jeffrey J Aalberg, Rainier P Soriano, and Celia M Divino. 2018. New 5-factor modified frailty index using American College of Surgeons NSQIP data. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 226, 2 (2018), 173--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Michael JL Sullivan, Scott R Bishop, and Jayne Pivik. 1995. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychological assessment 7, 4 (1995), 524.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Olga Troyanskaya, Michael Cantor, Gavin Sherlock, Pat Brown, Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, David Botstein, and Russ B Altman. 2001. Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics 17, 6 (2001), 520--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Carl Van Walraven, Peter C Austin, Alison Jennings, Hude Quan, and Alan J Forster. 2009. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Medical care (2009), 626--633.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Giorgia Varallo, Emanuele Maria Giusti, Federica Scarpina, Roberto Cattivelli, Paolo Capodaglio, and Gianluca Castelnuovo. 2020. The association of kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing with pain-related disability and pain intensity in obesity and chronic lower-back pain. Brain Sciences 11, 1 (2020), 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Johan WS Vlaeyen and Steven J Linton. 2000. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 85, 3 (2000), 317--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Stefanos Voglis, Michal Ziga, Anna M Zeitlberger, Marketa Sosnova, Oliver Bozinov, Luca Regli, David Bellut, Astrid Weyerbrock, Martin N Stienen, and Nicolai Maldaner. 2022. Smartphone-based real-life activity data for physical performance outcome in comparison to conventional subjective and objective outcome measures after degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Brain and Spine 2 (2022), 100881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Zirui Wang, Zihang Dai, Barnabás Póczos, and Jaime Carbonell. 2019. Characterizing and avoiding negative transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 11293--11302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. James N Weinstein, Tor D Tosteson, Jon D Lurie, Anna NA Tosteson, Emily Blood, Brett Hanscom, Harry Herkowitz, Frank Cammisa, Todd Albert, Scott D Boden, et al. 2008. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 358, 8 (2008), 794--810.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Cheng K Fred Wen, Stefan Schneider, Arthur A Stone, and Donna Spruijt-Metz. 2017. Compliance with mobile ecological momentary assessment protocols in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research 19, 4 (2017), e132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Sen Wu, Hongyang R Zhang, and Christopher Ré. 2020. Understanding and improving information transfer in multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00944 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Hiroyuki Yoshihara and Daisuke Yoneoka. 2014. Trends in the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of elective major orthopaedic surgery in patients eighty years of age and older in the United States from 2000 to 2009. JBJS 96, 14 (2014), 1185--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Ruoxi Yu, Yali Zheng, Ruikai Zhang, Yuqi Jiang, and Carmen CY Poon. 2019. Using a multi-task recurrent neural network with attention mechanisms to predict hospital mortality of patients. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 24, 2 (2019), 486--492.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Ming Yuan and Yi Lin. 2006. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 68, 1 (2006), 49--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Jingwen Zhang, Ruixuan Dai, Ashraf Rjob, Ruiqi Wang, Reshad Hamauon, Jeffrey Candell, Thomas Bailey, Victoria J Fraser, Maria Cristina Vazquez Guillamet, and Chenyang Lu. 2023. Contact Tracing for Healthcare Workers in an Intensive Care Unit. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 7, 3 (2023), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Jingwen Zhang, Dingwen Li, Ruixuan Dai, Heidy Cos, Gregory A Williams, Lacey Raper, Chet W Hammill, and Chenyang Lu. 2022. Predicting post-operative complications with wearables: a case study with patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 2 (2022), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Predicting Multi-dimensional Surgical Outcomes with Multi-modal Mobile Sensing: A Case Study with Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 8, Issue 2
      May 2024
      1330 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3665317
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 May 2024
      Published in imwut Volume 8, Issue 2

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)56
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)56

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader