Lijun Ni
Fred Martin
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
This study examined student learning outcomes from a middle school computer science (CS) curriculum developed through a researcher-practitioner partnership (RPP) project. The curriculum is based on students creating mobile apps that serve community and social good. We collected two sets of data from 294 students in three urban districts: (1) pre- and post- survey responses on their learning experiences and attitudes toward learning CS and creating community-serving apps; (2) the apps created by those students. The analysis of student apps indicated that students were able to create basic apps that connected with their personal interests, life experiences, school community, and the larger society. Students were significantly more confident in coding and creating community-focused apps after completing the course, regardless of gender, race/ethnicity, and grade. However, their interest in solving coding problems and continuing to learn CS decreased afterward. Analyses of students’ attitudes by gender, grade, and race/ethnicity showed significant differences among students in some groups. Seventh grade students rated more positively on their attitudes than eighth graders. Students identifying with different race/ethnicity groups indicated significantly different attitudes, especially students identifying as Southeast Asian, Black/African American, and Hispanic/Latino. Self-identified male students also reported stronger interest and more positive attitudes overall than self-identified female students. Students also reported positive experiences in learning how to create real apps serving their community, while there were disparities in their experiences with coding in general and some of the instructional tools used in the class.
- Sophie Andrews, and Lucia Morris. 2020. Diversity in CS: Race and gender among CS majors in 2015 vs 2020. Retrieved from: https://stanforddaily.com/2020/08/08/how-has-diversity-within-stanfords-cs-department-changed-over-the-past-5-years.Google Scholar
- Abby Budiman, and Neil G. Ruiz. 2021. Key facts about Asian Americans, a diverse and growing population. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/04/29/key-facts-about-asian-americans.Google Scholar
- Tamer Burçin. 2016. A Comparison of East Asian, South Asian, Southeast Asian, and White Undergraduate Student Familial Support. Retrieved from: https://cra.org/crn/2016/06/comparison-east-asian-south-asian-southeast-asian-white-undergraduate-student-familial-support.Google Scholar
- Jones Carolyn. 2017. Girls Draw Even with Boys in High School STEM Classes, but Still Lag in College and Careers. Retrieved from: https://edsource.org/2017/girls-now-outnumber-boys-in-high-school-stem-but-still-lag-in-collegeandcareer/578444#:∼:text=Boys%20consistently%20outnumbered%20girls%20in,engineering%20and%20computer%20science%20classes.Google Scholar
- Code.org. 2022. State of Computer Science Education: Understanding our national imperative. Retrieved from: https://advocacy.code.org/2022_state_of_cs.pdf.Google Scholar
- Caitlin Duncan, and Tim Bell. 2015. A pilot computer science and programming course for primary school students. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, London, United Kingdom, November 39-48, 2018 (WiPSC’15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818328.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ron Eglash, Juan E. Gilbert, and Ellen Foster. 2013. Toward culturally responsive computing education. Communications of the ACM, 56, 7, 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2483852.2483864.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ron Eglash, Audrey Bennett, Laquana Cooke, William Babbitt, and Michael Lachney. 2021. Counter-hegemonic Computing: Toward Computer Science Education for Value Generation and Emancipation. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 4 (October 2021), 29:1-29:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449024.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martha Escobar, Jeff Gray, Kathy Haynie, Mohammed Qazi, Yasmeen Rawajfih, Pamela McClendon, Donnita Tucker, and Wendy Johnson. 2021. Engaging Black female students in a year-long preparatory experience for AP CS Principles. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’21), March 13-20, 2021, Virtual Event, USA. ACM. New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432560.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernardo Feliciano, Gillian Bausch, Lijun Ni, Pauline White, Fred Martin, and Hsien-Yuan Hsu. 2021. One-on-one meetings as boundary practices: Managing RPP computer science curriculum co-design. In CSforALL & SageFox Consulting Group (Eds.), The intersection of RPPs and BPC in CS education: A culmination of papers from the RPPforCS Community [White paper], CSEdResearch.org. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13590.47683.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer Fereday, and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods 5,1, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leiny Y. Garcia, Miranda C. Parker, Santiago Ojeda-Ramirez, and Mark Warschauer. 2023. Confidence is the key: Unlocking predictive factors of Latinx elementary students on a computational thinking measure. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023), March 15–18, 2023, Toronto, ON, Canada. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569811.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geneva Gay. 2018. Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers college press.Google Scholar
- Google Gallup. Moving forward: Closing the computer science learning gap Girl. Retrieved from: https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/closing-computer-science-learning-gaps-girls.pdf.Google Scholar
- Shuchi Grover, Satabdi Basu, and Patricia Schank. 2018. What we can learn about student learning from open-ended programming projects in middle school computer science. In SIGCSE ’18: 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Feb. 21–24, 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159522.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Garima Jain, Fred Martin, Bernardo Feliciano, Hsien-Yuan Hsu, Barbara Fauvel-Campbell, Gillian Bausch, Lijun Ni, and Elizabeth Thomas-Cappello. 2022. CS Pathways: A culturally responsive computer science curriculum for middle school. In 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden, 2022, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962664.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jane Margolis. 2017. Stuck in the shallow end, updated edition: Education, race, and computing. MIT press.Google Scholar
- Yasmin B. Kafai, Eunkyoung Lee, Kristin Searle, Deborah Fields, Eliot Kaplan, and Debora Lui. 2014. A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14, 1, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576874.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hosun Kang, Angela Calabrese Barton, Edna Tan, Sandra D. Simpkins, Hyang-yon Rhee, Chandler Turner. 2019. How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in science activities and identification with STEM careers. Science Education, 103(2), 418-39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kapor Center (2021). Culturally Responsive-Sustaining Computer Science Education: A Framework. Retrieved from: https://www.kaporcenter.org/equitablecs.Google Scholar
- Nazish Zaman Khan, and Andrew Luxton-Reilly. 2016. Is computing for social good the solution to closing the gender gap in computer science?. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (ACSW ’16). Canberra, Australia. February 2-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2843043.2843069.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meredith W. Kier, Margaret R. Blanchard, Jason W. Osborne, and Jennifer L. Albert. 2014. The Development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS). Res Sci Educ 44, 3 (June 2014), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John King, Trevor Bond, and Sonya Blandford. 2002. An investigation of computer anxiety by gender and grade. Computers in Human behavior 18. 1(2002), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00030-9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Siu-Cheung Kong, Ming Ming Chiu, and Ming Lai. 2018. A study of primary school students' interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & education 127, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gloria Ladson-Billings. 1994. The dream keepers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BASS.Google Scholar
- Michael Lachney, William Babbitt, and Ron Eglash. 2016. Software design in the “construction genre” of learning technology: Content aware versus content agnostic. Computational Culture, 5. http://computationalculture.net/software-design-in-the-construction-genre-of-learning-technology-content-aware-versus-content-agnostic.Google Scholar
- Jieun Lee, Jenefer Husman, Kimberly A. Scott, and Natalie D. Eggum-Wilkens. 2015. COMPUGIRLS: Stepping stone to future computer-based technology pathways. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52, 2, 199-223.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hayley C. Leonard, and Sue Sentance. 2021. Culturally-relevant and responsive pedagogy in computing: A Quick Scoping Review. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 5, 2, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v5i2.130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacqueline Leonard, Monica Mitchell, Joy Barnes-Johnson, Adrienne Unertl, Jill Outka-Hill, Roland Robinson, and Carla Hester-Croff. Preparing teachers to engage rural students in computational thinking through robotics, game design, and culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education 69, 4, 386-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117732317.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Colleen M. Lewis, Niral Shah, and Katrina Falkner. 2019. Equity and Diversity. In Sally A. Fincher, and Anthony.V. Robins (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of computing education research (pp. 481 – 510). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tia C. Madkins, Jakita O. Thomas, Jessica Solyom, Joanna Goode, and Frieda McAlear. 2020. Learner-centered and culturally relevant pedagogy. In S. Grover (Ed.), Computer science in K-12: An A-to-Z handbook on teaching programming (pp.125-129). Edfinity.Google Scholar
- Stacie L. Mason and Peter J. Rich. 2020. Development and analysis of the Elementary Student Coding Attitudes Survey. Computers & Education 153, (August 2020), 103898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103898.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jessica Morales-Chicas, Mauricio Castillo, Ireri Bernal, Paloma Ramos, and Bianca L. Guzman. 2019. Computing with relevance and purpose: A review of culturally relevant education in computing. International Journal of Multicultural Education 21, no. 1 (2019), 125-155.Google ScholarCross Ref
- National Science Foundation. 2020. Computer Science for All (CS for All: Research and RPPs). Retrieved from: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf20539.Google Scholar
- New York State Education Department (NYSED). 2023. NY State Data. Retrieved from: https://data.nysed.gov.Google Scholar
- Lijun Ni, Fred Martin. Gillian Bausch, Rebecca Benjamin, Hsien-Yuan Hsu, and Bernardo Feliciano. 2021. Project, district, and teacher levels: Insights from professional learning in a CS RPP collaboration. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '21), 764-752.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lijun Ni, Gillian Bausch, Bernardo Feliciano, Hsien-Yuan Hsu, and Fred Martin. 2022. Teachers as curriculum co-designers: Supporting professional learning and curriculum implementation in a CSforAll RPP project. In 2022 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zachary Opps and Aman Yadav. 2022. Who belongs in computer science?. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2022), March 3–5, 2022, Providence, RI, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499401.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Django Paris. 2012. Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41, 3(April), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joan Peckham, Peter D. Stephenson, Lisa L. Harlow, David A. Stuart, Barbara Silver, and Helen Mederer. 2007. Broadening participation in computing: Issues and challenges. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ’07), 9–13, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1269900.1268790.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heraldo V. Richards, Ayanna F. Brown, and Timothy B. Forde. 2007. Addressing diversity in schools: Culturally responsive pedagogy. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 3, 64-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990703900310.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ashley Robinson, Manuel A. Pérez-Quinones, and Glenda Scales. 2015. Understanding the attitudes of African American middle school girls toward computer science. In Proceeding Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology, Charlotte, NC, USA, Auguest 13-14, 2015 (RESPECT). IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2015.7296507.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Darcy Ronan, Dennis Brylow, Maverick Berner, Sydney Crespo, Heidi Williams, Christine Thorp, and D. Cenk Erdil. 2023. Complexities in computer science teaching attitudes and beliefs: Findings of a baseline study of elementary school educators. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023), March 15–18, 2023, Toronto, ON, Canada. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569746.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kimberly A. Scott, Kimberly M. Sheridan, and Kevin Clark. 2015. Culturally Responsive Computing: A Theory Revisited. Learning, Media and Technology 40, 4 (January 2015), 412–436.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Sherman, Fred Martin, Larry Baldwin, and James DeFilippo. 2014. App Inventor Project Rubric–Computational Thinking through Mobile Computing. Retrieved from: https://nsfmobilect.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/mobile-ct-rubricfor-app-inventor-2014-09-01.pdf.Google Scholar
- Deepa Shivaram. 2021. Southeast Asians are underrepresented in STEM. The label “Asian” boxes them out more. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/2021/12/12/1054933519/southeast-asian-representation-scienceGoogle Scholar
- Amy E., Slaton, and Alice L. Pawley. 2018. The power and politics of engineering education research design: Saving the ‘Small N’. Engineering Studies, 10, no. 2-3, 133-157.Google Scholar
- Robert H. Tai, Christine Qi Liu, Adam V. Maltese, and Xitao Fan. 2006. Planning early for careers in science. Science 312, no. 5777, 1143-1144.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer Tsan, Fernando J. Rodríguez, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, and Collin Lynch. 2018. “I Think We Should. . . ”: Analyzing elementary students’ collaborative processes for giving and taking suggestions. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, Baltimore, MD, USA, February 21–24, 2018 (SIGCSE ’18), 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159507.Google ScholarDigital Library
- United States Census Bureau. 2016. American community survey (ACS) - Why We Ask: Hispanic Origin. Retrieved from: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/about/qbyqfact/2016/Hispanic.pdf.Google Scholar
- Xuefeng Wei, Lin Lin, Meng Nanxi, Tan Wei, Kong Siu-Cheung., Kinshuk. 2021. The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy, Computers & education 160 (Jan. 2021), 104023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104023.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aman Yadav, Sarah Gretter, and Jon Good. 2017. Computer science for all: Role of gender in middle school students’ perceptions about programming. In Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA). San Antonio, TX. April 1-10, 2017.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Creating Apps for Community and Social Good: Learning Outcomes of a Culturally Responsive Middle School Computer Science Curriculum
SIGCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1This study examined student learning outcomes from a culturally responsive middle school computer science (CS) curriculum. The curriculum is based on students creating mobile apps serving community and social good. Two sets of data were collected from ...
Investigating Middle School Students' Early Learning Experience of Computer Science through Creating Apps for Social Good
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1This study investigated middle school students' learning experiences with a computer science and digital literacy (CSDL) curriculum, which was developed through the CS Pathways researcher-practitioner partnership (RPP) project. The curriculum is based on ...
A cross-cultural study of the effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on middle school students' science knowledge and argumentation skills
The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore how seventh graders in a suburban school in the United States and sixth graders in an urban school in Taiwan developed argumentation skills and science knowledge in a project-based learning ...
Comments