skip to main content
research-article

2025 EAAI Mentored Undergraduate Research Challenge: Playing Word Association Games

Published:03 May 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The topic for EAAI 2025's Mentored Undergraduate Research Challenge is PlayingWord Association Games. What does that mean? Where are the applications? How can you get started? We break down the topic, discuss applications, and explore project ideas in this column.

References

  1. Aamoth, D. (2014, June). Interview with Eugene Goostman, the fake kid who passed the Turing Test. Time Magazine, 183(22). Retrieved from https://time.com/2847900/eugene-goostman-turing-test/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Acerbi, A., & Stubbersfield, J. M. (2023). Large language models show humanlike content biases in transmission chain experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(44), e2313790120. Retrieved from doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313790120 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P. F., Schulman, J., & Mane, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. CoRR, abs/1606.06565. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bard, N., Foerster, J. N., Chandar, S., Burch, N., Lanctot, M., Song, H. F., … Bowling, M. (2020, March). The Hanabi challenge: A new frontier for AI research. Artificial Intelligence, 280, 103216. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370219300116 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bela, G., & Joran, B. (2009). Citation proximity analysis (CPA): A new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In B. Larsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (Vol. 1, pp. 571--575). Sao Paulo: BIREME/PANO/WHO. Retrieved from http://www.sciplore.org/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/gipp09a.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 acm conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 610--623). Virtual Event, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from doi: 10.1145/3442188.3445922 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003, March). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(null), 993--1022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Christian, B. (2012). The most human human: What artificial intelligence teaches us about being alive. USA: Anchor Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Croft, B., Metzler, D., & Strohman, T. (2009). Search engines: Information retrieval in practice (1st ed.). USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ferrucci, D., Brown, E., Chu-Carroll, J., Fan, J., Gondek, D., Kalyanpur, A. A., … Welty, C. (2010, July). Building Watson: An overview of the DeepQA project. AI Magazine, 31(3), 59--79. Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2303 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gabrilovich, E., & Markovitch, S. (2009, March). Wikipedia-based semantic interpretation for natural language processing. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 34(1), 443--498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Griffith, S., Subramanian, K., Scholz, J., Isbell, C. L., & Thomaz, A. (2013). Policy shaping: Integrating human feedback with reinforcement learning. In C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, & K. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 26, pp. 1--9). Curran Associates, Inc. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper files/paper/2013/file/e034fb6b66aacc1d48f445ddfb08da98 -Paper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunning, D., & Aha, D. (2019, June). DARPA's explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program. AI Magazine, 40(2), 44--58. Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2850 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hutson, M. (2023, November 17). Hypotheses devised by AI could find 'blind spots' in research. Nature Index. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03596-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. IBM. (2011, February 16). IBM Watson: Final Jeopardy! and the future of Watson. YouTube. https://youtu.be/lI-M7O bRNg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. IBM. (2023). What are AI hallucinations? IBM. https://www.ibm.com/topics/ai-hallucinations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition (1st ed.). USA: Prentice Hall PTR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, B., Rudin, C., & Shah, J. (2014). The bayesian case model: A generative approach for case-based reasoning and prototype classification. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh international conference on neural information processing systems (Vol. 2, pp. 1952--1960). Montreal, Canada: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirby, S., Dowman, M., & Griffiths, T. L. (2007). Innateness and culture in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(12), 5241--5245. Retrieved from doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608222104 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kong, W., & Allan, J. (2013). Extracting query facets from search results. In Proceedings of the thirty-sixth international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 93--102). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from doi: 10.1145/2484028.2484097 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kotek, H., Dockum, R., & Sun, D. (2023). Gender bias and stereotypes in large language models. In Proceedings of the ACM collective intelligence conference (pp. 12--24). Delft, Netherlands: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from doi: 10.1145/3582269.3615599 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning: The latent semantic analysis theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(5), 161--164. Retrieved from doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10836862 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Langley, C., Cirstea, B. I., Cuzzolin, F., & Sahakian, B. J. (2022). Theory of mind and preference learning at the interface of cognitive science, neuroscience, and AI: A review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2022.778852 doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.778852Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mattel. (2008). N1488: Apples to Apples party box: The game of hilarious comparisons! - US. Mattel Instruction Sheets. https://service.mattel.com/instruction sheets/N1488-0920.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. McCann, B. T. (2020). Using bayesian updating to improve decisions under uncertainty. California Management Review, 63(1), 26.40. Retrieved from doi: 10.1177/0008125620948264 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021, July). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1.35. Retrieved from doi: 10.1145/3457607 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Microsoft. (2016, March 23). Tay poisoning. Mitre ATLAS. https://atlas.mitre.org/studies/AML.CS0009/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Moravec, H. (1990). Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence. USA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Moravcik, M., Schmid, M., Burch, N., Lisy, V., Morrill, D., Bard, N., … Bowling, M. (2017). DeepStack: Expert-level artificial intelligence in heads-up no-limit Poker. Science, 356(6337), 508.513. Retrieved from doi: 10.1126/science.aam6960 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ren, K., Zheng, T., Qin, Z., & Liu, X. (2020). Adversarial attacks and defenses in deep learning. Engineering, 6(3), 346.360. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209580991930503X Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Rossi, F., Venable, K. B., & Walsh, T. (2011). Preference modeling and reasoning. In A short introduction to preferences: Between artificial intelligence and social choice (pp. 3.28). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from 2 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-01556-4 2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Rudin, C. (2019, May). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 206.215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Russell, S., & Wefald, E. H. (2003). Do the right thing: Studies in limited rationality. USA: The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Shanahan, M., McDonell, K., & Reynolds, L. (2023, November). Role play with large language models. Nature, 623, 493. 498. -023-06647-8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Smith, C. S. (2023, March 13). Hallucinations could blunt ChatGPT's success. IEEE Spectrum. https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-hallucination.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Srivastava, A., & Sutton, C. (2017, April). Autoencoding variational inference for topic models. In Fifth international conference on learning representations. Toulon, France: OpenReview.net. Retrieved from https://openreview.net/forum?id=BybtVK9lgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Tadelis, S. (2013). Game theory: An introduction. USA: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Waldrop, M. M. (2019). What are the limits of deep learning? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(4), 1074.1077. Retrieved from doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821594116 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., … Fedus, W. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. Retrieved from https://openreview.net/forum?id=yzkSU5zdwD (Survey Certification)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yazdani, A., Safdari, R., Golkar, A., & Niakan Kalhori, S. R. (2019, February 28). Words prediction based on ngram model for free-text entry in electronic health records. Health Information Science and Systems, 7(1), 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image AI Matters
    AI Matters  Volume 10, Issue 1
    March 2024
    25 pages
    EISSN:2372-3483
    DOI:10.1145/3655032
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2024 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 May 2024

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader