skip to main content
10.1145/3654446.3654509acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspcncConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on the Improvement of the DPoS Consensus Mechanism Based on the EigenTrust Trust Model

Published:03 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Aiming at the problems of "swing node", poor voting enthusiasm of nodes with small interests, and corruption attack of malicious nodes in traditional DPoS algorithm, this paper proposes an ET-DPoS consensus algorithm based on EigenTrust trust model. Firstly, the algorithm classifies the transactional relationship between nodes, and calculates the direct, indirect and global trust values of nodes under the consideration of the influence of time decay; secondly, in the process of witnessing the nodes' voting, it increases the negative vote link, and utilizes the reputation value to construct a new election evaluation criterion, and dynamically selects the witness nodes according to the size of the evaluation value obtained from each round of calculation to complete the consensus process; lastly, it introduces the concept of node wobbling degree, and according to the size of its value, the node wobbling degree of nodes is calculated. concept, and according to the size of its value, different degrees of punishment restriction measures are made for the swing nodes. Simulation results show that the improved consensus algorithm can effectively improve the enthusiasm and fairness of the node election to become a witness node, and reduce the probability of the swing node to do evil.

References

  1. Qian Q, Ronghua X, Yu C, Enable Fair Proof-of-Work (PoW) Consensus for Blockchains in IoT by Miner Twins (MinT) [J]. Future Internet, 2021, 13(11): 291-291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kumar A Y, Karan S, H A comparative study on consensus mechanism with security threats and future scopes: Blockchain [J]. Computer Communications, 2023 ,201102-201115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Misbah K, Frank H D, Jiankun H. A Survey and Ontology of Blockchain Consensus Algorithms for Resource-Constrained IoT Systems [J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(21): 8188-8188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bachani, Vishal, Aniruddha, Preferential Delegated Proof of Stake (PDPoS)-Modified DPoS with Two Layers towards Scalability and Higher TPS [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2023, 15(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yang F, Zhou W, Wu Q, Delegated Proof of Stake with Downgrade: A Secure and Efficient Blockchain Consensus Algorithm with Downgrade Mechanism [J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7118541-118555.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gabin H, Dana Y, Inshil D, Efficient and Secure Blockchain System for Digital Content Trading [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 977438-77450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim Jae-Seok, Shi Jin-Myeong, Choi Seok-Hwan A Study on Prevention and Automatic Recovery of Blockchain Networks Against Persistent Censorship Attacks [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10:110770-110784.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Research on the Improvement of the DPoS Consensus Mechanism Based on the EigenTrust Trust Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SPCNC '23: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications
      December 2023
      435 pages
      ISBN:9798400716430
      DOI:10.1145/3654446

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format