skip to main content
10.1145/3647649.3647675acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicigpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Image Recognition of Concrete Electromagnetic Flaw Detection Based on Improved YOLOv7

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Owing to the invisibility characteristics of the interiors of concrete structures, nondestructive testing technologies are commonly employed to detect internal damage. Electromagnetic flaw detection technology, as a prominent nondestructive testing method, offers capabilities of strong penetration and precise imaging. However, the output images produced by this detection technology are usually reliant on subjective human judgment, and existing automatic detection algorithms have limitations in terms of accuracy. To enhance the accuracy of electromagnetic flaw detection images, this paper proposes improved YOLOv7 based detection method. First of all, the ACBlock convolution module is introduced to replace the original 3×3 convolution kernel for alleviating the loss of edge feature information caused by the sampling operation of the backbone network MP module. Next, in order to have more focus on the semantic features of small targets, a global attention mechanism (GAMAttention) is incorporated into the algorithm. Then, the FReLU activation function is adopted to enhance the algorithm sensitivity to image space. Finally, experiments are conducted on a self-created concrete flaw detection image dataset to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithm. The results show that the mean Average Precision (mAP) value achieved by the improved algorithm is 95.85%. which has a significant improvement of 13.89% in comparison with the pre-improved YOLOv7 algorithm and surpasses other algorithms in the same domain. These findings represent that the proposed algorithm effectively enhances the accuracy of concrete electromagnetic flaw detection image detection.

References

  1. Shan Zhao, and Imad L. Al-Qadi. 2016. Development of an analytic approach utilizing the extended common midpoint method to estimate asphalt pavement thickness with 3-D ground-penetrating radar. NDT & E International, 78(March 2016), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.11.005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dar-Hao Chen, Feng Hong, Wujun Zhou, and Peng Ying. 2014. Estimating the hotmix asphalt air voids from ground penetrating radar. NDT & E International, 68(December 2014), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.08.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Miguel A. Franesqui, Jorge Yepes, and Cándida García-González. 2017. Ultrasound data for laboratory calibration of an analytical model to calculate crack depth on asphalt pavements. Data in Brief, 13(July 2017), 723-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.06.053.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Shibin Lin, Dewei Meng, Hajin Choi, Sadegh Shams, and Hoda Azari. 2018. Laboratory assessment of nine methods for nondestructive evaluation of concrete bridge decks with overlays. Construction and Building Materials, 188(November 2018), 966-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jiaming Tang, Chunhua Chen, Zhiyong Huang, Xiaoning Zhang, Weixiong Li, Min Huang, and Linghui Deng. 2022. Crack Unet: Crack Recognition Algorithm Based on Three-Dimensional Ground Penetrating Radar Images. Sensors 22, 23(December 2022): 9366. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239366Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. -T. Pham and S. Lefèvre. 2018 Buried Object Detection from B-Scan Ground Penetrating Radar Data Using Faster-RCNN. IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE, Valencia, Spain, 6804-6807. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8517683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Wentai Lei, Feifei Hou, Jingchun Xi, Qianying Tan, Mengdi Xu, Xinyue Jiang, Gengye Liu, and Qingyuan Gu. 2019. Automatic hyperbola detection and fitting in GPR B-scan image. Automation in Construction, 106(October 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102839.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Yu-Cheng Fan, Chun Ju Huang, and Chitra Meghala Yelamandala, 2023. Image Recognition Based on High Accuracy 3D Depth Map Information, Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 14, 5(2023), 1082-1087.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hui Wang, Shan Ouyang, Qinghua Liu, Kefei Liao, and Lijun Zhou. 2022. Structure Feature Detection Method for Ground Penetrating Radar Two-Dimensional Profile Image Based on Deep Learning. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 44, 4 (2022), 1284-1294. https://doi.org/10.11999/JEIT211032.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Silva, Wilson Ricardo Leal da, and Diogo Schwerz de Lucena. 2018. Concrete Cracks Detection Based on Deep Learning Image Classification. Proceedings 2, 8(June 2018), 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ICEM18-05387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Shuwei Li, Xingyu Gu, Xiangrong Xu, Dawei Xu, Tianjie Zhang, Zhen Liu, and Qiao Dong. 2021. Detection of concealed cracks from ground penetrating radar images based on deep learning algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 273(March 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121949Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chienyao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy, and Hongyuan Mark Liao. 2023. YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7464-7475, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Bochkovskiy Alexey, Chien-Yao Wang, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao. 2020. YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection. arXiv, (2020), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.10934Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Joseph Redmon, and Ali Farhadi. 2018. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.02767Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Github 2021. Retrieved December 22, 2022 from https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Xiaohan Ding, Yuchen Guo, Guiguang Ding, and Jungong Han. 2019. ACNet: Strengthening the Kernel Skeletons for Powerful CNN via Asymmetric Convolution Blocks. International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), IEEE/CVF, Seoul, Korea (South), 1911-1920, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Yichao Liu, Zongru Shao, and Nico Hoffmann. 2021. Global Attention Mechanism: Retain Information to Enhance Channel-Spatial Interactions. arXiv, (2021), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.05561.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Stefan Elfwing, Eiji Uchibe, and Kenji Doya. 2018. Sigmoid weight-ed linear unitsfor neural network function approximation in reinforcement learning. Neural Networks, 107(2018), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.03118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Suo Qiu, Xiangmin Xu, and Bolun Cai. 2018. FReLU: Flexible Rectified Linear Units for Improving Convolutional Neural Networks. 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), IEEE, Beijing, China, 1223-1228. c10.1109/ICPR.2018.8546022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jinyang Zhou, and Ming Chen. 2023. Ground-penetrating radar earth and rock embankment cavity detection method based on improved YOLOv7. Foreign Electronic Measurement Technology, 42,07(2023), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-8978.2023.07.020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ming Xu, Gong Zhang, Guangtao Wang, Geng Luo, and Ruibo Zheng. 2023. Research and application of anomaly detection methods in ground-penetr-ating radar images. Coal Geology of China, 35, 2 (2023), 73-78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pengfei Lai, Wei Li, Yao Gao, Jiangang Ding, Bo Yuan, and Ming Yang. 2023. GPR Pipeline Target Detection Based on Improved Cascade R-CNN. Computer Systems&Applications, 32, 2, (2023), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.15888/j.cnki.csa.008945.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Image Recognition of Concrete Electromagnetic Flaw Detection Based on Improved YOLOv7

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICIGP '24: Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing
          January 2024
          480 pages
          ISBN:9798400716720
          DOI:10.1145/3647649

          Copyright © 2024 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 May 2024

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format