skip to main content
10.1145/3645279.3645285acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdmipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on Airborne LiDAR and Hyperspectral Combined System for Forest Tree Species Classification

Published:06 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increasing importance of forest resources management, accurate classification of forest tree species has become a key task. Based on airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and hyperspectral technology, a comprehensive application system is proposed to improve the accuracy of automatic classification of forest tree species. In this study, the airborne LiDAR data, and AISA Eagle Ⅱ hyperspectral data of a natural forest in mountainous area of a forest farm were taken as the objects, and a combined system of airborne LIDAR and hyperspectral data was established to study the classification of main forest species in mountainous areas. In this experiment, the image obtained by PCA (Principal Component Analysis) transformation and DCHM (Digital canopy height model) data are combined into a fused image by band fusion. In the experiment, RF (Random Forest) method, one of the supervised classification methods, was selected to classify forest tree species from the extracted single-point feature vectors. The findings of the study indicate that, in this experiment, the classification accuracy achieved through fusion surpasses that achieved solely through hyperspectral data and airborne LiDAR. The overall accuracy sees an improvement of 28.8% and 15.6% compared to the individual modalities, accompanied by respective increases in the Kappa coefficient by 0.407 and 0.184. Consequently, the classification performance is deemed optimal, and the level of recognition is notably elevated. When only hyperspectral data is used as the classification basis, there are more misclassification points, but the characteristics of point cloud are improved to some extent. The system of integrated application of airborne LiDAR and hyperspectral technology provides an efficient and accurate solution for forest tree species classification. This method can play an important role in forest resources management, ecological monitoring and other fields, and provide strong support for the protection and sustainable utilization of forest resources.

References

  1. Aarne Hovi, Lauri Korhonen, Jari Vauhkonen, and Ilkka Korpela. 2016. LiDAR waveform features for tree species classification and their sensitivity to tree- and acquisition related parameters. Remote Sensing of Environment 173, (February 2016), 224–237. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Moritz Bruggisser, Andreas Roncat, Michael E. Schaepman, and Felix Morsdorf. 2017. Retrieval of higher order statistical moments from full-waveform LiDAR data for tree species classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 196, (July 2017), 28–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dan Zhao, Yong Pang, Lijuan Liu, and Zengyuan Li. 2020. Individual tree classification using airborne LIDAR and hyperspectral data in a natural mixed forest of northeast China. Forests 11, 3 (March 2020), 303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Wenzhi Liao, Frieke Van Coillie, Lianru Gao, Liwei Li, Bing Zhang, and Jocelyn Chanussot. 2018. Deep learning for fusion of APEX hyperspectral and Full-Waveform LiDAR remote sensing data for tree species mapping. IEEE Access 6, (January 2018), 68716–68729. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2880083.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lien T.H. Pham, Lars Brabyn, Thanh Duc Dang, and Henry Gouk. 2019. Comparison of combination of dimensionality reduction and classification techniques for identifying tree species using integrated QuickBird imagery and LiDAR data. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 13, 01 (March 2019), 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jrs.13.018502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Xiaolong Liu and Yanchen Bo. 2015. Object-Based crop species classification based on the combination of airborne hyperspectral images and LIDAR data. Remote Sensing 7, 1 (January 2015), 922–950. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100922.sGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Santiago Martín-Alcón, Lluís Coll, Miquel De Cáceres, Lídia Guitart, Mariló Cabré, Ariadna Just, and José Ramón González-Olabarría. 2015. Combining aerial LiDAR and multispectral imagery to assess postfire regeneration types in a Mediterranean forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45, 7 (July 2015), 856–866. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chaves E Carvalho, Rodriguez, Silva, De Carvalho, Calegario, De Lima, Silva, De Mendonca, and Nicoletti. Predict volume of trees integrating LiDAR and Geostatistics. Scientia Forestalis 43, 107, 627–637..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Songqiu Deng and Masato Katoh. 2016. Interpretation of forest resources at the individual tree level in Japanese conifer plantations using airborne LIDAR data. Remote Sensing 8, 3 (February 2016), 188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8030188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Haoming Wan, Yunwei Tang, Linhai Jing, Hui Li, Fang Qiu, and Wenjin Wu. 2021. Tree species classification of forest stands using multisource remote sensing data. Remote Sensing 13, 1 (January 2021), 144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Victoria Scholl, Megan E. Cattau, Maxwell B. Joseph, and Jennifer K. Balch. 2020. Integrating National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) airborne remote sensing and In-Situ data for optimal tree species classification. Remote Sensing 12, 9 (April 2020), 1414. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wu Yanshuang and Xiaoli Zhang. 2019. Object-Based tree species classification using airborne hyperspectral images and LiDAR data. Forests 11, 1 (December 2019), 32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010032.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mathieu Varin, Bilel Chalghaf, and Gilles Joanisse. 2020. Object-Based Approach Using Very High Spatial Resolution 16-BandWorldView-3 and LiDAR Data for Tree Species Classification in a Broadleaf Forest in Quebec, Canada. Remote Sensing 12, 3092 (2020), 1–33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Research on Airborne LiDAR and Hyperspectral Combined System for Forest Tree Species Classification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      BDMIP '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Big Data Mining and Information Processing
      November 2023
      223 pages
      ISBN:9798400709166
      DOI:10.1145/3645279

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format