skip to main content
10.1145/3644713.3644772acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfndsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Predictive Factors Influencing the Adoption of Digital Finance: A Unified Approach Drawing from TOE and NV Theories

Published:13 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article aimed to investigate the factors that may impact the adoption of digital finance within Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Using the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Theory and the Net Valence (NV) Model, the study categorizes predictors into technological, environmental, and organizational factors. Findings highlight the significant effects of perceived benefits and risks, environmental factors, and organizational characteristics, notably human resource quality. The study collected data via a questionnaire survey from 313 Malaysian SMEs engaged in exporting, employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) for analysis. The implications of this study extend to policymakers, industry practitioners, and researchers, offering insights for policy formation, acknowledging the main factors that might affect digital finance adoption, assisting in the creation of tailored financial models to boost the companies' performance, providing SMEs with strategic understanding regarding the benefits of embracing digital finance for enhanced competitiveness, and aiding developers of digital finance solutions in addressing adoption barriers, thus tailoring solutions to meet SMEs' specific needs.

References

  1. Abbasi T., Weigand H. (2017). The Impact of Digital Financial Services on Firm's Performance: a Literature Review, International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education (CCSE), 12(10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Abed S. S. (2020). Social commerce adoption using TOE framework: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabian SMEs, International Journal of Information Management, 53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Abramova S. and Böhme R. (2016), Perceived Benefit and Risk as Multidimensional Determinants of Bitcoin Use: A Quantitative Exploratory Study. International Conference on Interaction Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ahmadi, H., & Helander, N. (2019). The role of technology turbulence in market orientation, dynamic capabilities, and business performance. Journal of Business Research, 97, 212-223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Aisaiti G., Liu L., Xie J., Yang J. (2019). An empirical analysis of rural farmers’ financing intention of inclusive finance in China, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1535-1563.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Aitken, A., & Cumming, D. (2015). Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Fintech: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Journal of Private Equity, 18(3), 7-8. Al-Herwi S. (2019). What are SMEs?, Lebanese International University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Alsetoohy, O., Ayoun, B., Arous, S., Megahed, F. and Nabil, G. (2019), Intelligent agent technology: what affects its adoption in hotel food supply chain management, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(3), 286-310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Asiaei A. and Ab. Rahim N.Z. (2019), A multifaceted framework for adoption of cloud computing in Malaysian SMEs, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 708-750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bagozzi, R. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 16, 74-94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Baig M. I., Shuib L., Yadegaridehkordi E. (2019). Big data adoption: State of the art and research challenges, Information Processing & Management, 56(6).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Baker, J. (2011). The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Banalieva E. R., Dhanaraj C. (2019). Internationalization theory for the digital economy, Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 1372–1387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Benlian A., Hess T. (2011). Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives, Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 232-246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bianchi C., Glavas C., Mathews S. (2017). SME international performance in Latin America, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(1), 176-195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Breidbach, C. F., Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., & Smith, A. N. (2019). Understanding the role of digital strategic resource allocations in guiding business model innovation in SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 44-58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Caldarelli, G., Zardini, A. and Rossignoli, C. (2021). Blockchain adoption in the fashion sustainable supply chain: Pragmatically addressing barriers, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(2), 507-524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Chaplin H. (2015, March). An Investigation of the Barriers to Internationalization Faced by Young Technology-Intensive Firms, New Technology-Based Firms in the New Millennium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chau N. T., Deng H. & Tay R. (2020). Critical determinants for mobile commerce adoption in Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises, Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5-6), 456-487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Chen M., Chang K., Hsu C., Xiao J. (2015). Applying a Kansei engineering-based logistics service design approach to developing international express services, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(6), 618-646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Chiu, I. C., Huang, H. W., & Liu, C. H. (2019). Fintech, Financing, and Firm Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China. International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Management, 7(1), 1-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Clohessy T., Acton T. (2019). Investigating the influence of organizational factors on blockchain adoption: An innovation theory perspective, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Daradkeh M. K. (2019). Determinants of Self-Service Analytics Adoption Intention: The Effect of Task-Technology Fit, Compatibility, and User Empowerment, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 31, 19-45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Davis G. F., & DeWitt T. (2021). Organization Theory and the Resource-Based View of the Firm: The Great Divide. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1684–1697.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Deb M. and Lomo-David E. (2014), An empirical examination of customers’ adoption of m-banking in India, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 32(4), 475-494.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Divakara S. & Surangi H.A.K.N.s. (2018). A literature Review on Small & Medium size Enterprises, Third Asia -Pacific Conference on Multidisciplinary Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Durst, S., Edvardsson, I.R. and Foli, S. (2023). Knowledge management in SMEs: a follow-up literature review, Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(11), 25-58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Fairouz H., Wickramasinghe C. N. (2019). Innovation and Development of Digital Finance: A Review on Digital Transformation in Banking & Financial Sector of Sri Lanka, Asian Journal of Economics, Finance and Management 1(2), 69-78, Article no.AJEFM.105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Farivar S. and Yuan Y. (2014). The Dual Perspective of Social Commerce Adoption, SIGHCI 2014 Proceedings. 18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Fernandes, C., Veiga, P.M. and Gerschewski, S. (2023). SME internationalisation: past, present and future trends, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(1), 144-161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Geisser, S. (1974). A Predictive Approach to the Random Effect Model. Biometrika, 61, 101-107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Gomez S. M., Mendoza O. E. O., Ramirez J., Olivas-Lujan M. R. (2020). Stress and Myths related to the Covid-19 pandemic's effects on remote work, Management Research: Journal of Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 18(4), 401-420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Gupta B.B., Yamaguchi, S. & Agrawal, D.P. (2018). Advances in Security and Privacy of Multimedia Big Data in Mobile and Cloud Computing. Computational Methods and Applied Sciences, 77, 9203–9208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Gupta, K., Wajid, A. & Gaur, D (2023). Determinants of continuous intention to use FinTech services: the moderating role of COVID-19, Journal of Financial Services Marketing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Hollensen S. (2016). Global Marketing, seventh edition, ISBN-13: 978-1292100111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Hu L., Galli M. and Sebastiani R. (2023). How digital platforms affect the internationalisation of wine firms in China, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Huang C. K., Lee N. Ch., Chen W. Ch. (2022), Dilemmatic dual-factor determinants of discontinuous intention in cryptocurrency usage, Information Technology & People, 0959-3845.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hossain, Mohammad & Quaddus, Mohammed. (2011). The adoption and continued usage intention of RFID: An integrated framework, Information Technology & People, 24. 236-256. 10.1108/09593841111158365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Huang C. K., Lee N. Ch., Chen W. Ch. (2022), Dilemmatic dual-factor determinants of discontinuous intention in cryptocurrency usage, Information Technology & People, 0959-3845.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Jain N., Raman T.V. (2022). The interplay of perceived risk, perceive benefit and generation cohort in digital finance adoption, EuroMed Journal of Business, 1450-2194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Jin H., Hurd F. (2018). Exploring the Impact of Digital Platforms on SME Internationalization: New Zealand SMEs Use of the Alibaba Platform for Chinese Market Entry, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 19(2), 72-95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Kurum, E. (2023), RegTech solutions and AML compliance: what future for financial crime, Journal of Financial Crime, 30(3), 776-794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Lee H., Park H., Kim J. (2013). Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users' behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(9), 862-877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Li R., Zheng L., Yuan L. (2022). TMT's decision-making on adoption of management innovation, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(7), 1061-1088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Li Z., Wang W.M., Liu G., Liu L., He J., Huang G.Q. (2018). Toward open manufacturing: A cross-enterprises knowledge and services exchange framework based on blockchain and edge computing, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(1), 303-320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Lokuge S., Sedera D., Grover V., Dongming X. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct, Information & Management, 56(3), 445-461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Lundberg H. (2019). Bank relationships’ contributions to SME export performance, International Journal of Bank Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-05-2018-0115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Maroufkhani P., Iranmanesh M. and Ghobakhloo M. (2022), Determinants of big data analytics adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2021-0695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Maroufkhani P., Tseng M., Iranmanesh M., Khairuzzaman W. I. W., Khalid H. (2020). Big data analytics adoption: Determinants and performances among small to medium-sized enterprises, International Journal of Information Management, 54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Matikiti, R., Mpinganjira, M. & Roberts-Lombard, M., 2018, ‘Application of the Technology Acceptance Model and the Technology– Organisation–Environment Model to examine social media marketing use in the South African tourism industry’, South African Journal of Information Management 20(1), a790. https://doi.org/10.4102/ sajim.v20i1.790Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. McHugh P., Domegan C. (2017). Evaluate development! Develop evaluation! Answering the call for a reflexive turn in social marketing, Journal of Social Marketing, 7(2), 135-155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Memon AH, Rahman IA. (2014). SEM-PLS analysis of inhibiting factors of cost performance for large construction projects in Malaysia: perspective of clients and consultants. Scientific World Journal, doi: 10.1155/2014/165158. PMID: 24693227; PMCID: PMC3947800.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Mengist W., Soromessa T., Legese G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research, MethodsX, 7, 100777, ISSN 2215-0161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Ng, A.W. and Kwok, B.K.B. (2017). Emergence of Fintech and cybersecurity in a global financial centre: Strategic approach by a regulator, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 25(4), 422-434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Ozili P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability, Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329-340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Ozturk A.B. (2016). Customer acceptance of cashless payment systems in the hospitality industry, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 801-817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Perez-Moron J. (2021). Eleven years of cyberattacks on Chinese supply chains in an era of cyber warfare, a review and future research agenda, Journal of Asia Business Studies, ahead-of-print. 10.1108/JABS-11-2020-0444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Pratono A. H. (2016). Strategic orientation and information technological turbulence, Business Process Management Journal, 22(2), 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Rijanto A. (2021). Business financing and blockchain technology adoption in agroindustry, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(2), 215-235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Rubino M., Vitolla F., Raimo N. and Garcia-Sanchez I.-M. (2020), Cross-country differences in European firms’ digitalisation: the role of national culture, Management Decision, 58(8), 1563-1583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Ryu H. (2018). Understanding Benefit and Risk Framework of Fintech Adoption: Comparison of Early Adopters and Late Adopters, Proceedings of the Conference on System Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Ryu H. (2018). What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech?: the moderating effect of user type, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 541-569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Sharma S.K. and Sharma M. (2019), Examining the role of trust and quality dimensions in the actual usage of mobile banking services: an empirical investigation, International Journal of Information Management, 44, 65-75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Song H., Han S., Liu W. and Ganguly A. (2023). What role do FinTech companies play in supply chain finance? A signaling intermediary perspective, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(6), 1279-1294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Stewart H., Jurjens J. (2017). Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany, Information and Computer Security, 26(1), 109-128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111-147. doi: 10.2307/2984809.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Streukens, S. and Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016). Bootstrapping and Pls-Sem: A Step-by-Step Guide to Get More out of Your Bootstrap Results. European Management Journal, 34, 618-632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Tweneboah-Koduah S., Endicott-Popovsky B., Tsetse A. (2014, August). Barriers to Government Cloud Adoption, International Journal of Managing Information Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Vadana I., Kuivalainen O., Torkkeli L., Saarenketo S. (2021). The Role of Digitalization on the Internationalization Strategy of Born-Digital Companies. Sustainability. 13. 14002. 10.3390/su132414002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Verma, S. and Bhattacharyya, S.S. (2017), Perceived strategic value-based adoption of Big Data Analytics in emerging economy: A qualitative approach for Indian firms, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(3), 354-382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Wamba-Taguimdje S. L., Fosso W., Robert S. & J., Kala K. & T., Chris E. (2020). Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Firm Performance: The Business Value of AI-based Transformation Projects. Business Process Management Journal. ahead-of-print. 10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang Y. M., Wang Y. Sh., Yang Y. F. (2010). Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(5), 803-815.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate Governance and Blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), 7-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Zalan T. (2018). Born global on blockchain, Review of International Business and Strategy, 28(1), 19-34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Zavolokina, L., Dolata M. & Schwabe G. (2016). The FinTech phenomenon: antecedents of financial innovation perceived by the popular press. Financial Innovation. 2. 16. 10.1186/s40854-016-0036-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICFNDS '23: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems
    December 2023
    808 pages
    ISBN:9798400709036
    DOI:10.1145/3644713

    Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 May 2024

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format