ABSTRACT
Traditional data monetization approaches face challenges related to data protection and logistics. In response, digital data marketplaces have emerged as intermediaries simplifying data transactions. Despite the growing establishment and acceptance of digital data marketplaces, significant challenges hinder efficient data trading. As a result, few companies can derive tangible value from their data, leading to missed opportunities in understanding customers, pricing decisions, and fraud prevention. In this paper, we explore both technical and organizational challenges affecting data monetization. Moreover, we identify areas in need of further research, aiming to expand the boundaries of current knowledge by emphasizing where research is currently limited or lacking.
- Rene Abraham, Johannes Schneider, and Jan vom Brocke. 2023. A taxonomy of data governance decision domains in data marketplaces. Electronic Markets 33, 1 (2023), 22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amir Shayan Ahmadian, Jan Jürjens, and Daniel Strüber. 2018. Extending model-based privacy analysis for the industrial data space by exploiting privacy level agreements. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM symposium on applied computing. 1142–1149.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sangam Bhujel and Yogachandran Rahulamathavan. 2022. A survey: Security, transparency, and scalability issues of nft’s and its marketplaces. Sensors 22, 22 (2022), 8833.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zeyd Boukhers, Christoph Lange, and Oya Beyan. 2023. Enhancing Data Space Semantic Interoperability through Machine Learning: a Visionary Perspective. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. 1462–1467.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arnaud Braud, Gaël Fromentoux, Benoit Radier, and Olivier Le Grand. 2021. The road to European digital sovereignty with Gaia-X and IDSA. IEEE network 35, 2 (2021), 4–5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cristina Georgiana Calancea and Lenuța Alboaie. 2021. Techniques to improve b2b data governance using fair principles. Mathematics 9, 9 (2021), 1059.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christian Catalini and Joshua S Gans. 2020. Some simple economics of the blockchain. Commun. ACM 63, 7 (2020), 80–90.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vassilis Charitsis, Detlev Zwick, and Alan Bradshaw. 2018. Creating worlds that create audiences: Theorising personal data markets in the age of communicative capitalism. (2018).Google Scholar
- Natalia Chaudhry and Muhammad Murtaza Yousaf. 2018. Consensus algorithms in blockchain: Comparative analysis, challenges and opportunities. In 2018 12th International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST). IEEE, 54–63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lingjiao Chen, Hongyi Wang, Leshang Chen, Paraschos Koutris, and Arun Kumar. 2019. Demonstration of Nimbus: Model-based Pricing for Machine Learning in a Data Marketplace. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data. 1885–1888.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michele Colli, Jonas Nygaard Uhrenholt, Ole Madsen, and Brian Vejrum Waehrens. 2021. Translating transparency into value: an approach to design IoT solutions. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 32, 8 (2021), 1515–1532.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew Crain. 2018. The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification. new media & society 20, 1 (2018), 88–104.Google Scholar
- Barbara J Evans. 2011. Much ado about data ownership. Harv. JL & Tech. 25 (2011), 69.Google Scholar
- David S Evans. 2014. Economic aspects of Bitcoin and other decentralized public-ledger currency platforms. University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper685 (2014).Google Scholar
- Nick Hynes, David Dao, David Yan, Raymond Cheng, and Dawn Song. 2018. A demonstration of sterling: a privacy-preserving data marketplace. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 11, 12 (2018), 2086–2089.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Georgy Ishmaev. 2020. The ethical limits of blockchain-enabled markets for private IoT data. Philosophy & Technology 33 (2020), 411–432.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Annika Jacobsen, Ricardo de Miranda Azevedo, Nick Juty, Dominique Batista, Simon Coles, Ronald Cornet, Mélanie Courtot, Mercè Crosas, Michel Dumontier, Chris T Evelo, 2020. FAIR principles: interpretations and implementation considerations., 10–29 pages.Google Scholar
- Pantelis Koutroumpis, Aija Leiponen, and Llewellyn DW Thomas. 2017. The (unfulfilled) potential of data marketplaces. Technical Report. ETLA working papers.Google Scholar
- Pantelis Koutroumpis, Aija Leiponen, and Llewellyn DW Thomas. 2020. Markets for data. Industrial and Corporate Change 29, 3 (2020), 645–660.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sebastian Lawrenz, Priyanka Sharma, and Andreas Rausch. 2019. Blockchain technology as an approach for data marketplaces. In Proceedings of the 2019 international conference on blockchain technology. 55–59.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuzheng Li, Chuan Chen, Nan Liu, Huawei Huang, Zibin Zheng, and Qiang Yan. 2020. A blockchain-based decentralized federated learning framework with committee consensus. IEEE Network 35, 1 (2020), 234–241.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kang Liu, Wuhui Chen, Zibin Zheng, Zhenni Li, and Wei Liang. 2019. A novel debt-credit mechanism for blockchain-based data-trading in internet of vehicles. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6, 5 (2019), 9098–9111.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weichao Mao, Zhenzhe Zheng, and Fan Wu. 2019. Pricing for revenue maximization in iot data markets: An information design perspective. In IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 1837–1845.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Du Mingxiao, Ma Xiaofeng, Zhang Zhe, Wang Xiangwei, and Chen Qijun. 2017. A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain. In 2017 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, 2567–2572.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crispin Niebel, Abel Reiberg, and Peter Kraemer. 2022. Gaia-X for SMEs. White Paper. Gaia-X Hub Germany.Google Scholar
- Chaoyue Niu, Zhenzhe Zheng, Fan Wu, Shaojie Tang, and Guihai Chen. 2020. Online pricing with reserve price constraint for personal data markets. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 34, 4 (2020), 1928–1943.Google Scholar
- Hyeontaek Oh, Sangdon Park, Gyu Myoung Lee, Hwanjo Heo, and Jun Kyun Choi. 2019. Personal data trading scheme for data brokers in IoT data marketplaces. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 40120–40132.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Boris Otto, Michael ten Hompel, and Stefan Wrobel. 2019. International Data Spaces: Reference architecture for the digitization of industries. Digital transformation (2019), 109–128.Google Scholar
- Heinrich Pettenpohl, Markus Spiekermann, and Jan Ruben Both. 2022. International data spaces in a nutshell. Designing Data Spaces; Springer: Cham, Switzerland (2022), 29–40.Google Scholar
- Gowri Sankar Ramachandran, Rahul Radhakrishnan, and Bhaskar Krishnamachari. 2018. Towards a decentralized data marketplace for smart cities. In 2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). IEEE, 1–8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dumitru Roman and Gatti Stefano. 2016. Towards a reference architecture for trusted data marketplaces: The credit scoring perspective. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD). IEEE, 95–101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Reinsel-John Gantz-John Rydning, John Reinsel, and John Gantz. 2018. The digitization of the world from edge to core. Framingham: International Data Corporation 16 (2018), 1–28.Google Scholar
- Wojciech Samek and Klaus-Robert Müller. 2019. Towards explainable artificial intelligence. Explainable AI: interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning (2019), 5–22.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ghaidaa Shaabany and Reiner Anderl. 2018. Security by design as an approach to design a secure industry 4.0-capable machine enabling online-trading of technology data. In 2018 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE). IEEE, 1–5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ghaidaa Shaabany, Marco Grimm, and Reiner Anderl. 2016. Secure information model for data marketplaces enabling global distributed manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 50 (2016), 360–365.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan-Terje Sørlie and Jörn Altmann. 2019. Sensing as a service revisited: A property rights enforcement and pricing model for IIoT data marketplaces. In Economics of Grids, Clouds, Systems, and Services: 16th International Conference, GECON 2019, Leeds, UK, September 17–19, 2019, Proceedings 16. Springer, 127–139.Google Scholar
- Markus Spiekermann. 2019. Data marketplaces: Trends and monetisation of data goods. Intereconomics 54, 4 (2019), 208–216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Melanie Swan. 2015. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. " O’Reilly Media, Inc.".Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hubert Tardieu. 2022. Role of Gaia-X in the European Data Space Ecosystem. In Designing Data Spaces: The Ecosystem Approach To Competitive Advantage. Springer International Publishing Cham, 41–59.Google Scholar
- Llewellyn DW Thomas and Aija Leiponen. 2016. Big data commercialization. IEEE Engineering Management Review 44, 2 (2016), 74–90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arvind Upadhyay, Sumona Mukhuty, Vikas Kumar, and Yigit Kazancoglu. 2021. Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. Journal of cleaner production 293 (2021), 126130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Montijn van de Ven, Antragama Ewa Abbas, Zenlin Kwee, and Mark de Reuver. 2021. Creating a taxonomy of business models for data marketplaces. In 34th Bled EConference: Digital Support from Crisis to Progressive Change. University of Maribor Press, 313–325.Google Scholar
- Blesson Varghese, Nan Wang, Dimitrios S Nikolopoulos, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2020. Feasibility of fog computing. Handbook of Integration of Cloud Computing, Cyber Physical Systems and Internet of Things (2020), 127–146.Google Scholar
- Shefali Virkar, Gabriela Viale Pereira, and Michela Vignoli. 2019. Investigating the social, political, economic and cultural implications of data trading. In Electronic Government: 18th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2019, San Benedetto Del Tronto, Italy, September 2–4, 2019, Proceedings 18. Springer, 215–229.Google Scholar
- Lara Vomfell, Florian Stahl, Fabian Schomm, and Gottfried Vossen. 2015. A classification framework for data marketplaces. Technical Report. Ercis working paper.Google Scholar
- Mark D Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E Bourne, 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data 3, 1 (2016), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Ronghua Xu and Yu Chen. 2021. Fed-ddm: A federated ledgers based framework for hierarchical decentralized data marketplaces. In 2021 international conference on computer communications and networks (ICCCN). IEEE, 1–8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mengxiao Zhang, Fernando Beltrán, and Jiamou Liu. 2023. A Survey of Data Pricing for Data Marketplaces. IEEE Transactions on Big Data (2023).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zibin Zheng, Shaoan Xie, Hongning Dai, Xiangping Chen, and Huaimin Wang. 2017. An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In 2017 IEEE international congress on big data (BigData congress). Ieee, 557–564.Google Scholar
- Mirko Zichichi, Contu Michele, Stefano Ferretti, Rodríguez-Doncel Víctor, 2020. Ensuring personal data anonymity in data marketplaces through sensing-as-a-service and distributed ledger. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2580. Sun SITE Central Europe/RWTH Aachen University, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Guy Zyskind, Oz Nathan, 2015. Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data. In 2015 IEEE security and privacy workshops. IEEE, 180–184.Google Scholar
Recommendations
The significant role of metadata for data marketplaces
DCMI'19: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata ApplicationsWith the shift to a data-driven society, data trading takes on a completely new significance. In the future, data marketplaces will be equivalent to other electronic commerce platforms such as Amazon or eBay. Just like any other online marketplace a ...
How to monetize data: An economic analysis of data monetization strategies under competition
AbstractWith data being generated at an unprecedented rate, monetizing data has become a paramount issue in this era of the digital economy. Firms have traditionally leveraged consumer data to improve their product or service offerings and ...
Highlights- The interplay between direct and indirect data monetization is investigated.
- ...
Data as Wealth, Data Markets and Its Regulation
Flexible Query Answering SystemsAbstractThe onerous exchange of data is a reality that needs to be regulated by the European Union. Despite the reluctance expressed by EDPS and EDPB during the debate on the current EU Directive 2019/770, the scientific literature is beginning to accept ...
Comments