skip to main content
10.1145/3644116.3644302acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisaimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can Capillary Refill Time (CRT) measurement be a reliable clinical test?

Published:05 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visually, the state of peripheral circulation in the body can be seen in the prolonged capillary refill time (CRT) when there are peripheral circulation disorders. Various forms of shock, organ failure, frostbite, and vasculitis are associated with prolonged capillary refill time. Given that this index is currently measured mainly by clinicians with the naked eye, it is lack of consensus on the measurement method, resulting extremely large measurement errors. This limits the application in clinical practice controversial. An examination of CRT's clinical utilization, its emotional components, and novel approaches to gauging CRT that could potentially facilitate more precise clinical tests for monitoring the condition of human peripheral circulation is presented in the review.In addition, our laboratory provides a new method for measuring CRT - a fully automatic capillary refill time measurement instrument based on PID pressure control, which introduces optical sensors instead of human eyes to record the change of light intensity in the subject area and can quantify and control the pressure by PID system, which reduces the influence of human factors on the measurement to a certain extent. This technology introduces an optical sensor instead of the human eye to record the light intensity changes in the subject area and can quantify and control the pressure through a PID system, which reduces the influence of human factors on the measurement results and improves the accuracy of the measurement.

References

  1. Mouncey PR,Osborn TM,Power GS,et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock[J].N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(14):1301-1311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group,Peake SL,et al.Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock[J].N Engl J Med, 2014, 371(16):1496-1506.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Asfar P,Meziani F,Hamel JF,et al.SEPSISPAM Investigators: High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock[J].N Engl J Med, 2014 ,370(17):1583-1593.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu D W, "Critical care hemodynamic therapy - Beijing consensus." Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine 54.03. 2015: 248-271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pickard A, Karlen W, Ansermino JM. Capillary refill time: is itstill a useful clinical sign? Anesth Analg 2011; 113:120–3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Champion HR,Sacco WJ,Copes WS,et al.A revision of the Trauma Score[J].J Trauma, 1989, 29(5):623-629.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lara B, Enberg L, Ortega M, Capillary refill time during fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis-related hyperlactatemia at the emergency department is related to mortality. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0188548.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hernandez G, Pedreros C, V eas E, Evolution of peripheral vs metabolic perfusion parameters during septic shock resuscitation. A clinical-physiologic study. J Crit Care 2012; 27:283-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hernández G, Cavalcanti AB, Ospina-Tascón G, Dubin A, Hurtado FJ, Damiani LP, Friedman G, Castro R, Alegría L, Cecconi M, Teboul JL, Bakker J. Statistical analysis plan for early goal-directed therapy using a physiological holistic view - the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK: a randomized controlled trial. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Jul-Sept;30(3):253-263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro R, Kattan E, Ferri G, Pairumani R, Valenzuela ED, Alegría L, Oviedo V, Pavez N, Soto D, Vera M, Santis C, Astudillo B, Cid MA, Bravo S, Ospina-Tascón G, Bakker J, Hernández G. Effects of capillary refill time-vs. lactate-targeted fluid resuscitation on regional, microcirculatory and hypoxia-related perfusion parameters in septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Nov 2;10(1):150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yazici P, Ozsan I, Aydin U. Capillary refill time as a guide for operational decision-making process of autoimmune pancreatitis: Preliminary results. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jul 27;7(7):110-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Ince C, Bakker J. The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):934-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorelick MH, Shaw KN, Baker MD. Effect of ambient temperature on capillary refill in healthy children. Pediatrics. 1993 Nov;92(5):699-702.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Anderson B, Kelly AM, Kerr D, Clooney M, Jolley D. Impact of patient and environmental factors on capillary refill time in adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.06.026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. ]Schriger DL, Baraff L. Defining normal capillary refill: variation with age, sex, and temperature. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Sep;17(9):932-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80675-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Raju NV, Maisels MJ, Kring E, Schwarz-Warner L. Capillary refill time in the hands and feet of normal newborn infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1999 Mar;38(3):139-44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Anderson B, Kelly AM, Kerr D, Clooney M, Jolley D. Impact of patient and environmental factors on capillary refill time in adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):62-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown LH, Prasad NH, Whitley TW. Adverse lighting condition effects on the assessment of capillary refill. Am J Emerg Med. 1994. 12:46–7.doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90196-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Schriger DL, Baraff L. Defining normal capillary refill: variation with age, sex, and temperature. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Sep;17(9):932-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80675-9. PMID: 3415066.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Espinoza ED, Welsh S, Dubin A. Lack of agreement between different observers and methods in the measurement of capillary refill time in healthy volunteers: an observational study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Jul-Sep;26(3):269-76. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20140038. PMID: 25295821; PMCID: PMC4188463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Shinozaki K, Jacobson LS, Saeki K, Kobayashi N, Weisner S, Falotico JM, Li T, Kim J, Lampe JW, Becker LB. Does training level affect the accuracy of visual assessment of capillary refill time? Crit Care. 2019 May 6;23(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2444-3. PMID: 31060576; PMCID: PMC6501297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle PY, Pichereau C, Alves M, Bertinchamp R, Baudel JL, Galbois A, Maury E, Guidet B. Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):958-64. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3326-4. Epub 2014 May 9. PMID: 24811942.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Alsma J, van Saase J, Nanayakkara PWB, Schouten W, Baten A, Bauer MP , The power of flash mob research: conducting a nationwide observational clinical study on capillary refill time in a single day. Chest. 2017. 151:1106–13. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.035.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Fleming S, Gill P, Jones C, Taylor JA, V an den Bruel A, Heneghan C, V alidity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2015. 100:239–49. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Shavit I, Brant R, Nijssen-Jordan C, Galbraith R, Johnson DW. A novel imaging technique to measure capillary-refill time: improving diagnostic accuracy for dehydration in young children with gastroenteritis. Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2402-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1108. PMID: 17142525.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Blaxter LL, Morris DE, Crowe JA, Henry C, Hill S, Sharkey D, Vyas H, Hayes-Gill BR. An automated quasi-continuous capillary refill timing device. Physiol Meas. 2016 Jan;37(1):83-99. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/1/83. Epub 2015 Dec 7. PMID: 26642080; PMCID: PMC4770525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. John RT, Henricson J, Nilsson GE, Wilhelms D, Anderson CD. Reflectance spectroscopy: to shed new light on the capillary refill test. J Biophotonics. 2018 Jan;11(1). doi: 10.1002/jbio.201700043. Epub 2017 May 24. PMID: 28544641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Fleming S, Gill P, Jones C, Taylor JA, Van den Bruel A, Heneghan C, Thompson M. Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2015 Mar;100(3):239-49. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307079. Epub 2014 Sep 26. PMID: 25260515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Saito D, Nakada TA, Imaeda T, Takahashi N, Shinozaki M, Shimizu R, Nakaguchi T. Impact of posture on capillary refilling time. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;56:378-379. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 7. PMID: 34776282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Can Capillary Refill Time (CRT) measurement be a reliable clinical test?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ISAIMS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Science
      October 2023
      1394 pages
      ISBN:9798400708138
      DOI:10.1145/3644116

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 April 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate53of112submissions,47%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format