skip to main content
10.1145/3644116.3644134acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisaimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved Super-harmonic Imaging of Ultrasound Contrast Agents Based on ICEEMDAN

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Super-harmonics (SH) only come from contrast agents (CA), and the clutter-free SH imaging (SHI) has higher quality in ultrasound CA imaging. How to better separate the SH from echo signals is a key issue to improve the SHI of the CA. The existing three algorithms all have some limitations, the arrival artifact of pulse inversion (PI) method, the inflexible parameters of high pass filter (HPF) method and the noise residue of complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) method. In this study, the improved complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise adaptive decomposition of adaptive noise (ICEEMDAN) method is proposed to improve the quality of the SHI. The CA echo signals from computer simulations and rabbit kidney experiments are decomposed by the ICEEMDAN to obtain a set of intrinsic mode functions (IMF), and then the SH are obtained by adaptive decomposition according to the IMF spectra. The results show that the SHI based on the ICEEMDAN has clearer contours, less interference, and higher image contrast. For the rabbit kidney experiments, the contrasts, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), and tissue-to-clutter ratios (TCR) of the ICEEMDAN-based SHI are averagely increased by 43.03%, 27.40% and 33.13%, compared with those based on the PI, HPF and CEEMDAN methods. Therefore, the ICEEMDAN method proposed in this paper has a better effect on separating the SH and can improve the performance of the SHI.

References

  1. Maresca D, Skachkov I, Renaud G, Imaging microvasculature with contrast-enhanced ultra-harmonic ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2014, 40(6):1318–1328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Maresca D, Renaud G, van Soest G, Contrast-enhanced intravascular ultrasound pulse sequences for bandwidth-limited transducers. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2013, 39(4):706–713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Daeichin V, Bosch J G, Needles A, Sub-harmonic, non-linear fundamental and ultra-harmonic imaging of micro bubble contrast at high frequencies. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2015, 41(2):486–497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Wada H, Yasu T, Sakakura K, Contrast echocardiography for the diagnosis of left ventricular thrombus in anterior myocardial infarction. Heart & Vessels, 2014, 29(3):308-312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Eisenbrey J R, Dave J K, Halldorsdottir V G, Simultaneous gray scale and sub-harmonic ultrasound imaging on a modified commercial scanner. Ultrasonic, 2011, 51(8):890-897.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Strobel D, Raeker S, Martus P, Phase inversion harmonic imaging versus contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography for the characterization of focal liver lesions . International Journal of Cool-rectal Disease, 2003, 18(1):63-72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chinda S, Pomchai P. Pulse inversion linear band pass filter for detecting sub-harmonic from micro bubbles. 2011 Eighth International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2011, 143-148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenbrey J R, Sridharan A, Liu J, Recent Experiences and Advances in Contrast-Enhanced Sub-harmonic Ultrasound. Biological Medicine Research International, 2015, 2015:640397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Torres M E, Colominas M A, Schlotthauer G, Complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, 2011, 125:4144-4147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Colominas M, Schlotthauer G, Torres M, Improved complete ensemble EMD: A suitable tool for biomedical signal processing, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2014, 39:19-29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Huang N E, Shen Z, Long S R, The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and no stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, 1998, 454(1971):903–995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Varray F, Basset O, Tortoli P, CREANUIS: a non-linear radio frequency ultrasound image simulator. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2013, 39(10):1915-1924.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Varray F, Ramalli A, Cachard C, Fundamental and second-harmonic ultrasound field computation of inhomogeneous nonlinear medium with a generalized angular spectrum method. Ultrasonic Ferroelectrics & Frequency Control IEEE Transactions on, 2011, 58(7):1366- 1376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K.E. Morgan, J. S. Allen, P. A. Dayton, J. E. Chomas, A. L. Klibanov, and K. W. Ferrara. Experimental and theoretical evaluation of micro bubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size. Ultrasonic Ferroelectrics & Frequency Control IEEE Transactions on, 2000, 47(6):1494-509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Van Wijk M C, Thijssen J M. Performance testing of medical ultrasound equipment: fundamental vs. harmonic mode. Ultrasonic, 2002, 40(1):585-591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improved Super-harmonic Imaging of Ultrasound Contrast Agents Based on ICEEMDAN

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ISAIMS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Science
              October 2023
              1394 pages
              ISBN:9798400708138
              DOI:10.1145/3644116

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 5 April 2024

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate53of112submissions,47%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format