skip to main content
10.1145/3644116.3644123acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisaimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The estimation of blood flow velocity profile with the Doppler Ultrasound based on adaptive pulse repetition frequency

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

The blood flow velocity profile (BFVP) is associated with atherosclerosis, and the Doppler Ultrasound has wide application in the BFVP estimation. However, the Doppler Ultrasound with autocorrelation technique chooses a fixed and high pulse repetition frequency(PRF) to estimate the BFVP in order to prevent frequency aliasing, which leads to incomplete fluctuation cycle of the Doppler signal for slow blood flow close to the wall due to insufficient acquisition time. This paper proposes the adaptive PRF to estimate the BFVP and improve the accuracy, especially for slow blood flow near the wall. To evaluate the performance of the adaptive PRF, in-vitro experiments were carried out. In-vitro experiments, the normalized root mean square errors (NRMSEs) between the estimated and theoretical BFVPs are calculated. The adaptive PRF provided mean errors 31.4% and 38.7% smaller and standard deviations 41.6% and 49.2% smaller than the fixed PRF in the two periods of a pulsing cycle, respectively. Therefore, the proposed method can effectively improve the BFVP estimation, which is expected to provide more accurate diagnostic information for cardiovascular diseases.

References

  1. Laslett , The worldwide environment of Cardiovascular Disease: prevalence, diagnosis, therapy, and policy issues. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 60:(25 Suppl), 1 49. Available at: https://www.jacc.org/doi/epdf/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.002. Accessed January 11, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Oleg Gaidai, Yu Cao, Stas Loginov, Global Cardiovascular Diseases Death Rate Prediction, Current Problems in Cardiology, Volume 48, Issue 5, 2023, 101622, ISSN 0146-2806.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. K. Zarins, D. P. Giddens, B. K. Bharadvaj, V. S. Sottiurai,R. Mabon, and S. Glagov, “Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress,” Circulat. Res., vol. 53, pp. 502-514, Oct. 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Malek A M, Alper S L, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis[J]. Jama, 1999, 282(21): 2035-2042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound[J]. Intensive care medicine, 2012, 38: 577-591.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Steinl D C, Kaufmann B A. Ultrasound imaging for risk assessment in atherosclerosis[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2015, 16(5): 9749-9769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lin J J, Cheng J Y, Huang L F, Detecting changes in ultrasound backscattered statistics by using Nakagami parameters: Comparisons of moment-based and maximum likelihood estimators[J]. Ultrasonics, 2017, 77: 133-143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Strintzis M G, Kokkinidis I. Maximum likelihood motion estimation in ultrasound image sequences[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 1997, 4(6): 156-157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. He B, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Optimum speckle tracking based on ultrafast ultrasound for improving blood flow velocimetry[J]. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2020, 68(3): 494-509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bharadwaj S, Almekkawy M. Faster search algorithm for speckle tracking in ultrasound images[C]//2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2020: 2142-2146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. Kasai, K. Namekawa, A. Koyano, and R. Omoto, “Real-time twodimensional blood flow imaging using an autocorrelation technique,” IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 458-464, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hasegawa H, Omura M, Nagaoka R. On the investigation of autocorrelation-based vector Doppler method with plane wave imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2022, 69(4): 1301-1311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I, Heindel W, Katalinic A. Imaging Studies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008. 105:541-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu H, Jiang Y, Dai Q, Zhu Q, Wang L, Lu J. Peripheral Enhancement of Breast Cancers on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Correlation With Microvessel Density and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014. 40:293-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The estimation of blood flow velocity profile with the Doppler Ultrasound based on adaptive pulse repetition frequency

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ISAIMS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Science
      October 2023
      1394 pages
      ISBN:9798400708138
      DOI:10.1145/3644116

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 April 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate53of112submissions,47%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format