Abstract
Integrating graduate education with professional skills development is still a challenge. People's beliefs about learning impact their learning processes. Therefore, we need to understand the mindset of graduates to determine best practices for promoting professional skills development. In this study, we explore the perspective of computing graduates within an Engineering educational program. This study aims to answer the following research questions: Which skills do computing graduates perceive they need in the workplace, and how do they position themselves regarding these skills? What learning beliefs do computing graduates hold regarding the skills required in the workplace? The research team conducted semistructured interviews with computing graduates within an Engineering program to analyze their experiences. The interviews were analyzed using grounded theory. As a result, the participants viewed professional and technical skills as independent, with professional skills perceived as more relevant to work success. The participants considered themselves to possess these skills. Our findings identify four learning beliefs within a fixed and growth mindset: (1) An essential personal characteristic that context may influence; (2) a learning outcome determined by early experiences; (3) a learning process associated with informal learning experiences; and (4) a learning process associated with formal learning experiences. We acknowledge the differences in perception between alums and the industry regarding possessing essential professional skills. We also highlight the need to position these skills as learnable during lectures contributing to Computing and Engineering Education.
- [1] . 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2023 from https://www.abet.org/Google Scholar
- [2] . 2023. Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs, 2023–2024. Retrieved October 29, 2023 from https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2023-2024/Google Scholar
- [3] ABET. 2023. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2023–2024. Retrieved October 29, 2023 from https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2023-2024/Google Scholar
- [4] . 2012. Timeline interviews: A tool for conducting life history research. Qualitative Studies 3, 1 (2012), 40–55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [5] . 2019. The impact of self-theories to academic achievement and soft skills in undergraduate CS studies: First findings. In Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’19).
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [6] . 2016. Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Reseach 10, 3 (2016), 228–250.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [7] . 2021. Boundary spanning at work placements: Challenges to overcome, and ways to learn in preparation for early career engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education 47 (2021), 50–69.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [8] . 2008. Developmental stages of the learner. Nurse as Educator. Jones & Bartlett, Boston, 147–198.Google Scholar
- [9] . 2008. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report 13, 4 (2008), 544–559.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [10] . 2019. Mindset theory. Social Psychology in Action, Springer, Cham.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [11] . 2020. On the roles of dispositions and beliefs in learning from multiple perspectives. In handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives, Peggy Van Meter, Alexandra List, Doug Lombardi, and Panayiota Kendeou (Ed.), Routledge, 141--163.Google Scholar
- [12] . 2019. Bridging the gaps between engineering education and practice. U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy. University of Chicago Press.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [13] Jeffrey Buckley, James Trevelyan, and Christine Winberg. 2022. Perspectives on engineering education from the world of practice. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47, 1 (2022), 1–7.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [14] . 2018. The development of theoretical sampling in practice. Collegian 25, 5 (2018).
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [15] . 2020. Development of a scale for measuring students’ attitudes towards learning professional (ie, soft) skills. Research in Science Education 50, 4 (2020), 1417–1433.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [16] . 2017. Millennials through the looking glass: Workplace motivating factors. The Journal of Business Inquiry 16, 2 (2017), 131–139.Google Scholar
- [17] . 2021. Developing growth mindsets in engineering students: a systematic literature review of interventions. European Journal of Engineering Education 46, 4 (2021), 503–527.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [18] . 2018. Mind the mindset! The interaction of proactive personality, transformational leadership and growth mindset for engagement at work. Career Development International 23, 1 (2018), 48–66.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [19] Kelly A. Cave, Zinta S. Byrne, Thomas J. Siller, and Anthony A. Maciejewski. 2019. Board 89: What engineering students think about how they learn professional skills. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019, June. ASEE Conferences, 2019. https://peer.asee.org/32453Google Scholar
- [20] CC2020 Task Force. 2020. Computing curricula 2020: Paradigms for Global Computing Education. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- [21] . 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Google Scholar.Google Scholar
- [22] . 2019. Thinking about data with grounded theory. Qualitative Inquiry 25, 8 (2019), 743–753.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [23] . 2001. Developing IT staff: A Practical Approach. Springer.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [24] . 2013. Fast-Tracking Your Career: Soft Skills for Engineering and IT Professionals. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [25] . 2017. The influence of participation in extracurricular activities to the employability of industrial engineering graduates of one private university in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5, 2 (2017), 163–170.Google Scholar
- [26] . 2020. Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research 30, 6 (2020), 947–959. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [27] . 2022. The impacts of scaffolding socially shared regulation on teamwork in an online project-based course. Internet and Higher Education 55 (2022), 100877.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [28] . 2021. Promoting critical thinking in an online, project-based course. Computers in Human Behavior 119 (2021), 106705 Google ScholarDigital Library
- [29] . 2020. Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: A systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education 45, 5 (2020), 729–757.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [30] Norman K. Denzin. 1989. Interpretive biography. Vol. 17. Sage, 1989.Google Scholar
- [31] . 2012. Triangulation 2.0*. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6, 2 (2012), 80–88.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [32] . 2008. The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17, 6 (2008), 391–394.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [33] Carol S. Dweck. 2012. Implicit Theories. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 2. London, SAGE Publications Ltd. 43–61. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [34] . 2019. Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science 14, 3 (2019), 481–496.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [35] . 1993. Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; First Edition (January 1, 1993).Google Scholar
- [36] . 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5, 1 (2016), 1–4.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [37] . Retrieved October 17, 2023 from http://www.enaee.eu/Google Scholar
- [38] . 2018. Comparing computing professionals’ perceptions of importance of skills and knowledge on the job and coverage in undergraduate experiences. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 18, 4 (2018),
Article 21 , 29 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library - [39] . 2022. Measuring professional skills misalignment based on early-career engineers’ perceptions of engineering expertise. European Journal of Engineering Education 47, 1 (2022), 117–143.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [40] Uwe Flick. 2020. Introducing research methodology: thinking your way through your research project. Introducing Research Methodology. 1–416.Google Scholar
- [41] . 2023. Challenge-based learning in higher education: An exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education 28, 6 (2023), 1135–1157.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [42] . 2020. Closing the gap between software engineering education and industrial needs. IEEE Software 37, 2 (2020), 68–77.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [43] Lisa M. Given. 2016. 100 Questions (and Answers) About Qualitative Research. California: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- [44] . 2017. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge, New York.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [45] . 2017. Who needs innate ability to succeed in math and literacy? Academic-domain-specific theories of intelligence about peers versus adults. Developmental Psychology 53, 6 (2017), 1188–1205.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [46] . 2018. The employment expectations of masters engineering students. In 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET’19). 1–6.Google Scholar
- [47] . 2020. Teachers’ belief that math requires innate ability predicts lower intrinsic motivation among low-achieving students. Learning and Instruction 65 (2020), 101220.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [48] Mohamed Hussein, Sandra Hirst, Vince Salyers, and Joseph Osuji. 2014. Using grounded theory as a method of inquiry: Advantages and disadvantages. The Qualitative Report, 19, 27 (2014), 1–15. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [49] . 2019. ‘Talent-spotting’ or ‘social magic’? Inequality, cultural sorting and constructions of the ideal graduate in elite professions. Sociological Review 67, 3 (2019).
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [50] . 2021. When industry meets education 4.0: What do computer science companies need from higher education? In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 367–372.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [51] . 2021. Lifelong and lifewide learning for the perpetual development of expertise in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education 0 (2021), 1–15.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [52] . 2017. Athletics, clubs, or music? The influence of college extracurricular activities on job prestige and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Work 30, 3 (2017), 249–269. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [53] . 2019. Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System 86 (2019), 102126.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [54] . 2019. The importance of soft skills for employability and career development: Students and employers’ perspectives. IUP Journal of Soft Skills 13, 4 (2019), 7–39.Google Scholar
- [55] . 2010. Generic engineering competencies: A review and modelling approach. Education Research & Perspectives 37, 1 (2010), 25–51. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=79555631&site=ehost-liveGoogle Scholar
- [56] . 2016. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research 26, 13 (2016), 1753–1760.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [57] . 2022. Soft skills, do we know what we are talking about? Review of Managerial Science 16 (2022), 969–1000.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [58] . 2018. Work, personal and cultural factors in engineers’ management of their career satisfaction. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47 (2018), 22–36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [59] . 2017. Qualitative Researching (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- [60] . 2019. A systematic mapping study on soft skills in software engineering. Journal of Universal Computer Science 25, 1 (2019).Google Scholar
- [61] Janet McDaid. 1993. Book reviews: Practical sampling, by Gary T. Henry. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990, 139 pp. Evaluation Practice, 14, 1 (1993), 69--71. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [62] . 2020. Employability skills for 21st-century STEM students: The employers’ perspective. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning 10, 3 (2020).
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [63] . 2019. Integrating professional and academic knowledge: The link between researchers skills and innovation culture. Journal of Technology Transfer 44, 4 (2019), 1273–1289.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [64] . 2010. A mindset for EFL: Learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT Journal 64, 4 (2010), 436–444.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [65] . 2019. Qualitative data analysis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [66] . 2016. Identity and identification at work. Organizational Psychology Review 6, 3 (2016), 215–247.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [67] National Science Foundation. 1997. Systemic engineering education reform: An action agenda. NSF98–27. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9827Google Scholar
- [68] . 2020. A systematic review on soft skills development among university graduates. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences 6, 1 (2020), 53–68.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [69] . 2015. Life-long learning, conscientious disposition, and longitudinal measures of academic engagement in engineering design teamwork. Learning and Individural Differences 39 (2015), 124–131.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [70] . 1984. Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 3 (1984), 274–287.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [71] . 2019. Employability traits for engineers: A competencies-based approach. Industry and Higher Education 33, 5 (2019), 308–326.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [72] . 2012. Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education 101, 1 (2012).
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [73] . 2017. What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education 106, 3 (2017), 475–526.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [74] . 2019. “Set in stone” or “willing to grow”? Teacher sensemaking during a growth mindset initiative. Teaching and Teacher Education 83 (2019), 156–167.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [75] . 2019. Analysis of macroethics teaching practices and perceptions in engineering: A cultural comparison. European Journal of Engineering Education 44, 6 (2019), 866–881.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [76] . 2013. Gaps between industry expectations and the abilities of graduates. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’13). Association for Computing Machinery, 525–530.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [77] . 2019. Employability and hiring trends of engineering job aspirants in UAE. In 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET’19). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [78] Raj Rajendra, Mihaela Sabin, John Impagliazzo, David Bowers, Mats Daniels, Felienne Hermans, Natalie Kiesler, Amruth N. Kumar, Bonnie MacKellar, Renée McCauley, Syed Waqar Nabi, and Michael Oudshoorn. 2021. Professional competencies in computing education: Pedagogies and assessment. In Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’21). Association for Computing Machinery, 133–161.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [79] . 2019. Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18 (2019).
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [80] . 2003. Open-ended vs. Close-ended Questions in Web Questionnaires. Adv Methodol Stats. 19.Google Scholar
- [81] . 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity 52, 4 (2018), 1893–1907.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [82] . 2005. The ABET “professional skills”—Can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education 94, 1 (2005), 41–55.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [83] . 2017. The STEM Dilemma: Skills that Matter to Regions. WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [84] . 2016. Competition-based learning: Determining the strongest skill that can be achieved among higher education learners. In Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS’14).
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [85] . 2020. Expanded yet restricted: A mini review of the soft skills literature. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020).
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [86] . 2019. Transitioning to engineering practice. European Journal of Engineering Education 44, 6 (2019), 821–837.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [87] . 2020. Teacher interactions in taking action upon pupil learning outcome data: A matter of attitude and self-efficacy? Teaching and Teacher Education 89 (2020), 102989.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [88] . 2021. More than growth mindset: Individual and interactive links among socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents’ ability mindsets, metacognitive skills, and math engagement. Child Development 92, 5 (2021), e957–e976.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [89] . 2020. Developing employability in engineering education: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Engineering Education 45, 2 (2020), 165–180.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [90] . 2003. Case study research design and methods. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Are Professional Skills Learnable? Beliefs and Expectations Among Computing Graduates
Recommendations
Professional Skills in the Engineering Curriculum
Faculty from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the College of Education at the University of Missouri (MU), Columbia, developed a novel course for engineering graduate students emphasizing pedagogy and professional skills. The ...
Soft Skills: What do Computing Program Syllabi Reveal About Non-Technical Expectations of Undergraduate Students?
ITiCSE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science EducationIndustry expectations of graduates are higher than ever. Not only are they required to be skilled in several technologies, but also need to be equipped with non-technical skills - often called soft skills or professional skills. This puts pressure on ...
Comparing Computing Professionals’ Perceptions of Importance of Skills and Knowledge on the Job and Coverage in Undergraduate Experiences
Special Issue on Learning Analytics and Regular PapersThis article discusses the findings of a survey of nearly 300 computing professionals who are involved in the design and/or development of software across a variety of industries. We report on the surveyed professionals’ perceptions of the importance of ...
Comments