Hana Darling-Wolf
Elizabeth Patitsas
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Researchers in the CSCW community have long problematized the separation of social and ethical considerations from design work. Despite increasing attention to tech ethics and ethics education, however, computer scientists' sense of ethical responsibility remains of concern. This paper offers insights on how this boundary between tech and ethics is maintained and reinforced for students as they develop their identities as computer scientists. Drawing on interviews with eight undergraduate computer science (CS) students at McGill University, we explore the role that ethics play in the legitimate peripheral participation of students inside and outside their formal education. We found that while individual opinions on the importance of ethics varied, students agreed that ethics are not valued or rewarded in their education, extracurriculars, or future work prospects. We describe how placing ethics outside the boundary of computing acts as a form of occupational closure, excluding both important multidisciplinary work and marginalized bodies. We argue that in order to promote ethical practice in the design of CSCW systems, we must make it in the interest of future designers to learn socially grounded ethics. This requires that designers, researchers, and future employers actively reshape the boundaries of computing by asserting social and ethical considerations as values of computing and design.
- P Agre. 1997. Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI in Bowker. G., Star, S., Turner, W., and Gasser, L., eds, Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, Erlbaum (1997).Google Scholar
- Sara Ahmed. 2006. The nonperformativity of antiracism. Meridians, Vol. 7, 1 (2006), 104--126.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tamara Alsheikh, Jennifer A Rode, and Siân E Lindley. 2011. (Whose) Value-Sensitive design: a study of long-distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 75--84.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morgan G Ames. 2018. Hackers, computers, and cooperation: A critical history of logo and constructionist learning. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--19. ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morgan G Ames, Janet Go, Joseph'Jofish' Kaye, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2011. Understanding technology choices and values through social class. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 55--64.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morgan G Ames, Daniela K Rosner, and Ingrid Erickson. 2015. Worship, faith, and evangelism: Religion as an ideological lens for engineering worlds. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 69--81.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Louise Archer, Emily Dawson, Jennifer DeWitt, Amy Seakins, and Billy Wong. 2015. ?Science capital": A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of research in science teaching, Vol. 52, 7 (2015), 922--948.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zahra Ashktorab, Benjamin Hoover, Mayank Agarwal, Casey Dugan, Werner Geyer, Hao Bang Yang, and Mikhail Yurochkin. 2023. Fairness Evaluation in Text Classification: Machine Learning Practitioner Perspectives of Individual and Group Fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00673 (2023).Google Scholar
- Lucy Avraamidou. 2020a. Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, Vol. 15, 2 (2020), 323--345.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lucy Avraamidou. 2020b. ?I am a young immigrant woman doing physics and on top of that I am Muslim": Identities, intersections, and negotiations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 57, 3 (2020), 311--341.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diana Bairaktarova and Anna Woodcock. 2017. Engineering student's ethical awareness and behavior: A new motivational model. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 23 (2017), 1129--1157.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301--1310.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Begel and Beth Simon. 2008. Novice software developers, all over again. In Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on computing education research. 3--14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marion G Ben-Jacob. 2005. Integrating computer ethics across the curriculum: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 8, 4 (2005), 198--204.Google Scholar
- Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Social forces (2019).Google Scholar
- Cynthia L Bennett and Os Keyes. 2020. What is the point of fairness? Disability, AI and the complexity of justice. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 125 (2020), 1--1.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nora Berenstain. 2016. Epistemic exploitation. (2016).Google Scholar
- Maureen Biggers, Anne Brauer, and Tuba Yilmaz. 2008. Student perceptions of computer science: a retention study comparing graduating seniors with cs leavers. Acm sigcse bulletin, Vol. 40, 1 (2008), 402--406.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stacy M Branham, Anja Thieme, Lisa P Nathan, Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Co-creating & identity-making in CSCW: revisiting ethics in design research. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 305--308.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, Vol. 13, 2 (2021), 201--216.Google Scholar
- Samantha Breslin. 2018. The making of computer scientists: rendering technical knowledge, gender, and entrepreneurialism in Singapore. Ph.,D. Dissertation. Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
- Amy Bruckman, Karrie Karahalios, Robert E Kraut, Erika Shehan Poole, John C Thomas, and Sarita Yardi. 2010. Revisiting research ethics in the facebook era: Challenges in emerging CSCW research. In Adjunct Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work ACM, Savannah, GA. Citeseer.Google Scholar
- Michael Buckley, John Nordlinger, and Devika Subramanian. 2008. Socially relevant computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 40, 1 (2008), 347--351.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Francisco Castro, Sahitya Raipura, Heather Conboy, Peter Haas, Leon Osterweil, and Ivon Arroyo. 2023. Piloting an Interactive Ethics and Responsible Computing Learning Environment in Undergraduate CS Courses. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 659--665.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephen Chan, Benjamin Hill, and Sarita Yardi. 2005. Instant messaging bots: accountability and peripheral participation for textual user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 113--115.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ruijia Cheng and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2022. Many Destinations, Many Pathways: A Quantitative Analysis of Legitimate Peripheral Participation in Scratch. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--26.Google Scholar
- Cynthia Cockburn. 1993. Technical competence, gender identity and women's autonomy. Les Cahiers du Genre, Vol. 7, 1 (1993), 111--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gilbert Cockton. 2005. A development framework for value-centred design. In CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 1292--1295.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Costas S Constantinou, Maria Georgiou, and Maria Perdikogianni. 2017. A comparative method for themes saturation (CoMeTS) in qualitative interviews. Qualitative research, Vol. 17, 5 (2017), 571--588.Google Scholar
- Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Wendy Cukier, Denise Shortt, and Irene Devine. 2002. Gender and information technology: Implications of definitions. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 34, 4 (2002), 142--148.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hana Darling-Wolf and Elizabeth Patitsas. 2024. Passion as Capital: The Cultural Production of "Good Computer Scientists". osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/bzthuGoogle Scholar
- Janet Davis, Lisa P Nathan, et al. 2015. Value sensitive design: Applications, adaptations, and critiques. Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design: Sources, theory, values and application domains (2015), 11--40.Google Scholar
- Victoria Dean and Illah Nourbakhsh. 2022. Teaching Ethics by Teaching Ethics Pedagogy: A Proposal for Structural Ethics Intervention. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 272--278.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marjorie L DeVault. 1996. Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology. Annual review of sociology, Vol. 22, 1 (1996), 29--50.Google Scholar
- Catherine D'Ignazio, Erhardt Graeff, Christina N Harrington, and Daniela K Rosner. 2020. Toward equitable participatory design: Data feminism for CSCW amidst multiple pandemics. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 437--445.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. 541--550.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Dourish. 2019. User experience as legitimacy trap. Interactions, Vol. 26, 6 (2019), 46--49.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Dourish and Genevieve Bell. 2011. Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Mit Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pelle Ehn. 1988. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Ph.,D. Dissertation. Arbetslivscentrum.Google Scholar
- Sheena Erete, Yolanda A Rankin, and Jakita O Thomas. 2021. I can't breathe: Reflections from Black women in CSCW and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW3 (2021), 1--23.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael John Eynon, Christopher O'Donnell, and Lynn Williams. 2018. Gaining qualitative insight into the subjective experiences of adherers to an exercise referral scheme: A thematic analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 23, 11 (2018), 1476--1487.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rodrigo Ferreira and Moshe Y Vardi. 2021. Deep tech ethics: An approach to teaching social justice in computer science. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 1041--1047.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Amy Bruckman, Robert E Kraut, Michael Muller, Cosmin Munteanu, and Katie Shilton. 2018. Research ethics and regulation: An open forum. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 125--128.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Mikhaila Friske, Natalie Garrett, Felix Muzny, Jessie J Smith, and Jason Zietz. 2021. Integrating ethics into introductory programming classes. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 1027--1033.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Natalie Garrett, and Nathan Beard. 2020. What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 289--295.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, R Benjamin Shapiro, and Amy S Bruckman. 2017. Growing their own: Legitimate peripheral participation for computational learning in an online fandom community. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 1375--1386.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenneth R Fleischmann, Sherri R Greenberg, Danna Gurari, Abigale Stangl, Nitin Verma, Jaxsen R Day, Rachel N Simons, and Tom Yeh. 2019. Good systems: Ethical ai for cscw. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 461--467.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jane Forman and Laura Damschroder. 2007. Qualitative content analysis. In Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 39--62.Google Scholar
- Andrea Forte, Judd Antin, Shaowen Bardzell, Leigh Honeywell, John Riedl, and Sarah Stierch. 2012. Some of all human knowledge: gender and participation in peer production. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion. 33--36.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Fox, Jill Dimond, Lilly Irani, Tad Hirsch, Michael Muller, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017a. Social Justice and Design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems. In Companion of the 2017 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 117--122.Google Scholar
- Sarah Fox, Amanda Menking, Stephanie Steinhardt, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017b. Imagining intersectional futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 387--393.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Fox, Rachel Rose Ulgado, and Daniela Rosner. 2015. Hacking culture, not devices: Access and recognition in feminist hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 56--68.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guo Freeman, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Susan C. Herring. 2015. Simulating Marriage: Gender Roles and Emerging Intimacy in an Online Game. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1191--1200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675192Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batya Friedman and David G Hendry. 2019. Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. Mit Press.Google Scholar
- Natalie Garrett, Nathan Beard, and Casey Fiesler. 2020. More than" If Time Allows" the role of ethics in AI education. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 272--278.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clifford Geertz. 1973. Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures, Clifford Geertz (Ed.). Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Grant Gilson, Stephen Ott, Noah Rose Ledesma, Aakash Prabhu, and Joël Porquet-Lupine. 2022. Design and Evaluation of" The Missing CS Class," A Student-led Undergraduate Course to Reduce the Academia-industry Gap. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education-Volume 1. 467--473.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Judith Glover. 2000. Exclusions: American Women of Science. In Women and Scientific Employment. Springer, 139--166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Goldweber, John Barr, Tony Clear, Renzo Davoli, Samuel Mann, Elizabeth Patitsas, and Scott Portnoff. 2013. A framework for enhancing the social good in computing education: a values approach. ACM Inroads, Vol. 4, 1 (2013), 58--79.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Allison J Gonsalves, Alexandre Soares Cavalcante, Emily Diane Sprowls, and Hailey Iacono. 2021. ?Anybody can do science if they're brave enough": Understanding the role of science capital in science majors' identity trajectories into and through postsecondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (2021). Publisher: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
- Ben Green. 2019. "Good" isn't good enough. In Proceedings of the AI for Social Good workshop at NeurIPS, Vol. 16.Google Scholar
- Greg Guest, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, Vol. 18, 1 (2006), 59--82.Google Scholar
- Mark Guzdial and Allison Elliott Tew. 2006. Imagineering inauthentic legitimate peripheral participation: an instructional design approach for motivating computing education. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research. 51--58.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Halbert and Lisa P Nathan. 2015. Designing for discomfort: Supporting critical reflection through interactive tools. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 349--360.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aimi Hamraie and Max Liboiron. 2020. Solidarity Chat 9: Max Liboiron. Critical Design Lab. https://www.mapping-access.com/podcast/2020/6/10/solidarity-chat-9-max-liboironGoogle Scholar
- Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, Vol. 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.Google Scholar
- Sandra Harding. 1995. ?Strong objectivity": A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, Vol. 104, 3 (1995), 331--349.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amir Hedayati-Mehdiabadi. 2022. How do computer science students make decisions in ethical situations? Implications for teaching computing ethics based on a grounded theory study. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), Vol. 22, 3 (2022), 1--24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Libby Hemphill, Ingrid Erickson, David Ribes, and Ines Mergel. 2014. Feminism and social media research. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 319--322.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber. 2007. The practice of feminist in-depth interviewing. Feminist research practice: A primer, Vol. 111148 (2007), 111--138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diane Horton, David Liu, Sheila A McIlraith, and Nina Wang. 2023. Is More Better When Embedding Ethics in CS Courses?. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 652--658.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joshua Introne, Karen Levy, Sean Munson, Sean Goggins, Rick Wash, and Cecilia Aragon. 2012. Design, influence, and social technologies: techniques, impacts, and ethics. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion. 9--10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lilly Irani. 2018. ?Design thinking": Defending Silicon Valley at the apex of global labor hierarchies. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, Vol. 4, 1 (2018), 1--19.Google Scholar
- Yasmin B Kafai. 1998. Video game designs by girls and boys: Variability and consistency of gender differences. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games (1998), 90--114.Google Scholar
- Os Keyes. 2018. The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW, Article 88 (nov 2018), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357Google ScholarDigital Library
- Os Keyes, Chandler May, and Annabelle Carrell. 2021. You Keep Using That Word: Ways of Thinking about Gender in Computing Research. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, CSCW1, Article 39 (apr 2021), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449113Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minji Kong and Lori Pollock. 2023. Experiences Piloting a Diversity and Inclusion in Computing Innovations Course. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 242--248.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michèle Lamont. 1992. Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and the American upper-middle class. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Michèle Lamont and Virág Molnár. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual review of sociology, Vol. 28, 1 (2002), 167--195.Google Scholar
- Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
- Christopher A Le Dantec. 2016. Designing publics. MIT Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ann Light, Tuck W Leong, and Toni Robertson. 2015. Ageing well with CSCW. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer, 295--304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ann Light and Clodagh Miskelly. 2019. Platforms, scales and networks: Meshing a local sustainable sharing economy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 28 (2019), 591--626.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirsti Malterud, Volkert Dirk Siersma, and Ann Dorrit Guassora. 2016. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative health research, Vol. 26, 13 (2016), 1753--1760.Google Scholar
- Jane Margolis and Allen Fisher. 1997. Geek mythology and attracting undergraduate women to computer science. Women in Engineering ProActive Network (1997).Google Scholar
- Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.Google Scholar
- C Dianne Martin and Elaine Yale Weltz. 1999. From awareness to action: Integrating ethics and social responsibility into the computer science curriculum. ACM Sigcas Computers and Society, Vol. 29, 2 (1999), 6--14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philipp Mayring et al. 2004. Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research, Vol. 1, 2 (2004), 159--176.Google Scholar
- Tara McPherson. 2013. US operating systems at mid-century: The intertwining of race and UNIX. In Race after the Internet. Routledge, 21--37.Google Scholar
- Maria Menendez-Blanco, Pernille Bjorn, and Antonella De Angeli. 2017. Fostering cooperative activism through critical design. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 618--629.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric M Meyers and Lisa P Nathan. 2016. Impoverished visions of sustainability: Encouraging disruption in digital learning environments. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 222--232.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric Monteiro, Neil Pollock, Ole Hanseth, and Robin Williams. 2013. From artefacts to infrastructures. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), Vol. 22 (2013), 575--607.Google Scholar
- AM Nú nez, MJ Mayhew, M Shaheen, and LS Dahl. 2021. Let's teach computer science majors to be good citizens. The whole world depends on it. Edsurge (2021).Google Scholar
- Frank Parkin. 1981. Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. (1981).Google Scholar
- Elizabeth Patitsas. 2019. Explaining gendered participation in computer science education. Ph.,D. Dissertation. University of Toronto (Canada).Google Scholar
- Alison M Patricia Hill Collins. 2015. Black Feminist Epistemology. In Just methods: An interdisciplinary feminist reader. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Anne-Kathrin Peters, Anders Berglund, Anna Eckerdal, and Arnold Pears. 2015. Second year computer science and IT students' experience of participation in the discipline. In Proceedings of the 15th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research. 68--76.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denise F Polit and Cheryl Tatano Beck. 2010. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International journal of nursing studies, Vol. 47, 11 (2010), 1451--1458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael J Quinn. 2006. On teaching computer ethics within a computer science department. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 12 (2006), 335--343.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Quinn Patton. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage (2002).Google Scholar
- Cyndi Rader, Doug Hakkarinen, Barbara M Moskal, and Keith Hellman. 2011. Exploring the appeal of socially relevant computing: are students interested in socially relevant problems?. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 423--428.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Radermacher and Gursimran Walia. 2013. Gaps between industry expectations and the abilities of graduates. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 525--530.Google Scholar
- Daniela K Rosner. 2018. Critical fabulations: Reworking the methods and margins of design. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hani Safadi and Nicholas Berente. 2019. Legitimate peripheral participation and value creation in online knowledge sharing communities. (2019).Google Scholar
- Ella Sarder and Casey Fiesler. 2022. Entering the Techlash: Student Perspectives on Ethics in Tech Job Searches. In Companion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 85--88.Google Scholar
- Devansh Saxena, Erhardt Graeff, Shion Guha, EunJeong Cheon, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Dawn Walker, Christoph Becker, and Kenneth R Fleischmann. 2020. Collective Organizing and Social Responsibility at CSCW. In conference companion publication of the 2020 on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 503--509.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Stacy M Branham, and Foad Hamidi. 2018. Safe spaces and safe places: Unpacking technology-mediated experiences of safety and harm with transgender people. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jacob M Paul, and Jed R Brubaker. 2019. How computers see gender: An evaluation of gender classification in commercial facial analysis services. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--33.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 1 (1992), 7--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Irving Seidman. 2006. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.Google Scholar
- Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph'Jofish' Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility. 49--58.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julius Sim, Benjamin Saunders, Jackie Waterfield, and Tom Kingstone. 2018. Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? International journal of social research methodology, Vol. 21, 5 (2018), 619--634.Google Scholar
- Michael Skirpan, Nathan Beard, Srinjita Bhaduri, Casey Fiesler, and Tom Yeh. 2018. Ethics education in context: A case study of novel ethics activities for the CS classroom. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 940--945.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jessie J Smith, Blakeley H Payne, Shamika Klassen, Dylan Thomas Doyle, and Casey Fiesler. 2023. Incorporating Ethics in Computing Courses: Barriers, Support, and Perspectives from Educators. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 367--373.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard. 2020. Troubling design: A design program for designing with women's health. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 27, 4 (2020), 1--36.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katta Spiel, Os Keyes, and Pinar Barlas. 2019. Patching gender: Non-binary utopias in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susan Michele Sturman. 2009. `Women in Computing' as Problematic: Gender, Ethics and Identity in University Computer Science Education. Ph.,D. Dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Lucy Suchman. 1993 a. Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 13--17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ECSCW'93. Springer, 1--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lucy Suchman. 1993 b. Working relations of technology production and use. Computer supported cooperative work, Vol. 2, 1 (1993), 21--39.Google Scholar
- Lucy Suchman. 2002. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian journal of information systems, Vol. 14, 2 (2002), 7.Google Scholar
- Cella M Sum, Rahaf Alharbi, Franchesca Spektor, Cynthia L Bennett, Christina N Harrington, Katta Spiel, and Rua Mae Williams. 2022. Dreaming disability justice in HCI. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1--5.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K Tijdens et al. 1997. Gender segregation in the IT occupations. Grundy, AF Women, Work, and Computerization. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer (1997), 449--462.Google Scholar
- Sander Valstar, Sophia Krause-Levy, Alexandra Macedo, William G Griswold, and Leo Porter. 2020. Faculty views on the goals of an undergraduate CS education and the academia-industry gap. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 577--583.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gijs van Maanen. 2022. AI ethics, ethics washing, and the need to politicize data ethics. Digital Society, Vol. 1, 2 (2022), 9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roli Varma. 2006. Making computer science minority-friendly. Commun. ACM, Vol. 49, 2 (2006), 129--134.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tero Vartiainen. 2003. A Study of Computer Science Students' Ethical Attitudes and Its Implications to Small Group Discussions in Computer Ethics Education. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society, Vol. 33, 3 (2003), 3.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben Wagner. 2018. Ethics as an escape from regulation. From ?ethics-washing" to ethics-shopping? (2018).Google Scholar
- Rua M Williams, Simone Smarr, Diandra Prioleau, and Juan E Gilbert. 2021. Oh no, not another trolley! On the need for a co-liberative consciousness in CS pedagogy. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, Vol. 3, 1 (2021), 67--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pamela Wisniewski, Jessica Vitak, Xinru Page, Bart Knijnenburg, Yang Wang, and Casey Fiesler. 2017. In whose best interest? Exploring the real, potential, and imagined ethical concerns in privacy-focused agenda. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 377--382.Google Scholar
- Anne Witz. 2013. Professions and patriarchy. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Alice Wong. 2015. Assistive technology by people with disabilities, part II: Designing better makeathons. Model View Culture, Vol. 29 (2015).Google Scholar
- Richmond Y Wong, Karen Boyd, Jake Metcalf, and Katie Shilton. 2020. Beyond checklist approaches to ethics in design. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 511--517.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- "Not my Priority:" Ethics and the Boundaries of Computer Science Identities in Undergraduate CS Education
Recommendations
Entering the Techlash: Student Perspectives on Ethics in Tech Job Searches
CSCW'22 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingPublic coverage of ethical scandals in tech companies often portrays tech workers as uncaring or short-sighted in their ethical consideration. But how do tech students regard the connection between ethics and their future jobs? To explore ethics in the ...
How K-12 CS Teachers Conceptualize CS Ethics: Future Opportunities and Barriers to Ethics Integration in K-12 CS
SIGCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1As issues of ethics, criticality, and social impact become more important in computer science, so does the need to teach them in CS classes. Despite the recent growth of academic writing around ethics in CS and a push for teaching ethics in post-...
Promoting professional responsibility and ethics: the pledge of the computing professional (abstract only)
SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationThe Pledge of the Computing Professional (http://computing-professional.org), endorsed by SIGCAS and the ACM Committee on Professional Ethics, was developed to both support professional responsibility in computing and to raise awareness of one's ethical ...
Comments