skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

DevEx in Action: A study of its tangible impacts

QueueVolume 21Issue 6Pages: 70pp 47–77https://doi.org/10.1145/3639443
Published:14 January 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

DevEx (developer experience) is garnering increased attention at many software organizations as leaders seek to optimize software delivery amid the backdrop of fiscal tightening and transformational technologies such as AI. Intuitively, there is acceptance among technical leaders that good developer experience enables more effective software delivery and developer happiness. Yet, at many organizations, proposed initiatives and investments to improve DevEx struggle to get buy-in as business stakeholders question the value proposition of improvements.

References

  1. Campion, M. A., McClelland, C. L. 1991. Interdisciplinary examination of the costs and benefits of enlarged jobs: a job design quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 76(2), 186-198. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-25985-001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., Newsted, P. R. 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14(2), 189-217; https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chin, W. W. 2010. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, eds. V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang, 655?690. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2008. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, J. R., Scully, J. A., Brtek, M. D. 1999. The measurement of work: hierarchical representation of the Multimethod Job Design Questionnaire. Personnel Psychology 52(2), 305?334; https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-05792-002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ford, F. A. 1999. Modeling the Environment: An Introduction to System Dynamics Models of Environmental Systems. Island Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Forsgren, N., Smith, D., Humble, J., Frazelle, J. 2019. Accelerate State of DevOps Report; https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/state-of-devops-2019.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Forsgren, N., Storey, M. A., Maddila, C., Zimmermann, T., Houck, B., Butler, J. 2021. The SPACE of developer productivity: There's more to it than you think. acmqueue 19(1), 20?48; https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3454124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gefen, D., Straub, D., Boudreau, M. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4; https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol4/iss1/7/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gefen, D., Straub, D. 2005. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 16(5); https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol16/iss1/5/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Greiler, M., Storey, M. A., Noda, A. 2022. An actionable framework for understanding and improving developer experience. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 49(4), 1411?1425; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9785882.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hair Jr., J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. 2021. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. Sarstedt, M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43, 115?135; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Houck, B., Yelin, H., Butler, J., Forsgren, N., McMartin, A. 2023. The best of both worlds: unlocking the potential of hybrid work for software engineers. Microsoft and Vista Equity Partners whitepaper; https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/the-best-of-both-worlds-unlocking-the-potential-of-hybrid-work-for-software-engineers/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P. 2007. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(5), 1332?1356; https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0021-9010.92.5.1332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kalliamvakou, E., Forsgren, N., Redford, L., Stephenson, S. 2021. Octoverse Spotlight 2021: Good Day Project ? Personal analytics to make your work days better. GitHub Blog; https://github.blog/2021-05-25-octoverse-spotlight-good-day-project/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Magyaródi, T., Nagy, H., Soltész, P., Mózes, T., Oláh, A. 2013. Psychometric properties of a newly established flow state questionnaire. Journal of Happiness & Well-Being 1(2), 89?100; https://jhwbjournal.com/uploads/files/acef39a197aeafb1b70cd2400037f869.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Meijer, A. 2019. Public innovation capacity: developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration 42(8), 617?627; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Morrison, B. B., Dorn, B., Guzdial, M. 2014. Measuring cognitive load in introductory CS: adaptation of an instrument. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research, 131?138; https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2632320.2632348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Murphy-Hill, E., Jaspan, C., Sadowski, C., Shepherd, D., Phillips, M., Winter, C., Knight, A., Smith, E., Jorde, M. 2019. What predicts software developers' productivity? IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 47(3), 582?594; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8643844.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Noda, A., Storey, M. A., Forsgren, N., Greiler, M. 2023. DevEX: what actually drives productivity? acmqueue 21(2); https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3595878.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., Cordery, J. L. 2001. Future work design research and practice: towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74(4), 413?440; https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1348/096317901167460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P., Johns, G. 2017. One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology 102(3), 403?420; https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-06118-001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M. 2022. SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sweller, J. 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12(2), 257?285; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Theriou, N., Maditinos, D. I., Theriou, G. 2017. Management control systems and strategy: a resource-based perspective. Evidence from Greece. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research 10(2), 35?47; http://ijbesar.teiemt.gr/docs/volume10_issue2/management_control_systems_strategy.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. DevEx in Action: A study of its tangible impacts
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Queue
            Queue  Volume 21, Issue 6
            Multiparty Computation
            November/December 2023
            131 pages
            ISSN:1542-7730
            EISSN:1542-7749
            DOI:10.1145/3640326
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 14 January 2024

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Popular
            • Editor picked
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)27,506
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4,675

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format