skip to main content
10.1145/3638067.3638093acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - An Experience Report on Evaluating Aesthetics of a Design System for HUDs in EUD Serious Games

Published:24 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Serious games have specific goals beyond entertainment. End-User Development (EUD) tools can enable diverse professionals to develop these games for a target audience. However, they overlook important game requirements like mechanics, interface, and aesthetics. This can result in confusing and disconnected interfaces. This experience report describes the process of design and evaluation of thematic families of reusable and standardized visual component elements for end-user-generated mobile games. The evaluation of user experiences with the perception of aesthetic aspects of the Design System used a semantic differential scale to assess their perceptions and interpretations. The results demonstrated good acceptability of the families while also suggesting improvements in typography, shapes, and color palette to improve mood communication. These results are discussed under the perspective of how aesthetic elements influence people’s perception of game interfaces produced for a serious purpose, possibly impacting the player experience.

References

  1. Sonam Adinolf and Selen Turkay. 2011. Controlling your game controls: interface and customization. 13–22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tugce Aldemir, Berkan Çelik, and Goknur Kaplan. 2018. A qualitative investigation of student perceptions of game elements in a gamified course. Comput. Hum. Behav. 78 (2018), 235–254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Elisabeth Bayle, Rachel Bellamy, George Casaday, Thomas Erickson, Sally Fincher, Beki Grinter, Ben Gross, Diane Lehder, Hans Marmolin, Brian Moore, Colin Potts, Grant Skousen, and John Thomas. 1998. Putting It All Together: Towards a Pattern Language for Interaction Design: A CHI 97 Workshop. SIGCHI Bull. 30, 1 (jan 1998), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/280571.280580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nayana Carneiro, Bianca Melo, Letícia Cavalcante, Rute Castro, Rossana M. C. Andrade, and Ticianne Darin. 2020. Mobili: Development and Use of a Usability Checklist for Mobile Games and Applications. In 19th Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality (São Luís, Brazil) (SBQS’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 33, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439961.3439994Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Creswell J. David Creswell, John W.2018. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ticianne Darin, Rossana Andrade, and Jaime Sánchez. 2022. Usability Evaluation of Multimodal Interactive Virtual Environments for Learners Who Are Blind: An Empirical Investigation. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 158, C (feb 2022), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Min Fan, Jianyu Fan, Sheng Jin, Alissa Nicole Antle, and Philippe Pasquier. 2018. EmoStory: A Game-based System Supporting Children’s Emotional Development. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Stian Jessen, Jelena Mirkovic, and Lise Solberg Nes. 2020. MyStrengths, a Strengths-Focused Mobile Health Tool: Participatory Design and Development. JMIR Formative Research 4 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Henrietta Jylhä and Juho Hamari. 2020. Development of Measurement Instrument for Visual Qualities of Graphical User Interface Elements (VISQUAL): A Test in the Context of Mobile Game Icons. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 30, 5 (nov 2020), 949–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-020-09263-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Christian Kruschitz and Martin Hitz. 2009. The anatomy of HCI design patterns. Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns, Computation World 0 (11 2009), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/ComputationWorld.2009.45Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Henry Lieberman, Fabio Paternò, Markus Klann, and Volker Wulf. 2006. End-user development: An emerging paradigm. In End user development. Springer, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zeno Menestrina and Antonella De Angeli. 2017. End-user development for serious games. In New Perspectives in End-User Development. Springer, 359–383.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David R Michael and Sandra L Chen. 2005. Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Aaron S Miller, Joseph Antony Cafazzo, and Emily Seto. 2016. A game plan: Gamification design principles in mHealth applications for chronic disease management. Health Informatics Journal 22 (2016), 184 – 193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Sakchai Muangsrinoon and Poonpong Boonbrahm. 2019. Game elements from literature review of gamification in healthcare context. Journal of Technology and Science Education 9, 1 (2019), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mariana Muri, Rachel Carvalho, Tiago Silva, Kamila Rodrigues, and Ticianne Darin. 2022. Boas Práticas para o Design de Jogos Sérios em Ferramentas de Autoria EUD. In Anais Estendidos do XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais (Diamantina). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 92–95. https://doi.org/10.5753/ihc_estendido.2022.224866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jakob Nielsen and Raluca Budiu. 2013. Mobily Usability. New Riders Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jesse Schell. 2019. TTenth Anniversary: The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. (3rd ed.). A K Peters/CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tarja Susi, Mikael Johannesson, and Per Backlund. 2007. Serious games: An overview. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sarah Verschueren, June van Aalst, Anne-Marie Bangels, Jaan Toelen, Karel Allegaert, Connor Buffel, and Geert Vander Stichele. 2019. Development of CliniPup, a Serious Game Aimed at Reducing Perioperative Anxiety and Pain in Children: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Serious Games 7 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - An Experience Report on Evaluating Aesthetics of a Design System for HUDs in EUD Serious Games

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '23: Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2023
      791 pages
      ISBN:9798400717154
      DOI:10.1145/3638067

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 January 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format