skip to main content
10.1145/3638067.3638073acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How to promote empathy in games? An analysis of the structural elements to be considered in the interaction design

Published:24 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Empathic Games is a category of games that try to capture the reality of the characters and situations they face in order to make the player understand how it is to be "in someone else’s shoe". These are games that, in general, bring sensitive themes such as bullying, death, or various prejudices. There are works that highlight the importance of empathy in games, yet there is very little on how games can foster empathy in the player. Through a literature review, we sought to find studies on how games can generate empathy and what games are considered empathic. We also carry out the selection of a set of games, and we analyzed their structural elements that as can foster empathy, namely their: narrative, gameplay, graphics, and sound design. Our findings point out that the narrative element, alongside the intent and interdisciplinary factors (such as cultural aspects the game’s plot presents), are key factors in guiding how the game’s technical aspects support the player’s immersion in the game’s universe. We hope our results help in the development of interactive experiences that connect with the user on a deeper level, and allow them to better understand realities and scenarios that are different from their own daily lives. The findings of this study also complement the artifacts available in a conceptual framework to support designers and developers in creating more empathetic games.

References

  1. Dominic Arsenault. 2017. Super Power, Spoony Bards, and Silverware: The Super Nintendo Entertainment System (Introduction). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9787.001.0001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M Cecília C Baranauskas, Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, and Roberto Pereira. 2012. GranDIHC-BR: prospecção de grandes desafios de pesquisa em interação humano-computador no Brasil. In Companion Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 63–64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Laura Beckwith, Margaret Burnett, Valentina Grigoreanu, and Susan Wiedenbeck. 2006. Gender HCI: What about the software?Computer 39, 11 (2006), 97–101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jonathan Belman and Mary Flanagan. 2010. Designing games to foster empathy. International Journal of Cognitive Technology 15, 1 (2010), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur Berger. 2017. Video Games: A Popular Culture Phenomenon. 3–28. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351299961-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Alice Blot. 2017. Exploring games to foster empathy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Liz Owens Boltz, Danah Henriksen, and Punya Mishra. 2015. Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century: Empathy through gaming-perspective taking in a complex world. TechTrends 59, 6 (2015), 3–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bruno Bonnechère and Bruno Bonnechère. 2018. Serious games in rehabilitation. Serious Games in Physical Rehabilitation: From Theory to Practice (2018), 41–109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Stuart Brown. 2015. A Brief History of Graphics. Ahoy (2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyjyWUrHsFcGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Paolo Burelli. 2016. Game Cinematography: From Camera Control to Player Emotions. In Emotion in Games. Springer, 181–195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kathy Charmaz. 2009. A construção da teoria fundamentada: guia prático para análise qualitativa. Bookman Editora.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Steven Conway. 2010. A circular wall? Reformulating the fourth wall for videogames. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 2, 2 (2010), 145–155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Patrick Crogan. 2018. Indie dreams: Video games, creative economy, and the hyperindustrial epoch. Games and Culture 13, 7 (2018), 671–689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cussan. 2019. Evolution of Video Game Graphics 1958-2020 [4K]. Cussan (2019). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsPPWWlV-T8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Alessandro De Gloria, Francesco Bellotti, and Riccardo Berta. 2014. Serious Games for education and training. International Journal of Serious Games 1, 1 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tânia Saraiva de Melo Pinheiro, Caio Cesar Valério, Cristiano Maciel, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, and Eunice P dos Santos Nunes. 2021. Revisiting Empathy Games Concept from User Comments Perspective. In Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jack Denham, Steven Hirschler, and Matthew Spokes. 2021. The reification of structural violence in video games. Crime, Media, Culture 17, 1 (2021), 85–103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustavo Velho Diogo. 2016. Empathy Games: Life, Death, and Digital Narratives. Radboud University (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Malte Elson, Johannes Breuer, James D Ivory, and Thorsten Quandt. 2014. More than stories with buttons: Narrative, mechanics, and context as determinants of player experience in digital games. Journal of Communication 64, 3 (2014), 521–542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Emmanoel Ferreira. 2014. Diz-me com quem andas e direi o quão ‘indie’és: relações entre gênero e mercado no cenário dos videogames independentes. In CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL COMUNICAÇÃO E CONSUMO, Vol. 4. 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Vinícius Ferreira Galvão, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, Cristiano Maciel, Eunice Nunes, and Daniele Trevisan. 2022. Máquinas de empatia-Uma visão geral histórica da indústria sobre elementos característicos dos jogos empáticos. Anais Estendidos do XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital (2022), 468–477.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Michael Mansfield Georgina Goodlander. 2013. Press Start: Video Games in an Art Museum,. Journal of Interactive Humanities 1, 1 (2013), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.14448/jih.01.0004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. SANDRA LÚCIA RÉBEL GOMES, MARÍLIA ALVARENGA ROCHA MENDONÇA, and Clarice Muhlethaler de SOUZA. 2000. Literatura cinzenta. In Fontes de informação para pesquisadores e profissionais. Ed. UFMG Belo Horizonte, 97–104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lucas Aguiar Goulart. 2017. Jogos vivos para pessoas vivas: composições queer-contrapúblicas nas culturas de jogo digital. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Maria J Grant and Andrew Booth. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal 26, 2 (2009), 91–108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Dustin Hansen. 2016. Game on!: Video game history from Pong and Pac-Man to Mario, Minecraft, and more. Vol. 1. Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Christian Happ, André Melzer, and Georges Steffgen. 2015. Like the good or bad guy—Empathy in antisocial and prosocial games.Psychology of Popular Media Culture 4, 2 (2015), 80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ben Hourigan. 2006. You Need Love and Friendship For This Mission!: Final Fantasy VI, VII and VIII as counterexamples to totalizing discourses on videogames. Reconstruction 6, 1 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. David Hume. 1896. A treatise of human nature. Clarendon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. James D Ivory. 2015. A brief history of video games. The video game debate: Unravelling the physical, social, and psychological effects of digital games (2015), 1–21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Anker Helms Jørgensen. 2004. Marrying HCI/Usability and computer games: a preliminary look. In Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction. 393–396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Johannes Katsarov, Markus Christen, Ralf Mauerhofer, David Schmocker, and Carmen Tanner. 2019. Training moral sensitivity through video games: A review of suitable game mechanisms. Games and Culture 14, 4 (2019), 344–366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Steven L Kent. 2010. The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond... the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world. Vol. 1. Crown.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Jake Kring-Schreifels. 2021. Video Games Used to Copy Movies. Now They’re Influencing Modern Action.The Ringer (2021). https://www.theringer.com/2021/2/22/22291182/video-games-film-influence-action-movies-john-wick-hardcore-henryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Petri Lankoski. 2007. Goals, affects, and empathy in games. Philosophy of computer games (2007), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Roni Linser, Nina Ree Lindstad, and Tone Vold. 2008. The magic circle-game design principles and online role-play simulations. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 5290–5297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Miroslav Macák 2020. The Dawn of the 9th Console Generation: The Scalpers’ Heaven. Acta Ludologica 3, 2 (2020), 92–93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Viviana Carola Velasco Martinez. 2009. " O brincar e a realidade"... virtual: videogame, assassinatos e imortalidade. Estilos da Clínica 14, 26 (2009), 150–173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Leonardo Dias Martins and Fabíola Pantoja Oliveira Araújo. 2021. Mineração de Texto para a Análise do Perfil Emocional de Usuários de Jogo Empático. Anais do Computer on the Beach 12 (2021), 370–377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Heidi McDonald. 2013. Romance Games: Unpopular Genre or Untapped Market?lecture, Montreal International Game Summit, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Alison McMahan. 2013. Immersion, engagement, and presence: A method for analyzing 3-D video games. In The video game theory reader. Routledge, 67–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Andrew McStay. 2018. Emotional AI: The rise of empathic media. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Michaelis. © 2022. Empatia. Editora Melhoramentos (© 2022). https://michaelis.uol.com.br/busca?r=0&f=0&t=0&palavra=empatiaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. R Myerson. 1991. Game theory: Analysis of conflict harvard univ. Press, Cambridge 3 (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Federica Pallavicini, Alessandro Pepe, and Maria Eleonora Minissi. 2019. Gaming in virtual reality: What changes in terms of usability, emotional response and sense of presence compared to non-immersive video games?Simulation & Gaming 50, 2 (2019), 136–159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Kamila R. H. Rodrigues, Caio Cesar Valério, Tânia S. M. Pinheiro, Cristiano Maciel, and Eunice P dos Santos Nunes. 2021. Revisiting Empathy Games Concept from User Comments Perspective. In Proceedings of the SBGames 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Marina Cotta Rangel, Luciana Cardoso de Castro Salgado, and Silvia Amélia Bim. 2022. TraduBem: Towards a Text Verification Tool for an Altruistic Language. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Diamantina, Brazil) (IHC ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 44, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3554364.3559143Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Tech Rules. 2020. History of VR Technology, But I Have to Explain in VR | Tech Rules. Tech Rules (2020). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYzZ4JfX4bUGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Danilo Barros dos Santos, Tânia Saraiva de Melo Pinheiro, Cristiano Maciel, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, and Eunice Pereira dos Santos Nunes. 2020. Interpreting posts in empathic games: assumptions for a conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Lucas Marques dos Santos. 2021. Jogos digitais e autorrepresentação: a construção de sentidos nos videogames com elementos autobiográficos. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Elena Shliakhovchuk and Adolfo Muñoz García. 2020. Intercultural Perspective on Impact of Video Games on Players: Insights from a Systematic Review of Recent Literature.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 20, 1 (2020), 40–58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Adam Smith. 1822. The theory of moral sentiments. Vol. 1. J. Richardson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Osama Sohaib, Walayat Hussain, and M Khalid Badini. 2011. User Experience (UX) and the web accessibility standards. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI) 8, 3 (2011), 584.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Chris Stone. 2019. The evolution of video games as a storytelling medium, and the role of narrative in modern games. Game Developer (2019). https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/the-evolution-of-video-games-as-a-storytelling-medium-and-the-role-of-narrative-in-modern-gamesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Steve Swink. 2008. Game feel: a game designer’s guide to virtual sensation. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Raymond Usher, Paul Robertson, and Robin Sloan. 2013. Physical responses (arousal) to audio in games. The Computer Games Journal 2 (08 2013), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392340Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Leandro Manuel Reis Velloso. 2017. O espaço nos videogames: dentro e fora do círculo mágico. Ph. D. Dissertation. Universidade de São Paulo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Andrew Walsh. 2021. Press Y to Cry: Generating Emotions in Videogame Narrative. Game Developers Conference (2021). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lp0libfp5MGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Josef Wiemeyer, Lennart Nacke, Christiane Moser, and Florian ‘Floyd’Mueller. 2016. Player experience. Serious games: Foundations, concepts and practice (2016), 243–271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Elie Wiesel. 2017. Night: Memorial Edition. Hill and Wang.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. F Michael Williams-Bell, Bill Kapralos, Andrew Hogue, BM Murphy, and EJ Weckman. 2015. Using serious games and virtual simulation for training in the fire service: a review. Fire Technology 51 (2015), 553–584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Mark JP Wolf. 2008. The video game explosion: a history from PONG to Playstation and beyond. ABC-CLIO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Richard TA Wood, Mark D Griffiths, Darren Chappell, and Mark NO Davies. 2004. The structural characteristics of video games: A psycho-structural analysis. CyberPsychology & behavior 7, 1 (2004), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Ossy Dwi Endah Wulansari, Johanna Pirker, Johannes Kopf, and Christian Guetl. 2019. Video games and their correlation to empathy. In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning. Springer, 151–163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How to promote empathy in games? An analysis of the structural elements to be considered in the interaction design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '23: Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2023
      791 pages
      ISBN:9798400717154
      DOI:10.1145/3638067

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 January 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format