skip to main content
research-article

Mirror Mentoring: Black Women’s Experiences Serving as Mentors for Black Girls During a Virtual Computer Science Camp

Published:16 April 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Several studies have reported the positive benefits of informal Computer Science learning programs for Black girls, which include staff, mentors, and peers reflective of the girls in the program; however, we do not know enough about what motivates Black women to sign up to teach in such programs, or how representation in mentoring affects future CS learning for Black girls. Here we report the intersectional experiences of 11 Black women who served as instructors and mentors for the virtual INTech Summer Camp. The women in this study confirm that it is imperative to consider the intersectional experiences of Black women in CS as a whole, without explicating their identities. We found that Black women in CS feel that it is their responsibility to give back to Black girls to pay it forward from their own mentorship experiences. The Black women in our study describe seeking to fill a gap in mentorship that they experienced themselves, to share their knowledge and experiences to support the development of others who can relate to that intersection of identifying as Black and a girl or woman. Providing positive representation to encourage young Black girls to pursue tech careers is imperative to diversifying the tech workforce.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] INROADS. 2021. About Us. Retrieved from https://inroads.org/about-inroads/history-mission/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] 2021. By the numbers: National Center for Women & Information Technology. Retrieved from https://ncwit.org/resource/bythenumbers/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Allen Tammy D and Eby Lillian T. 2011. The Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring: A Multiple Perspectives Approach. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Aminian Zohreh. 2018. Impact of same-race mentoring on adult female african-american students enrolled at a regional state college. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Atkins Kaitlyn, Dougan Bryan M., Dromgold-Sermen Michelle S., Potter Hannah, Sathy Viji, and Panter AT. 2020. “Looking at myself in the future”: How mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups. International Journal of STEM Education 7, 1 (2020), 115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Blake-Beard Stacy, Bayne Melissa L., Crosby Faye J., and Muller Carol B.. 2011. Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: Keeping our eyes on the prize. Journal of Social Issues 67, 3 (2011), 622643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Braswell Khalia M., Johnson Jasmine, Brown Brie’anna, and Payton Jamie. 2021. Pivoting during a pandemic: Designing a virtual summer camp to increase confidence of black and latina girls. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Toronto, CA) (SIGCSE’20).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Burt Brian A., Williams Krystal L., and Palmer Gordon J. M.. 2019. It takes a village: The role of emic and etic adaptive strengths in the persistence of black men in engineering graduate programs. American Educational Research Journal 56, 1 (2019), 3974.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Charleston LaVar J., George Phillis L., Jackson Jerlando F. L., Berhanu Jonathan, and Amechi Mauriell H.. 2014. Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of black women in U.S. computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7, 3 (sep2014), 166176. Retrieved from http://lp.hscl.ufl.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=eric&AN=EJ1054426&site=eds-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Christe. Barbara L.2013. The importance of faculty-student connections in STEM disciplines. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 14, 3 (2013), 22–26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Collins P. H. and Bilge S.. 2020. Intersectionality. Wiley. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=fyrfDwAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Creswell John W. and Poth Cheryl N.. 2019. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publication Incorporated.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Dawson Amy E., Bernstein Bianca L., and Bekki Jennifer M.. 2015. Providing the psychosocial benefits of mentoring to women in STEM: CareerWISE as an online solution. New Directions for Higher Education 2015, 171 (2015), 5362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Dotson Kristie. 2011. Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia 26, 2 (2011), 236257. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016544Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Erete Sheena, Pinkard Nichole, Martin Caitlin K., and Sandherr Jim. 2016. Exploring the use of interactive narratives to engage inner-city girls in computational activities. In Proceedings of the 2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Erete Sheena, Rankin Yolanda A., and Thomas Jakita O.. 2021. I can’t breathe. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3 (2021), 123. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Nostrand Danielle Findley-Van and Pollenz Richard S.. 2017. Evaluating psychosocial mechanisms underlying STEM persistence in undergraduates: Evidence of impact from a six-day pre–college engagement STEM academy program. CBE’Life Sciences Education 16, 2 (2017), ar36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Gopalan Maithreyi and Brady Shannon T.. 2020. College students’ sense of belonging: A national perspective. Educational Researcher 49, 2 (2020), 134137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Gregg Noel, Galyardt April, Wolfe Gerri, Moon Nathan, and Todd Robert. 2017. Virtual mentoring and persistence in STEM for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals 40, 4 (2017), 205214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Griffin Kimberly A, Perez David, Holmes Annie PE, and Mayo Claude EP. 2010. Investing in the future: The importance of faculty mentoring in the development of students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research 2010, 148 (2010), 95103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Hernandez Paul R, Bloodhart Brittany, Barnes Rebecca T, Adams Amanda S, Clinton Sandra M, Pollack Ilana, Godfrey Elaine, Burt Melissa, and Fischer Emily V. 2017. Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students. PloS One 12, 11 (2017), e0187531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Inc. Google Inc. & Gallup2016. Diversity Gaps in Computer Science: Exploring the Underrepresentation of Girls, Blacks and Hispanics. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/PG34aHGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23] Kamberi Shahnaz. [n.d.]. Enticing women to computer science with es (expose, engage, encourage, empower). In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Women in Engineering (WIE) Forum USA East. IEEE, 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Kennedy Brian, Fry Richard, and Funk Cary. 2021. 6 facts about America’s STEM workforce and those training for it. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/14/6-facts-about-americas-stem-workforce-and-those-training-for-it/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] King Natalie S. and Pringle Rose M.. 2019. Black girls speak STEM: Counterstories of informal and formal learning experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56, 5 (2019), 539569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Koch Melissa and Gorges Torie. 2016. Curricular influences on female afterschool facilitators’ computer science interests and career choices. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 5 (2016), 782794. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Kricorian Katherine, Seu Michelle, Lopez Daniel, Ureta Elsie, and Equils Ozlem. 2020. Factors influencing participation of underrepresented students in STEM fields: matched mentors and mindsets. International Journal of STEM Education 7, 1 (2020), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Latulipe Celine, Long N. Bruce, and Seminario Carlos E.. 2015. Structuring flipped classes with lightweight teams and gamification. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Kansas City, Missouri, USA) (SIGCSE’15). ACM, New York, NY, 392397. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Lewis Karyn L, Stout Jane G, Finkelstein Noah D, Pollock Steven J, Miyake Akira, Cohen Geoff L, and Ito Tiffany A. 2017. Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly 41, 4 (2017), 420436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Luedke Courtney L, McCoy Dorian L, Winkle-Wagner Rachelle, and Lee-Johnson Jamila. 2019. Students perspectives on holistic mentoring practices in STEM fields. JCSCORE 5, 1 (2019), 3359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Madkins Tia C, Martin Alexis, Ryoo Jean, Scott Kimberly A, Goode Joanna, Scott Allison, and McAlear Frieda. 2019. Culturally relevant computer science pedagogy: From theory to practice. In Proceedings of the 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Madrigal Veronica, Yamaguchi Ryoko, Hall Adam, and Burge Jamika. 2020. Promoting and supporting computer science among middle school girls of color: Initial findings from BRIGHT-CS. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 247253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Margolis Jane, Ryoo Jean J., Sandoval Cueponcaxochitl D.M., Lee Clifford, Goode Joanna, and Chapman Gail. 2012. Beyond access: Broadening participation in high school computer science. 7278 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [34] McCallum Carmen, Libarkin Julie, Callahan Caitlin, and Atchison Christopher. 2018. Mentoring, social capital, and diversity in earth system science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 24, 1 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] McFarlane Dana and Redmiles Elissa M.. 2020. Get paid to program: Evaluating an employment-aware after-school program for high school women of color. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE (2020), 212218. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. [36] McKinsey and Company. 2020. COVID-19 and student learning in the United States: The hurt could last a lifetime. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/covid-19-and-student-learning-in-the-united-states-the-hurt-could-last-a-lifetimeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Mondisa Joi-Lynn. 2020. The role of social capital in african american STEM mentoring relationships. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 26, 2 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Mooney Catherine and Becker Brett A. 2020. Sense of belonging: The intersectionality of self-identified minority status and gender in undergraduate computer science students. In Proceedings of the United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research Conference.2430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Morris Monique W. 2022. Cultivating Joyful Learning Spaces for Black Girls. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Sciences Engineering National Academies of and Medicine. 2022. Transforming Trajectories for Women of Color in Tech. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. [41] Statistics National Center for Science and Engineering. 2017. Women, minoritites, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: Special report NSF 17-310. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2017/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. [42] Palmer Robert and Gasman Marybeth. 2008. It takes a village to raise a child: The role of social capital in promoting academic success for african american men at a black college. Journal of College Student Development 49, 1 (2008), 5270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Patton Lori D. 2009. My sister’s keeper: A qualitative examination of mentoring experiences among African American women in graduate and professional schools. The Journal of Higher Education 80, 5 (2009), 510537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Perna Laura, Lundy-Wagner Valerie, Drezner Noah D., Gasman Marybeth, Yoon Susan, Bose Enakshi, and Gary Shannon. 2009. The contribution of HBCUs to the preparation of African american women for STEM careers: A case study. Research in Higher Education 50, 1 (2009), 123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Pinkard Nichole, Erete Sheena, Martin Caitlin K, and Royston Maxine McKinney de. 2017. Digital youth divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26, 3 (2017), 477516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Rankin Yolanda A. and Thomas Jakita O.. 2020. The intersectional experiences of black women in computing. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199205. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. [47] Rankin Yolanda A., Thomas Jakita O., and Erete Sheena. 2021. Real talk: Saturated sites of violence in CS education. ACM Inroads 12, 2 (2021), 3037.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. [48] Reddick Richard J. 2011. Intersecting identities: Mentoring contributions and challenges for black faculty mentoring black undergraduates. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 19, 3 (2011), 319346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. [49] Robinson Ashley and Pérez-Quiñones Manuel A.. 2014. Underrepresented middle school girls: On the path to computer science through paper prototyping. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Underrepresented Middle School Girls: On the Path to Computer Science through Paper Prototyping.97–102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. [50] Ross Monique, Hazari Zahra, Sonnert Gerhard, and Sadler Philip. 2020. The intersection of being black and being a woman: Examining the effect of social computing relationships on computer science career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 2 (2020), 115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. [51] Rowan-Kenyon Heather T., Swan Amy K., and Creager Marie F.. 2012. Social cognitive factors, support, and engagement: Early adolescents’ math interests as precursors to choice of career. The Career Development Quarterly 60, 1 (2012), 215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Scott Allison, Klein Freada Kapor, McAlear Frieda, Martin MRes Alexis, and Koshy Sonia. 2015. The leaky tech pipeline: A comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing the lack of diversity across the tech ecosystem. (2015). Retrieved from www.leakytechpipeline.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. [53] Singh Sakshi and Basu Debarati. 2021. Impact on women undergraduate CS students’ experiences from a mentoring program. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 12661266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. [54] Solomon Amber, Moon DeKita, Roberts Armisha L., and Gilbert Juan E.. 2018. Not just black and not just a woman: Black women belonging in computing. In Proceedings of the 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 15. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. [55] Syed Moin, Goza Barbara K., Chemers Martin M., and Zurbriggen Eileen L.. 2012. Individual differences in preferences for matched-ethnic mentors among high-achieving ethnically diverse adolescents in STEM. Child Development 83, 3 (2012), 896910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. [56] Thomas David R. 2017. Feedback from research participants: Are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qualitative Research in Psychology 14, 1 (2017), 2341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. [57] Thomas J. O., Joseph N., Williams A., Crum C., and Burge J.. 2018. Speaking truth to power: Exploring the intersectional experiences of black women in computing. (2018), 18. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. [58] Waisome Jeremy A. M., Jackson Jerlando F. L., and Gilbert Juan E.. 2020. The iAAMCS ecosystem: Retaining blacks/african-americans in CS PhD programs. In Proceedings of the 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. IEEE, 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. [59] Weiston-Serdan Torie. 2017. Critical Mentoring: A Practical Guide. Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. [60] Wilson Denise, Jones Diane, Bocell Fraser, Crawford Joy, Kim Mee Joo, Veilleux Nanette, Floyd-Smith Tamara, Bates Rebecca, and Plett Melani. 2015. Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study. Research in Higher Education 56, 7 (2015), 750776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. [61] Xie Yu, Fang Michael, and Shauman Kimberlee. 2015. STEM education. Annual Review of Sociology 41 (2015), 331357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Zweben By Stuart and Bizot Betsy. 2021. 2020 Taulbee survey bachelor’s and doctoral degree production growth continues but new student enrollment shows declines. Computing Research Association (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mirror Mentoring: Black Women’s Experiences Serving as Mentors for Black Girls During a Virtual Computer Science Camp

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
        ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 24, Issue 2
        June 2024
        264 pages
        EISSN:1946-6226
        DOI:10.1145/3613624
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 April 2024
        • Online AM: 13 December 2023
        • Accepted: 19 October 2023
        • Revised: 28 April 2023
        • Received: 30 October 2020
        Published in toce Volume 24, Issue 2

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text