ABSTRACT
Novel short video platforms such as TikTok and Instagram Reels often entertain, can inform and may persuade. Recent human-information interaction research has demonstrated the potential for information encounters on social media to sow the seeds of view change. However, little research has examined the role of this new type of social media platform in view change. To examine this role, we conducted a two-week diary study, followed by interviews, with 12 regular users of TikTok and Instagram Reels. All participants reported viewing videos that influenced their views. They predominantly passively encountered these videos on their personalized feeds, rather than actively seeking them. Content verification was limited, with many participants voicing (potentially misplaced) trust in influencers and accessible experts. Reassuringly though, some participants demonstrated a higher level of critical engagement. Overall, our findings highlight the strong persuasive power of short video platforms and the risk they may be used to misinform or manipulate. Based on our findings, we discuss key implications for research and platform design.
- Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 2018. Digital Platforms Inquiry: Preliminary Report.Google Scholar
- Basch, C.H., Hillyer, G.C., and Jaime, C., 2022. COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages. Int J. Adolsecent Med. & Health 34, 5, 367-369. DOI=doi:10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beall, S., Makri, S., and McKay, D., 2023. Stronger Than Yesterday: Investigating Peoples' Experiences of View Strengthening on Social Media. ASIST Proceedings 60, 1 (2023/10/01), 41-52. DOI=10.1002/pra2.767.Google Scholar
- Benegal, S.D. and Scruggs, L.A., 2018. Correcting misinformation about climate change: the impact of partisanship in an experimental setting. Climactic Change 148, 1 (2018/05/01), 61-80. DOI=10.1007/s10584-018-2192-4.Google Scholar
- Boeker, M. and Urman, A., 2022. An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok. In Proc. WWW '22 (Virtual Event, Lyon, France), Association for Computing Machinery, 2298–2309. DOI=10.1145/3485447.3512102.Google Scholar
- Bozdag, E. and van den Hoven, J., 2015. Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology 17, 4, 249-265. DOI=10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruns, A., 2019. It's not the technology, stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’ metaphors have failed us. In Proc. IAMCR 19 (Madrid, Spain), International Association for Media and Communication Research.Google Scholar
- Bucknell Bossen, C. and Kottasz, R., 2020. Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers 21, 4, 463-478. DOI=10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark, J.K. and Wegener, D.T., 2013. Chapter Four - Message Position, Information Processing, and Persuasion: The Discrepancy Motives Model. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, P. Devine and A. Plant Eds. Academic Press, 189-232. DOI=10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00004-8.Google Scholar
- Clarke, V. and Braun, V., 2021. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Colliander, J., 2019. “This is fake news”: Investigating the role of conformity to other users’ views when commenting on and spreading disinformation in social media. Comp. Hum. Behav. 97(2019/08/01/), 202-215. DOI=10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.032.Google Scholar
- Cuan-Baltazar, J.Y., Muñoz-Perez, M.J., Robledo-Vega, C., Pérez-Zepeda, M.F., and Soto-Vega, E., 2020. Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study. JMIR 6, 2 (2020/4/9), e18444. DOI=10.2196/18444.Google Scholar
- Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H.E., and Quattrociocchi, W., 2016. The spreading of misinformation online. PNAS 113, 3, 554. DOI=10.1073/pnas.1517441113.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Demartini, G., Mizzaro, S., and Spina, D., 2020. Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligence for Fighting Online Misinformation: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 43, 3, 65-74.Google Scholar
- Du, J.T., 2012. Information use and information sharing in marketing: A diary study. ASIS&T Proceedings 49, 1, 1-4. DOI=10.1002/meet.14504901290.Google Scholar
- Farrell, J., McConnell, K., and Brulle, R., 2019. Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. Nature Climate Change 9, 3 (2019/03/01), 191-195. DOI=10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6.Google Scholar
- Flaxman, S., Goel, S., and Rao, J.M., 2016. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Q 80, S1, 298-320. DOI=10.1093/poq/nfw006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Flintham, M., Karner, C., Bachour, K., Creswick, H., Gupta, N., and Moran, S., 2018. Falling for Fake News: Investigating the Consumption of News via Social Media. In Proc. CHI 18 (Montreal QC, Canada), ACM, New York, NY, 1-10. DOI=10.1145/3173574.3173950.Google ScholarDigital Library
- González-Aguilar, J.M., Segado-Boj, F., and Makhortykh, M., 2023. Populist Right Parties on TikTok: Spectacularization, Personalization, and Hate Speech. Media and Commumication 11, 2 (2023-03-30). DOI=10.17645/mac.v11i2.6358.Google Scholar
- Guess, A., Nagler, J., and Tucker, J., 2019. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances 5, 1, eaau4586. DOI=10.1126/sciadv.aau4586.Google Scholar
- Hansen, P.G. and Jespersen, A.M., 2013. Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. Eur J Risk Regulation 4, 1, 3-28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helberger, N., Karppinen, K., and D'Acunto, L., 2018. Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. Inf. Comm & Soc. 21, 2 (2018/02/01), 191-207. DOI=10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271900.Google Scholar
- Kaminskas, M. and Bridge, D., 2016. Diversity, Serendipity, Novelty, and Coverage: A Survey and Empirical Analysis of Beyond-Accuracy Objectives in Recommender Systems. ToIS 7, 1, 1-42. DOI=10.1145/2926720.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kang, H. and Lou, C., 2022. AI agency vs. human agency: understanding human–AI interactions on TikTok and their implications for user engagement. JCMC 27, 5. DOI=10.1093/jcmc/zmac014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ledwich, M. and Zaitsev, A., 2020. Algorithmic extremism: Examining YouTube's rabbit hole of radicalization. First Monday 25, 3 (02/26). DOI=10.5210/fm.v25i3.10419.Google Scholar
- Lee, A.Y., Mieczkowski, H., Ellison, N.B., and Hancock, J.T., 2022. The Algorithmic Crystal: Conceptualizing the Self through Algorithmic Personalization on TikTok. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2, Article 543. DOI=10.1145/3555601.Google Scholar
- Lee, S., Rojas, H., and Yamamoto, M., 2022. Social Media, Messaging Apps, and Affective Polarization in the United States and Japan. Mass Comm. & Soc 25, 5 (2022/09/03), 673-697. DOI=10.1080/15205436.2021.1953534.Google Scholar
- Leiva, L., Böhmer, M., Gehring, S., and Krüger, A., 2012. Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions. In Proc. MobileHCI (San Francisco, California, USA), Association for Computing Machinery, 291–294. DOI=10.1145/2371574.2371617.Google Scholar
- Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K.H., Seifert, C.M., Schwarz, N., and Cook, J., 2012. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psyc Sci in Public Interest 13, 3 (2012/12/01), 106-131. DOI=10.1177/1529100612451018.Google Scholar
- Lockyer, B., Islam, S., Rahman, A., Dickerson, J., Pickett, K., Sheldon, T., Wright, J., McEachan, R., Sheard, L., and the Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid-19 Scientific Advisory, G., 2021. Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Heath Expectations (2021/05/04). DOI=10.1111/hex.13240.Google Scholar
- Makri, S., Blandford, A., Woods, M., Sharples, S., and Maxwell, D., 2014. “Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. JASIST 65, 11, 2179-2194. DOI=10.1002/asi.23200.Google Scholar
- Makri, S., Ravem, M., and McKay, D., 2017. After serendipity strikes: Creating value from encountered information. ASIST Proceedings 54, 1, 279-288. DOI=10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401031.Google Scholar
- Malterud, K., Siersma, V.D., and Guassora, A.D., 2015. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qual. Health Res. 26, 13 (2016/11/01), 1753-1760. DOI=10.1177/1049732315617444.Google Scholar
- Marchi, R., 2012. With Facebook, Blogs, and Fake News, Teens Reject Journalistic “Objectivity”. J Comm Inquiry 36, 3 (2012/07/01), 246-262. DOI=10.1177/0196859912458700.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matamoros-Fernández, A., Gray, J.E., Bartolo, L., Burgess, J., and Suzor, N., 2021. What's “Up Next”? Investigating Algorithmic Recommendations on YouTube Across Issues and Over Time. Media and Communication 9, 4. DOI=10.17645/mac.v9i4.4184.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mckay, D., Makri, S., Gutierrez-Lopez, M., MacFarlane, A., Missaoui, S., Porlezza, C., and Cooper, G., 2020. We are the Change that we Seek: Information Interactions During a Change of Viewpoint. In Proc. CHIIR 20 (Vancouver BC, Canada), Association for Computing Machinery, 173–182. DOI=10.1145/3343413.3377975.Google ScholarDigital Library
- McKay, D., Owyong, K., Makri, S., and Lopez, M.G., 2022. Turn and Face the Strange: Investigating Filter Bubble Bursting Information Interactions. In Proc. CHIIR 22 (Regensburg, Germany), Association for Computing Machinery, 233–242. DOI=10.1145/3498366.3505822.Google Scholar
- Menon, D., 2022. Factors influencing Instagram Reels usage behaviours: An examination of motives, contextual age and narcissism. Factors influencing Instagram Reels usage behaviours: An examination of motives, contextual age and narcissism 5(2022/03/01/), 100007. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Montag, C., Yang, H., and Elhai, J.D., 2021. On the Psychology of TikTok Use: A First Glimpse From Empirical Findings. Frontiers In Public Health 9(2021-March-16). DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673.Google Scholar
- Nong, W., He, Z., Ye, J.-H., Wu, Y.-F., Wu, Y.-T., Ye, J.-N., and Sun, Y., 2023. The Relationship between Short Video Flow, Addiction, Serendipity, and Achievement Motivation among Chinese Vocational School Students: The Post-Epidemic Era Context. Healthcare 11, 4, 462.Google Scholar
- Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J., 2010. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behaviour 32, 2 (2010/06/01), 303-330. DOI=10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.Google Scholar
- Ofcom, 2022. News Consumption in the UK.Google Scholar
- Ostrovsky, A.M. and Chen, J.R., 2020. TikTok and Its Role in COVID-19 Information Propagation. Journal of Adolescent Health 67, 5, 730. DOI=10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.039.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pariser, E., 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pentina, I. and Tarafdar, M., 2014. From “information” to “knowing”: Exploring the role of social media in contemporary news consumption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 35(2014/06/01/), 211-223. DOI=10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.045.Google Scholar
- Petty, E., S.C., W., and Tormala, Z., 2003. Persuasion and Attitude Change. In Handbook of Psychology Wiley, 353-382. DOI=10.1002/0471264385.wei0515.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reviglio, U., 2017. Serendipity by design? How to turn from diversity exposure to diversity experience to face filter bubbles in social media. In Proc. INSCI 17 (Thessaloniki, Greece), Springer, Berlin, 281-300.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saltz, E., Leibowicz, C.R., and Wardle, C., 2021. Encounters with Visual Misinformation and Labels Across Platforms: An Interview and Diary Study to Inform Ecosystem Approaches to Misinformation Interventions. In Proc. CHI 2021 (Yokohama, Japan), Association for Computing Machinery, Article 340. DOI=10.1145/3411763.3451807.Google Scholar
- Seargeant, P. and Tagg, C., 2019. Social media and the future of open debate: A user-oriented approach to Facebook's filter bubble conundrum. Doiscourse Context and Media 27(2019/03/01/), 41-48. DOI=10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.005.Google Scholar
- Serrano, J.C.M., Papakyriakopoulos, O., and Hegelich, S., 2020. Dancing to the Partisan Beat: A First Analysis of Political Communication on TikTok. In Proc. WebSci '20 (Southampton, United Kingdom), Association for Computing Machinery, 257–266. DOI=10.1145/3394231.3397916.Google Scholar
- Song, S., Zhao, Y.C., Yao, X., Ba, Z., and Zhu, Q., 2021. Short video apps as a health information source: an investigation of affordances, user experience and users’ intention to continue the use of TikTok. Internet Research 31, 6, 2120-2142. DOI=10.1108/INTR-10-2020-0593.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Statista, 2022. Global TikTok user age and gender distribution 2022.Google Scholar
- Strickland, E., 2018. AI-human partnerships tackle "fake news": Machine learning can get you only so far-then human judgment is required. IEEE Spectrum 55, 9, 12-13. DOI=10.1109/MSPEC.2018.8449036.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Su, C., Zhou, H., Gong, L., Teng, B., Geng, F., and Hu, Y., 2021. Viewing personalized video clips recommended by TikTok activates default mode network and ventral tegmental area. NeuroImage 237(2021/08/15), DOI=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118136.Google Scholar
- Törnberg, P., 2022. How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. PNAS 119, 42, e2207159119. DOI=doi:10.1073/pnas.2207159119.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, Y., 2020. Humor and camera view on mobile short-form video apps influence user experience and technology-adoption intent, an example of TikTok (DouYin). Comp. Hum. Behav. 110(2020/09/01). DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106373.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weeks, B.E., Ksiazek, T.B., and Holbert, R.L., 2016. Partisan Enclaves or Shared Media Experiences? A Network Approach to Understanding Citizens’ Political News Environments. J Broadcasting Elec Media 60, 2, 248-268. DOI=10.1080/08838151.2016.1164170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weimann, G. and Masri, N., 2023. Research Note: Spreading Hate on TikTok. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 46, 5 (2023/05/04), 752-765. DOI=10.1080/1057610X.2020.1780027.Google Scholar
- Wood, W., 2000. Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence. Ann Rev Psyc 51, 1, 539-570. DOI=10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiao, L. and Khazaei, T., 2019. Changing Others' Beliefs Online: Online Comments' Persuasiveness. In Proc. SMS18 (Toronto, ON, Canada), Association for Computing Machinery, 92–101. DOI=10.1145/3328529.3328549.Google Scholar
- Yom-Tov, E., Dumais, S., and Guo, Q., 2013. Promoting Civil Discourse Through Search Engine Diversity. Soc Sci Comp Rev 32, 2 (2014/04/01), 145-154. DOI=10.1177/0894439313506838.Google Scholar
- Zenone, M., Ow, N., and Barbic, S., 2021. TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda. BMJ Global Health 6, 11, e007648. DOI=10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007648.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
“I See Me Here”: Mental Health Content, Community, and Algorithmic Curation on TikTok
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSocial media platforms are a place where people look for information and social support for mental health, resulting in both positive and negative effects on users. TikTok has gained notoriety for an abundance of mental health content and discourse. We ...
”The Dementia Diva Strikes Again!”: A Thematic Analysis of How Informal Carers of Persons with Dementia Use TikTok
MobileHCI '21: Adjunct Publication of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer InteractionInformal carers of persons with dementia often resort to social media to alleviate their sense of social isolation and cultivate their platform to share their experience in care. The present study performed a preliminary analysis on how TikTok creators ...
Short-Form Videos Degrade Our Capacity to Retain Intentions: Effect of Context Switching On Prospective Memory
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSocial media platforms use short, highly engaging videos to catch users’ attention. While the short-form video feeds popularized by TikTok are rapidly spreading to other platforms, we do not yet understand their impact on cognitive functions. We ...
Comments