skip to main content
10.1145/3627508.3638341acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Keepin' it Reel: Investigating how Short Videos on TikTok and Instagram Reels Influence View Change

Published:10 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Novel short video platforms such as TikTok and Instagram Reels often entertain, can inform and may persuade. Recent human-information interaction research has demonstrated the potential for information encounters on social media to sow the seeds of view change. However, little research has examined the role of this new type of social media platform in view change. To examine this role, we conducted a two-week diary study, followed by interviews, with 12 regular users of TikTok and Instagram Reels. All participants reported viewing videos that influenced their views. They predominantly passively encountered these videos on their personalized feeds, rather than actively seeking them. Content verification was limited, with many participants voicing (potentially misplaced) trust in influencers and accessible experts. Reassuringly though, some participants demonstrated a higher level of critical engagement. Overall, our findings highlight the strong persuasive power of short video platforms and the risk they may be used to misinform or manipulate. Based on our findings, we discuss key implications for research and platform design.

References

  1. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 2018. Digital Platforms Inquiry: Preliminary Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Basch, C.H., Hillyer, G.C., and Jaime, C., 2022. COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages. Int J. Adolsecent Med. & Health 34, 5, 367-369. DOI=doi:10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Beall, S., Makri, S., and McKay, D., 2023. Stronger Than Yesterday: Investigating Peoples' Experiences of View Strengthening on Social Media. ASIST Proceedings 60, 1 (2023/10/01), 41-52. DOI=10.1002/pra2.767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Benegal, S.D. and Scruggs, L.A., 2018. Correcting misinformation about climate change: the impact of partisanship in an experimental setting. Climactic Change 148, 1 (2018/05/01), 61-80. DOI=10.1007/s10584-018-2192-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeker, M. and Urman, A., 2022. An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok. In Proc. WWW '22 (Virtual Event, Lyon, France), Association for Computing Machinery, 2298–2309. DOI=10.1145/3485447.3512102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bozdag, E. and van den Hoven, J., 2015. Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology 17, 4, 249-265. DOI=10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bruns, A., 2019. It's not the technology, stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’ metaphors have failed us. In Proc. IAMCR 19 (Madrid, Spain), International Association for Media and Communication Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucknell Bossen, C. and Kottasz, R., 2020. Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers 21, 4, 463-478. DOI=10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Clark, J.K. and Wegener, D.T., 2013. Chapter Four - Message Position, Information Processing, and Persuasion: The Discrepancy Motives Model. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, P. Devine and A. Plant Eds. Academic Press, 189-232. DOI=10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00004-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, V. and Braun, V., 2021. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Colliander, J., 2019. “This is fake news”: Investigating the role of conformity to other users’ views when commenting on and spreading disinformation in social media. Comp. Hum. Behav. 97(2019/08/01/), 202-215. DOI=10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.032.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuan-Baltazar, J.Y., Muñoz-Perez, M.J., Robledo-Vega, C., Pérez-Zepeda, M.F., and Soto-Vega, E., 2020. Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study. JMIR 6, 2 (2020/4/9), e18444. DOI=10.2196/18444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H.E., and Quattrociocchi, W., 2016. The spreading of misinformation online. PNAS 113, 3, 554. DOI=10.1073/pnas.1517441113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Demartini, G., Mizzaro, S., and Spina, D., 2020. Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligence for Fighting Online Misinformation: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 43, 3, 65-74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Du, J.T., 2012. Information use and information sharing in marketing: A diary study. ASIS&T Proceedings 49, 1, 1-4. DOI=10.1002/meet.14504901290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrell, J., McConnell, K., and Brulle, R., 2019. Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. Nature Climate Change 9, 3 (2019/03/01), 191-195. DOI=10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Flaxman, S., Goel, S., and Rao, J.M., 2016. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Q 80, S1, 298-320. DOI=10.1093/poq/nfw006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Flintham, M., Karner, C., Bachour, K., Creswick, H., Gupta, N., and Moran, S., 2018. Falling for Fake News: Investigating the Consumption of News via Social Media. In Proc. CHI 18 (Montreal QC, Canada), ACM, New York, NY, 1-10. DOI=10.1145/3173574.3173950.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. González-Aguilar, J.M., Segado-Boj, F., and Makhortykh, M., 2023. Populist Right Parties on TikTok: Spectacularization, Personalization, and Hate Speech. Media and Commumication 11, 2 (2023-03-30). DOI=10.17645/mac.v11i2.6358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Guess, A., Nagler, J., and Tucker, J., 2019. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances 5, 1, eaau4586. DOI=10.1126/sciadv.aau4586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen, P.G. and Jespersen, A.M., 2013. Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. Eur J Risk Regulation 4, 1, 3-28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Helberger, N., Karppinen, K., and D'Acunto, L., 2018. Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. Inf. Comm & Soc. 21, 2 (2018/02/01), 191-207. DOI=10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271900.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaminskas, M. and Bridge, D., 2016. Diversity, Serendipity, Novelty, and Coverage: A Survey and Empirical Analysis of Beyond-Accuracy Objectives in Recommender Systems. ToIS 7, 1, 1-42. DOI=10.1145/2926720.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kang, H. and Lou, C., 2022. AI agency vs. human agency: understanding human–AI interactions on TikTok and their implications for user engagement. JCMC 27, 5. DOI=10.1093/jcmc/zmac014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ledwich, M. and Zaitsev, A., 2020. Algorithmic extremism: Examining YouTube's rabbit hole of radicalization. First Monday 25, 3 (02/26). DOI=10.5210/fm.v25i3.10419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, A.Y., Mieczkowski, H., Ellison, N.B., and Hancock, J.T., 2022. The Algorithmic Crystal: Conceptualizing the Self through Algorithmic Personalization on TikTok. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2, Article 543. DOI=10.1145/3555601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, S., Rojas, H., and Yamamoto, M., 2022. Social Media, Messaging Apps, and Affective Polarization in the United States and Japan. Mass Comm. & Soc 25, 5 (2022/09/03), 673-697. DOI=10.1080/15205436.2021.1953534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Leiva, L., Böhmer, M., Gehring, S., and Krüger, A., 2012. Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions. In Proc. MobileHCI (San Francisco, California, USA), Association for Computing Machinery, 291–294. DOI=10.1145/2371574.2371617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K.H., Seifert, C.M., Schwarz, N., and Cook, J., 2012. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psyc Sci in Public Interest 13, 3 (2012/12/01), 106-131. DOI=10.1177/1529100612451018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lockyer, B., Islam, S., Rahman, A., Dickerson, J., Pickett, K., Sheldon, T., Wright, J., McEachan, R., Sheard, L., and the Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid-19 Scientific Advisory, G., 2021. Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Heath Expectations (2021/05/04). DOI=10.1111/hex.13240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Makri, S., Blandford, A., Woods, M., Sharples, S., and Maxwell, D., 2014. “Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. JASIST 65, 11, 2179-2194. DOI=10.1002/asi.23200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Makri, S., Ravem, M., and McKay, D., 2017. After serendipity strikes: Creating value from encountered information. ASIST Proceedings 54, 1, 279-288. DOI=10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401031.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Malterud, K., Siersma, V.D., and Guassora, A.D., 2015. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qual. Health Res. 26, 13 (2016/11/01), 1753-1760. DOI=10.1177/1049732315617444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Marchi, R., 2012. With Facebook, Blogs, and Fake News, Teens Reject Journalistic “Objectivity”. J Comm Inquiry 36, 3 (2012/07/01), 246-262. DOI=10.1177/0196859912458700.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Matamoros-Fernández, A., Gray, J.E., Bartolo, L., Burgess, J., and Suzor, N., 2021. What's “Up Next”? Investigating Algorithmic Recommendations on YouTube Across Issues and Over Time. Media and Communication 9, 4. DOI=10.17645/mac.v9i4.4184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Mckay, D., Makri, S., Gutierrez-Lopez, M., MacFarlane, A., Missaoui, S., Porlezza, C., and Cooper, G., 2020. We are the Change that we Seek: Information Interactions During a Change of Viewpoint. In Proc. CHIIR 20 (Vancouver BC, Canada), Association for Computing Machinery, 173–182. DOI=10.1145/3343413.3377975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. McKay, D., Owyong, K., Makri, S., and Lopez, M.G., 2022. Turn and Face the Strange: Investigating Filter Bubble Bursting Information Interactions. In Proc. CHIIR 22 (Regensburg, Germany), Association for Computing Machinery, 233–242. DOI=10.1145/3498366.3505822.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Menon, D., 2022. Factors influencing Instagram Reels usage behaviours: An examination of motives, contextual age and narcissism. Factors influencing Instagram Reels usage behaviours: An examination of motives, contextual age and narcissism 5(2022/03/01/), 100007. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Montag, C., Yang, H., and Elhai, J.D., 2021. On the Psychology of TikTok Use: A First Glimpse From Empirical Findings. Frontiers In Public Health 9(2021-March-16). DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Nong, W., He, Z., Ye, J.-H., Wu, Y.-F., Wu, Y.-T., Ye, J.-N., and Sun, Y., 2023. The Relationship between Short Video Flow, Addiction, Serendipity, and Achievement Motivation among Chinese Vocational School Students: The Post-Epidemic Era Context. Healthcare 11, 4, 462.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J., 2010. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behaviour 32, 2 (2010/06/01), 303-330. DOI=10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ofcom, 2022. News Consumption in the UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostrovsky, A.M. and Chen, J.R., 2020. TikTok and Its Role in COVID-19 Information Propagation. Journal of Adolescent Health 67, 5, 730. DOI=10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.039.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Pariser, E., 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Pentina, I. and Tarafdar, M., 2014. From “information” to “knowing”: Exploring the role of social media in contemporary news consumption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 35(2014/06/01/), 211-223. DOI=10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.045.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Petty, E., S.C., W., and Tormala, Z., 2003. Persuasion and Attitude Change. In Handbook of Psychology Wiley, 353-382. DOI=10.1002/0471264385.wei0515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Reviglio, U., 2017. Serendipity by design? How to turn from diversity exposure to diversity experience to face filter bubbles in social media. In Proc. INSCI 17 (Thessaloniki, Greece), Springer, Berlin, 281-300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Saltz, E., Leibowicz, C.R., and Wardle, C., 2021. Encounters with Visual Misinformation and Labels Across Platforms: An Interview and Diary Study to Inform Ecosystem Approaches to Misinformation Interventions. In Proc. CHI 2021 (Yokohama, Japan), Association for Computing Machinery, Article 340. DOI=10.1145/3411763.3451807.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Seargeant, P. and Tagg, C., 2019. Social media and the future of open debate: A user-oriented approach to Facebook's filter bubble conundrum. Doiscourse Context and Media 27(2019/03/01/), 41-48. DOI=10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Serrano, J.C.M., Papakyriakopoulos, O., and Hegelich, S., 2020. Dancing to the Partisan Beat: A First Analysis of Political Communication on TikTok. In Proc. WebSci '20 (Southampton, United Kingdom), Association for Computing Machinery, 257–266. DOI=10.1145/3394231.3397916.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Song, S., Zhao, Y.C., Yao, X., Ba, Z., and Zhu, Q., 2021. Short video apps as a health information source: an investigation of affordances, user experience and users’ intention to continue the use of TikTok. Internet Research 31, 6, 2120-2142. DOI=10.1108/INTR-10-2020-0593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Statista, 2022. Global TikTok user age and gender distribution 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Strickland, E., 2018. AI-human partnerships tackle "fake news": Machine learning can get you only so far-then human judgment is required. IEEE Spectrum 55, 9, 12-13. DOI=10.1109/MSPEC.2018.8449036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Su, C., Zhou, H., Gong, L., Teng, B., Geng, F., and Hu, Y., 2021. Viewing personalized video clips recommended by TikTok activates default mode network and ventral tegmental area. NeuroImage 237(2021/08/15), DOI=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Törnberg, P., 2022. How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. PNAS 119, 42, e2207159119. DOI=doi:10.1073/pnas.2207159119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Wang, Y., 2020. Humor and camera view on mobile short-form video apps influence user experience and technology-adoption intent, an example of TikTok (DouYin). Comp. Hum. Behav. 110(2020/09/01). DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Weeks, B.E., Ksiazek, T.B., and Holbert, R.L., 2016. Partisan Enclaves or Shared Media Experiences? A Network Approach to Understanding Citizens’ Political News Environments. J Broadcasting Elec Media 60, 2, 248-268. DOI=10.1080/08838151.2016.1164170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Weimann, G. and Masri, N., 2023. Research Note: Spreading Hate on TikTok. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 46, 5 (2023/05/04), 752-765. DOI=10.1080/1057610X.2020.1780027.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Wood, W., 2000. Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence. Ann Rev Psyc 51, 1, 539-570. DOI=10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Xiao, L. and Khazaei, T., 2019. Changing Others' Beliefs Online: Online Comments' Persuasiveness. In Proc. SMS18 (Toronto, ON, Canada), Association for Computing Machinery, 92–101. DOI=10.1145/3328529.3328549.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Yom-Tov, E., Dumais, S., and Guo, Q., 2013. Promoting Civil Discourse Through Search Engine Diversity. Soc Sci Comp Rev 32, 2 (2014/04/01), 145-154. DOI=10.1177/0894439313506838.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Zenone, M., Ow, N., and Barbic, S., 2021. TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda. BMJ Global Health 6, 11, e007648. DOI=10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CHIIR '24: Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
    March 2024
    481 pages
    ISBN:9798400704345
    DOI:10.1145/3627508

    Copyright © 2024 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 10 March 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate55of163submissions,34%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)268
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)258

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format