skip to main content
10.1145/3627508.3638312acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Supporting Neuroscience Literature Exploration by Utilising Indirect Relations between Topics in Augmented Reality

Published:10 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Neuroscientists need to analyse a large number of publications to identify potentially fruitful experiments. This task is necessary before undertaking any costly practical experiments. Exploring direct relations between topics (rather than publications), such as brain regions and brain diseases, has been shown to help neuroscientists identify fruitful experiments. In previous studies, users were able to query and visualise direct relations between topics using DatAR, an Augmented Reality prototype. Neuroscientist participants suggested that identifying previously unknown, or indirect, relations between topics could provide additional information for identifying fruitful experiments. I follow a user-centred design approach: defining functional requirements for finding indirect relations, designing interactive AR visualisations for the specified functionalities, and engaging neuroscientists in evaluating the usefulness of finding indirect relations. Neuroscientists who participated in my initial study of finding indirect relations, pointed out the potential of current indirect relations by demonstrating how indirect relations in the past may have evolved into present direct relations. This suggestion informs Study 2 on exploring publication-date dependent direct and indirect relations. Participating neuroscientists also suggested providing specific intermediate topics, such as genes, when indicating indirect relations between topics. This proposal informs Study 3 on identifying specific intermediate topics and publications indicating indirect relations. My final study will assess the usefulness of the designed DatAR in neuroscientists’ daily research work for identifying potentially fruitful experiments.

References

  1. Lonni Besançon, Anders Ynnerman, Daniel F Keefe, Lingyun Yu, and Tobias Isenberg. 2021. The state of the art of spatial interfaces for 3D visualization. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 40. Wiley Online Library, 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Vishrawas Gopalakrishnan, Kishlay Jha, Wei Jin, and Aidong Zhang. 2019. A survey on literature based discovery approaches in biomedical domain. Journal of biomedical informatics 93 (2019), 103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dimitar Hristovski, Andrej Kastrin, Borut Peterlin, and Thomas C Rindflesch. 2010. Combining semantic relations and DNA microarray data for novel hypotheses generation. In Linking Literature, Information, and Knowledge for Biology: Workshop of the BioLink Special Interest Group, ISMB/ECCB 2009, Stockholm, June 28-29, 2009, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13131-8_7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Pranav Parekh, Shireen Patel, Nivedita Patel, and Manan Shah. 2020. Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in medicine, retail, and games. Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art 3 (2020), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-020-00057-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Janet M Six and Ritch Macefield. 2016. How to determine the right number of participants for usability studies. San Francisco (CA): UXmatters (2016). https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2016/01/how-to-determine-the-right-number-of-participants-for-usability-studies.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghazaleh Tanhaei. 2022. Exploring Neuroscience Literature and Understanding Relations Between Brain-Related Topics-Using Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. 387–390. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498366.3505806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ivar Troost, Ghazaleh Tanhaei, Lynda Hardman, and Wolfgang Hürst. 2021. Exploring relations in neuroscientific literature using augmented reality: A design study. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462053Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yi Zhang, Hongshu Chen, Jie Lu, and Guangquan Zhang. 2017. Detecting and predicting the topic change of Knowledge-based Systems: A topic-based bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2016. Knowledge-Based Systems 133 (2017), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.07.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Supporting Neuroscience Literature Exploration by Utilising Indirect Relations between Topics in Augmented Reality

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CHIIR '24: Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
          March 2024
          481 pages
          ISBN:9798400704345
          DOI:10.1145/3627508

          Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 March 2024

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • extended-abstract
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate55of163submissions,34%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format